When I was younger I recall that California used to lead the nation in higher education, until Reagan became the gov and trashed that (shame on you Californians: Nixon, Reagan and now what's-his-face).
I recall meeting guys with engineering degrees from what were once considered decent Cal. colleges, received in the '80s on, who had only taken up to calculus -- basically the same calculus I had in high school.
No multivariate calc....no linear algebra!
Now the standard template is for politicians running for office to claim we need better and improved education.
Sure, but for what? All the education goes for naught unless there's industry and jobs to utilize it.
Which is why, with all this talk of the US finally getting a bullet train (been hearing that for the last 30 years -- been trying to get it for the last 30 years) I have to laugh and ask them if they believe in the Tooth Fairy.
The media and powers-that-be have manufactured an aura that education is rather silly and time-wasting, and the HR industry has certainly promoted it as well.
When the fewmets hit the fan, the more knowledge, the better....
lest we never forget...we have Americans who cannot figure out that in McDonalds, "2 to $3.50" when 1 costs $1.50" means you really should buy that item one at a time.
They will and do buy 2 thinking that's the better deal. You cannot go into any major corporate retailer and not find hundreds of examples just like the above.
So, even though SS prints out reports for everyone in the U.S., the website is about the easiest thing to read....
believe this or not, when some idiot or "personal finance" idiot goes on cable, blaming Americans for not having any retirement....
most people cannot add that $10/hr with no job for 27 months equals zero retirement savings. They cannot get that "laid off from $125k/yr job, no job for 2 years, new job @ $34k/yr means.....due to their planning and probably housing costs alone to maintain the $125k job"....they probably just took the penalty and burned through whatever was left of a 401k just to survive.
Seriously, basic math skills are so lacking in the U.S. I notice and even when everyone can literally carry a very small calculator around if they cannot calculate out these numbers in their head ....it's like most people just simply cannot figure this basic math out.
It's like they have no concept here or cannot get quantities, scale as concepts burned into the synaptic junction brains....
hence, they are extremely vulnerable to daily ripoffs, bogus rhetoric with no statistic backing and snow jobs.
What am I saying here? Well it's almost like we have a teaching problem. How do we communicate to general folk that they must get the concept of scale and size in their brains when it comes to anything with a number in it?
I mean I'm not here to educate the uneducated, the point of this site is a lot of self-education....but on the other hand, when some concepts are hard to grasp I do try to use images to show scale....
just thinking out loud on how do you get the American people to use their friggin' calculators and understand basic addition and subtraction and multiplication to realize specifically how they are being had?
Thanks to Andrei Vyshinsky's post pointing to this excellent article by Prof. Hudson:
Spending a year hoping to get Republicans to sign onto health care almost seems to have been a tactic to give Mr. Obama a plausible excuse for stalling rather than to address what most voters are mainly concerned about: the economy. Subsidizing the debt overhead and the debt deflation that is shrinking markets and causing unemployment, home foreclosures and a capital flight out of the dollar has cost $13 trillion in just over a year – more than ten times the anticipated shortfall of any public health insurance reform or an entire decade of the anticipated Social Security shortfall.
That shortfall he mentions is similar to my mention of it in Full Spectrum Inequality from David Cay Jonston's books, Perfectly Legal: 1984 to 2002 Social Security took in $1.7 trillion more than was paid out.
That clarifies things a bit.
And, with regard to:
..and while seniors living on Soc. Sec. alone are probably guilty of poor planning..
Do you have any possible idea of the number of multiple layoffs American workers have been exposed to over the years, which have grossly robbed them of their retirement savings? Or the pension funds which have been "legally" destroyed and nullified by shysterly behavior of corporations and courts? Remember Cheney's purchase of that bankrupted company, which due to said bankruptcy, could forego their pension fund obligations?
I've given my reply to you much thought over the past 24 hours.
Over the past 35 years I, and a number of others, have begged, pleaded and cajoled people to take a more activist stance in their citizenship duties. Over this time, we've been insulted, yelled at, spat upon, and much, much worse. But the quasi-citizens have been too busy looking out for number one, or attending those ever important sports games, or some other type of games, or their favorite TV shows, etc.
Therefore, we have ended up today in the situation we had been fighting against for these many years --- namely a place where we essentially have no economy, simply the world ruled by the masters of fantasy finance.
A lady at the bus stop approached me a week ago, importuning me with a frequently heard phrase that Obama has been in office "only a year" so people should cut him some slack.
I asked her if she was aware of all those anti-worker, anti-union, and fundamentally, anti-American citizen cretins Obama had appointed to his administration.
Of course, she couldn't name a one. As long as people choose to absolve themselves of any citizenship duties and functions, they will easily fall prey to the common stupor-induced state by the corporate media, the foundation-sponsored propanda, those "experts" from those "think tanks" who always have the well-being of their ultra-rich patrons in mind.
As long as nobody notices that the various individuals making up the presidential administrations, from at least Nixon (and probably Johnson, as well) to the present administration, have an interesting similarity of names, people will continue in a normal state of obliviousness, never comprehending that those position papers from whatever political party is in power always seem to be written by the same people.
Anyone paying attention will notice that the position papers for this health insurance program and the cap-and-trade legislation appear to originate from the same groups, the Markle Foundation and the Center for a New American Security. Check out the names on those organizations; notice some similarities? Some were in the Clinton and Bush adminstrations (both Bushes, also). Several of those names were connected with the NY Fed, Goldman Sachs, and intelligence advisory boards of both Republican and Democratic administrations, and a number of intelligence community-related organizations.
And to those who read the 9/11 Commission report, will notice at least one of those organizations, the Markle Foundation (a member of the Rockefeller Foundations network), appearing. How very peculiar, what did that have to do with health "care," after all?
With over 50,000 foundations, possessing enormous resources, does anyone not understand that their stated purposes are seldom truthful? Otherwise, we'd be living in paradise or some form of utopian existence.
Does anyone really believe Zemurray, after leaving United Fruit, suddenly became a saint and therefore had to open a foundation? Ditto the Rockefellers? And Milken, has his foundation really been a charitable event, or up to nefarious profit-making activities? Puuuhhhlease!!!!!
The dems voted just as heavily as the cons against the Dorgan Amendment -- the closest thing to the public option over the past year of this fiasco.
Had Cheney been elected, he couldn't have chosen any worse appointments in the anti-worker category than Obama.
One of the best "conspiracy" books I've read, although I've never seen it mentioned under that label, was Jane Jacobs' Dark Age Ahead, where she very subtly points the reader in the proper direction. (She was heralded as a city design and urbitecture critic.)
If you have any idea of what has been transpiring, if you are familiar with Narus boxes, and IXP physical mapping (that's IXP, not ISP) and MASINT, and satellite remote sensing technology, then you realize that we are way, way beyond Will Smith's Enemy of the State movie. Ideally you realize my response because you are aware that the Obama administration has continued in law the USA PATRIOT Act, and other anti-privacy, anti-rights contrivances.
Which is why I will point you to the latest issue of 2600, and Annalee Newitz's column on p. 26 in the Hacker Perspective, especially to her final paragraph.
The question you posed rather late and akin to asking someone, after they have been imprisoned: "Now how do we break out?"
If anyone had bothered to listen to us over the preceding decades, we wouldn't be here, now would we?
We had our chance to vote for Ross Perot (whom I had little use for as he shirked his military obligation after graduating from the Naval Academy, obtaining a well-connected and extremely early discharge -- and obtained sweetheart government contracts via his brother-in-law, Ramsey Clark, then, after Clark was out of a position of power, abused and exploited the judicial system to bring baseless lawsuits to interdict the recipients of other government contracts he lusted after), and I did; we had a chance to vote for Ralph Nader, and I did, and I voted for the best candidate in the last election (as futile as it was) -- and it certainly was neither Obama nor that clown who bombed his own aircraft carrier, lost five planes while piloting while drunk, and couldn't even last 24 hours in combat prior to being captured!
Nope, I've tried and I've tried, it is for the others who been existing in a chronic state of obliviousness and idiocy to explain themselves.
here, which validates even further this crap on removing 4 holds, not 1, not 2 but 4, which requires 60 votes.
It's a nicely formatted table so you can quickly scan who's where what with their vote and past votes on Bernanke.
I personally am getting very tired of swimming through Bernanke testimony that gives no facts, no accountability, ...I'm sorry this is just stonewalling on a host of very expensive issues....$2 trillion friggin' dollars for one.
This was the reasoning that a chaotic situation would ensue from a bankruptcy so the US would take it over so it could be liquidated.
Geithner just testified under oath that that was the reason which is exactly what was regurgitated to the public in the fall of 2008.
How is that working out? Where is the liquidation?
How much of the $185 billion has been paid back and why do we need (we are the owners) to allow them huge bonus's if the whole idea is to sell them off?
I could sell them off in a week. First I'd lay everyone of them off causing the stock to spike then I'd sell quickly. That seems to be the way it works. Less people on the payroll equals a higher stock price.
Liars and thieves. Each and every one of them. BUT when you wear a suit lying and stealing is legal.
Social Security was seen as part of the three legged stool for retirement savings: 1) pensions 2) personal savings 3) social security. Over time pensions were replaced with 401Ks and other retirement scams.
I agree that there is a certain "welfare" quality to social security but that is not necessarily because current retirees were wrong in not saving instead they are out living their savings or even pensions converted to 401ks or entirely eliminated.
Social security needs some adjustments but most of all it needs to be preserved. Turning it over to Wall Street would be a monumental mistake.
I am afraid our entire retirement savings system is in trouble.
Because it does read like you're one of those conservatives who blast all social safety nets, social security as just a bunch of welfare bums...
If that's not your point and you did not know this information, then you're probably right and others do not know this information.
Myself, I get social security reports and almost immediately throw them in the trash it's so low. But I am self-employed, so I believe it's much worse for the self-employed.
I am surprised at the inferences you draw from my post. I do not think that Social Security is bad or screwed up, and I pointed out my sympathy for those struggling on Soc. Sec. alone. I was trying to point out the nature of the entire program, which was unknown to me until recently. If everybody was already aware of this, then I am guilty of wasting everybody's time and I apologize. But your degree of hostility is a surprise to me. Peace, brother!
Are you trying to claim that somehow welfare is "bad"? That poor people shouldn't get any money? Or somehow that social security is screwed up?
Pulling a bunch of facts we all pretty much all already know from the social security website doesn't tell us much and assuredly if you're trying to claim somehow social security is "bad" because those poor people get more money than rich people.....I don't think you're going to be too popular here.
Poor planning? How about no friggin' money to plan with?
I have been so angry since last night when I heard about the bullshit attempt at deficit reduction. Earlier in the day we get this "Middle Class Relief Package" that was far from bold. This is the best that Biden's Middle Class Task Force had to offer! Then came this bullshit "freeze" and I watched Bernstein try to defend this stuff on Rachel Maddow's Show. That was enough for me to say he is too neo-liberal for my liking.
I like Kucinich. I vote for him every time in the primaries...yet he too has his insane moments that make zero economic sense. But yeah, he was the only thing even close to a Progressive on the primary ballot.
Every single one of them sucked big wankers to me which is yet another reason I moved to having EP around...instead of really participating. I think I wrote 2, count 'em, "requested" blog posts for campaigns, although I do like Grayson. I think he's trying damn hard and ya now, he's had a few missteps, obviously blog culture doesn't work out too well in the House of Representatives sometimes...
on the other hand, we can say things like "are you shittin' me" and F word laden diatribes which considering the state of things...well, it's pretty damn appropriate.
Anywho, because we have such absolute bullshit, now both parties, including shocking and amazing economic fiction presented as fact.....
I feel more devoted to EP than ever. I want to build up this site, for as expected we do have both wings of the same corrupt bird going on here and so little policy based on what is really happening, and correct responses to what is happening.
that I wasn't prepared to regret voting for Obama. Well, after yesterday's show I can comfortably say that I regret voting for Obama. Conservatives were calling him the Manchurian Candidate. Well from my perspective he is the Manchurian Candidate on the right - he is channeling way too many neo-liberal policies.
Now, he is a deficit hawk - give me a break. Deficits didn't matter for Reagan, Bush I or Bush II. Deficits ONLY matter when it comes to using the instruments of government to help working class families.
Let me publicly apologize to Congressman Dennis Kucinich. I should have wrote your name in on the ballot in 2008.
I agree too, magically everything now requires 60 votes, yet somehow in the past the Senate could work just fine with 50 votes....
yet here we are with 4 serious holds, a whole lot of questions and Bernanke refusing to say who received $2 trillion dollars in loans, never mind ignoring missing the entire housing bubble and fighting against a CFPA, and wala, it's 50 votes instead.
I'm really starting to think we need impeachment trials for a lot of Senate members. This is so obviously corrupt...
also as far as health care goes, I am strongly leaning against any agenda, any legislation, any bill that cannot be written in 100 pages or less. Doesn't it seem like anything with the title comprehensive in it is guaranteed to be loaded with corporate lobbyist written agendas?
Seriously. How about taking each good idea, starting with making it illegal to deny insurance to those with pre-existing conditions and just pass each one separately.
Same with Financial reform. Break it down, pass each main reform point separately.
Not only does this put each Rep. on the record on each very specific issue, it stops the hiding of corporate lobbyists, special interests agendas buried deep within miles and miles of legislation that even the more seasoned geekies cannot get through....or at least do one read before it's too late to point out all of the loopholes.
Notice on the House Financial reform bill. Many made valiant attempts to read and analyze the bill. Only one reporter made it through the entire thing and he too did not discover all of the exceptions and loopholes.
I tried like hell, must have spent 2 entire days on it and I only identified 2 of the 4 major derivatives loopholes in the actual legislative text.
Another thing that would do, on these 60 votes for cloture...
let them filibusterer. Let those who wish to block something like making it illegal to deny health insurance benefits to those with pre-existing conditions stand up and filibusterer. Put it on TV and cherry pick out the diatribe.
I can hardly wait until Harry Reid is defeated frankly...
except for the fact we're going to get a corporate representative of course with the label GOP flavoring.
There must be a way to prevent the global bandits of Wall Street from destroying Main Street. This article turns the stomach and it is not new. We all knew this just like we knew much of what was happening was a ponzi scheme. Bush and SCOTUS allied with the GOP see these tax schemes as the real America. The "fix" needs to come from our sliver of democracy and probably not through traditional channels like Congress and the White House.
I think also you're tracking on "voting strategies".
That's most friggin' interesting and you're hitting on something I'm wondering about. I do not recall throughout the history of the Senate that magically one needed 60 votes all of the time to get anything done. Your comment is most insightful and if could expand in an Instapopulist I think it would be a hot read.
ACORN. ACORN was the one who made the AIG deal. That damn ACORN they were everywhere.
Kidding aside - this is absolutely ridiculous. Geithner and Bernanke should lose their jobs.
RebelCapitalist.com - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.
Seriously, Apple puts out a e-book display device, la de da and goes to the top of the business headlines with all of this very major stuff going on.
When I was younger I recall that California used to lead the nation in higher education, until Reagan became the gov and trashed that (shame on you Californians: Nixon, Reagan and now what's-his-face).
I recall meeting guys with engineering degrees from what were once considered decent Cal. colleges, received in the '80s on, who had only taken up to calculus -- basically the same calculus I had in high school.
No multivariate calc....no linear algebra!
Now the standard template is for politicians running for office to claim we need better and improved education.
Sure, but for what? All the education goes for naught unless there's industry and jobs to utilize it.
Which is why, with all this talk of the US finally getting a bullet train (been hearing that for the last 30 years -- been trying to get it for the last 30 years) I have to laugh and ask them if they believe in the Tooth Fairy.
The media and powers-that-be have manufactured an aura that education is rather silly and time-wasting, and the HR industry has certainly promoted it as well.
When the fewmets hit the fan, the more knowledge, the better....
lest we never forget...we have Americans who cannot figure out that in McDonalds, "2 to $3.50" when 1 costs $1.50" means you really should buy that item one at a time.
They will and do buy 2 thinking that's the better deal. You cannot go into any major corporate retailer and not find hundreds of examples just like the above.
So, even though SS prints out reports for everyone in the U.S., the website is about the easiest thing to read....
believe this or not, when some idiot or "personal finance" idiot goes on cable, blaming Americans for not having any retirement....
most people cannot add that $10/hr with no job for 27 months equals zero retirement savings. They cannot get that "laid off from $125k/yr job, no job for 2 years, new job @ $34k/yr means.....due to their planning and probably housing costs alone to maintain the $125k job"....they probably just took the penalty and burned through whatever was left of a 401k just to survive.
Seriously, basic math skills are so lacking in the U.S. I notice and even when everyone can literally carry a very small calculator around if they cannot calculate out these numbers in their head ....it's like most people just simply cannot figure this basic math out.
It's like they have no concept here or cannot get quantities, scale as concepts burned into the synaptic junction brains....
hence, they are extremely vulnerable to daily ripoffs, bogus rhetoric with no statistic backing and snow jobs.
What am I saying here? Well it's almost like we have a teaching problem. How do we communicate to general folk that they must get the concept of scale and size in their brains when it comes to anything with a number in it?
I mean I'm not here to educate the uneducated, the point of this site is a lot of self-education....but on the other hand, when some concepts are hard to grasp I do try to use images to show scale....
just thinking out loud on how do you get the American people to use their friggin' calculators and understand basic addition and subtraction and multiplication to realize specifically how they are being had?
Thanks to Andrei Vyshinsky's post pointing to this excellent article by Prof. Hudson:
That shortfall he mentions is similar to my mention of it in Full Spectrum Inequality from David Cay Jonston's books, Perfectly Legal: 1984 to 2002 Social Security took in $1.7 trillion more than was paid out.
That clarifies things a bit.
And, with regard to:
Do you have any possible idea of the number of multiple layoffs American workers have been exposed to over the years, which have grossly robbed them of their retirement savings? Or the pension funds which have been "legally" destroyed and nullified by shysterly behavior of corporations and courts? Remember Cheney's purchase of that bankrupted company, which due to said bankruptcy, could forego their pension fund obligations?
I've given my reply to you much thought over the past 24 hours.
Over the past 35 years I, and a number of others, have begged, pleaded and cajoled people to take a more activist stance in their citizenship duties. Over this time, we've been insulted, yelled at, spat upon, and much, much worse. But the quasi-citizens have been too busy looking out for number one, or attending those ever important sports games, or some other type of games, or their favorite TV shows, etc.
Therefore, we have ended up today in the situation we had been fighting against for these many years --- namely a place where we essentially have no economy, simply the world ruled by the masters of fantasy finance.
A lady at the bus stop approached me a week ago, importuning me with a frequently heard phrase that Obama has been in office "only a year" so people should cut him some slack.
I asked her if she was aware of all those anti-worker, anti-union, and fundamentally, anti-American citizen cretins Obama had appointed to his administration.
Of course, she couldn't name a one. As long as people choose to absolve themselves of any citizenship duties and functions, they will easily fall prey to the common stupor-induced state by the corporate media, the foundation-sponsored propanda, those "experts" from those "think tanks" who always have the well-being of their ultra-rich patrons in mind.
As long as nobody notices that the various individuals making up the presidential administrations, from at least Nixon (and probably Johnson, as well) to the present administration, have an interesting similarity of names, people will continue in a normal state of obliviousness, never comprehending that those position papers from whatever political party is in power always seem to be written by the same people.
Anyone paying attention will notice that the position papers for this health insurance program and the cap-and-trade legislation appear to originate from the same groups, the Markle Foundation and the Center for a New American Security. Check out the names on those organizations; notice some similarities? Some were in the Clinton and Bush adminstrations (both Bushes, also). Several of those names were connected with the NY Fed, Goldman Sachs, and intelligence advisory boards of both Republican and Democratic administrations, and a number of intelligence community-related organizations.
And to those who read the 9/11 Commission report, will notice at least one of those organizations, the Markle Foundation (a member of the Rockefeller Foundations network), appearing. How very peculiar, what did that have to do with health "care," after all?
With over 50,000 foundations, possessing enormous resources, does anyone not understand that their stated purposes are seldom truthful? Otherwise, we'd be living in paradise or some form of utopian existence.
Does anyone really believe Zemurray, after leaving United Fruit, suddenly became a saint and therefore had to open a foundation? Ditto the Rockefellers? And Milken, has his foundation really been a charitable event, or up to nefarious profit-making activities? Puuuhhhlease!!!!!
The dems voted just as heavily as the cons against the Dorgan Amendment -- the closest thing to the public option over the past year of this fiasco.
Had Cheney been elected, he couldn't have chosen any worse appointments in the anti-worker category than Obama.
One of the best "conspiracy" books I've read, although I've never seen it mentioned under that label, was Jane Jacobs' Dark Age Ahead, where she very subtly points the reader in the proper direction. (She was heralded as a city design and urbitecture critic.)
If you have any idea of what has been transpiring, if you are familiar with Narus boxes, and IXP physical mapping (that's IXP, not ISP) and MASINT, and satellite remote sensing technology, then you realize that we are way, way beyond Will Smith's Enemy of the State movie. Ideally you realize my response because you are aware that the Obama administration has continued in law the USA PATRIOT Act, and other anti-privacy, anti-rights contrivances.
Which is why I will point you to the latest issue of 2600, and Annalee Newitz's column on p. 26 in the Hacker Perspective, especially to her final paragraph.
The question you posed rather late and akin to asking someone, after they have been imprisoned: "Now how do we break out?"
If anyone had bothered to listen to us over the preceding decades, we wouldn't be here, now would we?
We had our chance to vote for Ross Perot (whom I had little use for as he shirked his military obligation after graduating from the Naval Academy, obtaining a well-connected and extremely early discharge -- and obtained sweetheart government contracts via his brother-in-law, Ramsey Clark, then, after Clark was out of a position of power, abused and exploited the judicial system to bring baseless lawsuits to interdict the recipients of other government contracts he lusted after), and I did; we had a chance to vote for Ralph Nader, and I did, and I voted for the best candidate in the last election (as futile as it was) -- and it certainly was neither Obama nor that clown who bombed his own aircraft carrier, lost five planes while piloting while drunk, and couldn't even last 24 hours in combat prior to being captured!
Nope, I've tried and I've tried, it is for the others who been existing in a chronic state of obliviousness and idiocy to explain themselves.
here, which validates even further this crap on removing 4 holds, not 1, not 2 but 4, which requires 60 votes.
It's a nicely formatted table so you can quickly scan who's where what with their vote and past votes on Bernanke.
I personally am getting very tired of swimming through Bernanke testimony that gives no facts, no accountability, ...I'm sorry this is just stonewalling on a host of very expensive issues....$2 trillion friggin' dollars for one.
I've been reading various blurbs about Greece from "crisis passed" "move along, nothing to see" to major calamity about to explode.
Jesus, so much financial news is fiction or maybe the public gets such a snow job it's very difficult to determine the actual stats, facts.
This was the reasoning that a chaotic situation would ensue from a bankruptcy so the US would take it over so it could be liquidated.
Geithner just testified under oath that that was the reason which is exactly what was regurgitated to the public in the fall of 2008.
How is that working out? Where is the liquidation?
How much of the $185 billion has been paid back and why do we need (we are the owners) to allow them huge bonus's if the whole idea is to sell them off?
I could sell them off in a week. First I'd lay everyone of them off causing the stock to spike then I'd sell quickly. That seems to be the way it works. Less people on the payroll equals a higher stock price.
Liars and thieves. Each and every one of them. BUT when you wear a suit lying and stealing is legal.
Social Security was seen as part of the three legged stool for retirement savings: 1) pensions 2) personal savings 3) social security. Over time pensions were replaced with 401Ks and other retirement scams.
I agree that there is a certain "welfare" quality to social security but that is not necessarily because current retirees were wrong in not saving instead they are out living their savings or even pensions converted to 401ks or entirely eliminated.
Social security needs some adjustments but most of all it needs to be preserved. Turning it over to Wall Street would be a monumental mistake.
I am afraid our entire retirement savings system is in trouble.
RebelCapitalist.com - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.
Because it does read like you're one of those conservatives who blast all social safety nets, social security as just a bunch of welfare bums...
If that's not your point and you did not know this information, then you're probably right and others do not know this information.
Myself, I get social security reports and almost immediately throw them in the trash it's so low. But I am self-employed, so I believe it's much worse for the self-employed.
I am surprised at the inferences you draw from my post. I do not think that Social Security is bad or screwed up, and I pointed out my sympathy for those struggling on Soc. Sec. alone. I was trying to point out the nature of the entire program, which was unknown to me until recently. If everybody was already aware of this, then I am guilty of wasting everybody's time and I apologize. But your degree of hostility is a surprise to me. Peace, brother!
Are you trying to claim that somehow welfare is "bad"? That poor people shouldn't get any money? Or somehow that social security is screwed up?
Pulling a bunch of facts we all pretty much all already know from the social security website doesn't tell us much and assuredly if you're trying to claim somehow social security is "bad" because those poor people get more money than rich people.....I don't think you're going to be too popular here.
Poor planning? How about no friggin' money to plan with?
I have been so angry since last night when I heard about the bullshit attempt at deficit reduction. Earlier in the day we get this "Middle Class Relief Package" that was far from bold. This is the best that Biden's Middle Class Task Force had to offer! Then came this bullshit "freeze" and I watched Bernstein try to defend this stuff on Rachel Maddow's Show. That was enough for me to say he is too neo-liberal for my liking.
RebelCapitalist.com - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.
He quotes a reporter saying in email:
I like Kucinich. I vote for him every time in the primaries...yet he too has his insane moments that make zero economic sense. But yeah, he was the only thing even close to a Progressive on the primary ballot.
Every single one of them sucked big wankers to me which is yet another reason I moved to having EP around...instead of really participating. I think I wrote 2, count 'em, "requested" blog posts for campaigns, although I do like Grayson. I think he's trying damn hard and ya now, he's had a few missteps, obviously blog culture doesn't work out too well in the House of Representatives sometimes...
on the other hand, we can say things like "are you shittin' me" and F word laden diatribes which considering the state of things...well, it's pretty damn appropriate.
Anywho, because we have such absolute bullshit, now both parties, including shocking and amazing economic fiction presented as fact.....
I feel more devoted to EP than ever. I want to build up this site, for as expected we do have both wings of the same corrupt bird going on here and so little policy based on what is really happening, and correct responses to what is happening.
that I wasn't prepared to regret voting for Obama. Well, after yesterday's show I can comfortably say that I regret voting for Obama. Conservatives were calling him the Manchurian Candidate. Well from my perspective he is the Manchurian Candidate on the right - he is channeling way too many neo-liberal policies.
Now, he is a deficit hawk - give me a break. Deficits didn't matter for Reagan, Bush I or Bush II. Deficits ONLY matter when it comes to using the instruments of government to help working class families.
Let me publicly apologize to Congressman Dennis Kucinich. I should have wrote your name in on the ballot in 2008.
RebelCapitalist.com - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.
I agree too, magically everything now requires 60 votes, yet somehow in the past the Senate could work just fine with 50 votes....
yet here we are with 4 serious holds, a whole lot of questions and Bernanke refusing to say who received $2 trillion dollars in loans, never mind
ignoringmissing the entire housing bubble and fighting against a CFPA, and wala, it's 50 votes instead.I'm really starting to think we need impeachment trials for a lot of Senate members. This is so obviously corrupt...
also as far as health care goes, I am strongly leaning against any agenda, any legislation, any bill that cannot be written in 100 pages or less. Doesn't it seem like anything with the title comprehensive in it is guaranteed to be loaded with corporate lobbyist written agendas?
Seriously. How about taking each good idea, starting with making it illegal to deny insurance to those with pre-existing conditions and just pass each one separately.
Same with Financial reform. Break it down, pass each main reform point separately.
Not only does this put each Rep. on the record on each very specific issue, it stops the hiding of corporate lobbyists, special interests agendas buried deep within miles and miles of legislation that even the more seasoned geekies cannot get through....or at least do one read before it's too late to point out all of the loopholes.
Notice on the House Financial reform bill. Many made valiant attempts to read and analyze the bill. Only one reporter made it through the entire thing and he too did not discover all of the exceptions and loopholes.
I tried like hell, must have spent 2 entire days on it and I only identified 2 of the 4 major derivatives loopholes in the actual legislative text.
Another thing that would do, on these 60 votes for cloture...
let them filibusterer. Let those who wish to block something like making it illegal to deny health insurance benefits to those with pre-existing conditions stand up and filibusterer. Put it on TV and cherry pick out the diatribe.
I can hardly wait until Harry Reid is defeated frankly...
except for the fact we're going to get a corporate representative of course with the label GOP flavoring.
There must be a way to prevent the global bandits of Wall Street from destroying Main Street. This article turns the stomach and it is not new. We all knew this just like we knew much of what was happening was a ponzi scheme. Bush and SCOTUS allied with the GOP see these tax schemes as the real America. The "fix" needs to come from our sliver of democracy and probably not through traditional channels like Congress and the White House.
The level of deceit coming from the Democratic Party, especially the Obama Administration, is clouding my thoughts.
Give a second.
RebelCapitalist.com - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.
I think also you're tracking on "voting strategies".
That's most friggin' interesting and you're hitting on something I'm wondering about. I do not recall throughout the history of the Senate that magically one needed 60 votes all of the time to get anything done. Your comment is most insightful and if could expand in an Instapopulist I think it would be a hot read.
Pages