1) Make interest on Treasuries tax-exempt - foreign investors such as China don't pay taxes on interest.
2) Make Treasuries easier to purchase - I know there is treasurydirect.gov - but something even easier - almost like making them available at post offices or grocery stores - make as easy as buying a saving bond.
And that's what the Fed and Treasury have been trying to do since this started - trying to scare the markets into normalizing.
In the end all they are doing is kicking the can down the road a little further.
The magic of compounding interest will eventually choke off the real economy to the point that the debts will be defaulted on.
There are sure a lot of straight lines in those graphs, sudden drastic changes in the housing market sure aren't a good thing. No wonder the housing market is in such a mess. Thanks for sharing.
I just downloaded the Horizon Project's recommendations and will be reading it over the weekend.
I agree that this "new" normal is unacceptable but it may be reality if something is not done. With the big money/lobbyists in Washington policy makers will continue to react to crises instead of being pro-active. So, painfully, I expect that we will experience this "new" normal before anything is done.
Anyone know how Vice President's Middle Class Task Force is doing?
Bernanke is a disingenuous frightened little man. He knows full well that the deficit is created by interest the Fed charges the government when it "loans" fiat money to the government to pay for public sector needs.
He also knows that interest need not be charged on its fiat money. That's right, we could have debt free paper money. He knows this, and so do Gietner, Summers and Volcker, and perhaps even the President since he's a student of Abraham Lincoln who gave us "Greenbacks" a debt free currency that financed the Civil War.
Yet, Bernanke persists in his duplicity, his hypocrisy of counselling America to be fiscally responsible. Well then, let's start with monetizing the debt. Congressmen and others who fear hyperinflation would result from doing so are just stupid parrots trained by the bankers to reflexively, although erroneously, scream "hyperinflation."
Monetizing the debt, say $14 trillion in bonds, bills, and notes, simply means printing that amount in new U.S. Treasury Dollars. Federal Reserve Notes, would be liquidated and replaced by these U.S. Treasury Dollars which would pay off all creditors over a period of 12 months. Then, a new Secretary of the Treasury, would mandate the liquidation of all redeemed debt instruments never to be issued again. The economy has what it had before, $14 trillion in dollars and no debt, no increaase in M3....it's a one for one swap including interest due, which would be a one time payout.
If the debt instruments and the Federal Reserve Notes were allowed to remain as part of M3 (the money supply)for recirculation of course we'd have hyperinflation. Liquidating both removes that threat.
We would also be wise to curtail the fractional reserve system. Raising the reserve requirement to 100% and forcing commercial banks to loan only those funds that were used to capitalize and invest in bank profits from commercial and individual loans. Savings and checking deposits would not be loanable.
The fractional reserve system is the primary source of inflation in the world since banks create money by creating debt at the ratio of 10 to 40 to 1. All the banks do is make entries into ledgers by computer. The Treasury Department orders money from the Mint. There is no gold or silver, just the "good faith and credit of the U.S. Government" backing the Federal Reserve Notes and debt instruments.
Transitioning to a debt free currency needs no new authorization/legislation. The authority is contained in All of the above could be done tomorrow morning. If we had a President who would use existing authority, Executive Order 11110 to restore America's sovereignty over its currency, wresting that authority from private bankers. Secondly, EO 11110 permits the monetization crushing domestic and international public debt. Thus reigning in the One Worlders and Masters of the Universe. And, most important, EO 11110 would usher in an era of limitless prosperity where debt free currency allows all levels of the public sector to;
-- employ idle resources,
-- rebuild America,
-- reemploy Americans,
-- train and educate all citizens needing those services,
-- provide for universal health care,
-- rationale energy policy, and
-- the downsizing of monopolies and oligopolies since their
would be no need for "too big to fail" enterprises anti
trust regulations could be liberally enforced.
-- provide America with the highest standard of debt free
living in all the world.
President Obama would simply call the Fed Chairman and tell him to implement Executive Order 11110:
If President Obama wants to "fix" America for all Americans and lead the way for the rest of world with real change all he need do is apply EO 11110.
As America's debt reaches unbearable levels and conflicts rage in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan all of which will further increase America's debt, one is forced to ask, will President Obama have the courage to consider utilizing Executive Order 11110 and, if not, is he willing to pay the ultimate price, national bancrupty?
Executive Order 11110 AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289
AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:
Section 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended-
By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):
(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12,1933, as amended (31 U.S.C.821(b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption
and --
By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.
Sec. 2. The amendments made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
John F. Kennedy The White House, June 4, 1963.
Silver certificates were printed without interest. The Order was for the Treasury to issue silver certificates against all silver held by the government which did not already have certificates against it. The Order was needed due to the passage of Public Law 88-36 which repealed the Silver Purchase Act and other related monetary measures. One result was that after the repeals, only the President could issue new silver certificates.
Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $14 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.
Kennedy was assasinated before full implementation of EO 11110. Although some $4 billion in debt free silver notes had been issued they were withdrawn shortly thereafter.
Debt free currency is a Banker's worst nightmare, as reflected in the following article in response to Lincoln's
"Greenbacks." The article was attributed to an unidentified editorialist writing for the London Times in 1865.
It warned:
"If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin
in the North American Republic, should become indurated down
to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own
money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without
debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its
commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the
history of the civilized governments of the world. The
brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North
America. That government must be destroyed, or it will
destroy every monarchy on the globe."1
President Obama has either been lied to by his economic team when presented with alternative monetary policy strategies, or having been informed of the alternatives chooses to take the path of least resistance and ultimately the path to national bancrupty. We will see over the next year to 18 months as debt and deficits mount and as unemployment rises with the unprecedented decline in economic activity, (consumption and exports,) and since the stimulus is woefully inadequate as a substitute for these traditional engines of GDP growth.
---------------------------------
1 G.H. Brown, "Web of Debt" the one book the Federal Reserve does not want you to read. If you only read Chapters 1-3 and 40-45 and 47 you will know what the bankers fear most. You may also wish to view the authors Q & A on www.youtube.com or visit her excellent site at webofdebt.co
What is The Common Good’ amongst an Uncommon Populace.
Speaking of a Common Good is like saying that something is of good common sense.
In example there are section 8 people across the street.
They own an Escalade, have cell phones, do their drugs, use food stamps, procreate like rabbits.
Are these the folks that should share in my hard labors?
What is their common good and why should I adopt it?
I grew up in a family of 12 in upper Appalachian Mountains.
We refused welfare food stamps and the like, but we did receive occasional cheese from government surplus.
We were taught faith. We shared everything from toys to clothing etc.
We walked to church and the bus stop.
We grew our own food, cut our own wood.
I worked on the neighbors farm (staunch Democrats) for $0.50/hour (Min wage was $1.80)
I was happy.
I finished school and joined the Navy.
I learned several trades and skills. I worked several jobs in the electronics field.
I started a business with my partner in the early 80’s with $100.00 between us.
We grew the business to $12 million in 16 years.
At this time I retired somewhat early.
I am still happy.
I have traveled to many Socialist countries.
The Chinese send their children to slave factories to work for pennies, a year at a time with only 1 week furlough. They are not happy
The streets of Kiev and Moscow are full of abandoned children, starving, stealing, pimping. They are not happy.
The largest industry in Cambodia is the sex trade of children. They are not happy
It is often said: ‘The Rich get Richer and the Poor get Poorer’. My rhetorical question for you today is “Are you Rich or Are you Poor?”
On globalization, frankly that's just the public relations mantra you heard.
They knew exactly what they were doing to the U.S. middle class and workforce.
It's right there, in the trade mathematical equations.
Labor must be statistic, i.e. not tradable in order for trade to be a win-win. Then, the equations will show that large 1st world economies can and will lose, and it's all depending on how trade policy is implemented.
So, in a nutshell, we do not have free trade. We have glorified labor arbitrage, wage arbitrage agreements.
This "new economy" is plain unacceptable and more importantly, does not have to be.
If we could get some serious policy reforms in trade, tax code, innovation incentives, support for the U.S. labor force and plain plan to win instead of a few MNCs getting their short term profits (hey that's worked out well Citigroup!) and agenda through Congress.
Use the search on Ralph Gomory and check out some of his work. He really gets the big picture and has some very innovative policy recommendations. He is coming from a macroeconomic viewpoint too....big picture policy changes.
I think that's what this sudden "deficit spending is unsustainable" is all about and what Bernanke did not mention while talking about we would not monetize debt (see the credit rating clip), is how China is the biggest holder of U.S. Treasuries.
So, Bernanke was claiming the U.S. wouldn't buy 'em back...
but the implication is (??) to make sure China keeps buying 'em.
Economists View has a good piece on what they mean when they say monetize debt
You need to hit the reply button if that's the case.
Hey, that's my take. I'm seriously burnt out on so many of these identity politics/special interest agendas that are not the big picture, the national interest as a whole.
When it comes to that policy arena...in Congress, lobbyists reign supreme and I think it is much more important, devastating.
Ya know but politics and labels therein, is off topic on EP...it's that devil we're after, the details in economic stats and policy...so ya know take my light handed comment with a grain of salt.
Use property tax instead of sales taxes. The big exception is local lodging taxes, which I guess are also property taxes on short-term rent properties.
I know of only two cities that are not this way. Ashland, home of the Shakespear festival and thus highly dependent on interstate tourism, has a sales tax. And Bonanza, which is very libertarian and runs a municipal casino in lieu of property taxes.
-------------------------------------
Maximum jobs, not maximum profits.
Job-reduction announcements were up 7.4% compared with May 2008.
So far in 2009, planned layoffs of 822,282 as tallied by Chicago-based Challenger Gray are more than twice as high as they were over the first five months of 2008, with layoffs having peaked in January at 241,749.
But check out the bottom of the article:
In March, for instance, 2.1 million workers were laid off, representing 1.6% of all workers, according to the latest data available from the Labor Department. Another 1.6 million quit their jobs voluntarily in March
Did the author make a mistake? that is 3.7 million jobs!
Or is this the aggregate? I calculated out the unemployed (official) to be about 6 million, in ADP instapopulist.
Also, note the quote that the lull in layoffs is probably short lived simply because corporations don't layoff much in this quarter, historically. (they like to wait until Christmas, to give everyone that year end holiday treat!)
Tigard, OR: Weird outlying data point; St. Vincent De Paul food bank served 100 fewer families in May; down to 456 from pretty steady 550-600 numbers for the last few months.
More families were asking for rent & electric assistance, though.
-------------------------------------
Maximum jobs, not maximum profits.
"Liberalism is NOT broken; the real story is conservatives have been working hard for decades to mug liberalism, rob it, and make it look broke."
I don't think I've seen fiscal conservationism since I was very little. Born at the start of the 1950's I was a young one when Johnson started his war on poverty. That war has been growing in strength, in size and nothing has changed much. Well, what has changed is there now exists generations that have never, ever known anything other than government checks and cheese. We have children that don't know their parents, we have baby momma's, we have 12 year old kids on the streets at midnight. Call me foolish and cruel but economic Darwinism would never allow weeds to grow unchecked.
Bush was one of the biggest offenders of economic conservatism.
What would we call a government that doesn't think $60 trillion isn't a big deal? I guess you can call them a printer....a printer of money.
God, I ain't buying any U.S. treasuries, they already got me on the hook for $12 trillion dollars.
1) Make interest on Treasuries tax-exempt - foreign investors such as China don't pay taxes on interest.
2) Make Treasuries easier to purchase - I know there is treasurydirect.gov - but something even easier - almost like making them available at post offices or grocery stores - make as easy as buying a saving bond.
is not the way to prosperity and return to normalization of the economy?
One cannot create debt without limits?
But, but, but .... what about my PhD thesis? All those years at Princeton wasted? Should have went to more keggers.
The SEC is starting to actually do their job?
Or is it our classic token guy who got so busted who could ignore it?
And that's what the Fed and Treasury have been trying to do since this started - trying to scare the markets into normalizing.
In the end all they are doing is kicking the can down the road a little further.
The magic of compounding interest will eventually choke off the real economy to the point that the debts will be defaulted on.
There are sure a lot of straight lines in those graphs, sudden drastic changes in the housing market sure aren't a good thing. No wonder the housing market is in such a mess. Thanks for sharing.
may cause huge problems for the Feds huge portfolio especially all of its purchases through Maiden Lane.
The Fed may have tied its hands and spent itself.
Mobius Says Money Supply around the Globe Exploding.
What do you mean bonds have been monetized for Bernanke just yesterday claimed they were not.
Welcome to the "Greatest Depression" and the next act ... currency devaluation.
shuttled off to Cambodia as if the middle class is an afterthought.
(Cambodia an obscure reference to the killing fields).
I just downloaded the Horizon Project's recommendations and will be reading it over the weekend.
I agree that this "new" normal is unacceptable but it may be reality if something is not done. With the big money/lobbyists in Washington policy makers will continue to react to crises instead of being pro-active. So, painfully, I expect that we will experience this "new" normal before anything is done.
Anyone know how Vice President's Middle Class Task Force is doing?
Bernanke is a disingenuous frightened little man. He knows full well that the deficit is created by interest the Fed charges the government when it "loans" fiat money to the government to pay for public sector needs.
He also knows that interest need not be charged on its fiat money. That's right, we could have debt free paper money. He knows this, and so do Gietner, Summers and Volcker, and perhaps even the President since he's a student of Abraham Lincoln who gave us "Greenbacks" a debt free currency that financed the Civil War.
Yet, Bernanke persists in his duplicity, his hypocrisy of counselling America to be fiscally responsible. Well then, let's start with monetizing the debt. Congressmen and others who fear hyperinflation would result from doing so are just stupid parrots trained by the bankers to reflexively, although erroneously, scream "hyperinflation."
Monetizing the debt, say $14 trillion in bonds, bills, and notes, simply means printing that amount in new U.S. Treasury Dollars. Federal Reserve Notes, would be liquidated and replaced by these U.S. Treasury Dollars which would pay off all creditors over a period of 12 months. Then, a new Secretary of the Treasury, would mandate the liquidation of all redeemed debt instruments never to be issued again. The economy has what it had before, $14 trillion in dollars and no debt, no increaase in M3....it's a one for one swap including interest due, which would be a one time payout.
If the debt instruments and the Federal Reserve Notes were allowed to remain as part of M3 (the money supply)for recirculation of course we'd have hyperinflation. Liquidating both removes that threat.
We would also be wise to curtail the fractional reserve system. Raising the reserve requirement to 100% and forcing commercial banks to loan only those funds that were used to capitalize and invest in bank profits from commercial and individual loans. Savings and checking deposits would not be loanable.
The fractional reserve system is the primary source of inflation in the world since banks create money by creating debt at the ratio of 10 to 40 to 1. All the banks do is make entries into ledgers by computer. The Treasury Department orders money from the Mint. There is no gold or silver, just the "good faith and credit of the U.S. Government" backing the Federal Reserve Notes and debt instruments.
Transitioning to a debt free currency needs no new authorization/legislation. The authority is contained in All of the above could be done tomorrow morning. If we had a President who would use existing authority, Executive Order 11110 to restore America's sovereignty over its currency, wresting that authority from private bankers. Secondly, EO 11110 permits the monetization crushing domestic and international public debt. Thus reigning in the One Worlders and Masters of the Universe. And, most important, EO 11110 would usher in an era of limitless prosperity where debt free currency allows all levels of the public sector to;
-- employ idle resources,
-- rebuild America,
-- reemploy Americans,
-- train and educate all citizens needing those services,
-- provide for universal health care,
-- rationale energy policy, and
-- the downsizing of monopolies and oligopolies since their
would be no need for "too big to fail" enterprises anti
trust regulations could be liberally enforced.
-- provide America with the highest standard of debt free
living in all the world.
President Obama would simply call the Fed Chairman and tell him to implement Executive Order 11110:
If President Obama wants to "fix" America for all Americans and lead the way for the rest of world with real change all he need do is apply EO 11110.
As America's debt reaches unbearable levels and conflicts rage in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan all of which will further increase America's debt, one is forced to ask, will President Obama have the courage to consider utilizing Executive Order 11110 and, if not, is he willing to pay the ultimate price, national bancrupty?
Executive Order 11110 AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289
AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:
Section 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended-
By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):
(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12,1933, as amended (31 U.S.C.821(b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption
and --
By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.
Sec. 2. The amendments made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
John F. Kennedy The White House, June 4, 1963.
Silver certificates were printed without interest. The Order was for the Treasury to issue silver certificates against all silver held by the government which did not already have certificates against it. The Order was needed due to the passage of Public Law 88-36 which repealed the Silver Purchase Act and other related monetary measures. One result was that after the repeals, only the President could issue new silver certificates.
Kennedy knew that if the silver-backed United States Notes were widely circulated, they would have eliminated the demand for Federal Reserve Notes. This is a very simple matter of economics. The USN was backed by silver and the FRN was not backed by anything of intrinsic value. Executive Order 11110 should have prevented the national debt from reaching its current level (virtually all of the nearly $14 trillion in federal debt has been created since 1963) if LBJ or any subsequent President were to enforce it. It would have almost immediately given the U.S. Government the ability to repay its debt without going to the private Federal Reserve Banks and being charged interest to create new "money". Executive Order 11110 gave the U.S.A. the ability to, once again, create its own money backed by silver and realm value worth something.
Kennedy was assasinated before full implementation of EO 11110. Although some $4 billion in debt free silver notes had been issued they were withdrawn shortly thereafter.
Debt free currency is a Banker's worst nightmare, as reflected in the following article in response to Lincoln's
"Greenbacks." The article was attributed to an unidentified editorialist writing for the London Times in 1865.
It warned:
"If that mischievous financial policy, which had its origin
in the North American Republic, should become indurated down
to a fixture, then that Government will furnish its own
money without cost. It will pay off debts and be without
debt. It will have all the money necessary to carry on its
commerce. It will become prosperous beyond precedent in the
history of the civilized governments of the world. The
brains and the wealth of all countries will go to North
America. That government must be destroyed, or it will
destroy every monarchy on the globe."1
President Obama has either been lied to by his economic team when presented with alternative monetary policy strategies, or having been informed of the alternatives chooses to take the path of least resistance and ultimately the path to national bancrupty. We will see over the next year to 18 months as debt and deficits mount and as unemployment rises with the unprecedented decline in economic activity, (consumption and exports,) and since the stimulus is woefully inadequate as a substitute for these traditional engines of GDP growth.
---------------------------------
1 G.H. Brown, "Web of Debt" the one book the Federal Reserve does not want you to read. If you only read Chapters 1-3 and 40-45 and 47 you will know what the bankers fear most. You may also wish to view the authors Q & A on www.youtube.com or visit her excellent site at webofdebt.co
What is The Common Good’ amongst an Uncommon Populace.
Speaking of a Common Good is like saying that something is of good common sense.
In example there are section 8 people across the street.
They own an Escalade, have cell phones, do their drugs, use food stamps, procreate like rabbits.
Are these the folks that should share in my hard labors?
What is their common good and why should I adopt it?
I grew up in a family of 12 in upper Appalachian Mountains.
We refused welfare food stamps and the like, but we did receive occasional cheese from government surplus.
We were taught faith. We shared everything from toys to clothing etc.
We walked to church and the bus stop.
We grew our own food, cut our own wood.
I worked on the neighbors farm (staunch Democrats) for $0.50/hour (Min wage was $1.80)
I was happy.
I finished school and joined the Navy.
I learned several trades and skills. I worked several jobs in the electronics field.
I started a business with my partner in the early 80’s with $100.00 between us.
We grew the business to $12 million in 16 years.
At this time I retired somewhat early.
I am still happy.
I have traveled to many Socialist countries.
The Chinese send their children to slave factories to work for pennies, a year at a time with only 1 week furlough. They are not happy
The streets of Kiev and Moscow are full of abandoned children, starving, stealing, pimping. They are not happy.
The largest industry in Cambodia is the sex trade of children. They are not happy
It is often said: ‘The Rich get Richer and the Poor get Poorer’. My rhetorical question for you today is “Are you Rich or Are you Poor?”
I have Nothing in Common with a Poor Mentality
Horizon Project.
On globalization, frankly that's just the public relations mantra you heard.
They knew exactly what they were doing to the U.S. middle class and workforce.
It's right there, in the trade mathematical equations.
Labor must be statistic, i.e. not tradable in order for trade to be a win-win. Then, the equations will show that large 1st world economies can and will lose, and it's all depending on how trade policy is implemented.
So, in a nutshell, we do not have free trade. We have glorified labor arbitrage, wage arbitrage agreements.
This "new economy" is plain unacceptable and more importantly, does not have to be.
If we could get some serious policy reforms in trade, tax code, innovation incentives, support for the U.S. labor force and plain plan to win instead of a few MNCs getting their short term profits (hey that's worked out well Citigroup!) and agenda through Congress.
Use the search on Ralph Gomory and check out some of his work. He really gets the big picture and has some very innovative policy recommendations. He is coming from a macroeconomic viewpoint too....big picture policy changes.
I think that's what this sudden "deficit spending is unsustainable" is all about and what Bernanke did not mention while talking about we would not monetize debt (see the credit rating clip), is how China is the biggest holder of U.S. Treasuries.
So, Bernanke was claiming the U.S. wouldn't buy 'em back...
but the implication is (??) to make sure China keeps buying 'em.
Economists View has a good piece on what they mean when they say monetize debt
You need to hit the reply button if that's the case.
Hey, that's my take. I'm seriously burnt out on so many of these identity politics/special interest agendas that are not the big picture, the national interest as a whole.
When it comes to that policy arena...in Congress, lobbyists reign supreme and I think it is much more important, devastating.
Ya know but politics and labels therein, is off topic on EP...it's that devil we're after, the details in economic stats and policy...so ya know take my light handed comment with a grain of salt.
Use property tax instead of sales taxes. The big exception is local lodging taxes, which I guess are also property taxes on short-term rent properties.
I know of only two cities that are not this way. Ashland, home of the Shakespear festival and thus highly dependent on interstate tourism, has a sales tax. And Bonanza, which is very libertarian and runs a municipal casino in lieu of property taxes.
-------------------------------------
Maximum jobs, not maximum profits.
corporate layoffs are down 16% in May, 2009.
But check out the bottom of the article:
Did the author make a mistake? that is 3.7 million jobs!
Or is this the aggregate? I calculated out the unemployed (official) to be about 6 million, in ADP instapopulist.
Also, note the quote that the lull in layoffs is probably short lived simply because corporations don't layoff much in this quarter, historically. (they like to wait until Christmas, to give everyone that year end holiday treat!)
Tigard, OR: Weird outlying data point; St. Vincent De Paul food bank served 100 fewer families in May; down to 456 from pretty steady 550-600 numbers for the last few months.
More families were asking for rent & electric assistance, though.
-------------------------------------
Maximum jobs, not maximum profits.
"Liberalism is NOT broken; the real story is conservatives have been working hard for decades to mug liberalism, rob it, and make it look broke."
I don't think I've seen fiscal conservationism since I was very little. Born at the start of the 1950's I was a young one when Johnson started his war on poverty. That war has been growing in strength, in size and nothing has changed much. Well, what has changed is there now exists generations that have never, ever known anything other than government checks and cheese. We have children that don't know their parents, we have baby momma's, we have 12 year old kids on the streets at midnight. Call me foolish and cruel but economic Darwinism would never allow weeds to grow unchecked.
Bush was one of the biggest offenders of economic conservatism.
What would we call a government that doesn't think $60 trillion isn't a big deal? I guess you can call them a printer....a printer of money.
Pages