Recent comments

  • Did V.I. also identify any acceptable alternatives? Many can see a problem, but none can suggested any long term solution.

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • ??

    USAToday Says Otherwise

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • Main stream media really must hate Taibbi. This forces them to follow up. If this was just a blog somewhere it would be ignored.

    Reply to: Everything's #@%*ed Up and Nobody Goes to Jail   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • And then I re-read history.  Looks like V.I. anticipated the current crisis of labor.  The Cold War may be back -- only the enemy has changed.  Is this the new colonialism?

    "Lenin identifies the merging of banks and industrial cartels as giving rise to Finance Capital. According to Lenin, in the last stage of capitalism, in order to generate greater profits than the home market can offer, such capital is exported and invested abroad. This leads to the division of the world between international monopolist firms and to the great powers colonizing and coming into conflict over large parts of the world in support of their businesses. Imperialism is thus an advanced stage of capitalism, one relying on the rise of monopolies and on the export of capital (rather than goods), and of which colonialism is one feature."

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • Well, the buying of toxic assets, still about $1 trillion and over, was the Fed. I don't buy that if they had not, the world would have collapsed.

    How about putting it this way, if Bernanke was head of the Treasury instead of Geithner, would we have China labeled a currency manipulator by now?

    Reply to: Bernanke Say What?   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • If you would learn how to do your maths, you would see public employees make less than the private sector.

    Be really nice if you stopped being rallied by hate and learned the numbers.

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • This "article" is filled with lies and half-truths. The truth is these greedy union bastards want to keep sucking at the public teat, regardless of the fact that the state is broke. I commend Governor Walker for standing up to the union thugs and the criminal Democraps.

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • Please rememember -- the Federal Reserve and its member banks in the business of peddling debt. At its "peak," -- just before the most recent popped bubble -- Total Credet Market Debt(Total Credit Market Debt Outstanding (TCMDO) was clipping along so so briskly that its growth (yearly increase) comprised approximately 30% of U.S. GDP -- as it swelled to more than $50 Trillion.

    Those "Happy Days" for our Merchants of Indebtedness are over and "deleveragng" means that the Debt-Biz has come to a screeching halt with folks actually paying down the amounts owed the Debt Biz -- a very bad state of affairs for our Merchants of Debt."

    Let me suggest that Ben and his cohorts will usy ANY pretect -- from U.S. Joblessness to his recent G20 Whinge to ramp up the monetary, regulatory and other subsidies to the Trolls do for a living -- that is, Their Lending Biz.

    Reply to: Bernanke Say What?   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • We're at a point where the 'work out' options are punitive for the victims of decades of fraud by both parties. The foremost among the frauds are the fake wars. Viet Nam was based on a bald faced lie regarding the precipitant, the Gulf of Tonkin incident. Gulf War I was the war to save fat cat sheiks based on a melodrama before Congress where the Kuwaiti ambassador's daughter lied about seeing babies thrown out of basinettes by Iraqi soldiers.  We all know about Gulf War II and the phantom WMD and doctored National Intelligence estimate that actually said the only way Hussein was a threat was if we attacked him.

    In addition to the fake wars for profit (which killed and injured millions), we have the various bubbles and bailout swindles and the annual pilfering of Social Security payroll taxes to fund everything that doesn't pay for itself.  The majority of citizens provide the cash flow for the elite who poach off of it in the form of government contracts from wars and whatever else they can bilk us for.

    It is totally unacceptable to think that this has to be paid for by us.  At the same time, something has to be done to make sense out of the financial system and create an equitable outcome for those who got screwed.   That means an entirely new financial system where this insanity and theft gets written off the books and derivatives vanish from the scene altogether at no cost to the people.

    Barnanke is doing what he's doing because the idiots in Congress and the White House, plus the Federalist society funded cohort of rubberstamp judges, are afraid to do anything other than steal as much as they can shove in their pockets.  He's like the one neat, organized guy living in "Animal House."  It won't work because the mess is so pervasive and the players stay the same, regardless of how poor their performance is.  Bernanke is the Best of the Worst.  Ultimately, he can't do anything other than temporize in increasingly desperate ways to counteract the thieves who permeate the system.

    Redo the whole system without any of the identifiable crooks and Mandarins.  Don't bother charging and trying the perpetrators.  Just take their ill gotten gains and declare them personna non grata.  I have no intention of paying for their mistakes, allowing my family to do so, or remaining quiet while another great heist occurs.  I'm not alone.  In fact, I'm in the not-so-quiet majority.

     

    Reply to: Bernanke Say What?   13 years 8 months ago
  • As usual, the most brazen fraud outfit of them all, Countrywide is walking away with not a single personal facing prosecution.

    Reply to: Everything's #@%*ed Up and Nobody Goes to Jail   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • I think the difference here is I was focused on capital flows, China, "easy money", the never ending requirement by VCs to FIRE to invest, build, manufacture in China.....before the "sham" as you aptly put it.

    I feel this speech is focused on those issues, versus the "no exit strategy" and "toxic assets" pumping up their "value" and things more having to do with bail outs.

    If the U.S. doesn't do something about China, truly we are in deep do do and this would be true before a fictional CDS with upteam buyers placing bets on one fictional CDO with hidden condemned properties and dead people home owners.

    Reply to: Bernanke Say What?   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • "Bernanke had no choice" is an excellent way to put it. He gets the blame for a lot of this but his critics (of which I am a vocal one) tend to forget that A) the Fed is an organization, not one guy and B) the alternative would mean exposing the entire sham for the, well, sham that it is.

    That's why deflation is his greatest fear. That's why they no longer talk about this "exit strategy" they never had in the first place. That's why they use the "fragile recovery" as an excuse to keep pumping more liquidity into the system that's already dripping wet with cheap cash.

    Still, this speech is a tad tacky if you ask me. But you didn't.

    Reply to: Bernanke Say What?   13 years 8 months ago
  • I know it's quite popular to rail on Bernanke and believe the globe will blow up in inflation and the U.S. standard of living is in the toilet and so on.

    That said, strange as it is, I find myself, not so much defending QE2 but believing Bernanke had no choice because of the inaction of our government...

    I wouldn't have said that even a year ago and sure still will not say that on Federal Reserve actions with Financial Armageddon, buying MBSes, toxic assets and loans.

    I notice EPers ignore the possibility he may just be right, but this is about the 3rd speech where Bernanke's words, at least for everything I've been looking at, match the statistics, facts and history.

    Seriously, it's a very good paper and speech and I hope people read them and consider them.

    Reply to: Bernanke Say What?   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • While we're bashing national journalism, esp. cable noise, when it comes to State and local news, it's atrocious. Finding out exactly what was even passed, or brought up in a State legislature is a real nightmare, and odds on one would have to read their state records, which is publicly available but a true blue paper dig/hunt.

    I'm more apt to believe it for I believe the corporate lobbyist strategy is to get to the States and it's even easier because there is less scrutiny, due to Journalists talking about the latest "bad restaurant" or other trivial news and states plus there are 50 of 'em to try, with ??? local governments?

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • We are considered a news source, which is why I have been so demanding on content quality, citations, references, fact checking.

    Therefore, you can write the Journalist level article on EP to counter the never ending and very obviously bought media, especially most of cable noise. They never ending set up "non-debate" "debate" on cable noise with a few nonsensical Pundits, arguing over non-existent points on a bed of lies of the actual facts.

    i.e. it's about the Wisconsin budget, when it clearly is not about the Wisconsin budget since this has no effect.

    We can pick almost any issue and show examples of the non-debate debate to drown out any real investigative reporting and facts.

    The only request is to validate data, sources as much as one can directly. In other words, if citing another person's article, and numbers, even graphs, try to check the methods and sources.

    I find dealing with anything the CBO says, in particular, very numerically in the weird. For myself, I am more and more checking methods, trying to discover actual error rates, assumptions, the std. deviation, if a distribution is normal and all sorts of "in it" statistics and so on when it comes to overviewing eocnomic reports and data.

    but, it can be done. Right now, like no other time in history has so much raw information and data been publicly available via a hand gesture/click of a mouse.

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • How few of the following facts are reported on the mostly useless main media ? Rather we hear the lazy parroting that Walker is attempting to balance the budget (the reason it’s out of balance is him). We need to constantly demand the media detail the following facts –

    15% OF THE PENSION MONEY EACH YEAR IS BEING PAID OUT TO WALL STREET to manage the money.
    As you point out -
    2/3 of the corporations pay nothing in taxes and where the percentage of overall state revenue from corporations is down 50% in that state. We all know that the banks were selling fraudulent mortgages to pensions

    As reported on both Rachel Maddow and YvesSmith - “an analysis of the state’s finances shows this shortfall to be entirely the result of spending increases planned by Walker. The state ran a modest surplus in the latest fiscal year and the projected falls in tax receipts over the next two years were less than $200 million cumulative. So this budget hysteria is a gross distortion of the state’s true condition)”

    Dean Baker concludes re National Pension shortfalls:

    "Most of the pension shortfall using the current methodology is attributable to the plunge in the stock market in the years 2007-2009. If pension funds had earned returns just equal to the interest rate on 30-year Treasury bonds in the three years since 2007, their assets would be more than $850 billion greater than they are today. This is by far the major cause of pension funding shortfalls. While there are certainly cases of pensions that had been under-funded even before the market plunge, prior years of under-funding is not the main reason that pensions face difficulties now. Another $80 billion of the shortfall is the result of the fact that states have cutback their contributions as a result of the downturn."

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • Big win for tax reform: Wal-Mart’s real-estate tax
    scam is now illegal
    http://www.wisconsinsfuture.org/publications_pdfs/newsletter/may08newlet...
    I could not find a direct quote on Wal-Mart in Walker's new Budget Repair Bill. The above article was about the previous governor who closed a Wal-Mart loop-hole. The general idea is that corporations pay almost no tax in Wisconsin. In the Budget Repair Bill they say new corporate tax measures are to be detailed later. The idea was to cut government workers to pay for corporate tax benefits and also destroy union rights (government and private) to negotiate for workers. No mention was made of the ability of the Chamber of Commerce to organize companies and charge an annual fee. I will keep working on documenting new corporate benefits in the Wisconsin "Budget Repair Bill". I did quote a blogger from Wisconsin and should have included a reference.

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • Have a reference? I completely believe it. Seems the tea party is just a new incarnation of the same old corporate lobbyists and political operators who manage their "money", i.e. their political control money that is.

    It's like politicians are glorified thugs, given orders to do some lobbyists' or "corporate donor" dirty work.

    If you find out Walmart is behind this, that's a huge story and would not surprise me. They have wanted to bust unions period for some time, for Walmart is a huge target, being the largest employee, for unionization.

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • The deficit Walker created was mostly given as a tax break to Wal-Mart. The prevention of collective bargaining extends to all union workers throughout Wisconsin. Ads prepared for this campaign in all the new red states were on the air before Wisconsin and Ohio began their "tea party" agenda. This is a well-funded, well-organized political attack to regain the government in 2012 and establish US, Inc. Democrats need to act fast and not depend on the MSM for news. Watch Maddow and Schultz on msnbc.

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago
    EPer:
  • Insisting on protecting the right to assembly and the rights to petition the government with grievances? Oh, right, our White House is just interested in the rights of the people overseas (and just as long as we retain what we want from the country). The people in Wisconsin, and everywhere, for that matter, have NO representation in Congress and are stuck with an increasingly less stealth Republican as president.

    They don't care about anyone but themselves.

    We are nothing to them.

    Great blog Robert!

    Reply to: Battle in the Cheese Head State   13 years 8 months ago

Pages