Recent comments

  • I don't have the numbers off hand but I recall China was a major holder in both Freddie and Fannie at some point and I also believe he massive bond trader, Pimco is also heavily involved.

    Now how that all works to "save their investments" (at our expense) would be a very good story to tell! (hint, hint if you are interested in doing some deep research).

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • It seems they are hell bent on trying to restore the fictional money and bubble cycle. I suspect that next bubble is somehow tied in with government spending too.

    I honestly do not think the economy, in reality, recovered from 2001-2002, instead was masked by the housing bubble.

    I also strongly suspect the real problem is offshore outsourcing, bringing in foreign guest workers, illegal labor and bad trade deals...

    In other words, the smashing, flattening of the U.S. middle class is so severe, without bubbles it would show up in the national EIs and the above policy areas are what is doing that (and less so things like health care, tax reveneues/corporate avoidance).

    i.e. another jobless "recovery".

    So, here's the big picture question, while all of these economic indicators point to your analysis....

    has anyone looked at the real "main street" recovery and looked at the de-correlation to the EI's over time?

    In other words, because even GDP has phantom components now that are not real, they count offshore outsourcing into domestic GDP when it should not be....

    so we have divergence in traditional economic indicators from what is really happening with main street?

    My hypothesis is 1. yes and 2. the divergence is increasing.

    this is taking into account that unemployment is a major lagging indicator.

    Reply to: 2009: Recession vs. Recovery (Update 5)   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • The fact they can steal from the FDIC is even more telling. It's fairly clear to me they are attempting to concentrate more power with the Treasury Secretary, administration and not only is this terrifying with Geithner, I think about past Treasury Secretary's, thus future ones....

    if they give this much power now, that means people like John Snowe and Hank Paulson would also have that much power.

    Reply to: TARP Executive Compensation Limits Bill Passed House   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • And personally, I fear what will happen when the G20 does finally get tired of this mess- and starts *requiring* payback in some other currency with threat of invasion.

    How are they going to renegotiate that debt? They bought it with dollars, and that's how they will be paid back.

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • And personally, I fear what will happen when the G20 does finally get tired of this mess- and starts *requiring* payback in some other currency with threat of invasion.

    Our military is in a shambles thanks to the Iraqi adventure, we've sent our home defense (National Guard and equipment) overseas to shore up the standing military. What happens if China decides the best way to get a payback off of their T-Bill investment is to invade San Francisco and just take it?
    -------------------------------------
    Moral hazards would not exist in a system designed to eliminate fraud.

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • FASB Eases Fair-Value Rules Amid Lawmaker Pressure

    It is final - "market to market" is completely watered down and the result:

    By letting banks use internal models instead of market prices and allowing them to take into account the cash flow of securities, FASB’s changes could raise bank industry earnings by 20 percent, according to Robert Willens, a former managing director at Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. who runs his own tax and accounting advisory firm in New York.

    Companies weighed down by mortgage-backed securities, such as New York-based Citigroup, could cut their losses by 50 percent to 70 percent, said Richard Dietrich, an accounting professor at Ohio State University in Columbus.

    Reply to: Geithner's PPIP - the Gift that keeps on giving....to certain people that is   15 years 7 months ago
  • I think recent data indicates where the wallet hits the checkout line, that consumer confidence is improving - not by much, but improving.

    Unemployment is a lagging indicator, it won't determine economic recovery or not, but it certainly is what is important to many if not most consumers.

    Oil has a direct impact on Joe/Jane Sixpack's ability to spend. When prices fell from ~$4 to ~$1.50 late last year, lower income consumers in particular got a substantial subsidy. If Oil prices climb back towards ~$3, consumers will start feeling tapped out again.

    Reply to: 2009: Recession vs. Recovery (Update 5)   15 years 7 months ago
  • consumer credit outstanding will also determine recovery. Particularly interesting is consumer credit outstanding because if consumers are feeling tapped out they may be less likely to spend more. The level is has been around $2.56 to $2.57 trillion for the past year (G-19 Release)

    Reply to: 2009: Recession vs. Recovery (Update 5)   15 years 7 months ago
  • or individual without any clear and specific guidelines/rules/limits tells me that this is a joke.

    Geithner will not do anything to upset Wall Street.

    Reply to: TARP Executive Compensation Limits Bill Passed House   15 years 7 months ago
  • Cutting cost is always one of the topics that most companies are discussing these past few months. Recently, the Microsoft announced that they are going to cut an enormous number of their workforce if the recession deepens. And it seemed that it already happened. In addition, just like other companies or businesses, the Blender magazine decided to quit printing, and will switch to an entirely online format. It looks like short term loans couldn't help their decreased revenue enough and they are no longer able to avoid layoffs. The magazine joins numerous other journals and newspapers that will no longer be able to keep up with costs associated with printing and the number of staff required to keep a publication circulating. The number of online only publications has been exploding, and many people are predicting the death of the newspaper and the magazine within the next decade. Among the first casualties appears to be Blender magazine.

    Reply to: Intel Microsoft Lay Off U.S. Workers While Demanding More Foreign Guest Workers   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • They fired pretty much all Americans under the cover of the 9/11 recession.

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • If you want to see a lot of Guest Workers (H1b and mostly L1) you should visit Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It seems that employed Americans are a rare species in their buildings.

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • When will these banks learn that they need to help unemployed Americans, so we all get out this recession. One good reason to move your business away from these banks and put them in a local credit union.

    But first, WHEN WILL OBAMA LEARN that he should fire these CEOs that continue to hire foreign workers instead of helping Americans. These are the head honchos of TARP funded banks (AIG, Bank of America, CitiGroup) and federal agencies (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac). That's a lot of high paying jobs.

    We are really in a big mess when common sense does not drive basic business decisions. If you want to sell a car, an ipod or any new gadget - you must make sure that Americans have good jobs so they can afford them.

    Reply to: BoA, Wells Fargo, TARP Recipients, Forcing U.S. Workers to Train their Foreign Guest Worker Replacements Before Being Fired   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • Thank you but I've read your comments and they are detailed, formatted, cited. You are more than capable of writing insightful blog posts. I'm convinced.

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • And I, for one, appreciate your efforts. You should take care of your health.

    I am as angry as anyone about what is going on, probably angrier than most. I would have respect for some of these bureaucrats if I thought they were honest, but I constantly feel like they think that we, the public, "can't handle the truth". I would rather be the judge of that.

    Obama has sold his supporters (me included formerly) on his "pragmatism". I now know it's just more Orwellian double speak. I think there is an "agenda" at play and we have left the realm of "normal" economic behavior. My intellectual interest is to flesh out that theory. But then again, I have been counter-culture since I was a teenager, way back in the day.

    Let's see what tomorrow brings and I'll try to develop a rhythm. I hesitate to take the front because I don't want to be seen as a proselytizer, just an opinionated citizen. I'm just one voice of many, but its comforting to feel that your ideas resonate.

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • Also, I believe that the level of financial illiteracy in this country is intentionally kept high. If people were more financially literate the predatory class would have a much smaller population to prey upon and not enough to make billions of dollars.

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
  • Simon Johnson with his analogy to a feudal kingdom is dead on and how one must be clever to get the nation back....

    but that is not at all what is happening.

    commongood, consider writing up a blog post. I have on my plate going over the latest House financial services committee hearing and legislation giving "vast powers" to seize any corporations as "systemic risk" but the issue is those would would have this power, as far as I can see, are part of the Oligarchy. (despite their backgrounds).

    I have carpo tunnel syndrome and am having to try to buy a car too and blogging is killing me but someone needs to write up a post on this before it passes and is enacted into law!

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • The more this game of bailouts and capital infusions goes on, the more you have to look for simple answers. The biggest banks suddenly reported to be "profitable" in February. Then it was discovered that AIG paid off cds's at full value to them, even though the cds's hadn't yet defaulted and there were no clear indications that they would. This backdoor capitalization of the favored banks is currently being investigated but is being stonewalled at every turn.

    On several occasions in the past, I have commented here by referring to the insight of a blogger Ilargi who is brutally honest but prescient in an Orwellian way, IMO. He had something to say about the GSEs today:

    Ilargi: We are now in the longest recession since the 1930's, and the US alone has pledged $12.8 trillion in rescues, bail-outs and stimulus plans. And that's by no means the worst of the news. That is that there is no end in sight, no recovery, no solution, nothing at all. Job losses in March were 742.000. I would make the bet that the US will lose over 10 million jobs in 2009.

    Sure, there are murkily opaque stats popping up every now and then of "unexpected" rises in mortgage applications or home sales. But those are inevitable the result of one sort of market manipulation or another. In fact, they can be traced back to what is the best hidden, and probably the largest by far, bank bail-out. It goes by the moniker GSE's, behind which we find Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. If the major banks couldn't sell their mortgage loans to these companies, which are fully funded with your money, no mortgages would be available at all in America. Fannie and Freddie will use at least $340 billion more in taxpayer money before the year is over. After which, they’ll come back for more. ANd they'll bet it, there is no plan B, and that suits the banks just fine.

    There is no end in sight to this scheme. Late last year, they were ordered to buy up some $500 billion on mortgage loans per year. The banks close the loans, pocket a hefty fee, and then turn around and dump them on the people. The total combined portfolio's of Fannie and Freddie is now $5 trillion, and they're bleeding cash -your cash- like you wouldn't believe (well, maybe by now you would). Yes, AIG is a disaster, but not nearly as big. And the pattern that emerges should alarm you.

    Where does the AIG bail-out cash go? To the major banks. Where do Fannie and Freddie's hundreds of billions end up? At the major banks. The world will tell the US this week that it's had enough of this circus. How much longer will the present bunch of clowns be allowed to remain on stage? The countries found siding with each other on the side of the G20 debate that calls for trillions more in "aid", the US, UK and Japan, are those with the deepest levels of debt and the highest levels of corruption and thievery. The other side is serving them notice that they are not completely lacking in functioning neurons. Obama and Gordon Brown will try to lay the blame with Russia, China, Germany and France, and the American media will feed that line to the public in staccato soundbites interspersed between American Idol and Dancing with the Stars. And it will serve to let the theft continue, all the way till you have nothing left at all. After that, watch out.

    (emphasis mine)

    Reb, you ask:

    It doesn't seem like we are dealing with this crisis "head-on". Why are we not winding down their operations?

    The simple, even obvious, answer then is that we (taxpayers) are being, and have been, played for suckers in this endless wealth transfer. I think Congress is only too happy to give Geithner, or anyone else, more regulatory power. They don't want to touch this con-job with a 10 foot pole.

    At this point, I don't know what can be done about it. Most people in this country have long ago bought into the "American Exceptionalism" that Andrew Bacevich wrote about. The vast majority of the citizenry is ignorant to economics and monetary/fiscal policies. Add in a MSM that is really a propaganda machine, it is a formula for corporate fascism, a la Simon Johnson's "The Quiet Coup".

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • I keeping looking to see if there is a link between job outsourcing and China agreeing to buy our debt. Should I say: was China offered our jobs if they buy our debt?

    Reply to: China! - Keep Buying Our Debt!   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:
  • and frankly he is an embarrassment. I'm sorry. He just started on his usual "let me finish, you don't let me finish" almost on "autoplay" by the first question. He mumbled a bunch of crap intermixed seemingly attacking Lou Dobbs, who was really asking some fairly benign questions about the latest bill giving Geithner more power (it's now supposedly divided up between the FDIC, Comptroller of the Currency, etc. which is good!)

    I mean he just should never get on television, seriously. I've seen him do that same thing, just immediately attack the interviewer on the Liberal media outlet MSNBC and of course the Bill O'Reilly scream match was a youtube hit.

    Chris Dodd? To me he should be impeached. It's well known he's controlled by financial lobbyists.

    Reply to: Why Are Fannie and Freddie Still Publicly Traded Companies?   15 years 7 months ago
    EPer:

Pages