Jobs guarantee program can have those limitations you mention - citizenship & permanent residents. People would be paid to do work. There will be examples of fraud & laziness in any program this size.
We need programs, particularly some direct jobs program, that can be implemented quickly. That may mean taking advantage of existing programs and agencies to do it. But as you point out with the previous stimulus - there has to be specific guidelines and "strings attached" to this money.
Sir James Goldsmith, Member-European Parliament/ Laura DAndrea Tyson, Chair-Presidents Council of Economic Advisers
Sir James Goldsmith, Member-European Parliament/ Laura D Andrea Tyson, Chair-President s Council of Economic Advisersall » Sir James Goldsmith, Member-European Parliament/ Laura D Andrea Tyson, Chair-President s Council of Economic Advisers«
I think that wouldn't work for a few reasons. Firstly they are not limiting it to just U.S. citizens, perm residents, so obviously a guarantee of a job is an immigration magnet beyond belief. We cannot employ the about ~100 million in the U.S. job market at it is, I don't think one wants to guarantee a job using taxpayer money to 1.5 billion global workers.
I also don't think one can guarantee a job because if someone can get paid without even showing up, doing the work....that's an incentive problem, seen in the U.S.S.R.
Then, there is a similar thing in India which has become a bureaucratic nightmare.
That's a huge problem with government programs generally, but from my reading, it appears Francis Perkins, FDR administration did so much to make sure programs were cost effective and efficient. It can be but the devil in the details. Why I think FDR's New Deal basically saved America and also gave America it's soul back, changed patriotism to a sense of community, of caring about one's fellows, to me they paid high attention to detail and results and that's why they were successful.
From this first Stimulus, I dare say the concept of "throw money at the problem" doesn't work, or at least isn't very effective.
I already have a direct jobs program in the list and Germany's short time unemployment benefits I put into the list. Germany's program works too so lots of evidence that it helps.
I guess this is another issue, they need to examine what paid out, what really worked, what's actually effective and what doesn't work out so well in the past.
This is something that drives me nuts. We see a lot of philosophy, strictly orthodox religions too, trying to craft labor and economic policy.
I'm not in those camps, I much more in the what's the most bang for the buck, what would actually work.
Does it make sense to give states billions of more debt fueled money when those very states already offshore outsourced hundreds of thousands of jobs...using taxpayer money?
This is an economics blog. Beyond yelling out to the public there isn't much we can do.
I would suggest contacting your Senators, Congress Rep. State and Local officials and tell them what's going on.
You might also try to contact an attorney. Seems absurd to reneg after 4 payments on a signed contract. You do have a signed, closed mortgage modification?
Whoever bought at that time just made a massive killing.
Finally, if gold is safe haven then it shouldn't go down to me during a crisis. Gold dropped fairly dramatically at the end of 2008 and it didn't make a lot of sense to me, which is why I've been questioning the safe haven motif.
(Reuters) - Dubai's debt crisis could be China's opportunity to snap up gold and oil assets, a senior Chinese official said in remarks published on Monday.
...
While the impact of the Dubai crisis on the global economy and on China was not known yet, it would last a while at the very least, Ji Xiaonan, who chairs the supervisory board for big state-owned companies under the State Council's state assets commission, told the Economic Information Daily.
"That could give China a buying opportunity to put some forex reserves into gold or oil reserves," Ji was quoted as saying by the paper, which is widely read by Chinese officials.
Another paper, the China Youth Daily, quoted Ji as saying that a team of experts from Beijing and Shanghai had set up a task force last year to look at the issue of gold reserves.
"We suggested that China's gold reserves should reach 6,000 tons in the next 3-5 years and perhaps 10,000 tons in 8-10 years," the paper quoted him as saying.
Looks like someone is going to be taking some serious losses.
The Government of Dubai said today that it will not stand behind its wholly-owned subsidiary Dubai World, prompting fears that the company’s creditors could lose billions of dollars.
Today's comment, from Abdulrahman al-Saleh, the director general of Dubai’s Department of Finance, effectively confirms that country does not have enough money to repay Dubai World’s $60 billion of liabilities.
The UAE central bank has stepped up and agreed to provide liquidity, which relieves short-term pressure on the markets, but that doesn't solve the problem of insolvency.
Looks a lot like a real estate venture gone bust to me. On a grand scale of course. But then so is Fannie and Freddie. From that aspect things should be able to get reorganized. I don’t know that it will cause any major down turns to the global markets, though it’s certainly frightening everyone.
It does continue in my mind to be evidence of a global market still requiring medical attention. And a market were people are going to be looking to better assets to protect what’s left of their wealth. It's this fall out that I think can cause the most damage long term.
citi bank offered me a home modification in may of 2009 in nov.2009 after 4 peyments they called to tell me i was not qualified. i made all payments on time and now they will not return my calls. i contacted sigtarp and greenpath. citi did not return those calls either. i have 2000,000in this home and need someone to help me talk to citi. thank you. i had a fixed 6% rate and used all my retirerment money.
Foreign banks would start offering better and better deals for dollars, and that would drive interest rates in the United States through the roof. It would severely damage our economy and a lot of jobs would be lost.
I read something about them doing public works projects and then the claim "that won't help the 20% unemployment rate".
I'm more worried about a domino or contagion, originating from Dubai moving to Greece, Ukraine then hitting U.K and so on. I posted in that BoA warning the Bank of Scotland has a lot of exposure, but the real question to me is derivatives. Beyond basis points for CDSes, I cannot find any intel on it. MBS backed CDOs and so on.
I'm surprised that none of you guys said, "Hey, what about Britain, Ireland, and Spain?"
The reason I didn't include them in this list isn't because they are any less insolvent than Greece or the Ukraine. Within a year or two Britain's public debt levels will rivals Greece's. Spain's private debt levels are crushing. It's because they have more access to liquidity. For some reason the markets trust western Europe more.
and this is beyond complex so odds are we're going to just have to overview a large analysis paper....is what are the effects globally? We know the Bank of Scotland has a lot of loans but it seems we do not know what's off the books and more odious, exactly what the total CDSes are as well as other MBS derivatives. Then, in terms of a sovereign default...I have no idea what that means and despite the claims in the major press that Abu Dhabi is just going to bail them out, then we read "case by case basis" to
more of a "kiss our ass" we're not going to do anything.
Is Dubai a broken Business As Usual failure or squeezed by unexpected volatility and extreme demand?
We no longer use the term 'north vs south' but categories such as 'developed vs emerging' fail to describe 10s of 1,000s of worldwide packages that are suddenly too fragile to book, or already worthless, because too many of these are at home.
I've been thinking we must require risk and force liquidity in order to meet tremendous challenges.
I wrote about this quite a bit about a year ago because it disturbs me to no end to listen to these "architects" of this glorified global cheap markets/labor arbitrage and know they have absolutely no analysis, no idea, no clue....on how national economies now interact. It makes the financial sector "systemic risk" look like a minor ripple from a skipping rock during a tsunami.
Nice to write about Vietnam, which was completely overshadowed.
I think Dubai hits such a nerve because of oil and also the beyond belief, almost "tower of babel" architecture.
Also note Jeff Merkley, who ran literally on "no bail outs period" and squeaked by in the election as a result...his first vote....was more TARP.
What an unethical, yet another liar, politician. Seriously, they ousted a sitting Senator on the promise he would be for the middle class so he voted exactly what Wall Street wants and then introduces some ridiculous thing to force more anti-smoking crap.
So, there he is, quoted saying how bad this is...well, his voting record so far is one of the reasons it's so bad.
At least Alan Grayson, who is a Freshman in the house...he's getting in there and raising hell.
These Freshman and Junior Senators, who were voted in to change this just have no excuse, none.
Jobs guarantee program can have those limitations you mention - citizenship & permanent residents. People would be paid to do work. There will be examples of fraud & laziness in any program this size.
We need programs, particularly some direct jobs program, that can be implemented quickly. That may mean taking advantage of existing programs and agencies to do it. But as you point out with the previous stimulus - there has to be specific guidelines and "strings attached" to this money.
RebelCapitalist.com - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.
The video below is quite good. It is dated, but warns of the dire consequences of GATT/NAFTA.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5064665078176641728#
Charlie Rose November 15 1994
54:46 - 3 years ago posted at Google Video
Sir James Goldsmith, Member-European Parliament/ Laura DAndrea Tyson, Chair-Presidents Council of Economic Advisers
Sir James Goldsmith, Member-European Parliament/ Laura D Andrea Tyson, Chair-President s Council of Economic Advisersall » Sir James Goldsmith, Member-European Parliament/ Laura D Andrea Tyson, Chair-President s Council of Economic Advisers«
I think that wouldn't work for a few reasons. Firstly they are not limiting it to just U.S. citizens, perm residents, so obviously a guarantee of a job is an immigration magnet beyond belief. We cannot employ the about ~100 million in the U.S. job market at it is, I don't think one wants to guarantee a job using taxpayer money to 1.5 billion global workers.
I also don't think one can guarantee a job because if someone can get paid without even showing up, doing the work....that's an incentive problem, seen in the U.S.S.R.
Then, there is a similar thing in India which has become a bureaucratic nightmare.
That's a huge problem with government programs generally, but from my reading, it appears Francis Perkins, FDR administration did so much to make sure programs were cost effective and efficient. It can be but the devil in the details. Why I think FDR's New Deal basically saved America and also gave America it's soul back, changed patriotism to a sense of community, of caring about one's fellows, to me they paid high attention to detail and results and that's why they were successful.
From this first Stimulus, I dare say the concept of "throw money at the problem" doesn't work, or at least isn't very effective.
I already have a direct jobs program in the list and Germany's short time unemployment benefits I put into the list. Germany's program works too so lots of evidence that it helps.
I guess this is another issue, they need to examine what paid out, what really worked, what's actually effective and what doesn't work out so well in the past.
This is something that drives me nuts. We see a lot of philosophy, strictly orthodox religions too, trying to craft labor and economic policy.
I'm not in those camps, I much more in the what's the most bang for the buck, what would actually work.
Does it make sense to give states billions of more debt fueled money when those very states already offshore outsourced hundreds of thousands of jobs...using taxpayer money?
good. The other option is contacting a HUD-approved housing counselor. But do something quickly don't hesitate.
RebelCapitalist.com - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.
This is an economics blog. Beyond yelling out to the public there isn't much we can do.
I would suggest contacting your Senators, Congress Rep. State and Local officials and tell them what's going on.
You might also try to contact an attorney. Seems absurd to reneg after 4 payments on a signed contract. You do have a signed, closed mortgage modification?
Whoever bought at that time just made a massive killing.
Finally, if gold is safe haven then it shouldn't go down to me during a crisis. Gold dropped fairly dramatically at the end of 2008 and it didn't make a lot of sense to me, which is why I've been questioning the safe haven motif.
Unlike our so-called American capitalists, China sees opportunity in a crisis.
Looks like someone is going to be taking some serious losses.
The UAE central bank has stepped up and agreed to provide liquidity, which relieves short-term pressure on the markets, but that doesn't solve the problem of insolvency.
Looks a lot like a real estate venture gone bust to me. On a grand scale of course. But then so is Fannie and Freddie. From that aspect things should be able to get reorganized. I don’t know that it will cause any major down turns to the global markets, though it’s certainly frightening everyone.
It does continue in my mind to be evidence of a global market still requiring medical attention. And a market were people are going to be looking to better assets to protect what’s left of their wealth. It's this fall out that I think can cause the most damage long term.
is the loss of skills. The best way to address this situation, IMO, is to have one of two things:
1) Jobs Guarantee program; and/or
2) Germany - like - short-time working program
Both programs would be counter cyclical and a much better alternative to straight unemployment insurance.
RebelCapitalist.com - Financial Information for the Rest of Us.
citi bank offered me a home modification in may of 2009 in nov.2009 after 4 peyments they called to tell me i was not qualified. i made all payments on time and now they will not return my calls. i contacted sigtarp and greenpath. citi did not return those calls either. i have 2000,000in this home and need someone to help me talk to citi. thank you. i had a fixed 6% rate and used all my retirerment money.
Foreign banks would start offering better and better deals for dollars, and that would drive interest rates in the United States through the roof. It would severely damage our economy and a lot of jobs would be lost.
The blog traffic today is way down! I'm assuming everyone is burnt out, playing around with their new gadgets.
Let's see, I've spent at least 5 hours fiddling with all of the features on my "home theater in a box".
What about you?
Forget Dubai, we're drowning in credit card purchased gadgets!
Anyone using a GPS to locate their bathroom?
I read something about them doing public works projects and then the claim "that won't help the 20% unemployment rate".
I'm more worried about a domino or contagion, originating from Dubai moving to Greece, Ukraine then hitting U.K and so on. I posted in that BoA warning the Bank of Scotland has a lot of exposure, but the real question to me is derivatives. Beyond basis points for CDSes, I cannot find any intel on it. MBS backed CDOs and so on.
I'm surprised that none of you guys said, "Hey, what about Britain, Ireland, and Spain?"
The reason I didn't include them in this list isn't because they are any less insolvent than Greece or the Ukraine. Within a year or two Britain's public debt levels will rivals Greece's. Spain's private debt levels are crushing. It's because they have more access to liquidity. For some reason the markets trust western Europe more.
Has some graphs and more technicals from timeline last year
First credit crisis since March Market Recovery.
and this is beyond complex so odds are we're going to just have to overview a large analysis paper....is what are the effects globally? We know the Bank of Scotland has a lot of loans but it seems we do not know what's off the books and more odious, exactly what the total CDSes are as well as other MBS derivatives. Then, in terms of a sovereign default...I have no idea what that means and despite the claims in the major press that Abu Dhabi is just going to bail them out, then we read "case by case basis" to
more of a "kiss our ass" we're not going to do anything.
Is Dubai a broken Business As Usual failure or squeezed by unexpected volatility and extreme demand?
We no longer use the term 'north vs south' but categories such as 'developed vs emerging' fail to describe 10s of 1,000s of worldwide packages that are suddenly too fragile to book, or already worthless, because too many of these are at home.
I've been thinking we must require risk and force liquidity in order to meet tremendous challenges.
I wrote about this quite a bit about a year ago because it disturbs me to no end to listen to these "architects" of this glorified global cheap markets/labor arbitrage and know they have absolutely no analysis, no idea, no clue....on how national economies now interact. It makes the financial sector "systemic risk" look like a minor ripple from a skipping rock during a tsunami.
Nice to write about Vietnam, which was completely overshadowed.
I think Dubai hits such a nerve because of oil and also the beyond belief, almost "tower of babel" architecture.
Lord knows the dominoes are perched.
This is the same B.S. recycled (as noted).
Also note Jeff Merkley, who ran literally on "no bail outs period" and squeaked by in the election as a result...his first vote....was more TARP.
What an unethical, yet another liar, politician. Seriously, they ousted a sitting Senator on the promise he would be for the middle class so he voted exactly what Wall Street wants and then introduces some ridiculous thing to force more anti-smoking crap.
So, there he is, quoted saying how bad this is...well, his voting record so far is one of the reasons it's so bad.
At least Alan Grayson, who is a Freshman in the house...he's getting in there and raising hell.
These Freshman and Junior Senators, who were voted in to change this just have no excuse, none.
Pages