Recent comments

  • I'll have to look at that one but yeah it's greatly improved. The trade deficit is just more evidence of shipping our national economy to china, offshore outsourcing our jobs and this government will not do a damn thing about it.

    What I was shocked about was the revisions. Granted I haven't followed GDP BEA reports for ages, but I saw those revisions and just said, well, who can rely on any of these statistics with changes, dramatic changes, going back 3 years.

    Reply to: Q2 2010 GDP - 2.4%   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • The key is the leaky hole in the leaky bucket - the trade deficit. Fixed investment is showing a performance like 1950 but trade is killing the economy. Government spending is increasing modestly, despite all the noise on both sides.

    The economy would be growing at over 6 percent if there was no trade deficit. Anything and everything that helps trade.

    Reply to: Q2 2010 GDP - 2.4%   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • I live in Alberta Canada one of the areas in North America least effected by the slow down. However I have seen a large amount of people turning to self employment. Is this true in other areas of NA?

    Reply to: Initial weekly unemployment claims for July 24, 2010   14 years 3 months ago
  • I didn't read the paper enough (the pdf), to see specifically how CRE evaluations affected the asset bloat.

    Bottom line, doesn't it seem that even with the great Enron/Dot Con/accounting scales corporations simply found new methods to super inflate their balance sheets?

    i.e. nothing changed, it simply moved to real estate?

    What I cannot also understand is why, when the entire real estate bubble is a glorified Ponzi scheme, cannot, never, doesn't happen, the debt holders simply take a hair cut. Everybody else is getting wiped, except for the mega banks.

    Reply to: Hung Over on Debt   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • The question to ask is how American companies were able to get into so much debt. Why didn't creditors stop lending money?

    American businesses have been running Ponzi schemes based on bubble-inflated asset prices. The formula was pump up assets prices, and borrow more money. Maybe, fake some income from operations for good measure. Next, you can use this cash pay yourself lots of money, pay nice dividends, or even create war chest. However, eventually you run out of money to keep this going. Now what?

    Reply to: Hung Over on Debt   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • I'm waiting on some raw data updates before posting.

    There is some astounding revisions going back 3 years, which I will also write about. It's coming!

    Reply to: What is your Q2 2010 GDP Advance Guess for July 30th?   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • No surprise and I honestly do not know why they keep referring to the swiss cheese rules on separation of derivatives from commercial banking the Volcker rule. I see no resemblance thereof!

    But it's like throwing twigs in front of a mac truck to block the road, HuffPo has a collection of news reports on the current end runs around any rules and regulations.

    Reply to: Here Come The Lobbyists   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • We'll see 3 revisions total on GDP reports. I'm betting the advance is overestimated, result from missing a host of trade import data.

    But on one of my rough correlation calculations, I came up with 1.48% and 1.23% which sent me off on a "what did I do wrong" formula hunt for a couple of hours. That one is missing a month of data (last month just repeated), this was ISM correlation. I've also come up with numbers as high as 2.4%, but that was before the trade data and retail sales.

    I like how the #1 answer is "who cares, I need a job". Damn straight. More like econ gives one something to do in-between firing off resumes.

    Reply to: What is your Q2 2010 GDP Advance Guess for July 30th?   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • Anyone reading this claim that TARP saved the country as did the stimulus plus the "great recession is over" paper by Blinder and Zandi?

    We also have the Fed Beige Book basically saying everything is "fine", not great, but ok.

    Am I on another planet?

    Reply to: Here Come The Lobbyists   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • You are right. It takes a while for US Economy to slow down. I can't see 1% or 1.5%. Q3 will be a disaster.

    Reply to: What is your Q2 2010 GDP Advance Guess for July 30th?   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2822176520100728.

    The consequence of politics and not smart, objective legislation and policy. Here we go, they'll run us into the ground before enacting policy/legislation on what actually is strategically wise.

    Reply to: State and local governments prepared to cut 500,000 jobs   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • When are they going to start reporting the actual numbers of out of work or underemployed workers instead of the "fairy tale" this is the crap we want you to believe numbers? Why is it that there are no increase of full time permanent workers only marginal jobs that are part time with no real wages and no benefits? Why is our economy under repressive media control with no accountability by the government to the public or for the moral and ethical value of defending the "Truth"? When are we going to wake up and realize that the "New World Order" is going to mean a repressive world wide government regime that will destroy the American standard of living and provide no jobs in the USA?

    Reply to: Bad News Friday - BLS Unemployment Statistics for July 17, 2009   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • Mainly over the ISM, retail sales, and my fav, the trade deficit.

    Reply to: What is your Q2 2010 GDP Advance Guess for July 30th?   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • You've got to read this gem, TMTGM on how Treasury "calculates redefaults" on HAMP.

    When the government cooks the books, no surprise they won't crack down on corporations.

    Reply to: Case-Shiller Home Price Indices for May 2010   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • EOM

    Reply to: Not ready for prime time: Some ideas on the relationship between gold and depressions   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • I read another report also saying funding for jobs was cut, yet it was very strange, as if they were not actually jobs, but increased welfare payments for not a job.

    I hate to sound conservative, but frankly what kind of jobs are these? In other words we have been presented, as discussed many times, with "Stimulus" and "Jobs" that are not strategic, reasonably paying, skill building, infrastructure needing jobs at all. They also refuse to require these "jobs" are even for Americans, in America.

    So, I'm kind of leery on these reports. I see some real true blue insanity going on frankly where state and local governments are cutting critical services, i.e. police, fire, when they are not purging the rolls of those who shouldn't be receiving social services at all.

    i.e. they are cutting much needed services to the aged instead of cleaning up their rolls.

    I know that sounds fuddy duddy but when it comes to really being strategic, using gov. funds for jobs that give the most bang for the buck, which we know there have been so many proposals reports for....those types of jobs get zero support...
    they won't do anything about "Buy American and Hire America" either.

    So, instead money, taxpayer money just hemorrhages out of the country instead of stimulating it.

    Reply to: State and local governments prepared to cut 500,000 jobs   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • Why I'm putting these in the comments is they are contradictory and also counter-intuitive.

    Bloomberg is reporting (notice contrast to gov. stats) a drop in rental vacancies.

    U.S. apartment landlords are seeing a surge in rentals as mounting foreclosures reduce homeownership and an improving job market for young adults encourages them to find their own places to live.

    The number of occupied apartments increased by 215,000 in the 64 largest U.S. markets in the first half of the year, according to MPF Research, almost twice the units added in all of 2009 and the most since the firm began tracking the data in 1992. The vacancy rate declined to 6.6 percent last month from 8.2 percent in December.

    Reply to: Case-Shiller Home Price Indices for May 2010   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • Your friendly neighborhood admin changed this posts content type to blog. It should now pop up on your RSS feed. ;)

    (Great formatting btw!)

    Reply to: Not ready for prime time: Some ideas on the relationship between gold and depressions   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • If anyone is interested the data is here.

    Homeownership Rate (HR)
    The homeownership rate in the second quarter 2010 (66.9 percent) was lower than the second quarter 2009 rate (67.4 percent). In the South and West, the homeownership rates were lower than a year ago, while the Northeast and Midwest showed no significant change from corresponding second quarter 2009 rates.

    Rental Vacancy Rate (RVR)
    The rental vacancy rate in second quarter 2010 (10.6 percent) remained approximately the same as the second quarter 2009 rate (also 10.6 percent).

    Homeowner Vacancy Rate (HVR)
    The homeowner vacancy rate in second quarter 2010 (2.5 percent) remained approximately the same as the second quarter 2009 rate (also 2.5 percent).

    I don't know what to make out of the rental vacancy rate, I'm thinking people cannot make rent, and still cannot but I can't see anything to prove that. With migration flows and labor mobility....unclear.

    Reply to: Case-Shiller Home Price Indices for May 2010   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • Of your evidence on TARP recipients using H-1B Workers, esp. over U.S. workers and fire it off to Senator Bernie Sander's office. He has championed STEM labor, as has Chuck Grassley and I'm sure they would be interested in evidence. Odds are they are simply working around the clause, which was pretty much symbolic, but regardless, I think it helps to show how these companies, saved by U.S. taxpayers are refusing to hire U.S. workers.

    Reply to: Goldman Sachs Paid Out $4.3 Billion of U.S. Taxpayer Money to Foreign Companies   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:

Pages