Recent comments

  • I fixed your link because it was broken in the copy.

    It's really true and the politicians, the elites and even a lot of Americans are still divorced from reality, thinking it's 1975.

    Reply to: Why the economy isn't recovering   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • The Economic Security Index is registering astounding levels of stress and insecurity for the entire US population with major losses of income and economic security. The study confirms what we have been saying here on these pages, never since the Great Depression have so many lost so much for so long.

    http://www.economicsecurityindex.org

    Reply to: Why the economy isn't recovering   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • Someone want to FOIA all corespondence between 1726 M Street, the treasury department, the state department, and the fed. We can find out what else they are ordering.

    Reply to: Who Killed the Federal Stimulus?   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • After the Communist Manifesto made the recommendation of a 'national pension system' it became a socialist principle. But the German Conservatives adopted SocSec after Bismark and Metternich saw a way to stop a Paris Commune from hitting Germany in 1870. These are the Burkean, Old Guard, Social Contract Conservatives. Lloyd George and FDR followed suit much later in Britain and the U.S. for exactly the same reasons. So take a hard look at the historical context and what shredding the safety net means for the stability of capitalism.

    Social Security was surely never a socialist agenda for the conservatives, but a way to save capitalism, social cohesion and blunt the agenda of the growing socialist movement.

    So when you hear the Barbarian Hoards of the Right complaining about the safety net, give them a history lesson. Start with Sarah, P., you know Rosebud.

    Reply to: Why the economy isn't recovering   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • They use the race card at almost every sentence to avoid the real issue of are you going to control your work force and keep it all legal or not? If you don't, yes you're going to get wage repression, a large underground economy, overpopulation and quite the mess.

    Wish it was different, but that's the way migration flows work by labor econ....but getting those facts out there is impossible.

    The real agenda is to lower wages, weaken workers, destroy middle classes and commit global labor arbitrage. The answer is to raise wages around the globe and give people, around the globe, a good standard of living, develop local economies, have some social values, build up the middle classes....around the globe.

    I just put up an "individual person" story that was such a prime example of what's really going on, I just titled it "this is pathetic". It's absolutely a crime to force people to move around the globe, leave their homelands, and play these games with wage differentials the way these corporations and special interests do.

    these cats could care less about the real answers to these problems.

    But putting U.S. workers on the sacrificial global labor arbitrage alter is simply not an acceptable answer.

    Reply to: Who Killed the Federal Stimulus?   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • This is the best precis of the economic meltdown and loss of our social net I have read yet. I try to explain to people that the rich (and not just in USA) just don't want to face their losses and thus, they come after our SS/Medicare (and make us feel guilty to boot). But I don't explain it well -- I will print this out and hand out or study closely to be articulate and accurate.

    Thanks midtowng - thank you so very much. As well your commentators are enlightening.

    Reply to: Why the economy isn't recovering   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • Arizona 1070 was aimed squarely at the sanctuary cities, according to its authors. For that reason, it is constitutional in the sense of devolution of power from federal to state to city. The State would not let the open border crowd supersede State Law with cockamamy local Sanctuary Cities.

    A conservative SCOTUS will also get the probable cause piece of the law designed to let cops stop somebody on a non-profiling basis (tail light, speeding, etc, etc).

    My favorite side of the Arizona story on immigration is the part about the Hokam Odam native Americans who are forced to defend their tribal lands against the Mexican Cartel. Riddle me about the White Racism on the part of native Americans.

    Reply to: Who Killed the Federal Stimulus?   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • The ones listed who should be given a cart ride to people's justice, a la lanterne. though I don't see such a thing such a thing happening for two generations at least.
    I'm sorry this isn't about economics, it's about anger and impotence.

    Reply to: Who Killed the Federal Stimulus?   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • I know nothing about this story. I think the entire thing, the fact GS was wrist slapped, AIG has no criminal prosecution, BoA was wrist slapped..
    I mean the consequences are even less than during the dot con crash, accounting scandals, Enron thing...and it's like no one notices today's stuff is directly an extension of those very accounting scandals and methods used! It's bullshit, which is why I'm writing up the post titles the way I am on those press releases as best I can...
    it's clear, as long as you pay your "campaign contributions" and know a few people, you can get away with anything in this country, even causing a global financial collapse and sucking all of the money out of an entire nation, putting them in hock, not up to their asses, but buried 6 feet under in debt.

    As far as the Shirley Sherrod, it's just YAD, yet another distraction to avoid the real facts and news. We get these almost every day, shoved through the MSM machine, the 24 hour "talking point" that might stretch out to 48, depending on what they do not want the American people to read about.

    So, you found the real story they want no attention paid to, the refusal to investigate the political firing of prosecutors, no surprise there.

    I've got one, on the "immigration" front, you'll see just pushed to the top of the headlines some crap about "racist xenophobe discrimination" whatever buzz sound byte, yet when an illegal rapes and murders a kid, was caught 5 times border hopping, lives in a "sanctuary city" and was released repeatedly....never gets even a mention in the MSM. I mean think what you will about the entire issue, but that's just where it becomes really obvious to me that the MSM is completely controlled, played, timed, monitored...

    I'll bet David Axelrod stays clued to Google trends graphs, timing every damn "media story" obsessively.

    From the beginning it's all talk, little walk.

    On the book, I'll check it out. I just rented the DVD two days ago, not usually into fiction much, has to be the bomb for me to read it.

    Reply to: Who Killed the Federal Stimulus?   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • ...which really makes the complete trilogy worthwhile.

    Stieg entertains the fantasy that there are still good people in high places; something we simply can't fathom in the USA, where only one actual democrat still exists in the US Senate (Russ Feingold, D-WI).

    Imagine, back in the aftermath of the S&L meltdown in the '80s (where the term "creative accounting" first originated), 1,000 bankers went to jail.

    Today, only Bradley Birkenfeld, attempted whistleblower from UBS, goes to jail for trying to do the right thing.

    Unfrigging believable! And the recent Ms. Shirley Sherrod debacle, where the maligned and beleaguered Ms. Sherrod is lambasted in the American Non-Media, obscuring the more important story:

    that Obama's Justice Department has dismissed that investigation into the illegal firing of those federal prosecutors, for purely political reasons, during the Bush Administration.

    Reply to: Who Killed the Federal Stimulus?   14 years 3 months ago
  • Richard Smith, keeper of the Naked Capitalism while Yves Smith is having a holiday, just caught something in a press release and wrote it up. I saw this too but he's got the juice.

    Bankrupt GM uses $3.5 billion of taxpayers’ money to buy subprime auto lender Americredit and signal a return to the good old days for Wall Street .

    Reply to: The bailouts continue   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • And....Keynesian stimulus formula and multipliers fall apart when one does not have the conditions that all government spending be kept within that domestic economy from where it originates. And of course that doesn't make any sense to award government contracts to foreign corporations or ship funds offshore to China because of course all one will do is stimulate the Chinese economy, the German economy. It's insult to injury because those are our tax dollars!

    Great find on the letter. Also we should note the IMF is busy demanding nations strip what is left of their social safety nets and believe this or not, the Obama administration is entertaining the idea of ....drum roll please, privatizing social security, benefit reduction (the attack of the U.S. middle class by dismantling social security has been on these same cat's radar for years)...and which age group do they plan to start with? The very age group which was denied traditional pensions and had crappy empty, depleted 401ks put in their place.

    On the fiction read, well, not exactly economics, so assuredly outside the purview of this site, but on the other hand, I just watched the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo on DVD and it was quite awesome (in Swedish, subtitles), for your classic sicko/mystery/violence type stuff.

    Shame we cannot get a blockbuster movie which makes people realize what is going on economically is about as bad. The public will watch crime shows, we're fed crime shows out the wazoo, but we cannot even get the cable news people to report, or if report, accurately report, what is going on in the economy and it equates to economic genocide of the U.S. middle class in my view.

    Reply to: Who Killed the Federal Stimulus?   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • Neither stimulus spending nor tax breaks for the rich can revive the economy with a wide open leaky plumbing system and a busted blowout preventer If it all goes out the door to China and elsewhere the system cannot maintain useful pressure to do useful work. Nothing is manageable without boundary conditions, or try heating a house in the winter with lousy insulation and drafty windows. Our idiot left/right politicians would rather bicker about whether to direct heat to the livingroom, bedroom or kitchen or crank up the furnace with the windows wide open than address the blatant systemic leakage.

    Reply to: Why the economy isn't recovering   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • In light of the extensive contributions made by the financial industry to both parties in Congress I am not sure why anyone would be surprised that there was no heistation in passing along more taxpayer dollars to Wall Street.

    Since the unemployed cannot give millions (billions) of dollars to elected officials they have no recourse.

    Thomas Jefferson (et al) in the Declaration of Independence stated that when government becomes destructive to the pursuit of life, liberty and happiness it is the right and in fact obligation of the people to throw off that government. Of course, there are very few people who know this as it is not in line with k-12 education goals.

    The Constitution is no longer a valid document for the common people.

    Reply to: The bailouts continue   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • PPP

    purchase power parity, or PPP is the more common method to show the differences and the "wage squeeze" of Americans. I don't know if you can in turn scale that to gold prices.

    But regardless, every single day we have another outrage which is just decimating the U.S. middle class and it does seem to start with the Nixon administration and continue on from there, doesn't matter what party is in power.

    Reply to: Wages versus gold: A look at historical data   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • True...if you look at gold prices, it looks like the process actually began about 1970, and built in strength through the 80s and 90s...

    I am trying to build a case for using gold as an analytical tool in place of dollars. It seems to retain its analytical value despite the fact that it is not money. My next step is to show how housing prices over the same period performed in comparison to wages...

    Reply to: Wages versus gold: A look at historical data   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • But be it said, by any measure the middle class has been under attack for 30 years.

    Reply to: Wages versus gold: A look at historical data   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • I think this is the common ground of the people. Everyone is outraged over the corporate giveaway while the people go without jobs and income. Unfortunately the solutions so often, at least on the pundit channel, are worse than the cause.

    When will the American people start organizing into one common ground whole to take back our government? It's continually fractured with wedge and other nonsensical issues to make sure the corporate welfare/corporate control system stays intact.

    Reply to: The bailouts continue   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • Regarding Midtowng's excellent piece.
    Debt finance has been favored over equity since inflation returned in force starting in the 1960's. Equity finance for banking was the way to go before the occurrence of this cyclical inflationary/debt cycle.

    So de-leveraging banks and other debt-resourced financials is well understood. Debt for equity swaps are a way out. Recall how Buffett took preferred shares in GS. Non-financial companies have cash-rich balance sheets and could take equity stakes as well.

    The consumer is much more difficult. So we have to ask - rich or poor consumers? The poor do not owe as much on mortgages and the dollar value of defaults is 2/3 or what the rich do. Poorer homeowners could be given reduced value and interest rate term balloon mortgages - common in 19th Century America.

    Credit card debt is much worse and I see no way out for the poor except debt forgiveness.

    Lastly, the Fed's $19 Trillion stuffed into the banks? Distribute it as equity to the owners.

    Reply to: Why the economy isn't recovering   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:
  • They are not writing and commenting? Me thinks we should not give up and start posting a host of job creation proposals, specific. I did Andy Grove's and there are so many surrounding trade. I'll probably do outsourcing soon again.

    But this is ridiculous! The unemployment projections are at crisis levels, unacceptable and if this government would stop making it easy for corporations to offshore outsource everything and horde cash, this situation would not be!

    Come on folks, I know you have good ideas out there.

    Reply to: Must Read Posts for July 19, 2010   14 years 3 months ago
    EPer:

Pages