Zero Hedge

Jake Sullivan Ridiculed For Supporting Withholding Arms To Israel

Jake Sullivan Ridiculed For Supporting Withholding Arms To Israel

Via Middle East Eye

Former US national security advisor Jake Sullivan was skewered as a hypocrite on Thursday after an interview aired of him saying he would support Congress voting to withhold military aid to Israel over its decision to abandon a Gaza ceasefire with Hamas in March.

"The situation as it stands today, following the breakdown of the ceasefire in March, means that a vote to withhold weapons from Israel is a totally credible position. That is a position I would support," Sullivan told a podcast hosted by The Bulwark media. Sullivan was lambasted on social media for his statement.  

Via AFP

“This has almost been too obvious to say, but Jake Sullivan is one of the original architects and cheerleaders for Israel's genocide and personally intervened to make sure the US is sending more bombs,” one commentator on X wrote.

Sullivan was Biden’s National Security Council advisor and deeply involved in efforts to arm Israel after it assaulted Gaza following the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attacks on southern Israel.

During his time at the White House, Sullivan lobbied Democratic members of Congress against voting to block arms transfers throughout the war. Human rights experts and high-profile academics have labelled Israel’s war a genocide against Palestinians. Sullivan did not link a blockade of arms transfers to Israeli atrocities in Gaza.

“Jake Sullivan does not deserve an ounce of credit for saying this after he spent his time in power arming, enabling and defending the genocide in Gaza,” another commentator said on X.

“The continuing slaughter today was made possible by Jake and his boss, Biden. Is he hoping Americans don’t have object permanence?”

Sullivan's record on calling shots in the Middle East has not aged well since he left office.

For months, he insisted that the former Hamas leader in Gaza, Yahya Sinwar, was the “massive obstacle” to a ceasefire. But Sinwar was killed in Gaza in October 2024, and the war has continued to rage without him. Almost a year after his death, Israel is preparing to assault Gaza City.

Sullivan is already remembered for his now infamous speech at the Atlantic Festival on September 29 2023, when he boasted that under the Biden administration, the Middle East “is quieter today than it has been in two decades”

A week later, the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel sparked a region-wide conflict that included fighting in Syria, Yemen, and Lebanon. Israel and Iran engaged in unprecedented direct fighting, and the US, under the Trump administration, bombed Iran’s nuclear facilities.

Meanwhile, Israel's genocide in Gaza has raged on with nearly unconditional US backing, first by the Biden administration and then the Trump administration. At least 62,966 Palestinians, mainly women and children, have been killed by Israel, according to Palestinian health officials.

Although Sullivan is no longer in public office, several commentators noted the irony of his calling for lawmakers to back an arms embargo on Israel while his wife, Maggie Goodlander, has remained relatively quiet on the topic. She is a Democratic congresswoman for the state of New Hampshire.

In a statement posted on her website on August 22, Goodlander called for humanitarian aid to surge into Gaza, but she did not call for an arms embargo against Israel or offer any new legislation on the matter.

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 14:20

Labor Day Gas Prices Lowest Since 2020, New Analysis Finds

Labor Day Gas Prices Lowest Since 2020, New Analysis Finds

Authored by Andrew Moran via The Epoch Times,

U.S. motorists will see the lowest gasoline prices heading into Labor Day in five years, a new analysis shows.

GasBuddy, which monitors national gas prices, projected in an Aug. 26 report that the cost of fuel will be $3.15 per gallon this Labor Day weekend.

By comparison, the average price for a gallon of gasoline on Labor Day was $3.29 last year and $3.77 in 2023.

Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, says this has been the “cheapest summer” for gas prices since the pandemic.

“We’ve seen a remarkably affordable summer to hit the road with incomes up and gas prices down, but there are some challenges that remain: hurricane season and uncertainty over trade, tariffs and Russia’s war on Ukraine,” said De Haan.

“However, I remain optimistic that as cooler weather invades, gas prices too, will seasonally cool off.”

At the same time, gas prices in nearly half of all states have increased over the past month amid localized refinery outages, the report stated.

BP Whiting Refinery in Indiana, the largest refinery in the Midwest, recently suspended operations for several days due to flooding caused by a severe thunderstorm. The refinery has returned to operation, and industry experts anticipate that drivers in the Great Lakes region will soon experience some relief.

Looking ahead, De Haan thinks the national average will drop below $3 per gallon this fall.

This aligns with the Energy Information Administration’s Aug. 28 forecast. The federal agency predicts gas prices will decline by 11 percent, or about 35 cents per gallon, from August to December. Market predictions of lower oil prices, combined with the annual transition to cheaper winter-grade gasoline, are expected to drive this downward trend.

Global Oil Markets

A chief contributing factor for less pain at the pump has been falling crude oil prices.

This year, a barrel of U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude oil has fallen about 11 percent to $64 on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Likewise, Brent, an international benchmark for oil prices, has declined almost 10 percent to below $68 on London’s ICE Futures exchange.

Oil, which accounts for about half of the cost of gasoline, has slumped due to various factors.

The chief component has been accelerated output by the world’s largest producers, mainly the United States and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and its allies, OPEC+.

According to data from the Energy Information Administration, U.S. production has remained above 13 million barrels per day throughout the year.

In April, key OPEC+ members—Algeria, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates—reversed their voluntary production cuts of 2.2 million barrels a day and will phase them out over 18 months, ending in September 2026. The group plans to bolster daily output by 547,000 barrels in September.

Softer domestic and global petroleum demand, as well as growing inventories, have also contributed to lower prices.

A pump jack operates near a crude oil reserve in the Permian Basin oil field near Midland, Texas, on Feb. 18, 2025. Eli Hartman/Reuters

The U.S. four-week moving average for gasoline demand is about 9 million barrels per day, down 1.1 percent compared to last year, says Phil Flynn, energy strategist at The PRICE Futures Group.

“And if we look at the big picture, total commercial petroleum inventories were down by 4.4 million barrels last week,” Flynn said in a daily note.

International Energy Agency data, meanwhile, suggest that worldwide consumption ticked up at a tepid pace of 0.8 percent, or approximately 830,000 barrels per day, this year. Additionally, global oil inventories reached a 46-month high of 7.84 million barrels, according to the group’s estimate.

Geopolitics has also played a role, with the situation in the Middle East stabilizing, and President Donald Trump potentially brokering a peace agreement between Ukraine and Russia. At the same time, market watchers have become skeptical that both sides will agree to end the conflict in Eastern Europe, leaving oil prices vulnerable to sudden developments.

“The lack of progress towards a peace deal means risks of sanctions and secondary tariffs continue to hang over the oil market,” said ING commodity strategists in a note.

Still, a wide range of forecasts point to lower oil prices in the year ahead.

The latest Short-Term Energy Outlook, for example, projects Brent crude to average $67 a barrel in 2025 and $51 in 2026.

Adam Turnquist, chief technical strategist for LPL Financial, says the recent break below $65 could prompt oil prices to retest the intraday lows of around $55 a barrel observed this past spring.

“Momentum remains bearish but is not oversold,” Turnquist said in a note emailed to The Epoch Times.

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 13:40

Trump Unveils Another $825M Arms Sale To Ukraine, While Talking Peace

Trump Unveils Another $825M Arms Sale To Ukraine, While Talking Peace

At a moment peace negotiations look to be going nowhere, and as German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has declared it's 'obvious' Putin and Zelensky aren't going to meet, the Trump administration has authorized another $825 million arms deal for Ukraine.

Crucially, this package will include long-range missiles and supporting equipment, ostensibly to strengthen Ukraine's defense capabilities, though the Kremlin is going to interpret this as another act of US escalation, given the long-range capability.

Via France24

The US State Department announced on Thursday that it had formally notified Congress about the sale, denoting 3,350 extended-range attack munition (ERAM) missiles are part of it. Additionally an equal number of GPS navigation units and other parts are included. 

Funding for the purchase will come not only from US foreign military assistance but also from NATO partners Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway, according to the announcement - which is according to Trump's desire of getting Europe to shoulder more of the burden.

"This proposed sale will support the foreign policy and national security objectives of the United States by improving the security of a partner country that is a force for political stability and economic progress in Europe," the State Dept. said.

Meanwhile Ukraine's Zelensky has announced that a complete framework of "security guarantees" for Kiev in case of a ceasefire or peace deal is going to be ready as early as next week - but its contents will surely not be to Moscow's liking, and so will be dead on arrival.

The European powers have been pushing for this to be as robust as possible, including Western troops to enforce the terms, and even air power - or a 'European defense shield'.

"There has been a lot of talk about security guarantees. National security advisers are currently working on the development of each specific component, and next week the entire configuration will be on paper," Zelensky added.

The reality is the sides are talking past each other, while cross-border attacks persist and even ramp up. This week saw Russia's second-largest aerial deadly assault on Ukraine of the war, which included around 600 missiles and drones. Ukrainian officials are pushing for maximal demands from the West - perhaps now more than ever...

Russia will only see the prospect of EU troop enforcement as essentially bringing things back to square one, as the root cause of the war has been identified as NATO expansion up to Russia's doorstep.

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 12:40

Kremlin Rejects 'Fabricated' Report of Russian Drones Spying On US Weapons Routes In Germany

Kremlin Rejects 'Fabricated' Report of Russian Drones Spying On US Weapons Routes In Germany

The Kremlin has rejected claims that Russia or its agents have been using drones to track American and allied weapons shipments passing through eastern Germany, after a Thursday New York Times article alleged it.

US officials suspect that Russian intelligence or its proxies have flown surveillance drones over supply routes in the German state of Thuringia, the NY Times said, in an effort to gather vital intelligence on arms manufacturers and logistical pathways for weapon deliveries to Ukraine via Poland - especially when it comes to US arms flows.

Via MSN

The idea is that Russia could use this information to then possibly sabotage supply routes or manufacturers, as part of an ongoing 'dirty war' against NATO's support infrastructure.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov used the word 'fabricated' to dismiss the report, saying, "It’s hard to believe - if it were true, the Germans would have certainly reacted. This sounds like yet another fabricated news story."

According to the Thursday NY Times report:

US spy agencies have been providing information to European governments about potential sabotage actions, according to people briefed on the discussions. That has included a warning to German intelligence officials about a plot to send explosives or incendiary devices on cargo planes transiting Germany.

The warning resulted in the arrest of the three Ukrainian nationals in Germany and Switzerland. The federal prosecutor’s office in Berlin said in a statement at the time that the plan appeared to be part of a plot to damage logistical infrastructure for commercial freight.

German intelligence has suspected that some of the drones may have originated from Iran in terms of design and manufacturing, and could have been launched from ships in the nearby Baltic Sea. But despite apparent eyewitness reports of the drone sightings, there's little or nothing confirmable in theirs of their origin or purpose.

One US military analyst cited in the Times report explained, "If at some point the Russians wanted to get more aggressive and forward leaning with that kind of intelligence collection, they know what companies are exporting and what routes are being used."

"It would be useful if they wanted to conduct sabotage or subversive operations," he added. The last years have seen a spate of major industrial fires in various EU states, as well as Britain, apparently targeting defense manufacturing facilities.

For example, just this summer 'Russian saboteurs' were alleged to be behind a suspected arson attack at a Bundeswehr facility in Erfurt, Germany - which destroyed half a dozen large military trucks. NATO and the Ukrainians have been suspected of doing their own dirty war sabotage operations inside Russia as well.

* * *

Alleged sabotage video of the June incident...

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 12:00

Watch: Cracker Barrel's 93-Year-Old Founder Blasts Abandoned Rebrand As "Crazy" And "Pitiful"

Watch: Cracker Barrel's 93-Year-Old Founder Blasts Abandoned Rebrand As "Crazy" And "Pitiful"

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

Cracker Barrel’s original founder has slammed the attempt at a sterile and soulless rebrand, calling it “pitiful.”

As we highlighted, the attempt to suck all life out of the country Americans eateries, overseen by a woke Karen girl-boss, elicited fierce backlash and eventually prompted the company to abandon the plan altogether despite having spent hundreds of millions on it.

Now Tommy Lowe, one of the original founders of Cracker Barrel has weighed in.

Being in his nineties, Lowe has all the incentive in the world to stay out of the matter, but clearly felt a need to make his feelings known.

“Oh, that’s crazy. That’s a bland nothing,” Lowe said referring to the now binned new logo. “It is pitiful,” he further urged.

Reporter Carrie Sharp then asked Lowe if he thinks Julie Felss Masino, the aforementioned CEO who oversaw this entire disaster, has even heard the Cracker Barrel story.

“I don’t think so,” Lowe said.

“They’re trying to modernize to be like the competition – Cracker Barrel doesn’t have any competition,” he continued.

“I heard she [Masino] was at Taco Bell. What’s Taco Bell know about Cracker Barrel and country food?” Lowe remarked, adding “They need to work on the food and service and leave the barrel – the logo alone.”

WATCH:

The name “Cracker Barrel” comes from the barrels used to ship soda crackers to general stores, which doubled as gathering spots for locals to socialize.

The founders, including Lowe, leaned into this imagery, designing the restaurants with rustic decor—rocking chairs on porches, checkers tables, and vintage Americana artifacts—to evoke warmth and community. 

The menu drew from Southern home cooking, with dishes like chicken and dumplings and meatloaf, aiming to feel like a meal at grandma’s house.

Under Masino, the company began stripping all of those things out of the outlets, claiming that it’s what customers asked for, and initially suggesting that the move was going well.

The full exchange with Lowe is below:

*  *  *

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 11:40

Brown Professor: "Gaza Is Now The Capital Of The World In Mutilated Children"

Brown Professor: "Gaza Is Now The Capital Of The World In Mutilated Children"

Last night’s ZeroHedge Debate, hosted by journalist Mario Nawfal, posed the question bluntly: Does Israel’s war in Gaza constitute genocide? The exchange between Brown University historian Omer Bartov and Ben Gurion University historian Benny Morris cut straight to the marrow. Here were the key highlights though we recommend the full discussion at the bottom:

“Ceiling to floor”

Bartov described the Israeli campaign not as combat but as destruction. “The IDF is engaged in demolition… ceiling to floor,” he said, referring to operations that flatten entire neighborhoods. He noted that Israel has even contracted private bulldozer crews, some imported from the U.S., to carry out the razing — with soldiers dying not in firefights but in defense of heavy machinery.

“We have a lot of stupid ministers”

Morris, a chronic critic of Israel’s ruling class, agreed that the rhetoric from Jerusalem has been dangerous. “We have a lot of stupid ministers… the worst Israeli cabinet ever put together,” he admitted, citing one official who mused about “atom bombing the Gaza Strip.” But he pushed back against the idea that these outbursts equate to state policy. Even the defense minister, whom he called “pretty stupid,” does not set military doctrine, Morris insisted.

War crimes upon war crimes

The debate turned on the contested terrain of international law. Morris argued that Hamas’s tactics — embedding fighters in schools, hiding among refugees, and operating beneath civilian infrastructure — complicate the charge. “When refugees end up in a school… they’re accompanied by Hamas terrorists who embed themselves among them,” he said.

Bartov countered that such realities do not excuse violations. “Forcible displacement… is a war crime,” he said, pointing to Israel’s practice of issuing 24–48 hour evacuation orders, only to bomb areas where the sick and elderly cannot move. “Use of starvation, of deprivation of means to live, is a war crime. It can also be a genocidal crime.”

“Capital of mutilated children”

For Bartov, the most damning evidence is not rhetoric but human wreckage. “Gaza now is the capital of the world in terms of mutilated children,” he said, citing thousands who have lost limbs under bombardment. With half the enclave’s population under 18, he argued, the war has left “the largest concentration in the world of children lacking limbs” — many of them also traumatized, malnourished, and stunted for life.

Watch out the full debate below or listen on Spotify and decide for yourself whether Israel (and by extension the US) is carrying out a genocide:

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 11:20

Friday Morning Fireworks Ensue During Cook Vs. Trump Courtroom Showdown

Friday Morning Fireworks Ensue During Cook Vs. Trump Courtroom Showdown

Update (1220ET): It was fireworks in federal court Friday morning as lawyers for Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook squared off against the Trump administration after Trump fired her on Monday over mortgage malarkey.

Cook (who was busted in 2024 for plagiarism and only got her job because Kamala Harris was the tiebreaker vote during her confirmation) responded by filing a lawsuit - asking a judge to issue a temporary restraining order (TRO) which would allow her to keep her job, for now. 

Fed Governor Lisa DeNell Cook

The drama kicked off at 9:30 a.m. before U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb, where Cook’s lawyer accused the White House of mounting a politically motivated power grab over claims of mortgage fraud as cover to oust Cook and stack the Fed with Trump loyalists.

"This is nothing more than a smear campaign," insisted Abbe Lowell, Cook’s attorney. "Cause for the president means she won’t go along with the interest rate drop." 

The courtroom drama unfolded amid the backdrop of Federal Housing Finance Authority Chief Bill Pulte having dropped a Thursday night bombshell: a second "criminal referral" accusing Cook of "misrepresentations" about properties she owns - specifically that she claimed a second residence as an investment property, which follows Pulte's initial criminal referral over Cook simultaneously claiming two properties as her 'primary residence.' 

Lowell torched the move as a desperate stunt:

"Nothing in these vague, unsubstantiated allegations has any relevance to Gov. Cook’s role at the Federal Reserve, and they in no way justify her removal from the Board."

Apparently actual documents bearing Cook's signature, which she hasn't refuted, are now 'unsubstantiated.' What's more, while Cook has denied any wrongdoing, she has yet to publicly explain her defense. 

What's Next?

Judge Cobb set an expedited briefing schedule, but stopped short of ruling on Cook’s TRO request Friday. A decision could come within days.

*  *  *

The Justice Department has filed a response to Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook's lawsuit over her Monday firing - claiming that the President was within his right to boot her over allegations of mortgage fraud (with a third property disclosed by Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) Director Bill Pulte last night), and that Cook is "highly unlikely to prevail on the merits." 

Trump's legal team argues that the Federal Reserve Act (FRA) gives the President “broad discretion” to remove governors "for cause" and that courts cannot second-guess that judgment:

The Federal Reserve Act (FRA) empowers the President of the United States to appoint (by and with the advice and consent of the Senate) the members of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. 12 U.S.C. § 241. Those Governors serve for fixed terms, “unless sooner removed for cause by the President.” Id. § 242. The statute thus expressly contemplates that, even setting aside his Article II authority over principal officers, the President retains broad discretion to remove a Governor for “cause.”

Citing Reagan v. United States (1901) and Dalton v. Specter (1994), they write "Where a statute commits decisionmaking to the discretion of the President, judicial review of the President’s decision is not available," therefore Cook cannot get a temporary restraining order allowing her to stay in her job.

Photo via Fox News Sufficient Cause Exists: Alleged Mortgage Misrepresentations

The filing claims the “cause” for Cook’s removal comes from allegedly false statements in two 2021 mortgage applications: 

“In both agreements - entered within just weeks of each other - Dr. Cook represented that she would occupy each property as her ‘principal residence.’”

Trump’s legal team frames this as potential mortgage fraud:

“It is difficult, if not impossible, to see how Dr. Cook could possibly have honestly represented that she intended to occupy and use both a property in Michigan and a condominium in Atlanta as her ‘principal residence’ during the same period.”

They stress that criminal prosecution is not required:

“The President need not prove criminal acts beyond a reasonable doubt to remove a principal officer.”

To wit, "And under any standard, making facially contradictory statements in financial documents - whether a criminal burden of proof could be sustained or not - is more than sufficient ground for removing a senior financial regulator from office.

She Never Denied It

The DOJ argues that Cook never rebutted the substance of the FHFA referral:

“Dr. Cook does not try to claim that the contradictory representations were somehow truthful, or maintain that she acted without scienter.”

Instead, she issued a statement:

"I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet"

The filing claims this refusal to provide an explanation justifies removal:

"Dr. Cook’s refusal even to offer an explanation or defense makes it all the more impossible to conclude that the ‘cause’ standard is unsatisfied."

Procedural Due Process Does Not Apply

In response to Cook's claims that she was 'deprived of notice' and an opportunity to respond to the President's concern over allegations of mortgage fraud, the DOJ notes that "no court has ever extended those due-process protections for employees to principal officers of the United States. Nor does the FRA purport to do so." 

The Trump admin also argues that principal officers like Federal Reserve governors have no property interest in their office

"Dr. Cook had no property interest in her public office and was thus owed no notice or opportunity to be heard"

"Public office is not property’ and ‘the nature of the relation of a public officer to the public is inconsistent with either a property or a contract right.'"

Trump's filing also argues that Cook did receive notice:

"The President gave Dr. Cook notice when he publicized the FHFA referral on August 20—and only acted to terminate her five days later, after it was clear that no adequate response was forthcoming."

The DOJ also notes that Cook has no explanation for the allegations.

Incredibly, Dr. Cook even now hazards no explanation for her conduct and points to nothing she would say or prove in any “hearing” that would conceivably alter the President’s determination that the perception of financial misconduct alone is intolerable in this role. Under these circumstances, there is certainly no equitable basis for a reinstatement injunction.

Addressing Cook's request for an injunction on her filing, the response asserts that recent decisions from the Supreme Court and the D.C. Circuit leave no doubt that reinstatement injunctions are improper.

Trump's Stated Rationale Was Not Policy-Based

Cook hinted her firing stemmed from policy disagreements on Fed independence and interest rates. Trump’s filing denies this:

"The President did not invoke a policy disagreement as the cause for Dr. Cook’s removal. Rather, his letter … made clear that he was acting based on her ‘deceitful and potentially criminal conduct’ in connection with the mortgage agreements."

No Irreparable Harm to Cook

Cook claimed she’d suffer irreparable harm if not reinstated. Trump disputes this:

Loss of employment does not constitute irreparable injury.

They also argue that the next Fed board meeting isn’t until September 16, 2025, meaning there’s no urgent harm justifying a TRO.

See below:

Filings Cook v TRUMP Et Al Cook v TRUMP Et Al Dcdce-25-02903 0013.0 by Zerohedge

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 09:12

Trump Cancels Extended Secret Service Detail For Kamala Harris Before Her Book Tour

Trump Cancels Extended Secret Service Detail For Kamala Harris Before Her Book Tour

President Donald Trump terminated the Secret Service protection of former Vice President Kamala Harris on Thursday, according to a new report.

By law, vice presidents receive six months of protection after leaving office, which for Harris ended on July 21. However, her protection was extended for an additional year by former President Joe Biden. Trump's decision comes just weeks before the failed leftist politician embarks on a tour to promote her new book.

"You are hereby authorized to discontinue any security-related procedures previously authorized by Executive Memorandum, beyond those required by law, for the following individual, effective September 1, 2025: Former Vice President Kamala D. Harris," according to a letter sent from the Trump administration to Harris. 

The letter, titled "Memorandum for the Secretary of Homeland Security," and dated Thursday, was first obtained by CNN, and the report was published Friday morning. 

Under federal law, specifically the Former Vice President Protection Act of 2008, it established that a former vice president, their spouse, and any children under 16 are entitled to up to six months of Secret Service protection after they leave office. That date for Harris concluded on July 21.

After the initial six-month period, the Secretary of Homeland Security has the authority to temporarily extend protection if deemed necessary due to credible threats or other conditions. 

As for the Trump administration's legal authority in this matter, it appears sound, since a memorandum authorizing DHS and the Secret Service to extend coverage beyond the statutory six months is not a permanent legal right. The only White House role entitled to lifetime protection under the law is that of the president.

The move comes just weeks before the failed leftist candidate embarks on a nationwide book tour to promote "107 Days," a behind-the-scenes look at the shortest presidential campaign in history.

Recall that Democratic leadership ousted Biden and replaced the boomer president with Harris for the presidential run, effectively disenfranchising voters.

As for Harris' book tour, it appears Trump has saved taxpayers tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, by ending protection for the failed leftist candidate as she promotes her book about life on the campaign trail.

Does history remember losers? The answer is no.

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 08:55

Fed's Favorite Inflation Indicator Shows No Signs Of Runaway Tariff Costs

Fed's Favorite Inflation Indicator Shows No Signs Of Runaway Tariff Costs

Having ticked higher in June, analysts expected headline PCE to be steady at +2.6% YoY in July and Core PCE - The Fed's favorite indicator - to rise from +2.8% to +2.9% YoY... and the numbers all came in right in line with expectations.

'As Expected' is the them of this morning's data with headline and Core PCE both matching expectations and staying in the same range they have been in for two years... not exactly the Trump Tariff terror future that was predicted...

Source: Bloomberg

Durable Goods prices decline MoM while Services costs increased the most...

Source: Bloomberg

Headline PCE rose 0.2% MoM (as expected) and +2.6% YoY (as expected)...

Source: Bloomberg

Super Core PCE - Services Ex-Shelter - rose to +3.32% YoY in July - the same level it was at in July 2024...

Source: Bloomberg

Financial Services costs (soaring stock market?) dominated SuperCore prices (and certainly have nothing to do with tariffs at all)...

Source: Bloomberg

So stocks up, financial services costs up, inflation up?

Source: Bloomberg

Blame Trump?

Source: Bloomberg

So while prices are rising but in their recent normal range, income and spending rose just 'as expected', up 0.4% MoM and 0.5% MoM respectively...

Source: Bloomberg

On the income side, for the first time since Dec 2022, wages of private workers (5.1% YoY) are rising faster than government workers (4.8%)

Real personal spending (adjusted for inflation) rose 2.1% YoY (slower than recent months but still positive)...

Source: Bloomberg

Not exactly screaming that the consumer is struggling with the savings rate flat at 4.4% of DPI...

...the lack of inflationary impact from tariffs is 'transitory'?

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 08:41

Futures Drop Led By Tech Ahead Of PCE Data

Futures Drop Led By Tech Ahead Of PCE Data

US equity futures are lower after closing at a new all time high, dragged by tech stocks as traders cut risk ahead of today's core PCE data that may test expectations for the pace of Fed rate cuts. As of 8:00am ET, S&P futures are down 0.3% and Nasdaq futures fell 0.5%: in premarket trading, Alphabet dropped 1.2% leading losses among the Magnificent Seven giants; Nvidia shares extended their premarket decline to over 1%, after the Wall Street Journal reported Alibaba had created a new AI chip. Dell slumped more than 6% after reporting slower sales of artificial intelligence servers. Europe's Stoxx 600 also dropped 0.4% while bond markets weakened across the board amid ongoing political turmoil in France. US Treasuries fell, with the yield on 30-year notes rising three basis points to 4.90% while the dollar gained 0.2%, putting it on track to snap a run of three weekly losses. Attention today will be on the July personal income/spending which includes the Fed's favorite core PCE data; we also get the advance goods trade balance and wholesale inventories (8:30am), August MNI Chicago PMI (9:45am, several minutes earlier to subscribers), August final University of Michigan sentiment (10am) and Kansas City Fed services activity (11am).

In premarket trading, Mag 7 stocks: are all lower (Microsoft -0.1%, Alphabet -1%, Apple -0.2%, Amazon -0.3%, Meta Platforms -0.6%, Tesla -0.4%, Nvidia -0.9%).

  • Affirm Holdings (AFRM) climbs 15% after the financial technology company reported fourth-quarter results that beat expectations and gave an outlook that is seen as strong.
  • Alibaba Group ADRs (BABA) rise 3% after the company reported a surge in revenue from China’s AI boom, helping offset a surprise drop in profit tied to a worsening battle with Meituan and JD.com Inc. in internet commerce.
  • Ambarella (AMBA) jumps 18% after the US semiconductor device maker beat revenue and EPS estimates and increased its fiscal 2026 revenue growth estimate. Analysts note strong AI momentum.
  • Caterpillar (CAT) falls 3% after the industrial giant warned that it faces a larger-than-anticipated tariff headwind of as much as $1.8 billion this year.
  • Celsius Holdings Inc. (CELH) rises 9% after PepsiCo Inc. increased its stake in the energy-drink maker.
  • Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL) falls 6% after the company booked fewer sales of artificial intelligence servers than in the previous three months and reported profit margins that fell short of analysts’ estimates.
  • Elastic (ESTC) rises 16% after the software company reported first-quarter results that beat expectations and raised its full-year forecast.
  • Marvell Technology (MRVL) falls 13% after reporting data center revenue for the second quarter that missed the average analyst estimate.
  • NeoGenomics (NEO) rises 4% after saying a US district court ruled in its favor, invalidating all of Natera’s asserted patent claims and clearing the way for broader commercialization of its RaDaR ST assay.
  • Petco (WOOF) jumps 22% after the US pet food maker gave 3Q guidance that topped expectations and nudged up its outlook for 2026.
  • SentinelOne (S) gains 8% after the software company raised its revenue forecast for the year. Analysts note that results were boosted by strong annual recurring revenues.
  • Ulta Beauty (ULTA) climbs 3% after the cosmetics retailer boosted its comparable sales forecast for the full year.

Friday’s stock market weakness casts a shadow heading into what is historically the toughest month for US equities. The S&P 500 has declined in September 56% of the time, with an average drop of 1.17%, according to Bank of America’s Paul Ciana, citing data back to 1927.

“Some profit-taking is healthy as the AI theme has been playing out for some time,” said François Rimeu, senior strategist at Credit Mutuel Asset Management in Paris. As for economic data, “if the labor market is really heating up, then that could lead to some repricing.”

Friday’s personal consumption expenditures report comes a week after Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s dovish tilt at Jackson Hole bolstered bets on the first rate cut of the year next month. Still, doubts linger over what follows that move, with inflation stuck above target. Swaps are pricing two quarter-point cuts this year and another two by June. The report is expected to show core PCE, the Fed’s preferred gauge for tracking inflation, rising 2.9% in July from the year before, the fastest pace in five months. Policymakers will have to balance higher price pressures with data next week that’s expected to show a rise in unemployment.

European stocks extend losses, as the Stoxx 600 drops 0.4% hitting its lowest level in over two weeks with financial stocks leading losses. All 20 sectors are in the red. UK banks dropped after a think tank said Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves could raise billions of pounds of revenue through a windfall tax on commercial banks. Defense stocks advanced after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian presidents is unlikely to happen. Here are the biggest movers Friday:

  • European defense stocks are rising on Friday after German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian presidents is unlikely to happen
  • Lotus Bakeries shares rise as much as 6.5% as BofA upgrades its rating on the maker of Biscoff cookies to buy from neutral with a €10,500 target price, and adds the stock to its SMID cap Europe Best Ideas list
  • Brunello Cucinelli shares rise to the highest in about a month after the luxury fashion company reported strong operating income for the first half-year. Analysts foresee limited tariff risk
  • Schaeffler gains as much as 4.5%, climbing to the highest since June 2024, as Citi upgrades to buy from neutral ahead of the automotive supplier’s forthcoming capital markets day
  • UK bank stocks slide after a think tank says Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves could raise billions of pounds of revenue by imposing a windfall tax on commercial lenders
  • Ayvens drops as much as 3.7% on a downgrade to neutral at Citi, which now sees a fairly balanced risk-reward for the car leasing company following a strong rally in the shares over the past year
  • CD Projekt drop as much as 3.4% as mounting development costs and uncertainty on timeline of forthcoming productions cast shadow on 2Q earnings beat
  • Pernod Ricard shares drop as much as 4.3% after analysts poured cold water on the optimism stemming from the spirit maker’s earnings beat on Thursday
  • Elekta shares drop as much as 6.2%, reversing earlier gains, after the firm reported first-quarter results. Citigroup analysts flagged the lack of order growth acceleration, while Barclays noted revenue will be under pressure in the second quarter

Earlier in the session, Asian stocks traded little changed, with a rally in Chinese equities offset by losses in Japan amid profit taking.  The MSCI Asia Pacific Index edged 0.1% lower, with Contemporary Amperex Technology and Suzhou TFC Optical Communication among the biggest gainers. China Taiping Insurance Holdings was among the laggards after its lackluster earnings.  Chinese stocks continued to march higher, partly as investor sentiment stayed high ahead of a military parade on Sept. 3 to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. Meantime, optimism around solid state batteries also supported gains in the broad market. Shares of CATL, a Chinese battery maker, soared on revenue hopes following an earnings report from a supplier. China’s onshore benchmark CSI 300 Index rose 0.7% to its highest level since 2022. The Hang Seng China Enterprises Index advanced as much as 1.3%. Elsewhere, Japanese stocks fell on profit-taking before the release of personal-consumption-expenditure data in the US. Selling spread across a broad range of sectors, hitting exporters such as makers of electronics and cars, as well as banks and insurers.

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rises 0.1%. The pound is the weakest of the G-10 currencies, falling 0.4% against the greenback. Currency traders are also pointing to the potential for further dollar weakness next month, particularly as Trump escalates his attacks on the Fed into uncharted territory. The greenback is poised to resume its streak of monthly losses after posting a gain in July, its first of the year.

“There are long-term implications from the US administration’s recent actions,” wrote Jayati Bharadwaj, head of FX strategy at TD Securities. “This chips away at the USD’s safe haven status.”

In rates, treasuries slip, with longer-dated maturities leading the slide, and 10-year yields rising 2 bps to 4.22%. European government bonds also fall, though Bunds didn’t show much immediate reaction to mixed regional euro-area inflation data.

In commodities, spot gold is down $10. WTI crude futures drop 0.5% to near $64.30 a barrel. Bitcoin falls 2% and below $110,000. 

Today's economic data slate includes July personal income/spending (including PCE price indexes), advance goods trade balance and wholesale inventories (8:30am), August MNI Chicago PMI (9:45am, several minutes earlier to subscribers), August final University of Michigan sentiment (10am) and Kansas City Fed services activity (11am). Fed speaker slate empty for the session. The first hearing in Lisa Cook's lawsuit against Trump is set for 10am ET.

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 mini -0.3%
  • Nasdaq 100 mini -0.5%
  • Russell 2000 mini -0.3%
  • Stoxx Europe 600 -0.6%
  • DAX -0.6%, CAC 40 -0.6%
  • 10-year Treasury yield +2 basis points at 4.23%
  • VIX +0.2 points at 14.61
  • Bloomberg Dollar Index +0.1% at 1202.63
  • euro little changed at $1.1679
  • WTI crude -0.8% at $64.1/barrel

Top Overnight News

  • FHFA Director Pulte sent a new criminal referral against Fed's Cook
  • The Trump administration plans to expand national-security tariffs on steel, aluminum and a variety of other industries in coming months in hopes of redirecting production in these sectors to the U.S. and thwarting potential legal threats in the trade war. WSJ
  • The EU must be prepared to walk away from a trade deal with the US if Trump acts on his threats to target the bloc unless it waters down its digital legislation, Brussels’ competition tsar Teres Ribera said. FT
  • The Fed’s Christopher Waller again said he would support a quarter-point rate cut next month and signaled more easing over the next three to six months. Waller said he does not believe a bigger September cut is needed unless the August jobs report shows substantial weakening and inflation stays well contained, while Waller added that he wanted a rate cut in July and feels more strongly about it now. BBG
  • US VP Vance said interest rates are too high and the Fed is not doing its job: Fox News
  • Russian oil exports to India are set to rise further in Sept as New Delhi defies the White House. RTRS
  • Alibaba posted a 3% drop in operating profit after an escalating price-based battle with Meituan and JD.com hurt margins. Separately, Alibaba developed a new chip compatible with the Nvidia platform, meaning engineers can repurpose programs they wrote for Nvidia chips. BBG
  • Tokyo’s inflation rate excluding fresh food slowed to 2.5% in August as expected, but remained above the BOJ’s target. The unemployment rate unexpectedly fell. BBG
  • Vladimir Putin will meet Xi Jinping and Narendra Modi at a summit in Tianjin, China, this weekend to discuss energy ties. BBG
  • CPIs from France, Italy, and Spain come in a bit cooler than anticipated in Aug at +0.8% Y/Y, +1.7%, and +2.7% Y/Y, respectively, although German regional CPIs accelerated in Aug vs. Jul. WSJ
  • U.S. companies have an unwelcome message for inflation-weary consumers: Prices are going up. Companies from Hormel to Ace Hardware forecast prices rising as the costs of Trump’s tariffs are passed on to consumers. Inflation has eased in recent months, but job growth has also slowed, and there are signs shoppers worry that tariffs could further increase prices. WSJ
  • HFs have aggressively net bought EM stocks so far in August, led by Chinese equities, EM EMEA, and to a lesser extent Taiwan, while EM Latin America has seen little net activity. Despite this month’s large net buying, Net allocation in Chinese equities does not look extended and is inline with 5-year average. Goldman Prime

Trade/Tariffs

  • Canada does not expect US President Trump to drop all his tariffs on the country, according to officials cited by FT.
  • Brazil's Vice President Alckmin said they plan to end negotiations for a complementary trade agreement with Mexico next June and plan to sign a complementary trade agreement with Mexico in August 2026.
  • Japanese trade negotiator Akazawa said he will visit the US as soon as necessary arrangements have been made, while he added that he may need to visit the US at least one more time before a presidential executive order is issued.
  • Indian Trade Minister says India is to look to new markets, including Australia; India is considering steps to boost domestic demand and support exporters hit by unilateral action by a country; India is taking steps to diversify exports.
  • China increases soybean purchases from Argentina and Uruguay due to ongoing US trade tensions, according to Reuters sources; says China has yet to book US soybean imports for Q4

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

APAC stocks were ultimately mixed heading into month-end and as participants digested a slew of data and earnings. ASX 200 traded rangebound as strength in tech and energy was offset by losses in real estate, healthcare, industrials and financials, while stock headlines in Australia continued to be dominated by a busy earnings slate. Nikkei 225 weakened after a slew of data releases, which were ultimately mixed, although Industrial Production and Retail Sales disappointed. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp gained following another substantial liquidity injection by the PBoC of around CNY 783bln and with Beijing authorities recently vowing support measures, while the spotlight is also on incoming earnings, including from Alibaba and Chinese banks.

Top Asian News

  • China state planner spokesperson said they are aware that household consumption capability and confidence need to be improved, and aware that company competition has intensified. The spokesperson added that China will study further increasing support from the central government to reduce funding pressure for local governments for people’s livelihood projects and will investigate dumping cases, misleading promotions, and improve governance of disorderly competition. Furthermore, China is to push for reducing R&D costs for AI innovation and will innovate methods to subsidise AI product purchases.
  • Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi held a phone call with Brazil's Foreign Minister and said China is willing to strengthen strategic mutual trust with Brazil and strengthen mutual support, while he added that China is willing to strengthen coordination with Brazil and work with BRICS countries to resist unilateralism and bullying.
  • Industrial and Commercial Bank (1398 HK) H1 (CNY): Net Income 168.1bln (prev. 171.1bln Y/Y), NII 313.6bln (prev. 314bln Y/Y).
  • Agricultural Bank of China (601288 CN) H1 (CNY): net 139.94bln (+2.7% Y/Y), net fee income 51.44bln.
  • Bank of Communications (3328 HK) H1 (CNY): Net Income 46bln, NII 85.3bln.
  • Bank of China (601988 CH) H1 (CNY): Net Income 117.59bln, -0.9% Y/Y, NIM 214.81bln.
  • TSMC (TSM) reportedly plans major supply chain overhaul, targeting high-margin and China-exposed suppliers, according to DigiTimes Asia.
  • Alibaba (BABA) Q1 2025 (USD): Revenue 34.6bln (exp. 34.3bln), EPS 2.06 (exp. 2.13); notes new highs in monthly active customers and daily order volume; to increase cloud adoption for AI. Alibaba (BABA) has developed a new AI chip to help fill China's void, according to WSJ sources.

European bourses began the session on the back foot despite stateside gains on Thursday. A slew of European data points had little impact on price action, which held a negative bias throughout the day. European sectors began the session mixed, though sectors have since slipped nearly entirely in the red as the risk tone deteriorated. Energy and Industrials prove resilient to the downbeat tone, with German Chancellor’s remarks on Thursday helping defence stocks. Merz said there would be no meeting between Russian President Putin and Ukrainian President Zelensky. Banks are the clear underperformers after the think-tank IPPR, recommended the Treasury should hit commercial banks with a new windfall tax on profits to raise up to GBP 8bln.
US equity futures are trading lower but faring better than stocks across the Atlantic. NQ underperforms following outperformance on Thursday, while ES and RTY are a little more resilient into PCE, the latter outperforms.

Top European News

  • ECB SCE: Consumers keep inflation expectations stable 1yr: 2.6% (prev. 2.6%). 3yr: 2.5% (prev. 2.4%). 5yr: 2.1% (prev. 2.1%).
  • ECB's de Guindos says "The US-EU trade agreement was the best outcome achievable among a series of difficult negotiations for Europe. In other words, it can be seen as the lesser evil.", via Econostream X
  • German Job Agency Head says the nation has reached a bottoming out of the Labour market.

FX

  • DXY is choppy after softening on Thursday alongside a lower yield environment and despite the several encouraging data releases stateside, including the upward revisions to headline US GDP and GDP Sales for Q2, while Core PCE Prices were revised lower and jobless claims fell. DXY currently resides in a narrow 97.85-98.04 parameter at the time of writing, with the 50 DMA seen at 95.58.
  • EUR/USD gradually eased back from Thursday's peak, with the single currency thwarted by resistance near the 1.1700 level. In terms of data this morning, German retail sales fell by -1.5% M/M in July (exp. -0.4%), which saw a tick higher in Bund futures, while German import prices fell by -0.4% M/M in July (exp. -0.3%). French prelim HICP printed 0.8% Y/Y in August (exp. 0.9%, prev. 0.9%), resulting in fleeting EUR downside; Spain's HICP printed 2.7% Y/Y (exp. 2.7%, prev. 2.7%), but notable that the Core Spanish CPI saw an uptick to 2.4% from 2.3% - little EUR movement. Back to Germany, state CPIs printed in line with what is expected from the mainland metric at 13:00 BST - an uptick in the Y/Y and a downtick in the M/M. Furthermore, ECB SCE saw consumers keep inflation expectations stable. EUR/USD resides in the 1.1657-1.1682 range at the time of writing after briefly dipping under its 50 DMA 1.1661.
  • JPY lacks direction as participants digested several data releases from Japan, which were ultimately mixed, whilst macro newsflow remained light in the European morning. The mixed bag of data releases included Tokyo CPI, which mostly matched estimates, and the Unemployment Rate surprisingly declined, although Industrial Production and Retail Sales disappointed. USD/JPY trades on either side of its 50 DMA (146.99) in a current 146.77-147.19 range.
  • GBP/USD fell further below the 1.3500 focal point, with Sterling lagging despite light pertinent catalysts for the UK, although there were reports yesterday that PM Starmer plans a cabinet shake-up and is expected to appoint a new economic advisor ahead of the Autumn Budget. Some focus also on the UK think tank IPPR (widely described as left-wing), which recommended that Chancellor Rachel Reeves impose a windfall tax on commercial banks to reclaim profits earned from taxpayer-backed deposits at the Bank of England. A senior banker, speaking with the FT, said, “Politically it is an easy target… No one likes banks, they are seen as a whipping boy for the government”.
  • Antipodeans remained afloat after recent advances, and as the PBoC continued to strengthen the yuan reference rate setting.

Fixed Income

  • USTs are lower by a handful of ticks in what has been a quiet and rangebound trade overnight. Currently trading in a 112-13+ to 112-18+ range, as traders now turn their attention to the US PCE later today at 13:30 BST/08:30 EDT. Headline PCE is expected to rise by +0.2% M/M (prev. +0.3%), with the annual rate unchanged at 2.6% Y/Y; the core PCE rate is seen rising +0.3% M/M (prev. 0.3%).
  • Bunds are ever so slightly on the back foot, as European traders finally have some key data to digest, by way of Retail Sales/inflation metrics. Nonetheless, moves have been relatively contained so far. German Retail Sales sparked some modest upticks in Bunds and then took another leg higher on the softer-than-expected French inflation metrics - high for the day at 129.77. No real move on German Unemployment or Spanish/Italian/German State CPIs.
  • Gilts are also trading on the back foot and are marginally underperforming vs peers. Currently trading in a 90.61 to 90.75 range; from a yield perspective, UK 10y is currently trading around 4.72%, still a little off the touted “danger zone” of 4.80% for the Chancellor’s budget. On that, a UK think tank IPPR (widely described as left-wing) recommended that Chancellor Rachel Reeves impose a windfall tax on commercial banks to reclaim profits earned from taxpayer-backed deposits at the Bank of England. A senior banker, speaking with the FT, said, “Politically it is an easy target… No one likes banks; they are seen as a whipping boy for the government”.

Commodities

  • Crude futures are taking a breather after gaining yesterday, owing to geopolitics on what was otherwise a choppy performance, with the benchmarks rising on Thursday as German Chancellor Merz said there will be no meeting between Russian President Putin and Ukrainian President Zelensky. b currently resides in a 64.03-64.41/bbl range while Brent sits in a USD 68.03-68.39/bbl range.
  • Spot gold faded some of the prior day's advances after ascending above USD 3,400/oz amid a softer dollar and yields.
  • Mixed trade across base metals amid a choppy dollar and tentative mood across markets. 3M LME copper resides in a USD 9,839.00-9,924.00/t.

Geopolitics: Middle East

  • Iran's Foreign Minister Araghchi said France, Germany and the UK have no legal jurisdiction to trigger automatic re-imposition of sanctions on Iran, while he added Iran is ready to resume diplomatic negotiations over its nuclear program, provided that other parties demonstrate seriousness and goodwill. Furthermore, he said in a letter to the EU foreign policy chief that any E3 efforts to revive UN Security Council resolutions that were terminated under Resolution 2231 are invalid and ineffective.
  • Deputy Russian UN Envoy said E3 move on Iran at UN has no legal bearing and does not think the Security Council should act on the E3 move, while Russia and China have not yet requested a UN Security Council vote on their draft resolution.

Geopolitics: Ukraine

  • European leaders are said to be mulling a 40-kilometre buffer zone between the Russian and Ukrainian frontlines as part of a peace deal, according to POLITICO. Officials disagree how deep the actual zone could be and it’s unclear Kyiv would accept the plan as it would likely come with territorial concessions. The US is seemingly not involved in these discussions. French and British forces will likely make up the core of the foreign troop presence.
  • Russia says Western proposals for Ukraine security are aimed at containing Russia and drawing Ukraine into NATO's orbit Russia says this will increase risk of military conflict. Russia says there must be one concept of security guarantees, reflecting Russia's concerns. Russia says West is trying to turn Ukraine into a 'strategic provocateur' on its border.

Geopolitics: Other

  • Venezuela's UN envoy said Venezuela complained in a letter to UN chief Guterres about a US naval build up, while the envoy added that the US naval deployment violates the UN charter and Venezuela does not constitute a threat to anyone. Furthermore, the envoy said the real threat to regional stability is the US military and nuclear weapons presence in the Caribbean. It was later reported that Venezuela's President Maduro said there's no way the US can enter Venezuela, and that Venezuela has support from China, Russia, and India.

US Event Calendar

  • 8:30 am: Jul Personal Income, est. 0.4%, prior 0.3%
  • 8:30 am: Jul Personal Spending, est. 0.5%, prior 0.3%
  • 8:30 am: Jul Real Personal Spending, est. 0.3%, prior 0.1%
  • 8:30 am: Jul PCE Price Index MoM, est. 0.2%, prior 0.3%
  • 8:30 am: Jul PCE Price Index YoY, est. 2.6%, prior 2.6%
  • 8:30 am: Jul Core PCE Price Index MoM, est. 0.3%, prior 0.3%
  • 8:30 am: Jul Core PCE Price Index YoY, est. 2.9%, prior 2.8%
  • 8:30 am: Jul P Wholesale Inventories MoM, est. 0.14%, prior 0.1%
  • 9:45 am: Aug MNI Chicago PMI, est. 46, prior 47.1
  • 10:00 am: Aug F U. of Mich. Sentiment, est. 58.6, prior 58.6

DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

Markets put in another decent performance yesterday, with the S&P 500 (+0.32%) at a new record as positive data reassured investors about the near-term outlook. But even as equities hit new highs, investors remain heavily focused on the Federal Reserve’s independence, and today there’s going to be an emergency hearing about Lisa Cook’s position on the Board of Governors that’s due to start at 10am EST. So this is going to be critically important for markets, as her removal would give President Trump the opportunity to refashion the Board of Governors in a more dovish direction.

In terms of the latest on the case, yesterday we got confirmation that Cook would be suing Trump to block his move to oust her, and the lawsuit also requested the courts to issue an injunction that would allow Cook to remain in her post as governor while litigation is ongoing. So that would be a bit like what happened with the tariffs, where the courts said they could still remain in place as the appeal moves through the courts. Therefore, even if the overall case takes some time to reach a final verdict as the appeal moves through the courts, the injunction decision will have important implications for the Fed in the coming weeks and months.

For now at least, it doesn’t appear that markets are pricing in much chance of Cook being forced out. In fact, if we look at Polymarket, it suggests there’s a 79% chance that Cook will still be voting at the next FOMC meeting in mid-September. And earlier this week, when Trump published his letter removing her, long-end Treasury yields were pretty unreactive in the circumstances. Indeed, the 30yr yield is still within the 4.8%-5% range it’s broadly been in for much of the last 3 months, and yesterday we saw a flattening in the Treasury yield curve that unwound some of the moves from earlier this week as concern grew about the Fed’s independence. So the 2yr yield (+2.0bps) rose to 3.63%, the 10yr yield (-3.0bps) fell to 4.20%, and the 30yr yield (-4.6bps) fell to 4.87%. For more info on the implications, our US economists published a note earlier this week (link here) on what Cook’s removal could mean.

Speaking of the Fed, we also heard from Governor Waller after the US close, who was one of the two Governors who dissented in favour of a rate cut at the last meeting in July. He struck a dovish tone, and the speech was titled “Let’s Get On with It”, in reference to cutting rates. He even floated the idea of a cut bigger than 25bps, saying that even though “I don’t believe that a cut of larger than 25 basis points is needed in September”, that could change if the next jobs report “points to a substantially weakening economy and inflation remains well contained.”

Whilst that was going on, investors grew more optimistic on the outlook thanks to a decent batch of US data yesterday. First, we had the second estimate of Q2 GDP, which showed the US economy grew at an annualised rate of +3.3% in Q2, above the +3.0% rate on the initial estimate. While this comes after a -0.5% decline in Q1, it still leaves average growth during the first half of the year not too far below trend, which our economists see at just above 2%. Second, there was also a little bit of reassurance on the inflation side, as headline PCE inflation was revised down to +2.0% in Q2 (vs. +2.1% before), whilst core PCE was unchanged at +2.5%. And third, the more recent data was also positive, as the weekly jobless claims for the week ending August 23 fell to 229k (vs. 230k expected), and the continuing claims for the previous week also fell to 1.954m (vs. 1.966m expected). So that all helped to bolster risk appetite and dampen fears about a US downturn. Looking forward, the focus today will be on the PCE inflation numbers for July, which are the Fed’s target measure.

Against that backdrop, US equities put in a decent performance, with the S&P 500 (+0.32%) posting a third consecutive gain to move up to a fresh record. Tech stocks led the way, and the NASDAQ posted a stronger +0.53% advance, although Nvidia (-0.79%) fell back after its earnings release the previous day, which showed an ongoing deceleration in revenue growth. Meanwhile, European equities put in a more subdued performance, with the STOXX 600 (-0.20%) losing ground, with UK equities underperforming as the FTSE 100 fell -0.42%. The mood in Europe wasn’t helped by an unexpected decline in Eurostat’s economic sentiment index for the Euro Area in August, which fell to 95.2 (vs 96.0 expected).

Over in France however, yesterday saw an ongoing stabilisation in the country’s assets. In particular, their sovereign bonds outperformed, and 10yr OAT yields fell -4.1bps, which meant that the 10yr Franco-German spread tightened to 78bps, falling back from its 7-month high on Wednesday. We also saw France’s 10yr bonds slightly outperform Italy’s, where yields fell by a smaller -3.6bps. So that meant the gap between Italy and France’s 10yr yield widened slightly to 6bps, having reached its tightest level since 2003 earlier in the week. Meanwhile, that flattening in the Treasury curve was also echoed in Europe, with 2yr German yields up +1.8bps, whilst the 10yr yield fell -0.7bps.

That uptick in front-end yields was supported by the accounts of the ECB’s July meeting, which added to the sense that they had reached the terminal rate now. For example, it said that “keeping interest rates unchanged was seen as a robust approach to managing shocks and two-sided inflation risks across a wide range of plausible scenarios.” They didn’t rule out further policy action, but the Governing Council seemed comfortable with waiting for more information to justify a cut. And on the theme of European inflation, we’ll get flash CPI prints for August from major Euro area countries today, including Germany, France, Spain and Italy, ahead of the Euro Area-wide number on Tuesday. Our European economists expect headline HICP at 2.1% yoy for the Euro Area (previously 2.0%), and you can see more in their preview here. 

Overnight in Asia, Chinese equities have continued to advance, with the CSI 300 (+0.58%) on course for its highest closing level since July 2022, whilst the Shanghai Comp is also up +0.16%. However, it’s been a more negative story elsewhere, the Japan’s Nikkei (-0.24%) and South Korea’s KOSPI (-0.21%) have both lost ground this morning. In Japan, that follows an underwhelming batch of activity data this morning, with retail sales down -1.6% in July (vs. -0.2% expected), whilst industrial production also fell -1.6% (vs. -1.1% expected). Admittedly, there was a deceleration in the Tokyo CPI for August, but that was in line with expectations so wasn’t really a positive surprise, with the headline rate down three-tenths to +2.6%. Looking forward, US equity futures are also slightly negative, with those on the S&P 500 down -0.12%.

To the day ahead now, and in addition to July PCE inflation, we’ll also get US personal income, personal spending, and the advance goods trade balance. In Europe, we’ll get the ECB’s July consumer expectations survey, Germany’s August CPI, unemployment claims and July retail sales, and CPI readings from France and Italy as well.

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 08:29

Trump Closes De Minimis Loophole As Dark Chapter In Trade Ends

Trump Closes De Minimis Loophole As Dark Chapter In Trade Ends

The long-standing "de minimis" exemption, which allowed small packages valued less than $800 to enter the U.S. duty-free, officially ended Friday. This closes the dark chapter on an era when China flooded America with cheap junk (think $10 Bluetooth wireless speakers) and, according to many in the America First movement inside the White House, helped flood the nation with fentanyl precursor chemicals - if not fentanyl itself - and fueled the drug-death crisis unlike anything this nation has ever seen. Think of it as a modern-day reverse Opium War (hybrid warfare by the CCP). 

For those with a background in Latin, "de minimis" translates to "too small to matter." But that's certainly not the case. Since 2015, the number of packages entering the U.S. under this exemption has surged from 134 million packages per year to 1.36 billion by 2024. Much of this flood originated from Chinese e-commerce giants, including SheIn Group and Temu.

The decade-long tsunami of small packages flooding the U.S. didn't just undercut domestic small businesses. It also created a backdoor for illegal drugs and fentanyl precursor chemicals from China to slip in undetected, fueling the drug-death crisis now killing more than 100,000 Americans every year.

Source: Heritage Foundation

"The de minimis exemption has been abused, with shippers sending illicit fentanyl and other synthetic opioids, precursors, and paraphernalia into the United States in reliance on the lower security measures applied to de minimis shipments, killing Americans," the White House stated in late July. 

Washington-based Greg Husisian, head of the international trade practice at Foley & Lardner, told Bloomberg that President Trump "actually had bipartisan support" in tackling the de minimis exemption mess. 

"This was intended for grandma sending over an $80 package of toys, not like a huge Chinese company sending tens of thousands of packages every single day of $12 T-shirts," Husisian pointed out. 

Under the new rules enforced today via Trump's executive order signed in July, all foreign shipments, except verified gifts under $100, will face new duties.

We pointed out last week (read the report) that several global postal office services warned about emerging bottlenecks in U.S. inbound shipping lines over confusion about duty collections: 

  • Asia: Korea Post and SingPost are halting standard parcel services, while Japan warns of delays.
  • Europe: Norway, Finland, Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, and the UK are suspending or limiting services; Deutsche Post/DHL halted business parcels via postal networks.

  • Australia: Transit shipments through Australia to the U.S. are paused, though direct U.S. deliveries remain.

Multinational logistics company DHL warned customers one week ago about mounting confusion over how duties would be collected. 

"Key questions remain unresolved, particularly regarding how and by whom customs duties will be collected in the future, what additional data will be required, and how the data transmission to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will be carried out," DHL stated in the letter. 

Millions of low-value packages today will lose their duty-free treatment and be subject to standard tariff rates or temporary flat fees of $80 to $200 per item for a period of six months.

For more details on rates. Customs and Border Protection outlined earlier this month in a bulletin how the flat fees would be calculated, corresponding to the countries' tariff rates. 

"It is a real concern that the dominoes are falling and there will be a ripple effect where more and more posts announce that they will be suspending packages to the US," warned Kate Muth, executive director of the International Mailers Advisory Group, which represents the U.S. international mailing and shipping industry, quoted by Bloomberg last week.

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 08:25

Ulta Beats Earnings, Cautions Consumer Uncertainty As Back-To-School Season Begins

Ulta Beats Earnings, Cautions Consumer Uncertainty As Back-To-School Season Begins

Ulta Beauty delivered solid second-quarter results and raised its full-year financial outlook, while cautioning that a potential consumer slowdown could materialize in the second half and impact sales of beauty products

Second-quarter comparable sales increased 6.7%, exceeding Bloomberg Consensus estimates. This outperformance, combined with a solid first half, led Ulta to raise its full-year revenue outlook to $12 to $12.1 billion, up from a previous forecast of $11.7 billion. Comparable sales are expected to be around 3.5% this year, up from the prior guidance of 1.5%. 

In the beauty products industry, Ulta commands about 9% of the total U.S. market, underscoring its substantial retailer presence across all aspects of cosmetics. So its earnings are certaintly a proxy to consumer behavior trends across the industry. 

Moreover, when management speaks, analysts tend to listen. Ulta's interim chief financial officer, Chris Lialios, stated on the earnings call that comparable sales are now expected to be flat or up by a low single-digit percentage in the second half of the fiscal year.

"We continue to believe it is prudent to take a cautious approach given continued uncertainty around consumer spending," Lialios said.

The earnings results highlight accelerating consumer demand in the first half, but a mix of elevated inflation, high interest rates, and tariffs may be sidelining some consumers from splurging on premium cosmetics as the back-to-school season kicks off.

Other key developments mentioned during the earnings report:

  • Target Partnership Ending: Ulta and Target will not renew their 600-store shop-in-shop partnership (expiring next year).
  • Leadership Change: Former CFO Paula Oyibo departed in June after just a year in the role. Lialios, previously SVP & Controller, is serving as interim CFO.
  • Consumers: Cosmetics demand remains resilient despite budget pressures, with shoppers balancing discretionary beauty spending against higher prices.

"Ulta Beauty's raised 2025 revenue outlook appears conservative, likely due to economic uncertainty, leaving room for more surprises," Bloomberg Intelligence's Lindsay Dutch wrote in a note. 

Ulta shares soared as much as 9.1% after hours on Thursday following the earnings release. Much of those gains have been erased in premarket trading on Friday, with shares up about 4%. The stock is now up 22% year-to-date (as of Thursday's close), far outpacing the S&P 500's +11%.

Goldman analyst Kate McShane told clients earlier that management "still sounds conservative". She added: "While the company increased its sales expectations for 2H, management continues to take a cautious approach given ongoing uncertainty around consumer spending." 

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 07:45

Ulta Beats Earnings, Cautions Consumer Uncertainty As Back-To-School Season Begins

Ulta Beats Earnings, Cautions Consumer Uncertainty As Back-To-School Season Begins

Ulta Beauty delivered solid second-quarter results and raised its full-year financial outlook, while cautioning that a potential consumer slowdown could materialize in the second half and impact sales of beauty products

Second-quarter comparable sales increased 6.7%, exceeding Bloomberg Consensus estimates. This outperformance, combined with a solid first half, led Ulta to raise its full-year revenue outlook to $12 to $12.1 billion, up from a previous forecast of $11.7 billion. Comparable sales are expected to be around 3.5% this year, up from the prior guidance of 1.5%. 

In the beauty products industry, Ulta commands about 9% of the total U.S. market, underscoring its substantial retailer presence across all aspects of cosmetics. So its earnings are certaintly a proxy to consumer behavior trends across the industry. 

Moreover, when management speaks, analysts tend to listen. Ulta's interim chief financial officer, Chris Lialios, stated on the earnings call that comparable sales are now expected to be flat or up by a low single-digit percentage in the second half of the fiscal year.

"We continue to believe it is prudent to take a cautious approach given continued uncertainty around consumer spending," Lialios said.

The earnings results highlight accelerating consumer demand in the first half, but a mix of elevated inflation, high interest rates, and tariffs may be sidelining some consumers from splurging on premium cosmetics as the back-to-school season kicks off.

Other key developments mentioned during the earnings report:

  • Target Partnership Ending: Ulta and Target will not renew their 600-store shop-in-shop partnership (expiring next year).
  • Leadership Change: Former CFO Paula Oyibo departed in June after just a year in the role. Lialios, previously SVP & Controller, is serving as interim CFO.
  • Consumers: Cosmetics demand remains resilient despite budget pressures, with shoppers balancing discretionary beauty spending against higher prices.

"Ulta Beauty's raised 2025 revenue outlook appears conservative, likely due to economic uncertainty, leaving room for more surprises," Bloomberg Intelligence's Lindsay Dutch wrote in a note. 

Ulta shares soared as much as 9.1% after hours on Thursday following the earnings release. Much of those gains have been erased in premarket trading on Friday, with shares up about 4%. The stock is now up 22% year-to-date (as of Thursday's close), far outpacing the S&P 500's +11%.

Goldman analyst Kate McShane told clients earlier that management "still sounds conservative". She added: "While the company increased its sales expectations for 2H, management continues to take a cautious approach given ongoing uncertainty around consumer spending." 

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 07:45

Here's What The US' Security Guarantees For Ukraine Might Look Like

Here's What The US' Security Guarantees For Ukraine Might Look Like

Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack,

Trump appears to be pushing his luck with Putin, who’s open to compromises, not concessions, let alone significant security ones. If this approach doesn’t change, then a serious escalation is expected.

Western security guarantees for Ukraine are one of the main issues delaying a political resolution to the conflict. Russia launched its special operation (SMO) primarily in response to NATO-emanating threats from Ukraine. It would therefore be a significant concession for Russia to agree to some level of those threats, perhaps even in some more intense forms than pre-SMO, remaining after the conflict ends. As it turns out, however, that’s precisely what Trump envisages per his own statements and recent reports:

* 18 August: “Ukraine offers Trump $100bn weapons deal to win security guarantees

* 23 August: “Pentagon Has Quietly Blocked Ukraine’s Long-Range Missile Strikes on Russia

* 25 August: “Trump says US has stopped bankrolling Ukraine

* 25 August: “US won’t play key role in Ukraine’s security guarantees – Trump

* 26 August: “US offers air and intelligence support to postwar force in Ukraine

The corresponding takeaways are that:

1) Ukraine wants Trump to continue his new policy of indirectly arming it via new arms sales to NATO;

2) although Ukraine is no longer allowed by the US to strike universally recognized Russian territory, 3,350 Extended Range Attack Munition air-launched missiles were just approved per the aforesaid policy;

3) such deals represent his new approach to the conflict;

4) he’s reluctant to get any more deeply involved; but

5) the US could still aid EU forces in Ukraine.

From Russia’s official perspective, which might speculatively not reflect its actual one behind closed doors:

1) the continued flow of any NATO arms into Ukraine is unacceptable;

2) it’s even worse if they’re modern offensive ones (the Javelins and Stingers from pre-SMO were already bad enough);

3) Trump’s pride in his new policy makes it unlikely that he’ll change course;

4) it’s praiseworthy though that he doesn’t want to get more deeply involved; but

5) any Western forces in Ukraine remain unacceptable.

Accordingly, the apples of discord are the continued flow of modern offensive arms to Ukraine and the US’ flirtation with backing EU troops there, which the earlier cited report claimed could deploy some distance from the front behind NATO-trained Ukrainian troops and neutral countries’ peacekeepers. US backing could reportedly take the form of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; command and control; more air defenses; and aircraft, logistics, and radar supporting an EU-enforced no-fly zone.

The abovementioned scenario would intensify NATO-emanating threats from Ukraine. It would be a more formidable adversary than in the pre-SMO era and this time have the direct backing of some NATO countries’ troops on its territory even if the US doesn’t officially provide Article 5 protection to them. The risk of a hot NATO-Russian war breaking out either by the bloc’s design or Ukraine manipulating them into it through future provocations would thus be unprecedentedly high and remain an enduring threat.

Russia is therefore unlikely to agree to this even if the West coerces Ukraine into ceding all of the disputed regions, which is unlikely in any case, since that would amount to the nature of NATO-emanating threats in Ukraine being much worse than pre-SMO. At most, Russia might agree to modern offensive arms flowing into Ukraine and maybe Western troops west of the Dnieper, but only if everything east of the river is demilitarized and the US significantly decreases its forces in Europe.

The demilitarization proposal was first put forth in January here and would also entail this “Trans-Dnieper” region (TDR) being controlled by non-Western peacekeepers with only a token Ukraine presence such as local police forces. This arrangement aligns with the spirit of what’s now being considered per the previously cited report with regard to neutral countries’ peacekeepers patrolling the front, NATO-trained Ukrainian troops behind them, and then Western ones some distance back.

The differences though are that the TDR wouldn’t be demilitarized due to the presence of NATO-trained Ukrainian troops there and the EU would enforce a no-fly zone, whether over all of Ukraine or just west of the TDR. Russia might accept NATO-trained Ukrainian troops in the TDR if Kiev cedes all of the disputed regions, but a no-fly zone over there would likely remain unacceptable. A significant decrease in US forces in Europe, however, might make one west of the Dnieper more palatable for Russia.

To summarize, Trump’s interest in continuing his new policy of indirectly arming Ukraine via NATO and even aiding some of the bloc’s forces there could in theory be approved by Russia as part of a political solution, but only under very specific conditions. These are territorial cessions and a demilitarized TDR controlled by non-Western peacekeepers, while an EU-enforced no-fly zone west of the river might – in the highly unlikely scenario that it’s agreed to – require a significant decrease in US forces in Europe.

The problem though is that Trump has ramped up his rhetoric against Russia after the recent White House Summit on security guarantees with Zelensky and a handful of European leaders. This includes counterfactually slamming Biden for not authorizing Ukrainian attacks inside of Russia’s universally recognized territory and threatening economic war with Russia if Putin doesn’t compromise. Trump might thus try to make Putin’s worst-case scenario a fait accompli as explained in this analytical series:

* 16 August: “What’s Standing In The Way Of A Grand Compromise On Ukraine?

* 21 August: “Which Western Security Guarantees For Ukraine Might Be Acceptable To Putin?

* 22 August: “Direct NATO Intervention In Ukraine Might Soon Dangerously Turn Into A Fait Accompli

The EU, Zelensky, and US warmongers like Lindsey Graham would prefer for Trump to either make unacceptable demands of Putin that sabotage the peace process, which can then be spun to justify Western escalation, or dangerously force him into this fait accompli. Judging from Trump’s words thus far and recent reports, he’s pushing his luck with Putin; who’s open to compromises, not concessions, let alone significant security ones. If this approach doesn’t change, then a serious escalation is expected.

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 07:20

Here's What The US' Security Guarantees For Ukraine Might Look Like

Here's What The US' Security Guarantees For Ukraine Might Look Like

Authored by Andrew Korybko via Substack,

Trump appears to be pushing his luck with Putin, who’s open to compromises, not concessions, let alone significant security ones. If this approach doesn’t change, then a serious escalation is expected.

Western security guarantees for Ukraine are one of the main issues delaying a political resolution to the conflict. Russia launched its special operation (SMO) primarily in response to NATO-emanating threats from Ukraine. It would therefore be a significant concession for Russia to agree to some level of those threats, perhaps even in some more intense forms than pre-SMO, remaining after the conflict ends. As it turns out, however, that’s precisely what Trump envisages per his own statements and recent reports:

* 18 August: “Ukraine offers Trump $100bn weapons deal to win security guarantees

* 23 August: “Pentagon Has Quietly Blocked Ukraine’s Long-Range Missile Strikes on Russia

* 25 August: “Trump says US has stopped bankrolling Ukraine

* 25 August: “US won’t play key role in Ukraine’s security guarantees – Trump

* 26 August: “US offers air and intelligence support to postwar force in Ukraine

The corresponding takeaways are that:

1) Ukraine wants Trump to continue his new policy of indirectly arming it via new arms sales to NATO;

2) although Ukraine is no longer allowed by the US to strike universally recognized Russian territory, 3,350 Extended Range Attack Munition air-launched missiles were just approved per the aforesaid policy;

3) such deals represent his new approach to the conflict;

4) he’s reluctant to get any more deeply involved; but

5) the US could still aid EU forces in Ukraine.

From Russia’s official perspective, which might speculatively not reflect its actual one behind closed doors:

1) the continued flow of any NATO arms into Ukraine is unacceptable;

2) it’s even worse if they’re modern offensive ones (the Javelins and Stingers from pre-SMO were already bad enough);

3) Trump’s pride in his new policy makes it unlikely that he’ll change course;

4) it’s praiseworthy though that he doesn’t want to get more deeply involved; but

5) any Western forces in Ukraine remain unacceptable.

Accordingly, the apples of discord are the continued flow of modern offensive arms to Ukraine and the US’ flirtation with backing EU troops there, which the earlier cited report claimed could deploy some distance from the front behind NATO-trained Ukrainian troops and neutral countries’ peacekeepers. US backing could reportedly take the form of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; command and control; more air defenses; and aircraft, logistics, and radar supporting an EU-enforced no-fly zone.

The abovementioned scenario would intensify NATO-emanating threats from Ukraine. It would be a more formidable adversary than in the pre-SMO era and this time have the direct backing of some NATO countries’ troops on its territory even if the US doesn’t officially provide Article 5 protection to them. The risk of a hot NATO-Russian war breaking out either by the bloc’s design or Ukraine manipulating them into it through future provocations would thus be unprecedentedly high and remain an enduring threat.

Russia is therefore unlikely to agree to this even if the West coerces Ukraine into ceding all of the disputed regions, which is unlikely in any case, since that would amount to the nature of NATO-emanating threats in Ukraine being much worse than pre-SMO. At most, Russia might agree to modern offensive arms flowing into Ukraine and maybe Western troops west of the Dnieper, but only if everything east of the river is demilitarized and the US significantly decreases its forces in Europe.

The demilitarization proposal was first put forth in January here and would also entail this “Trans-Dnieper” region (TDR) being controlled by non-Western peacekeepers with only a token Ukraine presence such as local police forces. This arrangement aligns with the spirit of what’s now being considered per the previously cited report with regard to neutral countries’ peacekeepers patrolling the front, NATO-trained Ukrainian troops behind them, and then Western ones some distance back.

The differences though are that the TDR wouldn’t be demilitarized due to the presence of NATO-trained Ukrainian troops there and the EU would enforce a no-fly zone, whether over all of Ukraine or just west of the TDR. Russia might accept NATO-trained Ukrainian troops in the TDR if Kiev cedes all of the disputed regions, but a no-fly zone over there would likely remain unacceptable. A significant decrease in US forces in Europe, however, might make one west of the Dnieper more palatable for Russia.

To summarize, Trump’s interest in continuing his new policy of indirectly arming Ukraine via NATO and even aiding some of the bloc’s forces there could in theory be approved by Russia as part of a political solution, but only under very specific conditions. These are territorial cessions and a demilitarized TDR controlled by non-Western peacekeepers, while an EU-enforced no-fly zone west of the river might – in the highly unlikely scenario that it’s agreed to – require a significant decrease in US forces in Europe.

The problem though is that Trump has ramped up his rhetoric against Russia after the recent White House Summit on security guarantees with Zelensky and a handful of European leaders. This includes counterfactually slamming Biden for not authorizing Ukrainian attacks inside of Russia’s universally recognized territory and threatening economic war with Russia if Putin doesn’t compromise. Trump might thus try to make Putin’s worst-case scenario a fait accompli as explained in this analytical series:

* 16 August: “What’s Standing In The Way Of A Grand Compromise On Ukraine?

* 21 August: “Which Western Security Guarantees For Ukraine Might Be Acceptable To Putin?

* 22 August: “Direct NATO Intervention In Ukraine Might Soon Dangerously Turn Into A Fait Accompli

The EU, Zelensky, and US warmongers like Lindsey Graham would prefer for Trump to either make unacceptable demands of Putin that sabotage the peace process, which can then be spun to justify Western escalation, or dangerously force him into this fait accompli. Judging from Trump’s words thus far and recent reports, he’s pushing his luck with Putin; who’s open to compromises, not concessions, let alone significant security ones. If this approach doesn’t change, then a serious escalation is expected.

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 07:20

Germany's Ruling CDU Party Targets Afghan & Syrian Benefit-Recipients In Push To Cut "Unsustainable" Welfare Budget

Germany's Ruling CDU Party Targets Afghan & Syrian Benefit-Recipients In Push To Cut "Unsustainable" Welfare Budget

Authored by Thomas Brooke via Remix News,

Germany’s ruling CDU/CSU bloc is demanding stricter limits on welfare, with party leaders pointing to high rates of reliance on the citizen’s allowance among Afghans and Syrians.

Deputy parliamentary group leader Mathias Middelberg said job centers must do more to place these groups into work, stressing there is “still considerable potential for catching up in terms of taking up employment.”

“Just 100,000 more people in work instead of relying on the citizen’s allowance could, depending on wage levels, relieve the federal budget in the low single-digit billion range every year,” the lawmaker told Bild.

According to government figures cited by Middelberg, 52.8 percent of Syrians and 46.7 percent of Afghans in Germany rely on the citizen’s allowance, while only 36.7 percent of Syrians and 37 percent of Afghans hold jobs subject to social security contributions.

“We cannot accept that hundreds of thousands of young asylum seekers here in Germany are unemployed for decades,” he said.

The call comes amid soaring welfare costs, with annual spending on the citizen’s allowance at around €52 billion. Statistics from the Federal Employment Agency (BA) last year showed that of the more than 4 million people who can work but receive social benefits, more than 2.5 million have a migration background, constituting 63.5 percent.

At the start of 2024, of the 2.6 million non-Germans registered for benefits, 706,000 were from Ukraine, 512,000 from Syria, and 201,000 from Afghanistan.

CSU leader Markus Söder and CDU General Secretary Carsten Linnemann said that those unwilling to work should no longer receive support.

Chancellor Friedrich Merz reinforced the message over the weekend, warning that Germany’s welfare model is no longer sustainable. “The welfare state as we have it today is no longer financially viable with what we are achieving economically,” he said.

Rising unemployment, bankruptcies, and inflation risks are also evidence of the mounting strain.

Alternative for Germany (AfD) co-leader Alice Weidel slammed the Grand Coalition government for continuing to oversee Germany’s economic decline on Tuesday, pointing to figures cited by Welt, which revealed 114,000 industrial jobs had been lost within the last year.

“The politically motivated deindustrialization continues unabated, even more than six months after the new elections. No economic turnaround without the AfD!” she wrote.

Read more here...

Tyler Durden Fri, 08/29/2025 - 02:00

Fracturing The Axis: Trump's Strategic Bet Against The China–Russia Partnership

Fracturing The Axis: Trump's Strategic Bet Against The China–Russia Partnership

Authored by Tanvi Ratna via The Epoch Times,

When President Donald Trump met Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, many dismissed the summit as a spectacle. Yet beneath the optics, something deeper was unfolding: a strategic gambit aimed at weakening the foundations of the China–Russia relationship. If Nixon’s 1972 trip to Beijing cleaved China from the USSR, this administration is attempting a reverse maneuver—quietly driving a wedge between Moscow and Beijing.

But this time, the tools aren’t detente or ideological diplomacy. They’re economic coercion, targeted pressure, and the calibration of dependency.

The goal is clear: not to reshape alliances in public, but to make their costs visible in private.

Since the summit, a pattern has emerged—one that spans India, China, the EU, and Russia itself.

These theaters are distinct, but the pressure applied in each is coordinated.

This is the “Reverse Kissinger Doctrine,” unfolding not as doctrine in name, but in practice.

India is a useful starting point. After New Delhi ramped up imports of discounted Russian oil to over 1.7 million barrels per day, the United States imposed a 25 percent blanket tariff on Indian exports. Weeks later, the tariff was doubled to 50 percent on categories tied to petroleum-linked supply chains. The effect was immediate: Russian crude shipments to India fell by 67 percent.

Washington’s message was implicit but unmistakable—continued support for Russia, even through commercial channels, would carry consequences. Indian refiners adjusted. The flows didn’t halt entirely, but the margins shrank. India’s largest exporters, including pharmaceutical and automotive suppliers, signaled concern. Moody’s revised India’s growth projections downward, citing export exposure. While Indian officials publicly emphasized resilience, the strategic discomfort was evident.

China, in contrast, absorbed the displaced volumes. Its purchases of Russian Urals crude increased sharply, pushing Moscow ahead of Saudi Arabia as China’s largest oil supplier. Trade between the two countries is increasingly yuan- and ruble-denominated. Swap lines have expanded. Military-industrial cooperation, though officially denied, continues under dual-use umbrellas.

Still, China’s response is not without cost. U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods are now at 30 percent, and export controls on semiconductors and precision inputs are tightening. Beijing has retaliated through rare earth export restrictions, but that tactic—effective in the short term—risks longer-term isolation. Moreover, its perceived alignment with Moscow on Ukraine has complicated relationships with Europe.

European policymakers have taken notice. While their public posture remains calibrated, Brussels has steadily escalated sanctions. At least 45 Russian financial institutions have been cut off from SWIFT. A price cap on Russian crude has significantly reduced Moscow’s daily revenues. Shadow tanker fleets, once a workaround, are now under sanctions pressure themselves.

Meanwhile, Europe’s security posture is shifting. Troop deployments across NATO’s eastern flank—while not full-scale—mark a departure from the defense posture of previous decades.

These shifts don’t reflect a desire to expand conflict. They reflect an understanding that deterrence now has to be distributed.

For Moscow, the costs are compounding. Its current account surplus has narrowed dramatically. Maintaining its shadow fleet is proving expensive. Insurance and repairs are harder to procure. While the Kremlin maintains a tough line in public—insisting on recognition of its territorial claims—there are signs of negotiation behind the scenes.

The administration’s objective is not necessarily a win in Ukraine as traditionally defined. It’s strategic containment—an equilibrium that limits Russian leverage without requiring NATO expansion or direct confrontation.

The logic is subtle but consistent. Create discomfort around Russia’s partnerships. Use trade and finance to constrain flexibility. Signal to third parties that proximity to Moscow comes with rising friction. It’s not about public declarations. It’s about recalibrating the cost-benefit equation.

This approach does not mirror the Cold War. There is no binary bloc logic. But the tactics resonate with history. Nixon once bet that ideological curiosity could reshape global alignments. This administration is betting that dependency—and its disruption—can achieve the same.

In doing so, it is quietly reshaping the landscape. Not through new alliances, but through the strategic burdening of old ones.

Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times or ZeroHedge.

Tyler Durden Thu, 08/28/2025 - 23:25

Latest Stories Freezing The Climate Crisis Hysteria

Latest Stories Freezing The Climate Crisis Hysteria

Folks across the eastern half of the U.S. have been wearing quarter zips, sweatshirts, and hoodies at night, with some even sparking up fireplaces and/or bonfires as the summer winds down, thanks to unseasonably cool air.

In some areas across the Lower 48 - mostly the eastern half - temperatures have been "record-breaking cold" and the coldest in a generation for some zip codes. 

Headlines That Put the "Climate Crisis" Narrative on Ice

Cool temps are producing optically displeasing headlines for the Democratic Party, which insists a "climate crisis" will destroy the world unless folks pay more taxes and ban cow farts. 

Latest reporting:

Another massive shot of "unseasonably cold air" is headed for the eastern half of the U.S. next week, as mentioned by meteorologist Ben Noll on X.

He said, "An even bigger surge of unseasonably cold air is coming straight down from the Arctic into the United States next week!" 

Meanwhile, Democrats have spent years brainwashing entire generations into believing a climate crisis will wipe out the world in just a few short years. Hopefully, the kids still own jackets.

Tyler Durden Thu, 08/28/2025 - 23:00

Soros-Funded Dark Money Group Secretly Paying Democrat Influencers To Shape Gen Z Politics

Soros-Funded Dark Money Group Secretly Paying Democrat Influencers To Shape Gen Z Politics

Submitted by Jason Curtis Anderson of One City Rising

When Taylor Lorenz breaks a story on Democrat dark money, you know something strange is happening. Lorenz, who has made a career as the poster child for progressive social media culture, finally turned her reporting lens onto her own side. And what she uncovered in Wired is pretty dark: a secret program bankrolled by one of the largest Democrat dark money machines in America, designed to quietly pay off dozens of high-profile influencers to steer young voters toward the left.

The story centers around the Sixteen Thirty Fund, one of the crown jewels of Arabella Advisors' dark money empire. According to public filings, this fund has been showered with staggering sums from progressive megadonors:

  • $257.1 million from the New Venture Fund

  • $64 million from the Open Societies Action Fund 

  • $20.2 million from the Hopewell Fund

  • $13 million from the North Fund

  • $5.6 million from Tides Advocacy

A spreadsheet posted by DataRepublican on X bluntly spelled it out: "That 'dark money' group, Sixteen Thirty Fund, is Arabella Advisors and is pure Open Society passthrough."

And this time, the pipeline wasn't just about elections, protests, or legislation—it was about directly paying the online voices that shape the political worldview of America's youngest voters.

The project was blandly branded the "Chorus Creator Incubator Program." According to Lorenz, more than 90 influencers were expected to join. The New York Post confirmed some of the names tied to the program:

  • Olivia Julianna, the Gen Z activist who spoke at the 2024 Democratic National Convention

  • Loren Piretra, a former Playboy executive turned Occupy Democrats podcast host

  • Barrett Adair, who runs a viral American Girl Doll–themed meme account

  • Suzanne Lambert, who calls herself a "Regina George liberal"

  • Arielle Fodor, a TikTok-famous teacher with 1.4 million followers

  • Sander Jennings, TLC reality star and sibling of trans influencer Jazz Jennings

  • David Pakman, progressive YouTube host

  • Leigh McGowan, better known as "Politics Girl"

This was no casual networking group. WIRED reported that contracts explicitly barred creators from admitting they were being paid, revealing their funders, or even acknowledging the program's existence, operating like a top-secret mission by an intelligence agency. Breaking the silence could mean expulsion—and the loss of thousands in monthly income.

The fine print was even darker. One clause gave Chorus the right to order creators to delete content produced at its events. Another required influencers to route any political dealings through Chorus itself, effectively turning the nonprofit into a shadow PR firm that stood between Democrat politicians and their own online supporters. In fundraising pitches, Chorus bragged that its creators collectively commanded 40 million followers and more than 100 million weekly views.

If you've ever wondered why so much progressive content online feels eerily uniform, this is why. It's not organic at all, it's just another arm of the machine.

And the timing couldn't be more potent. According to Pew Research, over 50% of Americans under 30 say they get their news primarily from social media. Among Gen Z, the number is even higher, with TikTok and Instagram rivaling traditional news outlets as primary sources of information. Combine that with the fact that younger Americans tend to trust influencers more than politicians or journalists, and you begin to understand just how valuable a Soros-funded influencer army really is.

Two of the most prominent figures on the hard-left influencer scene are Taylor Lorenz herself and Hasan Piker. Between them, they embody the cultural energy of the young online left. Yet when it comes to their politics, both are radically anti-Western, openly sympathetic to America's enemies, and fall into the "burn America to the ground" category of the progressive left. 

Piker once glorified the 9/11 terrorists. Lorenz routinely amplifies fringe activists and thinks Luigi Mangione is the greatest thing to happen to mankind since sliced bread. Both sit at the center of an online ecosystem that frames nihilism and "death to America" sloganeering as a form of cool, cultural chic.

Both play a key role in mainstreaming hatred for America to young voters. 

Now imagine this ethos pumped into classrooms, dorm rooms, and teenage TikTok feeds—not through organic content, but through a dark money-funded pipeline designed to bypass any form of accountability.

That's the real story here: while many Americans are scratching their heads at the state of our politics, wondering why crime rises as prosecutors look away, why borders stay open, why drug decriminalization spreads despite chaos, the answer often traces back to a single man and his bank account. George Soros already bankrolls district attorney races, radical criminal justice reforms, immigration lobbying, "racial justice" organizations, and massive street protests. Now we learn he's also bankrolling the influencers who interpret those same issues for the youngest, most impressionable slice of the electorate.

That should terrify anyone who still believes in transparency, democracy, or the free flow of ideas. 

And here's the bitter irony: Taylor Lorenz, a living embodiment of this world, may have finally done her most important piece of journalism, not by accident, but because the truth slipped out in a way that even the left couldn't ignore. She showed us how the sausage is made.

What comes next is the harder question. Will the media class brush this off as "just how politics works"? Or will Americans finally see what's really happening—that their children's politics are being shaped not by authentic cultural voices, but by professionalized operatives on Soros's payroll?

In a nation where young people trust Instagram more than the nightly news, this isn't just clever marketing. It's an engineered future. And unless someone pulls the plug, that future is going to look a lot like the worst instincts of the radical left—slickly packaged, algorithmically boosted, and secretly funded by a billionaire class that pretends to hate billionaires.

Tyler Durden Thu, 08/28/2025 - 22:35

California Faces High Pump Prices As Phillips 66 Shuts LA Refinery

California Faces High Pump Prices As Phillips 66 Shuts LA Refinery

By Julianne Geiger of OilPrice.com

Phillips 66 will begin shutting down its 139,000 bpd Los Angeles-area refinery as soon as next week, sources told Reuters, moving forward on a closure plan announced last year. Units at the plant will idle in phases through Q4 2025, with the facility permanently offline by year-end.

The decision isn’t a surprise—Phillips 66 said in October it would exit the site, citing “market dynamics.” But it comes with fallout: about 600 employees and 300 contractors will lose their jobs by December, with only a handful reassigned to the company’s marine terminal. The company insists it will support workers through the transition, though local officials remain worried about the economic hit.

California, meanwhile, is staring at a bigger problem. Between Phillips 66’s LA facility and Valero’s Benicia refinery, scheduled to close in 2026, the state is set to lose roughly 17% of its refining capacity. That’s a dangerous haircut in a state already paying the nation’s highest pump prices. Analysts warn that by late 2026, California gasoline could top $8 a gallon if supply disruptions collide with fewer in-state refineries.

Lawmakers appear caught flat-footed. California has prided itself on leading the clean energy charge, but the state has no system-wide transition plan to manage a shrinking refinery fleet. Imports will plug some of the gap, but relying on tankers means higher costs and more emissions at the ports. For now, policymakers are scrambling to balance climate ambition with the political pain of $6-plus fuel.

The closure also lands as Phillips 66 wrestles with other headaches. Earlier this month, a California court hit the refiner with an $800 million judgment in a biofuels trade secrets case, and earlier this year, activist hedge fund Elliott Management pressed the company to spin off assets to boost shareholder value.

In the end, the LA refinery shutdown is part of a larger trend. Refining is being squeezed worldwide by overcapacity, shifting demand, and environmental rules. But in California, the lack of a clear bridge plan means refinery retirements risk sparking exactly the kind of fuel crunch the state wanted to avoid.

Tyler Durden Thu, 08/28/2025 - 21:45

Pages