Individual Economists

Combined NextEra-Dominion Would Have 130-GW Large-Load Pipeline

Zero Hedge -

Combined NextEra-Dominion Would Have 130-GW Large-Load Pipeline

By Robert Walton of UtilityDive

Summary

  • NextEra Energy plans to acquire Dominion Energy in an all-stock transaction announced Monday, potentially creating the largest regulated electric utility in the world — with 10 million customers in four states — if the deal passes muster with three state and two federal regulatory commissions.

  • The companies have proposed $2.25 billion in bill credits for Dominion customers in Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina, and they say all customers would see benefits from “enhanced scale in operations, procurement, construction and financing.”

  • The combined company would have a more than 130-GW large-load pipeline of projects and a rate base of $138 billion, which it expects to grow at approximately 11% through 2032, according to the deal announcement.

Company officials frame the deal as a win for customers by maintaining operating stability and putting downward pressure on rates while allowing the combined utility company to grow faster and more efficiently. Customer advocates, however, warned of the deal’s potential impact on consumers, and analysts say it could signal shifts in the utility operating model and wholesale markets.

“The Dominion Energy name isn’t changing, nor is how we operate locally, serve our customers or engage with the community,” NextEra Chairman, President and CEO John Ketchum said in a statement.

NextEra Chairman, President and CEO John Ketchum speaks during a panel at the BlackRock Infrastructure Summit in March 2026, in Washington, D.C.

The merger has been approved by the boards of directors of Dominion and NextEra, and the companies say they expect to close the transaction in 12 to 18 months subject to approvals from a host of regulators. The deal must be approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Virginia State Corporation Commission, North Carolina Utilities Commission and the Public Service Commission of South Carolina.

Customer advocate group Clean Virginia called for state officials to subject the proposed merger “to the most rigorous scrutiny possible.”

“This deal would hand control of Virginia’s electric grid to a company with a deeply troubling track record,” Brennan Gilmore, executive director of Clean Virginia, said in a statement.

“Before Virginia ratepayers are locked into a relationship with NextEra Energy, every policymaker and regulator in the Commonwealth needs to understand what NextEra has done in Florida,” he added, pointing to rate hikes and scandals around dark money political advocacy.

The companies say they plan to maintain dual headquarters in Florida and Virginia. NextEra owns Florida Power & Light, which serves 6 million customer accounts. Dominion serves 3.6 million electric customers in its three-state territory, and about 500,000 gas customers in South Carolina.

The combined entity would have an almost $250 billion market capitalization, which the companies said would make them the “world’s largest regulated electric utility business by market capitalization and one of the world’s largest energy infrastructure companies.”

Consensus data from S&P Global Visible Alpha paints a picture of two growing companies. Analysts expect NextEra to have total operating revenues of $30.6 billion this year, up 11.68% year over year; Dominion is expected to see total operating revenues of $18.4 billion, up 11.5% year over year.

Limited energy capacity remains a vital issue for the broad adoption of AI.

“This deal may support increased scale and efficiency in the space to support the ramp in data center compute,” Melissa Otto, head of research at S&P Global Visible Alpha, said in an email to Utility Dive.

The deal would combine “two well-run utility franchises,” Alex Kania, BTIG managing director and utilities and power analyst, said in a statement. There is some question about how the combination could impact operations in the PJM Interconnection, he noted.

“We believe [the deal] could mark a step to a return to the integrated utility model that has largely been abandoned over the past 10 years — but we think that model may end up being one of the better ways to address PJM resource adequacy. Stay tuned,” Kania said in a research note.

Dominion’s pipeline of contracted data center capacity now stands at about 51 GW, the company said earlier this month in its first-quarter earnings. And in Virginia, its largest utility market, Dominion sold 4% more electricity year over year in the first quarter of 2026. 

Dominion’s position in Virginia’s “data center alley” means the utility is “very well situated for large load growth,” Kania said. Its large load pipeline and PJM interconnection portfolio would pair with NextEra’s “vast generation development platform” of gas, renewables and storage.

The combined entity would be “one of just a few players in PJM that could readily offer comprehensive grid and generation solutions to large load,” Kania said.

The deal “makes much sense for NextEra to rebalance its business mix,” Jefferies equity analyst Julien Dumoulin-Smith said in a Monday note. NextEra’s unregulated business has been growing faster than its utilities, “a trend expected to continue,” he said. “Buying a regulated business has been important for years.”

The combined business would be “anchored by a more than 80% regulated business mix, with approximately 11% regulatory capital employed growth across four fast-growing states with constructive regulatory environments,” Dominion and NextEra said.

Officials expressed confidence in getting the merger across the finish line.

“We have some experience getting deals done,” Robert Blue, Dominion chair, president and CEO, said in a call with analysts. “We feel very good about the way the deal has come together, with the focus on customers and communities, and that gives us a high degree of confidence.”

Under terms of the deal, Dominion shareholders will receive 0.8138 shares of NextEra Energy for each share of Dominion they own. The companies say this will result in NextEra and Dominion shareholders owning approximately 74.5% and 25.5% of the combined company, respectively.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 20:05

Almost All Non-Iran Tankers That Entered The Persian Gulf During The War, Have Successfully Exited With A Cargo

Zero Hedge -

Almost All Non-Iran Tankers That Entered The Persian Gulf During The War, Have Successfully Exited With A Cargo

Despite a near-halt in daily Hormuz traffic, Bloomberg reports that almost all large non-Iranian tankers that have entered the Persian Gulf during the war appear to have successfully exited with a cargo, underscoring the emergence of a small group of shipowners willing to risk crossing the Strait of Hormuz.

At least 19 oil- and liquefied petroleum gas-carrying ships without Iranian links have both entered and exited Hormuz since March 1, according to vessel-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg. In contrast, about 100 such tankers that entered the Gulf before the conflict remain stuck for fear of attacks, the data show.

As noted above, merchant shipping through the vital energy chokepoint has - for the most part - ground to a halt since US-Israeli attacks at the end of February triggered a wave of Iranian retaliation and led Tehran to tighten its grip over the waterway. Yet a handful of vessels have been managing to cross under an array of schemes, including deals arranged at a government level (with payment in bitcoin) in some cases (and keep in mind that the numbers, both for ships stranded in the Gulf and those making the crossing, could be higher in reality, given many vessels in the region are switching off their satellite signals to protect against strikes).

Of the 19 ships to cross, seven have been linked to Greece’s Dynacom Tankers Management. The company has been one of the main firms to continue using the strait since the conflict began. In true honey badger form, the company is known to turn off its ship transponders and then to quietly make the Hormuz crossing usually under the cover of night. It is unclear if Dynacom had arranged any special arrangement with Tehran ahead of its crossings.  

The cargoes the vessels were carrying have largely been from the United Arab Emirates and Iraq. Of the rest, three were transporting oil from Saudi Arabia or a mix of oil from the kingdom and other Arab Gulf nations.

Only one large tanker that entered the Gulf after the war started hasn’t left, the data show.

The crossings are only a fraction of the typical Hormuz transits before the war, which accounted for about a fifth of the world’s oil supply.

 

 

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 19:40

Trump: Holding Off 'Planned' Attack On Iran At Request Of Gulf Allies, 'Deal Will Be Made'

Zero Hedge -

Trump: Holding Off 'Planned' Attack On Iran At Request Of Gulf Allies, 'Deal Will Be Made' Summary
  • Trump says holding off on 'planned' Tuesday attack upon request of Gulf states.
  • US denies earlier Tasnim report of agreeing to lift oil sanctions during talks; Trump tells NYP 'not open' to Iran concessions.
  • Trump calls for Iran's total military surrender in Monday morning Truth Social post.
  • Oil rebounds on Tasnim reporting Iranian denial: Tehran "under no circumstances" will negotiate nuclear issue as part of an end to the war.
  • A flurry of (the somewhat typically-timed) Monday opener headlines have pushed oil prices lower, erasing weekend gains, including Al Arabia reporting that Iran is ready to accept a long-term nuclear freeze, instead of full dismantling.
  • Iran has submitted its latest proposal comprising 14-points through Pakistan, amid reports that the US has offered to lift sanctions on Iranian oil during the interim negotiating period.
//--> //--> US obtains Iranian enriched uranium by December 31?
Yes 26% · No 75%
View full market & trade on Polymarket

*  *  *

Trump: Asked by Gulf States to Hold Off Attacking Iran

Here we go again: Trump says he's holding off a planned attack which was supposedly "scheduled" for Tuesday, at the request of Gulf leaders, including Qatar, KSA, and UAE. "A deal will be made," he says...

Oil drops on the headlines, amid the ongoing roulette...

Iranian President Somewhat Defensive

A message from Iran's president, perhaps aimed at those arguing that trying to engage the US has run its course. Words aimed at IRGC and domestic population, it appears...

"Dialogue does not mean surrender..." will "safeguard the interests and honor of Iran."

Trump 'Not Open' to Any Concessions for Tehran: NYP Interview

Another repetition of the weeks-long stale-mated reality: ...so Trump is 'not open' to any concessions, but Iran deal happening 'soon' - we are yet again told, as the Iranians themselves haven't appeared to budge on anything.

President Trump told The NY Post on Monday he is “not open” to any concessions for Tehran after receiving the latest disappointing Iranian response on peace deal talks. Highlights:

  • And in an ominous foreshadowing, Trump said Iran knows “what’s going to be happening soon.”
  • In the brief phone interview The Post, Trump seemingly shut the door to Iran’s Sunday offer for a diplomatic talks.
  • Asked about his Friday remark that he’d be willing to accept a 20-year moratorium on Iranian uranium enrichment, Trump interjected: “I’m not open to anything right now.”
  • The president declined to get into any detail. “I can’t really talk to you about it. Too many things are happening,” he said.
  • “I can tell you they want to make a deal more than ever, because they know we’re—what’s going to be happening soon,” Trump said.
  • Questioned about regional source claims that Iran is attempting to “wait out” Washington on both the nuclear issue and reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, Trump said he “hadn’t heard that.”
US Denies Tasnim Report It Agreed to Lift Iran Oil Sanctions

And the denials keep rolling in. First via CNBC:

...as the US side does not seem very confidently in control of the situation - quite the opposite:

Just like that, back to square zero once again we go... and back to headline roulette

US PLANS NEW RUSSIAN OIL WAIVER AS IRAN WAR CRUNCHES SUPPLIES

US DENIES REPORT IT AGREED TO LIFT IRAN OIL SANCTIONS: CNBC

Steady climb in oil continues on the denials...

Trump Monday Morning Truth Social 'Threat'

Like clockwork, the start of the week threat from Trump on TS... same as the old threats:

And bearish news via Axios:

Iran has given an updated proposal for a deal to end the war, but the White House believes it is not a meaningful improvement and is insufficient for a deal, a senior U.S. official and a source briefed on the issue told Axios.

Oil Quickly Rebounding on Iranian Denial

In a far too familiar pattern, just before US market open on Monday, a slew of optimistic Iran headlines saw oil erase weekend gains, which mostly came through Saudi Arabia's state-funded Al Arabiya, as well as Reuters... only to be followed by Iranian officials rejecting the substance of these reports, putting things firmly back at square one. 

Tasnim has newly cited Iranian government sources who seek to make clear that "Iran under no circumstances" will engage in new nuclear negotiations for an end to the war. Contradicting the earlier morning reports, it still sees negotiations to find peace in the war with the US as separate from the nuclear file. "Fundamental differences between the Iranian and American texts still remain", Tasnim reports, citing a source.

"Despite some changes in the new American text, fundamental differences stemming from the Americans' exaggeration and lack of realism remain," Tasnim writes, citing the Iranian source. According to more of the statements per state media:

  • "Iran will not abandon its firm and principled positions on ending the war and realizing the rights of the Iranian people".
  • "Iran's frozen assets must be returned to the Iranian people in a transparent and definitive manner, and paper promises are of no use".
  • "Despite some promises, there is disagreement about the return of the frozen funds".
  • "Iran's determination regarding the necessity of paying compensation by the Americans for the military aggression against Iran is very serious".
  • "The Americans are far from Iran's demands regarding its amount and some other issues."
  • "the Americans are still trying to tie the negotiations to end the war to the nuclear issue, which is against logic and Iran will not agree to it. The Americans must understand that Iran will in no way agree to an end to the war in return for nuclear commitments".
  • "Iran has not and does not have any intention of building nuclear weapons, and this claim is just an excuse and deception by the Americans. This issue has also been emphasized in the new text".

Oil reacted as expected to this official 'denial' of the prior optimism - quickly rebounding, also as Trump is said to be "losing patience" with the progress of talks. A US source has told Al Jazeera Iran has "days not weeks" to show progress.

The optimism and then denials happened within a span of a couple hours...

Tasnim: Another Iranian Ship Breaks Through US Blockade Line

Iranian state media is claiming that a Iranian oil tanker under US sanctions that was off the coast of India two weeks ago has now docked at Kharg Island, having broken through the US naval blockade. Tasnim reports that "the LPG tanker passed through the US blockade line undetected and entered Iranian waters." 

The Pentagon has been asserting an essentially airtight blockade on 'illicit' ships going to or from Iranian ports. CENTCOM has said it has turned around at least 75 vessels, while Iranian media has since the blockade's start touted several ships making it through.

Long-Term Nuclear Freeze on Table

Saudi state-owned Al Arabiya early Monday has issued a bombshell if true (but still very much not officially confirmed), reporting that Iran has agreed to a long-term nuclear freeze instead of a complete dismantling. The outlet also reports that Iran has withdrawn its demand for compensation, instead demanding economic concessions. However, this could be highly dubious, given over the past several days Tehran has not shown willingness to back down from this demand of compensation.

It also seems Russia's offer to take and temporarily hold Iran's enriched uranium is being taken seriously. Here are the alleged "leaks" of the working draft peace document:

  • Working on a condition transfer of enriched uranium to Russia instead of the US.
  • Seeking multiple international guarantees for any agreement.
  • Wants Pakistan and Oman to have a 'role' in any 'clash' in the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Seeking a political formation that allows Iran to save face.
  • Separate the maritime route from nuclear issues.

Oil pushes lower on the additional headlines, following initial reports that the US would lift sanctions on Iranian oil during the negotiating period...

As a reminder from days ago: "US President Donald Trump said Friday that he would accept a 20-year suspension of the uranium enrichment at the heart of Iran’s rogue nuclear program if Tehran gave a “real” guarantee, in an apparent shift from his previous demand that Iran permanently halt its program and his pledge to ensure Iran can never attain nuclear weapons."

US Lifting Oil Sanctions During Negotiation Period: Tasnim

Tasnim news agency says Iran has submitted its latest proposal comprising 14 points through Pakistan. State sources say the focus by Iranian leadership is to end the war and build trust. This as Pakistan’s interior minister has extended his Tehran visit for a third day.

In this context a source close to the negotiating team reportedly told Tasnim that, unlike their previous texts, Washington agreed in the new text to lift Iran's oil sanctions during the negotiation period. This is a first big sign of progress since the White House reportedly sent five 'counter' conditions to Tehran, which only offered a partial sanctions reduction.

Per more from Tasnim: 

  • Waiving sanctions means temporarily lifting sanctions.

  • Iran insists that lifting all sanctions on Iran should be part of the US's commitments.

  • However, the US has proposed suspending OFAC until a final understanding is reached.

The headline was enough to push oil down, erasing the gains over the weekend...

Another blurb via TASS, offering a little more in terms of likely conflicting interpretations and expectations:

According to the source, unlike in its previous proposals, the US has agreed in its new offer to suspend oil sanctions against Iran for the duration of the talks. The source noted that Tehran, for its part, insists on the lifting of all sanctions, while Washington is only ready to waive US Treasury sanctions until a final agreement is reached.

More Latest Developments

According to more of the latest headlines via Al Jazeera:

  • Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson says talks between Iran and the US are continuing through Pakistan.
  • He added that Iranian and Omani technical teams met in Oman to negotiate a mechanism for ensuring safe transit in the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Kuwait and Qatar have condemned drone attacks on Saudi Arabia, which officials say originated from Iraqi airspace.
  • The Israeli army says it struck more than 30 targets in southern Lebanon, which it claims were used by Hezbollah to attack Israeli forces.
  • The Israeli navy has seized vessels that were part of the Gaza-bound Global Sumud Flotilla, arresting 100 activists on board.

And more developments via Newsquawk:

  • US President Trump warned on Truth Social that the clock is ticking for Iran and that they better get moving fast, or there won’t be anything left for them, and that time is of the essence.
  • US President Trump declined to give a specific deadline for negotiations with Iran and will hold a Situation Room meeting with his national security team on Tuesday to discuss possible options for military action, while he spoke with Israeli PM Netanyahu about the situation in Iran, according to Axios. Trump also stated that he still thinks Iran wants a deal and he is waiting for an updated Iranian proposal, which he hopes will be better than the prior offer. Furthermore, Axios’s Ravid reported that Trump threatened that attacks would resume with greater intensity if the Iranian regime does not come up with a better proposal, while Channel 12’s Kraus posted that President Trump said in a phone call that he thinks the Iranians should be afraid of what’s going on right now.
  • Pakistan shared revised Iranian proposal to end the war with the US on Sunday night, according to Pakistani sources. The course added that "we don't have much time", adding that both countries "keep changing their goalposts".
  • Western sources say the new Iranian proposal includes a commitment of unclear value not to produce nuclear weapons but no mention of uranium or Hormuz, according to Journalist Segal.
  • Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Baghaei said talks with the US continue through Pakistani mediation. The spokesperson added that they have made great efforts for safe movement and protection of the Strait of Hormuz and are in constant contact with Oman to develop a mechanism. On Uranium, Baghaei said Tehran does not need any party to recognize its right to uranium enrichment and will not discuss during negotiations with the US.
  • Iranian Defence Ministry spokesman Brigadier General Reza Talaei-Nik warned of a regretful response to enemies and said that Iranian armed forces are fully prepared to confront any potential attack by the US and Israeli regime, according to IRNA.
  • Iranian Major General Rezaei said Iran is serious about diplomacy and negotiations, but is more serious about dealing with the aggressor, while he added that the US must now prove its good intentions and that Iranian armed forces are on the trigger as diplomatic efforts continue.
  • Iran said transit through the Strait of Hormuz would flow again once its conflict with the US and Israel is over, although the sides remain far from resolving their differences, according to Bloomberg. In relevant news, three cargo-empty, US-sanctioned tankers reportedly slipped through the US naval blockade in recent days, according to TankerTrackers.com.
  • Israel said it carried out a Gaza strike targeting the de facto head of Hamas's armed wing, while Israel also conducted an airstrike on the towns of Froun, Kfar Hounah and Zawtar al-Sharqiya in southern Lebanon. Furthermore, an Israeli air strike targeted Baalbek, Lebanon and killed an Islamic Jihad commander and his daughter.
  • UAE officials said a drone attack set off a fire near the UAE’s nuclear power station, while it was still investigating the source of the attack.
  • Saudi Defence Ministry said it intercepted three drones launched from Iraq after entering the kingdom’s airspace.

* * *

While a Pakistani-mediated ceasefire managed to take effect on April 8, subsequent talks in Islamabad completely collapsed, but then President Trump later extended the truce indefinitely, likely to buy time and to figure out "what's next" - while seeking a complete blockade of Iranian oil exports, and of all vessels entering or exiting Iranian ports. Currently the sides are merely trying to get back to the table.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 16:20

Graham Calls For 'Short But Forceful' New Strikes On Iran, Complains Waiting For 'Status Quo' Talks Looks Weak

Zero Hedge -

Graham Calls For 'Short But Forceful' New Strikes On Iran, Complains Waiting For 'Status Quo' Talks Looks Weak

At a moment the US-Iran ceasefire is officially on life support, and with the world's most critical energy chokepoint remaining blocked while the American consumer is paying the price at the pump, beltway hawks are calling for renewed major military action to 'solve' the standoff.

Foremost among them, Senator Lindsey Graham, hit the Sunday news circuit to urge President Trump to rip up the current playbook and resume US major military strikes on Tehran. According to Graham, the current diplomatic paralysis and the shuttered Strait of Hormuz are only fueling Iran's strategic position while inflicting severe economic pain domestically.

He has perhaps picked up on the bad optics of Trump's constant barrage of Truth Social posts which often seem written in an exasperated and impatience style.

"I think the status quo is hurting us all," Graham told NBC News' "Meet the Press" - as he made the case for using military pressure to get the Iranians to comply with Washington demands on their nuclear program and other issues.

The well-known hawk from South Carolina correctly observed: "The longer the [Strait of Hormuz] is closed, the more we try to pursue a deal that never happens, the stronger Iran gets." However, this reflects one of those 'one more escalation step and the problem will be fixed' approaches among the NeoCons. The 'just one more thing' usually perpetuates the quagmire. 

He turned to urging the president to "weaken them further" given that "there's more targets to be had" - which is pretty much also the Israeli line.

Graham further said there are no signs that after the prior 38-day bombing campaign that Iran's leadership has abandoned what he called the Islamic Republic's supposed goal "to terrorize the world, destroy Israel, come after us."

"Gas prices will come down when you put Iran in a box," Graham added. 

Another interesting moment in the interview came when the GOP senator seemed in agreement with Trump on not caring about Americans' finances in comparison with the Iran nuclear question:

Trump drew criticism last week for saying he was not weighing Americans' finances in the talks, comments that stirred Republican anxiety ahead of the midterm elections. Graham dismissed that concern.

"It's worth losing my job," he told Welker. "If I had to give my job up to make sure Iran would never have a nuclear weapon, I would do it."

Iran is meanwhile still not backing down, after last Friday Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi made clear that Tehran has "no trust" in Washington given its "contradictory messages".

Graham calling for a "short but forceful" new military escalation against Iran...

He reiterated that Washington needs to get serious, while it is US officials saying Iran must show willingness to make compromise. At this point it seems Washington is the more desperate to get a deal done, but each side is waiting out the other.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 15:45

Watch $134 Million Go Up In Smoke As Navy Jets Collide At Air Show

Zero Hedge -

Watch $134 Million Go Up In Smoke As Navy Jets Collide At Air Show

As if Pentagon losses in the Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran weren't already sapping them enough already, American taxpayers were losers again on Sunday when two U.S. Navy EA18-G Growlers blew up in spectacular fashion after colliding at an air show at Mountain Home Air Force Base in Idaho. Four crew members ejected and were medically evaluated and said to be in stable condition.

EA18-G Growlers are used to jam and suppress enemy radar and other electronics (USAF Photo)

The aircraft were performing a maneuver for the audience at the Gunfighter Skies Air Show when they made contact and then appeared to be locked together. In an instant, the four crew members ejected. As their parachutes successfully deployed, the two jets -- valued at a combined $134 million -- fell to the ground together and exploded, generating a massive cloud of smoke, and necessitating a careful descent by the crew members who had to avoid landing in the flaming wreckage. Made by Boeing, the EA18-G Growler is an F/A-18 Super Hornet variant that serves as something of an "electronic bodyguard" for other aircraft, by jamming, deceiving or suppressing enemy radar and electronic systems. 

Jeff Guzzetti, an aviation safety expert, said the unusual collision in which the two jets were seemingly stuck together may have bought the crew members a few more critical moments. “It’s really striking to see,” Guzzetti told Associated Press. “It looks like they struck each other in a very unique fashion to cause them to remain intact and kind of stick to each other and that very well could have saved them.” Some social media users pointed to a wind advisory that had been issued

While the Air Force will investigate the crash, Guzzetti's first impression was that it was not a mechanical failure: "It appears to be a pilot issue to me...Rendezvousing with another airplane in formation flight is challenging, and it has to be done just right to prevent exactly this kind of thing.” The jets landed in an empty patch of land far from the audience. The crash started a brush fire that torched 25 acres, and forced the remainder of the show to be cancelled.  It was the first edition of the Gunfighter Skies Air Show since 2018, when a hang glider pilot was killed in a crash. 

The four aviators were able to land outside the inferno

The two jets are part of the Electronic Attack Squadron 129 at Whidbey Island, Washington. They become the third and fourth Growlers from Whidbey Island to be destroyed in just the past 19 months. In October 2024, both female crew members died when they crashed near Mount Rainer. There were no fatalities in a February 2025 crash in San Diego Bay, in which the two male pilots ejected before their jet met this end: 

Another aviation expert, Safety Operating Systems CEO John Cox, told AP that the maneuvers used to dazzle air-show crowds leave little room for error. "Air show flying is demanding. It has very little tolerance,” Cox said. “The people who do it are very good and it’s a small margin for error. I’m glad everybody was able to get out.” It's enough to make you wonder whether such demonstrations are a reasonable use of taxpayers' assets -- to say nothing of the risk to the crew members. 

The Pentagon's loss of the two 67-million-dollar jets comes amid a very costly US war on Iran waged in tandem with Israel. On April 10, The War Zone reported that US forces had seen at least 39 aircraft destroyed at that point, including 24 MQ-9 Reaper drones, four F-15E Strike Eagles, two MC-130J Commando II's, an E-3G Sentry, two KC-135 Stratotankers, a CH-47F Chinook, two MH-6M Little Bird helicopters and an A-10C Warthog. 

Last week, the Pentagon owned up to $29 billion in costs of the war to date, though there are plenty of skeptics who think it's likely far higher -- along with some insiders. In late April, unnamed US officials who were familiar with the DOD's internal numbers said it was closer to $50 billion. That's just the Pentagon's tab -- it doesn't begin to account for the cost being imposed on American families and businesses via rising outlays for fuel, food and seemingly everything else. 

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 15:05

Saylor's Strategy Scoops Up Another $2B Bitcoin, Holdings Reach 843,738 BTC

Zero Hedge -

Saylor's Strategy Scoops Up Another $2B Bitcoin, Holdings Reach 843,738 BTC

Authored by Helen Partz via CoinTelegraph.com,

Michael Saylor’s Strategy, the world’s largest public Bitcoin holder, made another massive BTC acquisition last week as the crypto asset hovered around $80,000.

Strategy acquired 24,869 Bitcoin (BTC) for $2.01 billion between May 11 and 17, according Monday's 8-K filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Source: SEC

The purchases were made at an average price of $80,985 per BTC, raising Strategy’s cost basis to $75,700.

The company now holds 843,738 BTC, acquired for about $63.87 billion. At the time of publication, the holdings were valued at roughly $65.3 billion, according to CoinGecko.

STRC sales account for 97% of the entire purchase

Strategy funded nearly all of its latest Bitcoin purchase through sales of its STRC perpetual preferred stock, which accounted for about 97% of total proceeds.

According to the SEC filing, Strategy raised roughly $1.95 billion from the sale of about 19.5 million STRC shares.

In comparison, Strategy’s Class A common stock (MSTR) contributed a smaller share of funding, generating about $83.7 million in net proceeds from the sale of 430,344 shares.

Source: SEC

The outcome was broadly in line with expectations from STRC Live, which reported heavy STRC activity during the week, including a record trading day of 15.1 million shares, with estimated purchases of around 15,466 BTC.

The structure mirrors previous large bitcoin buys this year, including a 34,164 BTC purchase, Strategy’s third-largest on record, which was also largely financed through preferred securities rather than common equity.

Strategy co-founder Saylor previously signaled that the company would add to its Bitcoin holdings by posting a chart showing Strategy’s purchase history with 109 Bitcoin acquisition events since 2020.

Its 843,738 BTC now far outpaces BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, which holds around 817,000 BTC on behalf of its clients.

The purchases came a week after Saylor raised the possibility of selling Bitcoin during Strategy’s recent earnings call, framing it as a way to better protect the asset’s long-term value.

He said that sticking too rigidly to a “never sell” Bitcoin approach could, over time, work against the very asset the company is built to accumulate and hold.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 14:50

Senate Parliamentarian Rejects White House Ballroom Funding In Reconciliation Bill

Zero Hedge -

Senate Parliamentarian Rejects White House Ballroom Funding In Reconciliation Bill

Authored by Joseph Lord via The Epoch Times,

The Senate’s nonpartisan referee has rejected a bid by Republicans to fund $1 billion for the White House ballroom expansion and other White House security upgrades.

According to Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough, the $1 billion proposal breaks the rules of the reconciliation process. As parliamentarian, MacDonough’s go-ahead is traditionally required to approve individual items passed under the partisan process.

Republicans are seeking to use the reconciliation process—which is not subject to the filibuster—to pass $72 billion in funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection, which has been blocked by Democrats in the wake of fatal shootings of U.S. citizens by immigration agents. The GOP bill would fund the agencies through 2029, the end of President Donald Trump’s second term.

Trump has long pushed for the addition of a major ballroom to the East Wing of the White House, particularly in the wake of an alleged assassination attempt while attending an event away from the executive mansion.

The Secret Service had requested the money after the incident at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner last month.

Republicans had pursued including this funding in an immigration enforcement funding package.

According to Democrats, MacDonough’s ruling holds that funding for a project as large as the proposed White House expansion is too broad to be included in the filibuster-proof bill.

It’s unclear which, if any, segments of the GOP proposal can be included in the final funding bill.

The parliamentarian left the bulk of the bill’s immigration language intact, barring some minor provisions such as the one providing funding for Customs and Border Protection to hire, train, and pay agents. Republicans have indicated that these sections can be revised and retained in the legislation.

A model of the White House and proposed ballroom (R) is displayed during a ballroom fundraising dinner with President Donald Trump in the East Room of the White House on Oct. 15, 2025. Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images

Technically, Republicans can ignore MacDonough’s rulings, which are ultimately considered advisory; however, respect for the parliamentarian’s authority is so deeply embedded in the upper chamber’s culture that this rarely happens.

Ignoring or overriding a ruling on a budget reconciliation bill would set a precedent that could deeply weaken the filibuster, an eventuality that members of both parties have long wished to avoid.

In 2021, after the Senate parliamentarian rejected a bid by Democrats to include a $15 minimum wage in a reconciliation package, some Democrats called for the ruling to be overturned; however, these calls were ultimately rejected.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) speaks to members of the press in Washington on April 14, 2026. Madalina Kilroy/The Epoch Times

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) wrote in a post on X that “none of this is abnormal” during the complicated budget process that Republicans are using to try to pass the immigration enforcement and White House security money on a partisan basis.

“Redraft. Refine. Resubmit,” Wrasse said in the post.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) framed the ruling as a win for Democrats.

“Republicans tried to make taxpayers foot the bill for Trump’s billion-dollar ballroom. Senate Democrats fought back — and blew up their first attempt,” Schumer wrote in a May 17 post on X.

“Americans don’t want a ballroom. They don’t need a ballroom. And they sure as hell should not be forced to pay for one,” Schumer added, vowing that Democrats would continue to seek to block funding for the White House expansion.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 14:15

Judge Dismisses Musk's OpenAI Lawsuit After Jury Reaches Verdict

Zero Hedge -

Judge Dismisses Musk's OpenAI Lawsuit After Jury Reaches Verdict

Update: Musk to appeal

*  *  * 

A nine-person federal jury has sided with OpenAI, Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, and Microsoft, determining that Elon Musk filed his high-profile lawsuit too late under the statute of limitations. The verdict effectively ends Musk’s claims that OpenAI abandoned its founding nonprofit mission to benefit humanity.

The jury unanimously concluded that Musk knew or should have known about OpenAI’s shift toward a for-profit model and major Microsoft partnerships years earlier - potentially as far back as 2019–2021, making his August 2024 filing untimely. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in turn accepted the advisory jury’s finding on this threshold issue and dismissed the case. 

Musk, a co-founder who contributed roughly $38–44 million in OpenAI’s early days, alleged that the company betrayed its original charitable trust by pursuing massive profits and commercial deals, particularly with Microsoft. He sought up to $150 billion in damages or “ill-gotten gains,” the removal of Altman and Brockman from leadership, and a restructuring to restore the nonprofit focus on safe, humanity-benefiting AI.

OpenAI countered that Musk was fully aware of the company’s evolving plans (including for-profit elements he himself had once advocated), waited until after launching his competing xAI venture in 2023, and was motivated by competitive rivalry rather than genuine concern for the mission. They described the suit as “sour grapes.”

Developing...

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 13:38

Judge Tosses Key Evidence In Luigi Mangione Case Over Warrantless Backpack Search

Zero Hedge -

Judge Tosses Key Evidence In Luigi Mangione Case Over Warrantless Backpack Search

A judge just handed Luigi Mangione some big wins in his high-profile murder case. On Monday, New York Supreme Court Justice Gregory Carro issued a mixed ruling on evidence seized during the suspect’s dramatic arrest at a Pennsylvania McDonald’s. The decision represents a partial victory for the defense on constitutional grounds while delivering a significant boost to prosecutors by preserving the most damning pieces of physical evidence linking Mangione to the assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.

Mangione, 28, appeared in court for the hearing, dressed sharply as he has throughout proceedings. He has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder and other charges in the Dec. 4, 2024, killing that shocked the nation and ignited fierce public debate over corporate greed in the American healthcare system.

The Arrest and the Evidence at Stake

The ruling stems from Mangione’s arrest on Dec. 9, 2024, in Altoona, Pennsylvania - roughly 280 miles from the Manhattan crime scene. Police responded to a tip after Mangione was recognized while eating breakfast. Officers approached him, and what followed became the focal point of lengthy suppression hearings held late last year.

During the initial encounter at the McDonald’s, officers conducted a warrantless search of Mangione’s backpack in a public setting, visible to restaurant employees and patrons. They discovered a loaded gun magazine wrapped in underwear and other items. The search was paused, and Mangione was taken to the Altoona police station, where a more formal inventory search occurred.

Justice Carro ruled that the initial McDonald’s search was improper - an unconstitutional warrantless intrusion because the backpack was not within Mangione’s immediate control or reach at the time. As a result, several items recovered during that phase are now suppressed and inadmissible in the state trial.

The Ditched Evidence Includes:

  • Loaded handgun magazine
  • Cellphone
  • Passport
  • Wallet
  • Computer chip
  • Certain initial statements made by Mangione to officers at the scene

However, the judge found the subsequent search at the police station valid, allowing prosecutors to use critical items recovered there.

Admissible Key Evidence:

  • The alleged murder weapon: A 3D-printed “ghost gun” with a silencer, which ballistics reportedly match to shell casings found at the crime scene.
  • A red notebook containing handwritten notes expressing deep frustration with the health insurance industry—often described in media as a “manifesto.”
  • USB drive and related items from the station search.

This split decision mirrors similar outcomes in Mangione’s separate federal case and underscores the complexities of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence in high-stakes arrests.

The Crime That Captivated America

To understand the ruling’s weight, one must revisit the events of December 2024. On the morning of Dec. 4, Brian Thompson, 50, a father of two and CEO of UnitedHealthcare, was gunned down in cold blood outside the New York Hilton Midtown. He was heading to an investors’ conference when a masked assailant approached from behind and fired multiple shots. Thompson was struck in the back and leg; he died shortly after.

The killer fled on a bicycle, leaving behind shell casings engraved with the words “delay,” “deny,” and “depose” - phrases widely interpreted as a pointed critique of insurance industry practices that deny claims and delay care. Surveillance video, fingerprints, DNA, and other forensic links quickly pointed investigators toward Mangione, a 26-year-old University of Pennsylvania graduate from a well-to-do Maryland family with a background in engineering.

Mangione’s arrest five days later, with a fake ID and a backpack full of incriminating items, ended a intense manhunt. His Ivy League education, handsome appearance, and apparent grievances against corporate America turned him into an unlikely folk hero for some. Protests, “Free Luigi” chants, and online memes have accompanied the case from the start, reflecting broader societal anger over healthcare costs, claim denials, and corporate profiteering.

Legal Strategy and Implications

For the defense, led by prominent attorneys, the suppression motion was a cornerstone of their strategy. By challenging the backpack search, they hoped to dismantle much of the prosecution’s physical case. While they secured wins on peripheral items, the admission of the gun and notebook is a heavy blow. The notebook, in particular, could allow prosecutors to argue motive and premeditation before a jury.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office hailed the ruling as preserving justice for a “premeditated, targeted” killing. Bragg has emphasized that additional evidence - beyond the backpack - ties Mangione to the scene, including video footage, ballistics, and witness identifications.

Legal experts describe the outcome as a classic “partial win” scenario. Defense attorneys may appeal the admissible evidence or challenge statements under Miranda rules (the judge also addressed Huntley issues regarding voluntariness of statements). However, with the weapon and writings intact, the state’s case remains formidable.

The state trial is scheduled to begin September 8, 2026, in Manhattan Criminal Court. A separate federal case, charging stalking and other counts, carries potential life sentences but no death penalty following an earlier federal ruling. Mangione remains detained at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 13:30

Russian Drone Hits Chinese Ship In Black Sea, Less Than 24-Hours Before Xi-Putin Summit

Zero Hedge -

Russian Drone Hits Chinese Ship In Black Sea, Less Than 24-Hours Before Xi-Putin Summit

Just 24 hours before Presidents Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping are set to meet for their planned summit in Beijing, soon on the heels of Trump's visit, and a geopolitical wrench may have just been thrown into the works.

According to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Russian forces have attacked a Chinese ship heading toward a Ukrainian port - a provocative move that threatens to seriously anger Beijing at the worst possible diplomatic moment.

via Ukraine Navy

Early Monday morning, a Russian drone reportedly struck the KSL Deyang, a vessel flying under the Marshall Islands flag, just off the coast of Ukraine, Reuters also confirms.

The ship was reportedly empty at the time while en route to Ukraine's Pivdennyi port in the Odesa region to load up on iron ore concentrate.

A fire was observed on board, but it was quickly brought under control and extinguished, with the vessel escaping severe damage. 

The Ukrainian government is alleging this wasn't some kind of accidental fog-of-war blunder, with President Zelensky immediately calling out Moscow:

“Drones struck Odesa ... and one of the UAVs hit a vessel owned by China. The Russians could not have been unaware of what vessel was at sea,” Zelensky said.

A Ukrainian navy spokesman told AFP that none of the crew members, all Chinese nationals, were injured. He added that the vessel continued on its journey.

“The ship was entering for loading. After it was hit at night by a Shahed, the crew coped with the consequences on their own. Fortunately, no one was injured, and the vessel continued on its way to its port of destination,” navy spokesman Dmytro Pletenchuk said.

The incident went down just after on Sunday Xi and Putin had just exchanged "congratulatory letters" to set the stage for Putin's upcoming arrival in Beijing. 

The China-owned vessel wasn't the only ship attacked within that span of time. According to The Independent:

Russia attacked a Panama-flagged civilian vessel heading to Ukraine's Chornomorsk port in the southern Odesa region on the Black Sea early on Monday, the regional governor said.

It is one of several ships destined for Ukrainian ports that have been struck by Russian forces in the past day.

The vessel was damaged in the attack, which caused a fire, Governor Oleh Kiper said on the Telegram messaging app, adding that no one had been injured in the incident and that the crew had extinguished the fire. The vessel has continued on its way, the governor added.

TradeWinds is also suggesting a third ship was struck, but few details have been given. Black Sea transit continues to be a dangerous prospect, also with naval mines long being a feature of the 4+ year long war.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 12:00

DoJ Establishes "Anti-Weaponization" Fund After Trump Drops $10 Billion Lawsuit Against IRS

Zero Hedge -

DoJ Establishes "Anti-Weaponization" Fund After Trump Drops $10 Billion Lawsuit Against IRS

Update (1130ET)The DOJ announces that as a part of the settlement agreement in President Donald Trump v. the IRS, the Attorney General established “The Anti-Weaponization Fund” to provide a systematic process to hear and redress claims of others who suffered weaponization and lawfare.

“The machinery of government should never be weaponized against any American, and it is this Department’s intention to make right the wrongs that were previously done while ensuring this never happens again,” said Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. “As part of this settlement, we are setting up a lawful process for victims of lawfare and weaponization to be heard and seek redress.”

“The use of government power to target individuals or entities for improper and unlawful political, personal, or ideological reasons should not be tolerated by any Administration,” said Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter. 

Bloomberg reports that the fund will receive $1.776 billion and will come from the judgment fund, which is a perpetual appropriation allowing DOJ to settle and pay cases.

The fund will have the power to issue formal apologies and monetary relief owed to claimants.

The Fund will consist of a Commission of five members appointed by the Attorney General. One Member will be chosen in consultation with congressional leadership. The President can remove any member, but a replacement must be chosen the same way as the replaced member was selected.

*  *  *

As Tom Ozimek detailed earlier via The Epoch Times, President Trump’s attorneys on Monday filed a court notice voluntarily dismissing his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department, in a case that accused the agencies of failing to prevent a former contractor from leaking Trump’s tax returns to the media.

No reason was stated in the May 18 motion, which asks the court to dismiss the case with prejudice, meaning Trump and the other plaintiffs cannot bring the same claims again in the future. A court filing in April indicated that talks were underway to settle the case, with the parties stating at the time that discussions were taking place “productively to avoid protracted ligitation.”

Monday’s filing said the IRS and Treasury Department had neither filed an answer nor moved for summary judgment, allowing the plaintiffs to dismiss the action unilaterally without requiring court approval or government consent.

Trump, along with two ​of his sons and the Trump ⁠family business, sued the IRS ​and the Treasury Department in January, accusing both agencies of failing to take mandatory precautions to prevent former IRS contractor Charles “Chaz” Littlejohn from illegally obtaining access to their tax records and disclosing that information to The New York Times and ProPublica.

The lawsuit alleged that Littlejohn had “staff-like access” to confidential tax return information and exploited weaknesses in IRS safeguards to obtain and leak the records between 2019 and 2020.

Lawsuit Details

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, sought at least $10 billion in damages and accused the IRS and THE Treasury of violating federal privacy laws governing taxpayer information.

Trump brought the suit in his personal capacity, while Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, and the Trump Organization were also named as plaintiffs.

Littlejohn, who at the time was employed by defense contractor Booz Allen Hamilton, was accused of having improperly accessed and disclosed tax information related to Trump and affiliated entities, including business holdings.

The plaintiffs claimed Littlejohn’s actions caused “reputational and financial harm, public embarrassment, unfairly tarnished their business reputations, portrayed them in a false light, and negatively affected President Trump, and the other plaintiffs’ public standing.”

The lawsuit argued that IRS and Treasury safeguards were so inadequate that the agency took roughly 3 years to detect the breach.

“Defendants had a duty to safeguard and protect Plaintiffs’ confidential tax returns and related tax return information from such unauthorized inspection and public disclosure,” the complaint alleged, pointing to the need for the agencies to have in place appropriate technical, employee screening, and monitoring systems to prevent Littlejohn’s actions.

“Defendants failed to take such mandatory precautions.”

Littlejohn pleaded guilty in October 2023 to one count of unauthorized disclosure of tax return information.

Prosecutors said he used broad search parameters to conceal his activities, uploaded stolen data to a private website to avoid IRS monitoring systems, and stored records on personal devices before providing them to media outlets.

In January 2024, U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes sentenced Littlejohn to five years in prison, the maximum sentence permitted under the statute. Reyes described the breach as the “biggest heist” in IRS history.

“It cannot be open season on our elected officials,” Reyes said, noting that Littlejohn purposefully sought his job at least in part to obtain and leak tax information.

Before Monday’s voluntary dismissal, the case had appeared to be moving toward a possible resolution in recent weeks.

In an April 17 filing, attorneys for Trump and the Justice Department jointly requested a 90-day pause in proceedings to allow settlement negotiations to continue.

The IRS and THE Treasury Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the dismissal filing.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 11:40

Cuban Foreign Minister Says US Is Building 'Fraudulent Case' For Military Action

Zero Hedge -

Cuban Foreign Minister Says US Is Building 'Fraudulent Case' For Military Action

Authored by Chris Summers via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez on May 17 said the United States is building a “fraudulent case” ​to justify economic war and eventual military intervention against the Caribbean island nation.

Cuban troops participate in a military parade in honor of former Cuban leader Fidel Castro at Revolution Square in Havana on Jan. 2, 2017. Yamil Lage/AFP via Getty Images

His comments were a direct response to a report by Axios, which cited classified U.S. intelligence reports saying Cuba had obtained more than 300 military drones and had discussed using them against the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay, which is at the eastern end of the island. The Epoch Times is unable to verify the Axios report.

Without any legitimate excuse, the #US government is building, day after day, a fraudulent case to justify a ruthless economic war against the Cuban people and eventual military aggression,” Rodriguez said in a post on X. “Specific media outlets are playing along, promoting slander and leaking insinuations from the U.S. government itself.”

The minister did not specifically mention the Axios report about military drones, and he did not formally deny that Cuba possessed such weapons, which have been used by both Russia and Iran, and Tehran’s proxies, in conflicts in recent years.

Cuba does not threaten or desire war,” Rodriguez added. “It defends peace and is willing and preparing to confront external aggression in exercise of the right to legitimate self-defense recognized by the UN Charter.”

In a May 18 email to The Epoch Times, a U.S. State Department spokesperson said the U.S. president will always act “to protect Americans, our interests and our homeland from any threat.”

“President Trump ... has taken historic action to rid our backyard of uncontrolled migration, dangerous narco trafficking, organized crime, and hostile foreign military presence,” the department said.

“Cuba, a failed Communist state which has long hosted hostile foreign military, intelligence and terror groups, presents a significant threat to our national security that President Trump will not allow to devolve into a greater crisis to the safety and security of Americans.”

In a May 17 post on X, Monroe County Sheriff’s office, which covers the Florida Keys, said, “Monroe County Sheriff Rick Ramsay has not been contacted by any federal or state authorities regarding news reports Sunday of any possible military action taken by Cuba against the U.S. military base in Cuba at Guantanamo Bay using drones.”

The post quoted Ramsay as saying he did not believe there was any reason to be concerned.

“I am confident I will be notified if anything does change and I will alert the public,” Ramsay added.

The Cuban ambassador to the United Nations, Ernesto Soberón, said in a May 17 post on X that the people of Cuba “stand ready to defend their territory, their sovereignty, and their independence.”

“Cuba would never initiate an attack on any country, let alone the United States,” Eva Golinger, an attorney and writer based in New York, said in a May 17 post on X. “They do, however, have the right to self defense under international law, as all countries do, if they are attacked.”

U.S. President Donald Trump has previously said Cuba persecutes and tortures political opponents, provides a safe haven for terrorist groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas, and constitutes an “extraordinary threat to U.S. national security and foreign policy.”

Last week, Cuba said it poses no threat to U.S. national security and that there are no legitimate grounds for it to remain on the list of state sponsors of terrorism.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe and other officials visited Cuba on May 14, at the invitation of the communist regime in Havana. At the time, the U.S. Embassy in Cuba referred The Epoch Times to the White House for comment, which in turn referred it to the CIA. The CIA didn’t respond to an email seeking comment on that meeting.

Fuel Crisis

Cuban Energy and Mines Minister Vicente de la O Levy said on May 13 that the country has completely run out of diesel and heavy fuel oil, and its power grid has entered a critical state.

O Levy said Cuba had not received any oil imports since December, until Russia sent 100,000 tons (about 700,000 barrels) of crude last month.

Trump said on Truth Social last week that Cuba was asking for help and that the two countries were going to talk.

Newly erected holding tents for detained migrants at the U.S. Naval Station in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, on Feb. 21, 2025. U.S. Navy/AFN Guantanamo Bay Public Affairs via Reuters

The regime in Cuba was founded in 1959 after rebels led by Fidel Castro ousted U.S.-backed leader Fulgencio Batista. Under Castro’s leadership, the regime moved toward Marxism-Leninism and consolidated one-party communist rule in the years that followed. Cuba was closely allied with the Soviet Union until the bloc’s collapse in the early 1990s.

Cuba was heavily reliant on Venezuelan oil, supplied by former Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro’s socialist regime, but that supply was stopped after he was ousted in January and replaced by interim leader Delcy Rodríguez.

Mexico also stopped sending oil, under pressure from the United States.

A watch tower at Camp X-Ray, which was the first detention facility to hold what the U.S. government described as "enemy combatants," at the U.S. Naval Station in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, on June 27, 2013. Joe Raedle/Getty Images

The U.S. State Department said in a May 13 post on X that it “is publicly restating the United States’ generous offer to provide additional direct humanitarian assistance to the Cuban people.”

“The Cuban regime must decide whether to accept our offer or deny life-saving help for the Cuban people, who desperately need it,” the State Department said.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 11:20

"Scale Matters": NextEra, Dominion To Merge In Utility Megadeal Aimed At Grid Expansion To Power AI Boom

Zero Hedge -

"Scale Matters": NextEra, Dominion To Merge In Utility Megadeal Aimed At Grid Expansion To Power AI Boom

As power demand surges on the back of data-center buildouts, with hyperscalers expected to unleash about $700 billion in capex this year to expand AI infrastructure and maintain an edge over China in the AI compute race, NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy are moving to scale up. The utilities agreed to a $67 billion all-stock merger that would create the world's largest regulated electric utility network.

Dominion shareholders will receive .8138 NextEra shares for each Dominion share, leaving NextEra investors with about 74.5% of the combined company and Dominion holders with 25.5%. The merged utility would be more than 80% regulated, serve 10 million customer accounts, and control about 110 gigawatts of generation capacity across the U.S. East Coast, from Florida to a cluster of data centers in Northern Virginia.

NextEra positioned the merger with Dominion as a way to quickly scale power grids along the East Coast while lowering power bills, as the era of AI data center buildouts only begins to accelerate: 

With growth drivers evenly balanced between regulated and long-term contracted businesses and more than 130 GW of large-load opportunities in its pipeline, the combined company will have a broader opportunity set, more ways to grow and the scale, balance sheet and best-in-class operating, supply chain, construction and technology capabilities to deliver the generation, transmission and grid investments needed to serve customers, support economic growth and cost-effectively meet surging power demand while keeping bills affordable.

"The transaction is structured as a 100% stock-for-stock transaction and is expected to be tax-free to shareholders. The combined company will operate under the NextEra Energy name and trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol NEE," NextEra wrote in the press release.

NextEra CEO John Ketchum said the merger is a "historic moment" and comes as "electricity demand is rising faster than it has in decades."

Ketchum continued:

We are bringing NextEra Energy and Dominion Energy together because scale matters more than ever— not for the sake of size, but because scale translates into capital and operating efficiencies. It enables us to buy, build, finance and operate more efficiently, which translates into more affordable electricity for our customers in the long run.

The way the merger is framed appears aimed at federal regulators, who have seen growing resistance to data centers at the local level amid soaring power bills. It is worth noting that on some grids, especially in the Mid-Atlantic, backfiring green policies have collided with data-center buildouts and surging demand, sending power prices sky-high.

This earnings season was an eye-opener, as we noted that hyperscalers will deploy $700 billion in capex this year to support AI infrastructure.

In markets, shares of Dominion Energy soared 15%, while shares of NextEra remained flat.

Evercore ISI analyst Nicholas Amicucci noted that the merger will "likely face a significant amount of regulatory scrutiny."

The way the merger is framed, as a means of scaling grids and supporting data-center buildouts while pitching affordable household power prices, is music to the ears of federal regulators.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 10:45

"Shockingly Bad" Chinese Econ Data Stuns Wall Street, Sparks Hard Landing Concerns

Zero Hedge -

"Shockingly Bad" Chinese Econ Data Stuns Wall Street, Sparks Hard Landing Concerns

Confirming our Sunday preview, overnight China reported growth data which slowed across the board in April with investment resuming declines, retail sales missing sales and growing at the weakest rate in 4 years while industrial production rose at the slowest pace in three years, calling into question Beijing's reluctance to add stimulus to the economy as a global energy crisis hits factories and consumers across the world.

China's Monday data dump of official data on Monday painted a picture of an economy where booming exports no longer offset deteriorating consumption at home, prompting analysts at banks including Nomura and SocGen to urge bolder measures in support of growth.

As shown in the chart below, fixed-asset investment unexpectedly shrank 1.6% in the first four months of 2026 from a year earlier, while industrial production grew just 4.1% last month, the weakest in almost three years. Retail sales also missed forecasts and rose just 0.2% in April, the worst reading since they contracted in December 2022, when China reopened from Covid.

What is shocking is that it is common knowledge that Beijing traditionally massages its economic data to present itself in the rosiest possible light: the fact that it allowed data this ugly would suggest that the picture on the ground is much uglier. 

Goldman's Delta One head Rich Privorotsky captured this sentiment well, writing this morning that "overnight news from China showed economic data materially below expectations. Industrial production, retail sales and fixed asset investment all missed meaningfully. It’s hard to tell whether this reflects genuine demand destruction but perhaps it helps explain how the oil market has managed to balance despite ongoing supply concerns. I genuinely can’t remember a period when Chinese data, which tends to be heavily massaged, missed by anything close to this magnitude. Negative read through for consumption related categories."

Remarkably, not a single economist surveyed by Bloomberg had predicted as pessimistic a reading for industry, retail sales and investment. The disappointing performance of the world’s second-biggest economy last month is a reminder of its domestic vulnerabilities, after a global artificial intelligence investment boom sent trade soaring.

The breadth of the acute slowdown in April has put the prospect of a more aggressive stimulus back on the agenda after China stood out in its resilience to the fallout from the Iran war. The government pulled back on fiscal spending in March, while the central bank has steered clear of even hinting at any further loosening in policy, amid ample market liquidity and weak demand for credit. 

Fu Linghui, spokesman for the National Bureau of Statistics, described the deterioration of economic indicators as “a normal fluctuation from month to month.” But he also highlighted challenges such as a persistent imbalance between supply and demand as well as a complex global environment.

Investment plunged by around 8% in April from a year earlier, according to estimates from Goldman Sachs and Capital Economics, returning to a similar pace of decline seen in the second half of 2025. Manufacturing and infrastructure investment both weakened, while private investment plummeted

In response to the dismal data, Nomura economists wrote that authorities “might need to step up policy support for stabilizing growth,” adding that “Beijing has no room for complacency.”

A rising number of economists has been forecasting the People’s Bank of China won’t lower interest rates this year after the oil shock pushed up inflation expectations, though many still expect a cut to lenders’ reserve requirement ratio. The PBOC last lowered the policy rate and the RRR at the peak of the trade tensions with the US a year ago. 

Authorities are still likely to take a patient approach and avoid rushing out response to just one month of data. The Communist Party’s decision-making Politburo will convene in July to review economic growth and policies, making it the next potential window for any adjustment in stimulus. 

“The stance still seems to be to play cautiously,” said Jing Liu, chief economist for Greater China at HSBC in an interview on Bloomberg TV. “Our base case is no extra stimulus for the economy for the time being.”

Even though many manufacturers are struggling to cope with higher raw material costs, overall exports soared as Chinese tech products found willing buyers abroad. Greater demand for green energy products is also benefiting China. But a sustained weakening of investment and consumption at home could still bring risks to Beijing’s goal of achieving 4.5% to 5% artificial growth this year.

The April data suggest gross domestic product may expand as little as 4.1% on-year in the second quarter, which could prompt incremental policy easing, according to Macquarie Group Ltd. For now, Goldman is maintaining its forecast for a GDP gain of 4.7% in April-June, compared with 5% in the first three months of the year.

The data “should keep PBOC easing – RRR and even rate cuts – firmly on the table, while fiscal top-up may come later,” SocGen's head China economist Wei Yao wrote in a note.

The plunging manufacturing data comes at a time of continued dismal credit demand and heavy rainfall in southern China, which could be behind the sharp fall in capital spending, Goldman economist Lisheng Wang said in a note (available to pro subs here).

Statistical adjustment is another potential factor. Many economists believe authorities took measures to correct over-reporting of the data in late 2025. Such a change may have exaggerated the volatility of the figures recently, as the on-year contraction in steel and cement output narrowed in April, according to Goldman Sachs. 

The consumer economy has meanwhile continued to struggle as households spent less on items as varied as autos and furniture. Car sales plunged 15% in April from a year earlier, the worst contraction since mid-2022, when the country was under Covid restrictions. The government has scaled back subsidies for electric vehicle purchases this year, while the Iran oil shock hurt sales of gasoline-powered cars. 

Purchases of home appliances and furniture — products that used to be buoyed by government subsidies — declined at a double-digit pace. Gold, silver and jewelry sales plummeted 21% — a huge reversal from earlier this year and 2025, when soaring prices for precious metals led to a speculative investment frenzy.

The industrial sector is also getting more lopsided as export-driven sectors lead the growth while industries that relied on domestic sales lagged. The production of electronics, lifted by soaring global demand for AI chips, expanded 15.6% in April, the fastest pace in two years.

The auto industry also expanded briskly at 9.2%, as overseas EV sales took off. Meanwhile, commodities linked to real estate and construction — such as cement, glass and steel — recorded declines, while crude oil processing volume fell, which ING Bank economist Lynn Song attributed to the war’s impact

Soaring chip prices may partly explain why factory output weakened even as exports surged.  While industrial production is reported after an adjustment made for inflation, sales abroad are calculated in nominal terms, making it hard to separate movements in prices versus volumes. Surging costs of chips and electronics accounted for about half of April’s 14% headline export growth, according to Nomura. 

“China still looks like a two-speed economy: strong in strategic manufacturing and exports, but weak where household confidence matters most,” said Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo Markets in Singapore. “The concern is not just that activity missed, but that the weakness is broadening across the domestic side of the economy.”

There is one silver lining when it comes to the Chinese economy: exports are expected to remain strong after climbing 15% in the first four months from a year ago. Stabilizing trade ties with the US, reinforced by President Donald Trump’s visit to Beijing, further bolster the outlook.

But a turnaround is nowhere in sight for domestic consumption. Chinese households net repaid the most loans in April since comparable data going back to 2010.

“Policy space remains ample,” said Hao Zhou, chief economist at Guotai Junan International Holdings. “The April data are less a sign of deterioration than a trigger for more proactive easing — which should help anchor growth and support a gradual recovery into the second half of the year.”

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 10:30

Key Events This Week: Nvidia Earnings, FOMC Minutes And Global PMIs

Zero Hedge -

Key Events This Week: Nvidia Earnings, FOMC Minutes And Global PMIs

Looking at the week ahead, Nvidia’s earnings on Wednesday, with a market capitalisation now of $5.46tn, will be the main event. In economics, we have the global flash PMIs on Thursday, along with inflation data from Canada tomorrow, the UK on Wednesday, and Japan on Friday. From central banks, the highlight will be the FOMC minutes on Wednesday. Those flash PMIs will be important, as they’re one of the first indicators on how the global economy has performed this month, so will be scrutinized for any signs of how the war in Iran is impacting activity and prices.

The US calendar is relatively light, with the NAHB housing market index today expected to remain unchanged at a cyclically low 34, followed by Tuesday’s pending home sales, where a modest +1.0% increase is anticipated (from +1.5% previously). Attention will then turn to Thursday’s April housing activity data, where housing starts are expected to ease to an annualized pace of 1.425mn (from 1.502mn), while permits are projected to tick higher to 1.375mn (from 1.363mn). All estimates are according to our economists.

Beyond housing, Thursday is the key day for macro releases. The weekly initial jobless claims are expected to edge slightly lower to 209k (from 211k). The same day will also bring the Philadelphia Fed manufacturing survey, where our economists expect a pullback to +21.0 (from +26.7), alongside the flash PMIs. In the US, manufacturing is expected to soften marginally to 53.7 (from 54.5), while services are seen ticking up to 51.5 (from 51.0).

In contrast to consumer sentiment—which will see an updated reading of the Michigan survey on Friday (expected at 48.2 versus 49.8 previously)—business surveys have generally remained more resilient despite the energy shock. That said, some indicators have shown rising input costs and lengthening delivery times, developments that could signal renewed inflationary pressure building beneath the surface.

Turning to central bank communications, the Fed speaker slate is relatively limited but still notable. Governor Waller is scheduled to participate in an ECB policy panel tomorrow, alongside comments from Philadelphia Fed President Harker (voter) on the outlook. On Wednesday, Vice Chair Barr will discuss consumer financial health metrics, while the Fed will also publish the minutes from the April FOMC meeting. Richmond Fed President Barkin (non-voter) will follow on Thursday with remarks on the economy, before Governor Waller rounds out the week with a further appearance on Friday.

In Europe, the highlights will include the UK labour market report tomorrow and inflation data on Wednesday. DB's UK economist expects headline CPI to slow to 2.98% YoY and core CPI to fall to 2.61% YoY. More detail and forecasts are in the full inflation spotlight note here. The UK will also release the GfK May consumer confidence index and April retail sales on Friday. Other notable European releases include Eurozone consumer confidence on Thursday and Germany’s Ifo survey on Friday.

In Asia, Japan faces a busy week, with key data including Q1 GDP tomorrow and April nationwide CPI on Friday. Our Chief Japan economist expects positive real growth of an annualised 1.3% QoQ for the GDP report and sees core CPI inflation, excluding fresh food, holding at 1.8% YoY, alongside a retreat in core-core inflation, excluding fresh food and energy, to 2.2% (from 2.4% in March). 

Finally, beyond Nvidia’s earnings on Wednesday, results are also due from major US retailers, including Walmart, Home Depot, and TJX.

Courtesy of DB, here is a day by day calendar of the week's main events:

Monday May 18

  • Data: US May New York Fed services business activity, NAHB housing market index, March total net TIC flows, China April retail sales, industrial production, investment, home prices, Italy March trade balance
  • Central banks: BoE's Greene and Mann speak
  • Earnings: Baidu, Ryanair Holdings
  • Other: G7 meeting of finance ministers and central bank governors (through May 19)

Tuesday May 19

  • Data: US April pending home sales, UK March average weekly earnings, unemployment rate, April jobless claims change, Japan Q1 GDP, March capacity utilisation, Eurozone March trade balance, Canada April CPI, March building permits
  • Central banks: Fed's Waller speaks, ECB's Lane and Makhlouf speak, BoE's Breeden speaks
  • Earnings: Home Depot, Amer Sports

Wednesday May 20

  • Data: UK April CPI, RPI, PPI, March house price index, Germany April PPI, Denmark Q1 GDP
  • Central banks: FOMC minutes, Fed's Paulson and Barr speak, China 1-yr and 5-yr loan prime rates
  • Earnings: NVIDIA, Analog Devices, TJX, Lowe's, Intuit, Target, Experian, Marks & Spencer
  • Auctions: US 20-yr Bonds ($16bn)

Thursday May 21

  • Data: US, UK, Japan, Germany, France and Eurozone May preliminary PMIs, US May Philadelphia Fed business outlook, Kansas City Fed manufacturing activity, April housing starts, building permits, initial jobless claims, Japan April trade balance, March core machine orders, Italy March current account balance, ECB March current account, Eurozone March construction output, Q1 labour costs, May consumer confidence, Australia April labour force survey
  • Central banks: ECB's Villeroy speaks, BoJ's Koeda speaks, BoE's Taylor speaks
  • Earnings: Walmart, Deere, Generali, Ross Stores, Take-Two, BT, Zoom, Workday
  • Auctions: US 10-yr TIPS (reopening, $19bn)

Friday May 22

  • Data: US May Kansas City Fed services activity, UK May GfK consumer confidence, April retail sales, public finances, Japan April national CPI, Germany June GfK consumer confidence, May Ifo survey, France May business confidence, Canada March retail sales, April industrial product price index, raw materials price index
  • Central banks: Fed’s Waller speaks, ECB's Vujcic, Kazimir, Muller and Lane speak
  • Earnings: Cie Financiere Richemont, Lenovo

Taking a look at just the US, Goldman writes that the key economic data release this week is the Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index on Thursday. There are several speaking engagements with Fed officials this week, including events with Governors Waller and Barr and Presidents Paulson and Barkin. The minutes to the FOMC’s April meeting will be released on Wednesday.

Monday, May 18 

  • 10:00 AM NAHB housing market index, May (consensus 34, last 34)

Tuesday, May 19 

  • 08:00 AM Fed Governor Waller speaks: Fed Governor Christopher Waller will participate in a panel at the European Central Bank. Moderated Q&A is expected. On April 17th, Waller cautioned that higher oil prices as a result of the Iran war could lead to a “more lasting increase in inflation.” Waller noted that “if the risks to inflation outweigh those to the labor market,” that could require “maintaining the policy rate at the current target range.”
  • 10:00 AM Pending home sales, April (GS +1.0%, consensus +1.0%, last +1.5%)
  • 07:00 PM Philadelphia Fed President Paulson (FOMC voter) speaks: Philadelphia Fed President Anna Paulson will speak about the economic outlook at the Atlanta Fed’s Financial Markets Conference. Text and audience Q&A are expected. On March 27th, Paulson said that there was “a little bit more of a risk that the transmission of higher fuel prices, higher fertilizer prices, into inflation expectations is faster and maybe a little bit more durable.” That said, Paulson also noted that “for [all these shocks] to turn into sustained inflation, you need a mechanism that keeps that going” and that “on the wage-setting side, it doesn’t seem like there’s a lot of impetus that would make that happen now.”

Wednesday, May 20 

  • 09:15 AM Fed Governor Barr speaks: Fed Governor Michael Barr will deliver a speech on consumer financial health at a conference in Atlanta, Georgia. Text is expected. On May 5th, Barr said that “the longer [the Iran war] goes on, the greater the risk that the inflation we’re seeing in these prices becomes embedded in the economy, and then we have to worry more.” Barr noted that “we’re in a situation right now where we really need to wait and see to understand what direction [the conflict] is going.”
  • 02:00 PM FOMC meeting minutes, April 28-29 meeting: At its April meeting, the FOMC left the fed funds rate and the policy guidance in its statement unchanged. Presidents Hammack, Logan, and Kashkari dissented against the implicit easing bias in the standing policy guidance, while Governor Miran dissented in favor of a 25bp cut. Chair Powell said that the number of FOMC participants who could support moving to balanced guidance has increased since March and that the center of the FOMC “is moving toward a more neutral” outlook for future rate changes, but most felt making a change now was unnecessary. We pushed back our expectations for Fed cuts by one quarter to December and March. With energy cost passthrough likely to keep year-over-year core PCE inflation closer to 3% than 2% all year, we think that a combination of lower monthly inflation prints after the oil shock fades and further labor market softening will likely be needed for the FOMC to cut this year. We still expect that bar to be met but now expect it to take a bit longer.

Thursday, May 21 

  • 08:30 AM Initial jobless claims, week ended May 16 (GS 210k, consensus 210k, last 211k); Continuing jobless claims, week ended May 9 (consensus 1,785k, last 1,782k)
  • 08:30 AM Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index, May (GS 20.0, consensus 18.0, last 26.7)
  • 08:30 AM Housing starts, April (GS -3.5%, consensus -5.5%, last +10.8%) 
  • 09:45 AM S&P Global US manufacturing PMI, May preliminary (consensus 53.7, last 54.5); S&P Global US services PMI, May preliminary (consensus 51.0, last 51.0)
  • 12:20 PM Richmond Fed President Barkin (FOMC non-voter) speaks; Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin will deliver a speech at the Urban Land Institute Triangle in Raleigh, North Carolina. Text and Q&A are expected.

Friday, May 22 

  • 10:00 AM University of Michigan consumer sentiment, May final (GS 48.2, consensus 48.3, last 48.2); University of Michigan 5-10-year inflation expectations, May final (GS 3.4%, last 3.4%)
  • 10:00 AM Fed Governor Waller speaks; Fed Governor Christopher Waller will deliver a lecture on the economic outlook at the Frankfurt School of Finance and Management in Germany. Text and moderated Q&A are expected.

Source: Goldman, DB

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 09:25

Transcript: Shelia Bair, former FDIC Chair

The Big Picture -

 

 

The transcript from this week’s, MiB: Shelia Bair, former FDIC Chair, is below.

You can stream and download our full conversation, including any podcast extras, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube (video), YouTube (audio), and Bloomberg. All of our earlier podcasts on your favorite pod hosts can be found here.

 

~~~

 

Masters in Business — Sheila Bair

Hosted by Barry Ritholtz · Bloomberg Radio · May 15, 2026

00:00:02  Announcer: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News. This is Masters in business with Barry Riol on Bloomberg Radio

00:00:16  Barry Ritholtz: This week on the podcast, another Extra, extra special guest, Sheila Bear, former FDIC, chairperson author. What a fascinating career. She was right in the thick of it through the financial crisis, butting Heads with Tim Geithner and, and working with Hank Paulson. She really has done more than just about anyone in the country to help shore up the financial system, the banking system, and to drive us all towards a better degree of financial education through her work, not only at the FDIC, but at Treasury and through all the books she’s written for children and young adults about finance.

00:01:02  I, I thought this was fascinating, and I think you will also, with no further ado, my conversation with Sheila Bear.

00:01:11  Sheila Bair: Thank you for having me.

00:01:12  Barry Ritholtz: So I want to start with a little bit of background from you. You get a bachelor’s in philosophy from the University of Kansas and then go to law school at the same school, university of Kansas, right. Where you got a jd. Yeah.

00:01:28  What was the career plan? Were you, did you want to be a lawyer or what were you thinking?

00:01:31  Sheila Bair: Well, I’m a native Kansan, grew up in southeast Kansas. Traditional Kansas Republican family, the whole, we were all J Hawks and dad went to medical school. KU mom went to nursing school. My sister was a physical therapist.

00:01:44  I was a, I didn’t choose a medical profession, but did choose ku. So it’s a good school. It was an affordable school, and I really didn’t know what I wanted to do. I was interested in philosophy.

00:01:55  I took a lot of courses in English and economics too, but majored in philosophy and realized pretty much as soon as I graduated, I wasn’t gonna get a very good job with that degree. So, well, you

00:02:07  Barry Ritholtz: Could always teach philosophy.

00:02:08  Sheila Bair: I could do that, but I would have to get a PhD in and probably go to school longer than I wanted to do, do that. So I decided to go to law school, which was a, you know, philosophy is a good major if you’re gonna go into law school, because both disciplines are about logical thinking analysis, you know, good writing skills. And so actually the philosophy major was, was good preparation for law school.

00:02:30  Barry Ritholtz: Yeah, yeah. Say, say the very least. So, so your career spans from government and academia and finance really at the highest levels across all three. Yeah.

00:02:42  What’s the through line? Connecting, connecting each of these worlds? Yeah. Government regulation, academia, and finance.

00:02:51  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, I have been, I’ve had a, I’ve done a lot of different things in my career and I, young people, I tell them, don’t try to pre-program your career career and don’t mean narrow minded about opportunities. And a lot of people stay in the same job for 30, 40, 50 years. I respect that.

00:03:05  That’s fine. That was never for me. I’m always looking for new things. But I guess my, my first entree to the big leagues released, adjacent to the big leagues, was when I worked for Bob Dahl as his council first in the Senate Judiciary Committee, where I actually, I staffed him on the Voting Rights Act, compromise to Title two, the Voting Rights Act, which is pretty much just eviscerated by the Supreme Court, which was, which was very, you know, that was my first big project for him.

00:03:31  So that, that’s, that hurts. But anyway, so I, and then I went with, to the leaders when became majority leader, I went to the Majority Leader’s office with them and handled a broader range of issues. But that’s, that’s really, and then I was on his 88 presidential campaign, actually, which obviously started in 1987. Those campaigns start a good year before the primaries began, and that’s where I started off as a civil rights lawyer and did civil rights issues and other things for him.

00:03:59  But we had the 1987 market crash in, during that time we were, I was working for his presidential campaign became a big issue. I had to take a crash course and stock markets. And that’s when I was first exposed to finance and found that I was really interested in it.

00:04:13  Barry Ritholtz: Huh. Really interesting. Is it, and I wanna focus on, on some of your writing, because you are, you’ve written for very different age groups, demographics, right? So, bull by the horns, obviously for adults about the G ffc.

00:04:28  But the Money Tales book series is aimed at kids, right? And then the new book is really aimed at, at teenagers, people starting out, right? How different is it communicating? Yeah.

00:04:45  Somewhat complex ideas to each, or is it the same? Is it just making it understandable or is it a different approach for each group?

00:04:51  Sheila Bair: It’s, no, it, it’s a bit of a different approach. I think, you know, that the fact that I didn’t really start in findings, that I segued into it working for the stock exchange than later many other senior level jobs. I had to start from scratch when I was learning it, and I had to learn it fast. And so, but I think my own experience helped me really break down and understand and understand how to approach understanding finance.

00:05:16  And one of the big issues is the terminology, the jargon that we use in, in the financial industry. And that can be very confusing and intimidating. And I think sometimes weaponized, frankly, by people who are trying to sell a product or service. So, but yeah, I mean, I think my early need to really start from scratch and learn, it helped me later break down and explain things.

00:05:37  And then I think also my philosophy major, the, the logical thinking, you know, breaking things down into their component parts, understanding the causal connections, kinda laying it out, the analysis out for people in an understandable way is something that I’ve always tried hard to do and have refined over the years. So, but yeah, the, my, you know, bull by the horns was definitely, it was written for a general population, but it talks a lot about securitization and, and topics that make, might make some people’s eyes glaze over. But for industry professionals, I think it was of interest. But my children’s books, and actually I, I wrote another book for teens called Bullies of Wall Street, which was a book about the, the financial crisis for teenagers.

00:06:20  And then I have, golly, since 2006, I’ve been on, you know, as a sideline writing picture books for children. And that those are really fun. ’cause those are fictionalized stories. I use rhyming verses.

00:06:32  They’re just fun. You can be creative. ’cause they’re really about basic concepts, you know, compounding interest risk, capital formation. Those are things that really you can’t explain at a very ba basic level for kids.

00:06:46  Ponzi schemes is one of ’em. Asset bubbles is one, I, I wrote one, it’s called Daisy Bubble. It’s kind of riff on the Tula bubble that occurred in Hollywood hundreds of years ago. And I, I was concerned that kids were not gonna get this.

00:06:59  And that’s one of my more popular books, especially with the boys. There’s a character named Sly Seal that’s manipulating the daisy market. And, and, you know, I make that very transparent in the book. And they, they enjoy that.

00:07:10  Barry Ritholtz: That’s very, that’s very funny. My, my favorite part of Bull by the Horns is just the really vivid detail you go into in with the clashes with Tim Geman. Oh, yeah. And Hank Paulson, if you could go back in time and magically change any decision that was made during the GFC, what, what was the wrong decision and how would you fix it?

00:07:38  Sheila Bair: You mean during the crisis or in the lead up to the

00:07:39  Barry Ritholtz: Crisis? Either or. What, what do you think, what do you think the big is? Excuse me.

00:07:45  It’s never one thing, but if, if, so let, let’s, since I mentioned Guyer Paulson, what of their decisions do you think was most problematic that you would’ve liked to reverse?

00:07:57  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, I think there should have been more accountability. I, I do think there should have been more accountability, I

00:08:02  Barry Ritholtz: Think, meaning Bankers Wall Street, that helped create

00:08:05  Sheila Bair: The crisis. Yes. We should have let at least provided more financial penalties, even if we weren’t gonna send people to jail. I think the bailouts could have been less generous.

00:08:14  I am still outraged that we let them pay bonuses at the end of 2009. So I think that was, you know, after giving ’em all this capital and then once they, you know, got the benefit of all these other programs and, you know, re stabilize themselves to enable ’em to pay that capital back so they could pay bonuses at the end of 2009 when the rest of the country was reeling in a recession. No, I think we could have been a lot tougher. So, but, you know, these things are all compromises.

00:08:40  And actually it was more with Tim Geer than Hank Pauls. And Hank and I could usually come to a common ground, and we did on issues where we started with different, different viewpoints. But yeah, I mean, I think there is a perception of some that they were kind of, the Wall Street was the center of the universe and the heartthrob of the economy, and we needed to take gender living care with it and all of that. And we need to do something.

00:09:04  I’m not suggesting we shouldn’t have provided some stabilization measures, but we didn’t have to. I think we really went overboard. And, and I do regret that, and I think people are still mad about it. I think a lot of the polarization that we have today stems from the, the perception on Main Street that not only did we bail these guys out, but we bailed them out very generously.

00:09:21  Barry Ritholtz: I, I, I couldn’t agree more. Let, let me shock listeners by saying, I think President Trump got something right, almost accidentally by taking a piece of a company like Intel. My, my big complaint during the bailouts were, Hey, if you’re gonna give these publicly traded companies a bailout and not send them to bankruptcy court, well great. Take 40% of the company Yeah.

00:09:49  And promise to sell it back to the public markets within a decade. Right. And it would’ve cut the cost of bailouts substantially and would’ve hurt existing shareholders and management who made a Yeah. Who helped create the whole disaster.

00:10:06  That’s

00:10:07  Sheila Bair: Exactly right. Yeah. No, I think that was, there was, we did a little bit of that, but not enough, because I think there was just a visceral reaction against being too tough. So

00:10:18  Barry Ritholtz: When the alternative is that those, that Hansen building down town with the tall columns and the judge who basically says, okay, you’re now in receivership. Yeah, yeah. Like, when you look at

00:10:30  Sheila Bair: The next,

00:10:31  Barry Ritholtz: I know the next best alternative is your toast. Oh, okay, we’ll give up 40% at a substantial Exactly. Discount and stay live to fight another day.

00:10:39  Sheila Bair: I, I couldn’t agree more. We were, they were looking, their baseline was what, you know, how these companies that operated before they got into trouble. And my baseline was, you know, bankruptcy was the alternative. We did, but it was uneven too.

00:10:51  So we put Fannie and Freddie into conservatorship. Right. And maybe they should have been put in bankruptcy too, but they were the, the, the statute provided for conservatorship where they still, you know, language still. So they, they got punished pretty well, and they didn’t, you know, we were still getting, well now they’re, they’re allowed to keep their capital, to build a capital base.

00:11:08  But the government’s made quite a bit of money since then from that a IG poor a IG, you know, they were, it’s my, they were effectively put conservatorship by the Fed and, and finally emerged from that. But, you know, there was an unevenness too with the way some of those entities were treated versus, for instance, a Citi group, which Right. You know, what else can we do to help you Citi group? I was, it was

00:11:30  Barry Ritholtz: For the third time. Fourth time. Yeah. Third times.

00:11:32  Yeah. Yeah. They’re like every generation, they’re back. They’re back with their hat in hands.

00:11:36  And they, again, we need a few billion. Right.

00:11:40  Sheila Bair: I’m, I’m, I’m rooting for, but you know, historically you knows that he is gonna be back.

00:11:44  Barry Ritholtz: So, so I, I’m kind of fascinated by, over the course of your car career, you have spanned three distinct cycles of deregulation. Right. So we had Graham Leach Bliley. Right.

00:12:00  Which certainly was a major factor, right. That led to the GFC. Yes. It was, we have the entire Dodd-Frank deregulation of, of the decade, the past decade, and then everything that’s Yeah.

00:12:19  Like all the carve outs and, and then most recently Yeah. Reducing the amount of net cap in reserve that Yeah. Banks have to hold that.

00:12:27  Sheila Bair: Yeah. That’s, that’s ongoing.

00:12:30  Barry Ritholtz: So, so why do we keep having these crises? Yeah. Is it structural? Is it the American political system?

00:12:35  Yeah. It seems like we’re constantly repeating these cycles over and over.

00:12:38  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Yeah. Well, we are, and deregulation was a big part of the crisis. Nobody wants to say that.

00:12:44  Or just lack of regulation. The Fed and Bernanke and Greensman of both said this. The Fed had the authority to write lending standards, mortgage lending standards for the entire industry. Problem is, most of these mortgages are being originated by non-banks.

00:12:57  Right. The banks were funding it. Right. But they were providing the, the conduit funding to get ’em obs securitizations.

00:13:02  But the Fed had the power to, to stop that and just flat out fu Oh, we don’t wanna constrain credit. If I hear that once, I think those are, you know, Warren Buffet once said the most dangerous wor words in, in finance. Everybody else is doing it. I think it’s, we’re gonna expand access to credit.

00:13:16  I swear to God, because it is used as an excuse for so many terrible, terrible, did decisions.

00:13:21  Barry Ritholtz: Didn’t Greenspan say, we don’t wanna stifle innovation in the finance markets.

00:13:26  Sheila Bair: Well, that’s, those are the interest words too, right. I don’t wanna stifle innovation either, but it’s just used as an excuse. Oh. You know, like we got, we gotta reduce capital to get more lending out there.

00:13:36  Right. When I think, I would argue there’s too much lending out there already. We’re seeing all the cockroaches screwing out now. So, so yeah.

00:13:42  So it was, and derivatives that you said, Graham Leach Bly, they broke down the, it created these two big to fail institutions. It all got bailed out, but also derivatives, their basically decision was that nobody needs to regulate derivatives markets. The, the theory was, well, the big banks were dealers, the derivatives dealers, they’re regulated by the bank regulators. So we don’t need market regulation.

00:14:01  And that did not turn out so well because the thing about the mortgage crisis was there were hundreds of billions of, of, of mortgages going bad. But there were trillions and trillions of financial engineering on top of how those mortgages would, would perform. And that’s really what got us at the end of the day. Yeah.

00:14:20  There were a lot of mortgages that never should have been made, but the system could have absorbed those underlying losses. It was, it was the derivatives on top of that that really brought things down suddenly.

00:14:30  Barry Ritholtz: So, so let’s talk a little bit about finance. The world has really gotten kind of interesting in terms of, we’re still seem to be dealing with the echoes of the financial crisis. Yeah. We’re, yeah.

00:14:48  It’s amazing. It’s almost 20 years ago. And yet things like when SVB, Silicon Valley Bank and, and Signature Bank failed in 2003, people started to get concerned about systemic risk, even though these are kind of two minor, that was not,

00:15:05  Sheila Bair: Those are not systemic. It was

00:15:07  Barry Ritholtz: Reaction Yeah. Systemically important they to financial institutions. Yeah. They, and yet, in order to cover uninsured depositors Yeah.

00:15:16  Regulators,

00:15:17  Sheila Bair: Who are the richest people? Some among the richest people in the country.

00:15:20  Barry Ritholtz: Gee, I wonder if there’s, I wonder if that’s just a total coincidence or if some upset people made some phone calls.

00:15:27  Sheila Bair: Yeah, I, I was appalled

00:15:28  Barry Ritholtz: Because if your local credit union Yeah. Goes out Yeah. And it’s, and you’re

00:15:33  Sheila Bair: Yeah. You’re, you’re taking a loss if you’re an uninsured deposit or a community bank. Yeah, you bet.

00:15:37  Barry Ritholtz: But if you’re a Silicon Valley VC and you’re connected, you, you get

00:15:41  Sheila Bair: Stable coin issuer. Yeah. It’s like somebody, the Biden administration was doing everything they could to kill crypto on one hand, and then they bail out. One of the biggest, they the biggest stable coin issuers who had, what, a couple, two and a half billion or so of uninsured deposits.

00:15:57  You’re really irresponsible on their part to put that much of their reserves in uninsured deposits. But they were bailed out. I couldn’t believe it. I wrote a very strong piece in the Financial Times after it happened.

00:16:07  I th you know, it was just this knee jerk bailout, bailout, bailout. Right. Especially if they’re rich, powerful people. I don’t, I was just, I was appalled.

00:16:15  I’m still appalled. I was, it was, it was 200 billion. It was not systemic. It had good assets.

00:16:20  If they had, they should have tried to find a, a buyer quickly

00:16:23  Barry Ritholtz: And like Washington Mutual.

00:16:25  Sheila Bair: Yeah. So, but there was, I think nobody said this, but my suspicion is there is outta this Biden administration religious adversity to, to, you know, bank mergers and acquisitions. Oh, look, we can’t make banks bigger. So instead of quickly trying to market and sell it, they didn’t do that.

00:16:42  And, but if, even if they hadn’t, if they just put it into a bridge bank, they had good assets, they probably could have paid 85 90 cents on the dollar to Didn’t

00:16:51  Barry Ritholtz: Someone else come along, buy all the assets anyway. Yeah. Well, yeah. Yeah.

00:16:55  So the merger happened regardless,

00:16:57  Sheila Bair: But, but it cost, the FDAC was 17, $18 billion the deposit insurance fund. It was, it was outrageous. I’m, I’m still aghast that that even happened. And that, you know, and you know, that annoys me with my Democrat friends who pretend that the Republicans are the ones that are pro industry and pro bail out, and then they do something like that.

00:17:17  So, go figure.

00:17:18  Barry Ritholtz: Coming up, we continue our conversation with Sheila Bear, former chairperson of the FDIC, discussing regulation and deregulation in the modern financial system. I’m Barry Ritholtz. You are listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. I am Barry Ritholtz.

00:17:50  You are listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My extra special guest today is Sheila Bear. She’s the former chair of the FDIC, which she helped steer through the financial crisis, her latest book, how Not to Lose a Million Dollars, aimed at Teenagers and helping them really understand the basics of finance. So let’s talk about something else that’s a potential issue.

00:18:15  Private credit has exploded in the past decade. It’s now over $2 trillion. And while we have all of these private, non-bank credit funds, they’re all being funded by regulated banks. Yeah.

00:18:29  Banks. Yeah. Is this just regulatory arbitrage? Yeah.

00:18:33  Sheila Bair: Well, it is in a not, but not in the way that I think the banks soundbites make it sound. So there’s, their soundbite is, is that the capital regulations are too onerous, much tougher than they are for these private funds, which is, the private funds are much less levered than banks. Right. Banks are, you know, on a, on a non-risk weighted basis, you know, bank, these big banks are operating with six 8% capital funding.

00:18:58  Right. It’s equity fund funding. So it’s not, it’s not like they’re, they have tougher capital requirements. The problem is these risk-based rules, and this is exactly what was going on in subprime two, the risk-based rules through the magic of securitization structures and quote unquote overcollateralization, you can lend to a private fund.

00:19:18  And the private fund will give you collateral. They’ll give you their loans and they’ll say they’ll be valued 150% of, of what your loan is. Right. So that you’re way over collateralized.

00:19:28  And if you do it that way, the capital rules will give you a very favorable capital treatments. You can use a lot of leverage increasing your return on equity with that by lending to the fund. If you make the loan directly to the highly levered business who the fund is lending to, you’ve got a very, very high capital charge. And so the argument is, well, you’re directly exposed to this highly levered business, so you know, you need to have it tougher than if you just lend the fund.

00:19:56  That problem is that you’re basically allowing banks to lend and fund indirectly, highly risky mortgages that they would not do or not be permitted to do, frankly, if they were doing it directly. And that’s exactly what was going on with subprime. These horrible unaffordable mortgages pedal to a lot of people who didn’t understand what they were getting. The banks were funding that through their, their were credit lines and their warehouse funding to, you know, provide the, provide the money to the originators packing about securitization and selling them.

00:20:29  And, and again, the capital refer required for that was much, much less than, than actually making a mortgage yourself and holding it. So it, it really is the same basic flaw in how the risk-based capital rules work. I would just say you can’t fund a mor a loan directly or indirectly that doesn’t meet prudent underwriting standards. ’cause what happens is the banks, from a societal standpoint, the banks are funding a lot of really risky loans that if they go bad, can have broader, bad adverse ramifications for the economy.

00:21:02  But they don’t look at it that way. And in point of fact, there are pending capital rules now that will make it even more favorable for these banks to be lending to these intermediary funds as opposed to lending directly. So that’s what’s driving this, not because banks have much tougher capital rules than, than private funds. That is not true.

00:21:20  It’s just that it’s, they can use more leverage to lend the fund directly than to lend the business

00:21:25  Barry Ritholtz: Itself. Here’s what the banks say, and I don’t necessarily believe this, but it, it, it’s not completely un unconscionable. They say when we were securitizing loans during the financial crisis, lending standards had been completely abdicated in all of these. No income check, no job check, just, yeah.

00:21:50  You know? Yeah, that’s true. Sign and pray. And then, oh, it’ll all come out in the, in the collateralization and the syndication.

00:21:57  Right. We’ll spread the risk around. Right. This is, hey, these are, we’re lending money to firms that have been in operation for 10, 20 years and names like Apollo and Carlisle and Blackstone who are trying to get a return on investment.

00:22:14  And this sounds a little familiar, you know, they would never put their reputations or their names at risk by doing anything too stupid. And besides the, the default rates have been really low and it’s highly spread out across sectors and geographies. Is that a fair argument or It,

00:22:33  Sheila Bair: It is a fair argument. And I’m not saying private credit is legitimate asset class. I I don’t, and I don’t think it’s systemic, primarily because you don’t have all this financial engineering sitting on top of it. I do think they’ve been making some really risky loans.

00:22:46  There are a lot of conflicts of interest involved since a lot of the private credit funds are affiliated with the private equity funds, they’re lending to the private equity portfolio companies. And this is a particular problem, actually. I, I’m more, I think this is an investor protection issue more than systemic issue. I really do.

00:23:03  And for sophisticated investors, I think private credit is absolutely a legitimate asset class. You know, gotta understand it’s not regulated. You don’t really know what the loans are worth. Right.

00:23:13  So there’s, there’s a big problem with getting a proper valuation on the assets. Not a lot of transparency for retail or even high wealth, high net worth individuals. There’s liquidity issue, right. The business model doesn’t really work unless most of the capital is locked in.

00:23:30  And, and frankly, there’s a re a lot of research questioning whether it really provides better returns. You know, the s and p 500 has been kicking it for, for several years now. Right. So, you know, so there, there are a lot of questions, but for sophisticated investors, you know, go forth and do it.

00:23:44  And it’s, I don’t think it’s systemic, but I do, and I do worry about these life insurance companies and the annuities because the, again, you’ve got private equity owned life insurance affiliate. You’ve got the private credit affiliate, you’ve got the life insurance affiliate lending into the private credit affiliate. You’re using these third party credit raters to make sure, you know, it’s all at arm’s length, but very incestuous. Yeah.

00:24:08  And that the BIS did a study about a year ago on this. And there others have taken a look at these valuations and they’re finding significant evidence of inflated values. So I, I do think we need to protect at the retail level. We need to, there need to be some not expanding access to this.

00:24:25  Barry Ritholtz: So you’re not a fan of private equity or private debt in 4 0 1 Ks? No,

00:24:30  Sheila Bair: I am not. As a matter of fact, I am not. You know what, if you wanna, there’s a pub, you, you wanna buy a stock in KKR, go for it. You know, you might check how it’s been forming.

00:24:38  I an actual, I don’t know how it’s been performing, but I’m just saying there are pub, if you really want exposure, there are, you know, publicly traded away BDCs. Now sure, there are publicly traded BDCs, there are public ways to do it. There are some funds, 40 ACT funds that do invest a small percentage in alternatives too. So there, there are ways now, but yeah, opening it up for, directly for retail, especially 4 0 1 Ks, to, to start, you know, loading up on this, on this asset class, I think is really problematic.

00:25:07  And I do worry that, you know, the, the, the, the plan sponsors, the fund sponsors, the 401k sponsors are gonna be getting the hard sell about, you know, putting this stuff into people’s 4 0 1 Ks. And I, and I, again, I don’t think retail, I know I don’t, I I don’t want exposure to it. I’ve read enough to make me really worried about it. So I think really sophisticated big institutions, which have traditionally been their investor base, they wanna do it fine, but no, it’s not right for retail.

00:25:35  And it, it shouldn’t be going into 4 0 1 Ks and I’m, yeah, I’m very worried about that.

00:25:39  Barry Ritholtz: And, and to put some numbers on what you had referenced about the performance, the median alternative funds doesn’t do all that great. No. Doesn’t, it’s not that diversified. No.

00:25:52  And it doesn’t outperform the s and p 500. Hey, if you’re lucky enough to get into a top decile fund Exactly. You, you’re gonna kill it. But it’s gonna take a couple hundred million dollars

00:26:03  Sheila Bair: Yes, exactly. To have access to that. Yeah. That’s, yeah.

00:26:05  The retail people are not gonna be getting the criminal LA crim on this. No, that’s, and that’s a huge issue. They’re gonna stuff the, the riskier stuff into the 401k.

00:26:13  Barry Ritholtz: It makes a lot of sense. So, so we’ve talked about everything, but too big to fail. Right. Which was a big part of the lead up to the financial crisis and how the fed, the FDIC, everybody dealt with it afterwards.

00:26:30  As an example, JP Morgan Chase now has over 4 trillion with a t Yeah. In assets. Can a bank that size be effectively regulated? Is is too big to fail the norm now?

00:26:44  Sheila Bair: Oh, I think so. It absolutely is. I mean, I, I worked hard in Dodd-Frank to come up with res, you know, to instill more, better authorities to put these large institutions into a resolution type process where you would impose that accountability. You could fire the top management, the boards and impose, you know, make the shareholders and bond holders unsecured creditors absorb the losses.

00:27:07  All the stuff we didn’t do during the crisis.

00:27:09  Barry Ritholtz: You mean normal bankruptcy rules?

00:27:11  Sheila Bair: Yeah, exactly. Yeah. It was, it was similar to the FDIC process, which is basically a bankruptcy process. And, and Title two, and Dodd-Frank, excuse Dodd-Frank provides for both the Title two mechanism, which is FDIC run and a bankruptcy process, a Title one process.

00:27:25  So the tools are there, but I don’t, I don’t think there’s any, I i I, I hate to say this, but I don’t think there’s any chance they’d ever use it. I really don’t. I think they’re gonna bail out again. They already, they already do.

00:27:36  They’ll, they’ll set up special lending facilities or ratchet interest rates down. You know, they’ll, if, if, you know, private equity, so actually I worry more about private equity than private credit because private equity funds are heavily exposed to software companies, which we don’t know how that’s gonna shake out. But there’s a quite a bit of concentration there is. So, you know, so, but if that sector gets into trouble, you know, the Fed will lend to the banks who can then lend the funds.

00:28:01  I mean, that’s, that’s just the way I think it works now. And I think a lot of the push for ev ever more deregulation, lower capital rules, is based on the assumption of the big bank lobbyist that they’re never gonna go down. There’s another kerfuffle, another problem. The fed’s just gonna open up the spigot again.

00:28:18  So, you know, why should they have to operate with all this capital when they can lower their capital and get much higher returns on equity? And I do think that’s, that’s the unspoken rationale, because it doesn’t make any sense otherwise. Because we’ve got a lot of uncertainties in the banking system right now to be lowering capital. Makes no sense.

00:28:37  Unless you’re just banking on a bailout if things get dicey.

00:28:40  Barry Ritholtz: Let, let’s talk about a financial crisis that really has gotten a lot of short shrift, given everything else we just discussed, which is the student debt crisis. Yeah. Yeah. We’ve seen just an explosion of student loans.

00:28:57  It was briefly and defaults, it was briefly put on pause during the pandemic. And right afterwards. I just saw a survey earlier today that said 83% of young people say this is a bad economy when by most historical measures, it’s a booming economy. Yeah.

00:29:18  Yeah. So, so how did we get here? Why is it so difficult to fix? What is a potential policy?

00:29:28  Solution to Yeah. The student debt crisis?

00:29:30  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, and I do, I think the headline numbers are, in this case shaped economy. I think the headline numbers can be, can be misleading. ’cause you gotta look at how, how that wealth is being distributed, of course.

00:29:39  But I think for student debt, I, I will give credit to the Trump administration in Congress. The, the BBB, the big beautiful bill, I hate that name, but it had some really important reforms to the student loan system. So they’ve dramatically simplified the repayment options. There’s now a standard plan and a one income based repayment plan.

00:29:59  They have imposed some accountability on colleges, which desperately needed to be done. And so it’s easy to kick colleges now with high default rates out of the, out of the loan system. They have gotten rid of negative amortizations. One of the, one of the frustrating things about student loan borrowers was that because in previous administrations, the repayment plans that were based on a percentage of your income were set so low that people were even, some of ’em were not, were paying zero because you had to earn a certain amount of money before, you know, a loan payment obligation even kicked in.

00:30:33  But what happened was, then they, for bookkeeping purposes or whatever, they would negatively amortize the loan. So all your unpaid interest was going into your debt principle and it was getting bigger and bigger. Just

00:30:43  Barry Ritholtz: Recapitalized.

00:30:44  Sheila Bair: Yeah, yeah. Forever. So even if you were, if even if you were making some payment, your got frustrated ’cause your debt was getting bigger and bigger. That’s all gone away with.

00:30:52  Now negative amortization has been abolished. Everybody has to pay at least $10 a month. I don’t think that’s unreasonable. If you got a loan from taxpayers, even if you’re struggling, you can pay $10 a month.

00:31:04  And then there’s, and then, so if you, and if that payment is so low, if you income driven payment is so low that you’re not covering your interest, the government will pay $50 a month to lower your principal. So, so long as you’re making at least $10 a month, your principal will go down each month. And I think this will be, it’s simpler and will provide better incentives to keep, make loan payments, keep up the loan payments, you’ll actually be able to see the principal going down. So I give credit, and in full disclosure, my son, who’s a fellow at the a EI was, was also heavily involved in this.

00:31:40  So he’s a chip off the old block though. We think a lot when it comes to student. Yeah. Simplification, more accountability.

00:31:47  And those are the things that this bill accomplished. So I’m, I’m hoping that this gets straightened up and people are having to pay now. But the transition to going from not paying for years, you know, and Trump did that too. We had this, what, three or four year long moratorium people are gonna have to pay now, it’s gonna hurt.

00:32:04  They haven’t made room in their budget for these lump

00:32:06  Barry Ritholtz: Payments. Well, $10 a month isn’t, isn’t,

00:32:08  Sheila Bair: It’s not huge. No, it’s

00:32:09  Barry Ritholtz: Not. Right. And if the government is kicking in 50, yeah. I mean, it’s not a ton of money, but it’s, no, it’s not, it’s not still, what, $600 a year?

00:32:16  Yeah. Yeah. Have we done enough to resolve the student debt crisis or no? What, what else can we do to move this along?

00:32:25  Yeah.

00:32:25  Sheila Bair: Well, I I do think there needs to be more accountability for colleges to assume some belong The schools themselves. Yes. The colleges themselves, because this is, this was, it was the classic misaligned economic incentives. So with the best of intentions, the Congress said, okay, and from now on, all the student loans can be made.

00:32:44  You know, pretty much all of ’em are gonna be made by the government. ’cause we’re worried the banks are not treating borrowers as well as they should. So we’re gonna be doing this. And then the, the colleges themselves will basically originate the loans.

00:32:56  So you apply to a college, and the college financial aid office will come up with a financial aid package, and they will calculate how much you need to borrow to go to their school. Well now what are their incentives? You know, they’re gonna get the money, right. Buying for a tuition room and board.

00:33:10  So they’re, they’re gonna get the money. They’re not on the hook if the student can’t repay the loan. So what do you think is gonna happen? And, and the the what happened exactly is you, you could have predicted it, inflation, you know, with tuition, you know, many multiples, what, you know,

00:33:26  Barry Ritholtz: 9% a year for 40 years, 50

00:33:28  Sheila Bair: Years for, for whatever. Yeah. So it’s crazy. Tuition is, as any parent knows or student knows, this skyrocketed become very unaffordable without borrowing.

00:33:37  And, but, you know, there was all this easy money. And the grad, the undergraduate is problem with the graduate schools. You know, a lot of young people then sold a bill of goods to get a master’s or a PhD because they’re unlike undergraduate loans. There is some caps on your federal loans, but no effective caps.

00:33:52  That’s been changed now too. There are some caps, thank goodness, on your graduate professional schools, you know, so somebody like me, oh, I’m gonna go get a PhD in philosophy so I can teach. Right? So I paid $300,000 to get my PhD in philosophy and get a job maybe paying 60,000 a year, some small college.

00:34:09  Well, that makes sense. But I think that’s happened to a lot of people. And, and I don’t think, you know, I don’t absolve the borrower either. They should have known better.

00:34:20  But the schools let this happen. These, these graduate professional schools can be real money makers. They are, the graduate schools in particular, real money makers for colleges. And the degrees are frequently do not enhance the earnings potential of the student.

00:34:32  Barry Ritholtz: So do you have any hope that students are, are in a better shape financially going forward? Or is this still very problematic and needs

00:34:41  Sheila Bair: More help? I know, I think things are getting better. And a lot of it is something else that Trump, the first Trump administration did, which Biden continues. And the, and the current Trump administration continues, is to publish postgraduate outcomes.

00:34:53  So you can go on college scoreboard now and put in a college and a degree that you may be thinking about it. And you can see what the graduates are actually making. And you can find out the graduation rate, you can find out the retention rate, you can find out all sorts of information that will tell you is that college graduating students and are they getting job good jobs after they leave? And so I think more and more parents and student advisors, high school, college advisors are using those tools are more calculators too, that are based on help you figure out how much you can borrow based on what your postgraduate income will likely be in that field at that college.

00:35:31  So there is more awareness. And then I think a lot of, you know, ironically this is coming back to buy a lot of the colleges now, because I think it got so expensive. People were starting to take a second look, well, do I really need to go to college? You know, for so long there was all this social pressure to go to college.

00:35:47  I was a college president. I’ve taught a university. I think it’s a wonderful experience, but it’s not for everybody. And you don’t have to do it.

00:35:53  And there’s no stigma if you don’t do it. You know, you might wanna go directly into the workforce, learn on the job, you might wanna go to a, a trade school. There are, you know, community colleges, you gotta be careful there too. But many of them provide really good, you know, education that’s less expensive and a shorter duration.

00:36:10  So I think students in their parents are also thinking more broadly that they don’t have to go to college. There may be other options available.

00:36:16  Barry Ritholtz: La last question about college and education. We have thousands and thousands of, of universities and colleges. Do we have too many? Too

00:36:28  Sheila Bair: Many? Yeah,

00:36:29  Barry Ritholtz: Probably do. I mean, are we gonna lose 10 or 20% of the college base over the next decade? Yeah,

00:36:35  Sheila Bair: We probably will. And I think the, the, the, the, the, the, the part of it that’s really, really struggling are the private liberal arts schools. And they, they became too pricey. And I, I think that’s sad because I used to be the president of one of those colleges and I think they do offer very special educational experience.

00:36:54  A very, you know, it’s, it’s, it’s more high touch. It’s more, you know, for some, you know, going to college when you’re 17, 18 years old can be pretty traumatic. You’ve never been away from home, you know, and so, so some students that small intimate college environment was a good option, but they’re really struggling now. And so I think we’ll still have them, but I think there’ll be a lot of consolidation there.

00:37:13  Hmm. And then it’s the weaker schools, you know, if they, they’re not proving their worth, they’re gonna, they’re gonna close probably, huh.

00:37:18  Barry Ritholtz: Yeah. Really, really fascinating. So you went from writing a crisis memoir for adults to totally the opposite direction, basic financial literacy for children. What made you decide to aim in between at yeah.

00:37:35  Young adults and teenagers? Yeah.

00:37:37  Sheila Bair: Well actually it was my editor who, you know, everybody, when I first started running the, the picture books, everybody said, oh, this is too, you know, elementary school children are too young for this. And they’re not, they absolutely. And the books have sold well, and, and they, they totally get it. But my, my publisher, everybody said, you need to write a book for teenagers.

00:37:54  And my publisher thought that was a good idea as well. And so I thought about it and I thought, yeah, because, you know, there’s more and more financial education being required in high schools. And I, I want, I’m concerned that as schools start offering these courses, that there’s, you know, good quality, accurate content. There’s a lot of people out there providing financial, you know, a lot of people on social media, a lot of curricula, you know, sponsored by industry groups.

00:38:19  And so I thought, well, you know, I’m gonna, I’m gonna throw my hat in here to try to provide some basic financial advice to teenagers as they’re entering adulthood. So that’s, that was the, I will have to say my, my publisher’s initiative, but I think it was a good idea and I’m pleased with the way they came book came out.

00:38:35  Barry Ritholtz: So, so I’m glad you brought up social media. Yeah. Gen Z and what’s the new generation after them? Generation Alpha.

00:38:43  Yeah. I, I can’t get someones generation. Jones is another one. I can’t keep up with it.

00:38:48  But they all seem to get a lot of financial advice from Instagram and YouTube. Yeah. And TikTok. Yeah.

00:38:55  Rather than, let’s say, more professional experienced folks. Right. How did that impact how you thought about reaching this age group and, and how did it shape the tone of, of your book? Yeah,

00:39:11  Sheila Bair: So it was, I did wanna get some accurate information out there because there’s, and a a, a big theme of this book is, you know, I say in the introduction, building wealth is not hard. You need to establish a regular saving investing habit. You need to avoid debt. That’s really what you need to do.

00:39:29  And, and, but there’s so much advice that’s just the opposite. And especially on social media, it pushes debt. You know, well, why bother with a nice safe index fund? You can go borrow some money and buy a rental property and make way, you know, way more returns than No, no, no, no.

00:39:45  So, but there’s crazy stuff like that or, or borrowing to invest in crypto or mim stocks or, you know, gambling, you know, and their kids are getting confused about the difference between gambling and investing. They’re very different things. So I wanted to, to provide some correctives to that. And then just basically also address and flag common financial behaviors that cost people money.

00:40:07  Like carrying a credit card balance that I’m very open in my first chapter about my, I totally got in trouble with credit card debt. I was just, just graduated from law school. I was a civil rights lawyer, then. Didn’t know anything about finance, didn’t care, thought it was beneath me.

00:40:22  I needed to, you know, buy some clothes for work. I needed to get a, an apartment and furnish my apartment as I was getting all these solicitations from various credit card issuers who had found out that I was now, you know, working for a living somehow. So yeah, I got in trouble with credit card debt and I made that minimum payment and I thought, wow, this is great. I can borrow this money and it, this tiny little payment every month.

00:40:43  And I ended up, I think it was about $6,000 in interest when all of a sudden done,

00:40:46  Barry Ritholtz: Oh my god, that’s a lot. Well,

00:40:48  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Which if it invest in the s and p 500, it would be worth around 240, 200 $50,000 now. So there you go. So, but I think, you know, just avoiding things like that, the average family pays 1600 a year in credit card interest.

00:41:01  If that was just put into an s and p 500 index fund, boy, you know, over 30 or 40 years, that’s, you’re talking real money, huh. So that was, I I wanted to emphasize that is the simplicity of, of how to build wealth compounding opportunity costs are big themes. Those are, I think those are so fundamental to understanding how to manage money. And, but I basically, I just wanna help kids avoid mistakes.

00:41:23  I don’t want them to have financial problems when they grow up. I want them to get off on a, on the good, on the right foot, which I did not, and a lot of people don’t.

00:41:29  Barry Ritholtz: Coming up, we continue our conversation with Sheila Bear discussing her latest book, how Not to Lose a Million Dollars, A Young Person’s Guide to Avoiding the Tricks and Traps of Our Financial System. I’m Barry Ritholtz, you’re listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. I am Barry Ritholtz. You are listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

00:42:12  My extra special guest this week is Sheila Bear. She is the former chair of the FDIC. Her latest book is out How Not to Lose a Million Dollars, A Young Person’s Guide to Avoiding the Tricks and Traps of our Financial System. So, so you mentioned a couple of really interesting things that taken together.

00:42:34  Howard Linson runs a venture fund and he calls it the degenerate economy. Gambling speculation. Yeah, yeah. End of day options.

00:42:43  Mean stocks, crypto coins. Yeah. And all of these have been through, through apps and other Yes. Methods, yes.

00:42:51  Because of the phones have been adopted by teenagers en mass. What do you make of the DGen economy and what does it mean to the future health of, of these young adults? Yeah.

00:43:04  Sheila Bair: Well, it’s very dangerous and it’s particularly a problem with young boys. And oh, by the way, they shouldn’t be doing this if they’re under 18, but a lot of ’em, ours, we know they’re targeted and they, they don’t understand the, the worth of money. The, the apps just make it so easy and don’t, you know, they don’t make the connection between the financial losses they’re experiencing. It’s a game for them.

00:43:24  And, and the industry advertises. They, they do gamify it. So, and even, you know, stock trading, some of these online brokers are big ones. They, they gamify it and it’s not a game.

00:43:34  It’s, it’s serious money. Serious. And I think one of the things from early on, if parents give their children allowances, but tie that to work, I think it’s really important for kids to understand early on the connection between work and money. It’s not just free, easy, you know, ’cause too many kids don’t make that connection and their parents are generous with the credit cards or whatever.

00:43:56  And, and they use their credit card numbers to do all these gaming apps. And, and I just don’t think it, the reality of what these kids are doing actually sinks in until they’re really in over their head. And I think it’s purposeful. I think, you know, kids don’t understand the difference between gambling and investing.

00:44:13  Well, there’s a big difference. And you’re investing, you’re supporting capital formation and the real economy helping businesses who make real goods and real services raise money and operate or supporting the secondary market that enables all of that. And what are you supporting with gambling or crypto? I mean, some crypto to the extent it, it represents the technology, I think crypto technology is, is very valuable.

00:44:36  But these, these, these, you know, these different currencies and tokens that have nothing

00:44:41  Barry Ritholtz: Behind them, you can call ’em shit coins.

00:44:42  Sheila Bair: That’s what they’re, how I call ’em shit coins. ’cause that’s, that’s nothing behind them. I’m amazed that Bitcoin is held up. I think it’s just, you know, it’s kind of the, the granddaddy of ’em all.

00:44:50  So if you’re gonna invest, most people do a Bitcoin ’cause they’ve, they’ve heard about it and the rest of it is crap. But Bitcoin may be too, but it has lasted. I will give it that. But yeah, I mean, what are they supporting?

00:45:02  And they’re losing money. You know, there’s a, there was a study done of gambling apps that showed that the people that use gambling apps, only 5% take out more money than they put in. And it’s addictive in these, these gambling platforms. If these, even if you start winning, well wow.

00:45:18  Oh, you’re doing great. Here’s a little money, why don’t you keep going? You know, they want you to keep going until you start losing money. ’cause the yard are, you will always lose money.

00:45:25  And Bloomberg came out with some great research recently on prediction markets. 75% of the profits, I believe are going to 1%

00:45:32  Barry Ritholtz: Of the users. Less than 1%. Yeah. Less than 1%.

00:45:34  It’s crazy. It’s so less money.

00:45:36  Sheila Bair: The whole game is rigged. Well, even active trading of stocks, very few people can do that and make, make money consistently

00:45:42  Barry Ritholtz: Over time.

00:45:42  Sheila Bair: Yeah. And you’re gonna be going against people who do it for a living, have a lot more access to data and expertise and, you know, algorithms and all the things, all the tools you’ll not have when you try to actively trade

00:45:53  Barry Ritholtz: Stocks. So, so this is kind of fascinating. I bet most people don’t know how much of a passion project this has been for you so long. I’m not, did I read this correctly?

00:46:04  You established the financial education division within the Treasury department early. I did

00:46:08  Sheila Bair: The Office of Financial thousand early education early in 2001. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Well I did, I still, I established the Office of Financial Education and it’s grown now. It’s in the treasurer’s office now.

00:46:17  And I think they held, they held, they held a group, it’s called fl and it’s basically a, a council of all the different financial education components of the various different regulatory agencies. And it’s a good group. Yeah, I did start it. That’s, that’s one of the things that got me interested in I, and actually my first book I was, was pre-crisis, was Rock.

00:46:37  Rock and the Saving Shock. It actually came out in 2006 because based on that experience, it inspired me to start writing kids books. ’cause I became aware that there really weren’t any resources for elementary age schools.

00:46:48  Barry Ritholtz: So, so how not to lose a million dollars covers basics like savings accounts, right. Student loans, debt avoidance. Right. And retirement planning it.

00:46:55  Yep. It kind of raises a question, why aren’t we teaching our kids financial fundamentals at the grade school level? Yeah. Why, why is this not just part of civics and Yeah.

00:47:07  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well it can and should be. I mean, I, I think there’s a big movement now to have a standalone high school personal finance class. But I think is good.

00:47:16  But it really, it needs to be more than that. It needs to be, every year it needs to be introduced. And, you know, math curriculum is an, an obvious place. ’cause I think it makes ma it will make math more interesting to kids if you do use money examples, right?

00:47:29  So you wanna learn about ratios and percentages. Let’s talk about compounding and how much your money grows at four percents a year, whatever. So it, it does need to be introduced every year. And, and again, that’s one of the reasons my books are, I mean there’s supplements to curricula.

00:47:44  I don’t write educational curricula, but there’s certainly could be assigned readings to go with those, those classroom efforts. And I think that’s important and the kids get it. They’re interested in it. They absolutely get it.

00:47:54  They’re not too

00:47:55  Barry Ritholtz: Young. One of my favorite parts of the BBB was the new newborn accounts. Oh,

00:48:03  Sheila Bair: It’s Trump accounts.

00:48:04  Barry Ritholtz: Yeah. The baby bonds, which Corey Booker started talking about, drawing a blank on the name of the venture capitalist who suggested something like this years ago. But it’s only a thousand dollars to every newborn in an investment account. Yeah.

00:48:18  Yeah. I Is this a good start? Is this gonna help kids learn about money? Yeah.

00:48:23  Yeah.

00:48:24  Sheila Bair: It absolutely is. It’s, I think, you know, it’s only for, there’s a three year period where children are born within this three year period we’ll get the thousand dollars. But it, it can be matched by employers. A lot of employers who

00:48:36  Barry Ritholtz: We’re hearing already, Dell and JP Morgan and a bunch of big employers. And they’ll do a a thousand dollars match. Exactly. And the assumption is this’ll be renewed after three years.

00:48:46  Sheila Bair: I, I hope so. I hope it is. I’m, you know, I’m kind of a fiscal conservative when it comes to our deficits, but I think this is a good way to spend the money. ’cause it goes directly, you know where it’s going.

00:48:56  You know, it’s helping. And it is, it’s a wonderful way to learn about the power of compounding. Congress mandated the, the money has to be invested in broad based index funds, which is good. Right.

00:49:06  I, you know, or we’d be seeing crypto and mim so, or whatever, right. So that’s, that’s good. But you can see over time how it’ll grow. And I hope, you know, when they’re 18 they can, they can take it out.

00:49:15  But I hope they leave it there and it just converts into a regular, i a at that point. But it’s, it’s great. It’s a wonderful financial educational tool as well as some additional financial security for low income families and their children.

00:49:27  Barry Ritholtz: So let, let’s talk about another aspect of money that’s so different today than it was when we were kids. Money is effectively invisible. Yeah. Credit cards, apps, buy now, pay later, subscriptions, all that.

00:49:42  There, there have been studies that have shown that if you give people a pile of cash to spend or a credit card loaded with the same amount, they spend more with the credit card than with actually paying, you know, greenbacks, which says a lot about the psychology of, you know, modern spending. It does. Yeah. So, so how do you, how do we recognize that and how do we teach kids the value of a dollar?

00:50:10  It’s, it’s, it’s really a challenge when you, you just tap the card and it’s magic.

00:50:15  Sheila Bair: It’s, it’s not real money. It’s funny money. Yeah. Well that’s what, you know, I think it’s important to attach an allowance to jobs.

00:50:23  I think helping kids make the connection between having to work and earning money is really, really important. ’cause the parents are too generous. They let ’em use their credit card. So that’s, they start getting that easy usage.

00:50:33  And if they’re using their parents’ credit card, they’re not having to, it’s not causing them any pain to spend money. So I think the parents can control a lot of this, but the, the kids need to understand the connection between earning money and spending money. And if they make that connection, they will be more judicious and careful with their money because they realize how dear it is because it took that $10, took an hour of their life, raking leaves or whatever, you know. So I, I think it’s, it’s important to make that connection and financial education understanding.

00:51:03  You know, I have a chapter on, I spend a lot of time on credit cards. ’cause I think it is a, an early trap for a lot of families and a lot of kids because it’s just so easy. And bnm PL is the same thing. B-M-P-L-I don’t like it.

00:51:15  Barry Ritholtz: Buy now, pay later,

00:51:16  Sheila Bair: Buy now, pay later. The whole idea is to facilitate impulse buying. Let’s face it, you know, you’re using BMPL when it’s really beyond your budget to buy. You weren’t thinking about buying it.

00:51:25  You don’t really have the money now to buy it, but you really want it. And that’s what BNPL does. And they’re, you know, BNPL users a, a very high percentage of them. You know, first of all it’s not interest free ’cause it ends up going on your credit card ’cause you can’t pay it off.

00:51:38  So you’re just carrying the balance on your credit card or it’s coming outta your checking account and you overdraft and you get an overdraft fee. So it’s not really, they say it’s interest rate, it’s not for a lot of users’, it’s not really, it gets them in a financial

00:51:50  Barry Ritholtz: Trouble. When we were kids it was called layaway lay. That’s right. And you didn’t get the good or item, I tell you until you paid it off.

00:51:57  And you very much understood. Yeah, I gotta shovel more, more sidewalks or, or mom more lawns Yeah. If I want that bike or whatever it happened to be. Exactly.

00:52:08  Yeah. It, it was, this is the opposite lesson.

00:52:10  Sheila Bair: It is. It, it totally is. And I, you know, so I think it feeds a lot of overspending. I think impulse, I, you know, kids are making decisions and decisions more impulsively.

00:52:21  I mean, they don’t have the same impulse control adults have. And, and I think you know it, people know that, retailers know that. Commercial entities know that. So they, they try to encourage them to make snap decisions to, to buy something.

00:52:35  And it just, it’s so important. I, I have a rule, wait a week when my chapter I’m budgeting about buying things. Just wait a week. You know, there’s some things you have to buy your needs, like your rent or whatever.

00:52:44  Right? But if, if it’s your wants, first of all, don’t buy any want that’s not within your budget. And even if you do wait a week, you know, just don’t buy it on impulse. Wait a week, come back to it.

00:52:54  You really wanna, or not? When I go into grade schools and do readings, I, my common question is, raise your hand if you’ve ever bought something you wish you hadn’t bought. Every hand goes up. Every hand goes up.

00:53:05  Yeah. Every hand goes up. It’s amazing. Yeah.

00:53:07  Already, you know, at seven years old, they, they’ve got buyer’s remorse. It’s usually junkie toys. What,

00:53:11  Barry Ritholtz: What I, speaking of junkie toys, when there’s a car I fixate on. My little hack is I’ll buy one of the die cast models and put it on my shelf. So for 60 bucks, I like, alright. I feel like, all right.

00:53:27  I, I have a little experience in this car. Yeah. And after a few weeks, it’s like, all I have the toy, I’m good. I don’t need to spend a hundred thousand dollars on another stupid thing for the garage.

00:53:38  Well,

00:53:38  Sheila Bair: That’s right. There’s a, there’s, there’s a chapter on buying a car too. I just bought a by a, I just bought a car, actually, a used car. I didn’t wanna, they, they proceed so fast, it’s gonna be second car.

00:53:47  But this, this, I couldn’t believe it. I mean, I knew this, I’ve had experience in the past. It’s been a while since I bought a car. He was trying to upsell me with everything.

00:53:54  And now they’re trying to sell me, give me all these service contracts. So would increase the price of the car by about 25%. It’s just, it’s just unbelievable. They’re, you know, kids wanna buy cars.

00:54:04  They want their own cars. That is such,

00:54:05  Barry Ritholtz: Such erritory. I I don’t think that’s true anymore. Anymore.

00:54:08  Sheila Bair: Maybe not,

00:54:09  Barry Ritholtz: Not a lot. A lot of kids aren’t getting licenses. They can uber wherever on mom’s urban. I think that’s true.

00:54:14  Yeah. Right. And it, it’s, there seem, although there is a renaissance of kids buying, let’s call ’em 20-year-old analog as opposed to digital cars with stick, with stick shifts, really. Like there’s a whole generation of new car enthusiast coming up.

00:54:34  Yeah. That I, I think a stick shift today is an anti-theft device because, you know, nobody knows how to drive. You bring it to a valet, they look at you, you go to a restaurant, they’re like, would you mind pulling it in over there? Yeah.

00:54:46  Okay. Nice.

00:54:47  Sheila Bair: That’s funny. But it’s really true. It, and it’s good because, you know, cars are expensive. The average monthly payments, well, like 700 a month, you know, for a young boy party,

00:54:56  Barry Ritholtz: It’s a thousand dollars a month is not uncommon on a lease. Yeah.

00:55:00  Sheila Bair: Well

00:55:00  Barry Ritholtz: Lease. And kids don’t understand why, Hey, no down payment. Yeah. Well, yeah.

00:55:05  But no, no residual at the end, you have the back. Right. It’s just the cost.

00:55:10  Sheila Bair: It’s exactly right. Yeah. So it, yeah. It’s really expensive for in person to buy a car if they can avoid that.

00:55:15  Barry Ritholtz: So, so I only have you for a few more minutes. Yeah. So let me jump to my favorite questions. I ask all my guests.

00:55:22  Starting with, tell us about your mentors who helped shape this Yeah. Career you’ve enjoyed through academia, finance, and government. Yeah.

00:55:31  Sheila Bair: Well, Bob Dole obviously stands out. He was really, he, he really taught me what public service meant. And he was always focused on the public interest. He was a populist in the good sense.

00:55:42  You know, he was from a small rural town in, in Kansas. He was horribly injured during World War ii. Laid up for years. The townspeople rallied, supported him, got him back to health.

00:55:52  Helped him become who he became. So he was really, he really focused on, on the public. And I learned that. And I think later in my career and at the FDIC, we, we kept that focus on the public, the people who are using the banks, not the banks.

00:56:06  Who are we helping? Were we helping the people who use banks? So I, I’m proud of that. And I learned a lot from him.

00:56:12  You know, later I got to know Paul Volker. I learned a lot from him. I, Paul Paul. Yeah, that’s right.

00:56:19  Elizabeth Dole was someone, I never really had a chance to work with her, but I knew her through, through the Senator Bob and had maintained contact with her over years. Another woman who inspired me, not a mentor, but Senator d O’Connor, the first woman, Supreme Court Justice, when I was on the Judiciary committee, I got to handle her confirmation. And she was just a lovely person. So a lot of people I’ve met over the years, but Dole really stands out as, as my, my prime supporter and, and mentor in my career.

00:56:48  Hmm. Yeah.

00:56:49  Barry Ritholtz: Let, let’s talk about books. What are you reading now? What are some of your favorites? Yeah,

00:56:53  Sheila Bair: So I love murder mysteries. I’m reading Anthony Horowitz’s new book, A Deadly Episode. I mean, if we an know Anthony Horowitz, he’s a British mystery brother. I

00:57:02  Barry Ritholtz: Know the name. Yeah. My wife is a fan of those. So she, yeah.

00:57:05  Sheila Bair: Well, she burns through those. Yeah. He’s quite prolific. Yeah.

00:57:07  Right. He, he was the young, he, he was actually chosen by the Ian Fleming estate to continue writing. He’s written two. They’re really good.

00:57:14  Yeah. I actually like

00:57:16  Barry Ritholtz: Tofl owned by Amazon.

00:57:19  Sheila Bair: That’s right. That’s right. So, so yeah. And then I’m reading John Hershey’s Hiroshima.

00:57:25  My family and I are going to Japan at the end of the month. And I wanted to, I’m dying to go take them. Yeah. Yeah.

00:57:29  And I, the kids kind of bought, I said, we’re gonna go to Hiroshima. ’cause I think that’s an important part of history. You need to, we need to see this and, and understand it. And I read Hiroshima when I was young, you know, probably, you know, high school.

00:57:41  Right. I think when it came out and, and it had such an impact on me in so media again. And it still has an impact on me. And especially everything going on in the world now.

00:57:49  And other countries, even Japan talking about wanting to have a nuclear capability because things just don’t seem very unsettled on that score right now. So that’s, those are my two. I usually have two books going. One nonfiction and one fiction.

00:58:02  Barry Ritholtz: So yeah. So I’m gonna recommend a book to you. Okay. It’s just really kind of fascinating.

00:58:06  An American who’s a professor somewhere in, in the uk, Brian Klaus with two As. And the book is called Fluke. And the book starts with this story of a young couple honeymooning in Kyoto. Later in life, the husband becomes the head of the war department.

00:58:29  And when we have to figure out where to drop the abo, he absolutely vetoes Kyoto And Hiroshima is what gets, is what gets true because this couple went there for a honeymoon. Oh, that’s really interesting. That country, that city is spared. And then it wasn’t supposed to be Nagasaki, it was in, I don’t remember what city it was, but there was cloud cover and they couldn’t, back then you were doing visual reads.

00:58:59  Right. You couldn’t see. So they went to the secondary target. Yeah.

00:59:03  And so think about, talk about flukes. Yeah. How random things are. Yeah.

00:59:08  So Hiroshima gets it because somebody went there on a honeymoon.

00:59:12  Sheila Bair: On a honeymoon. Just crazy. Well, and now you look back and why did any city get it? Couldn’t you drop it over the ocean or something?

00:59:17  You wanna make a point? I mean, really. I don’t, it’s hard for me, me to understand now. I know.

00:59:22  And that’s just, you know, we are not there at the time. There was a lot of

00:59:26  Barry Ritholtz: The psychology during

00:59:27  Sheila Bair: War time. Yeah. So different. And the Japanese had been, everybody had been horrible, but the Japanese had done some brutal things.

00:59:33  Well, for

00:59:33  Barry Ritholtz: Centuries.

00:59:34  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, okay. All right. Speak

00:59:35  Barry Ritholtz: To speak to China. Korea. Not I’m, no, no. I’m a big fan of Japan.

00:59:42  Yeah. But no, but they were quite a, they in China Ruthless Empire

00:59:45  Sheila Bair: For a long time. Yeah. Yeah. So there was a lot of, so I understand that.

00:59:49  And I think, well, maybe the horror of it when, you know, and the, and I think that’s why John Hershey’s book was so important. ’cause it really underscored the horror of it. But maybe because people then understood how horrible it was, it made it even less likely every anybody would ever use it again. I’m gonna, I’m gonna rationalize it that way.

01:00:05  But it is hard. You know, you look back and, oh my gosh, did we really have to do that to people? Because it was, it was not just the people who probably were killed immediately were the lucky ones. Oh yeah.

01:00:14  The radiation sickness after the horrors

01:00:17  Barry Ritholtz: Slow up. I think I signed that same book in, in high school and

01:00:20  Sheila Bair: Everybody read it. Yeah.

01:00:21  Barry Ritholtz: And plowed through it. And it was just,

01:00:23  Sheila Bair: It was, yeah. No, it’s very well written. It was. Yeah.

01:00:26  Barry Ritholtz: Let, let’s shift to, are you streaming anything these days? You listen to any podcasts? I don’t. Or watching anything.

01:00:31  Yeah.

01:00:32  Sheila Bair: I don’t stream or podcasts that much. I get podcaster, I like to read transcripts of podcasts ’cause I can read a lot Faster. Faster. That’s what I can listen

01:00:39  Barry Ritholtz: Faster. Yeah. How, how about Netflix or HBO or anything like that? Yeah.

01:00:42  Sheila Bair: You know, again, I’m, I’m, you know, one note on this murder, BBC, I’m there, you know, I love the murder mystery box box. Yeah. The, all the, all the agathe IES I’ve seen in the, the David Che prose are by far the best. Foils war was great.

01:00:58  Also, Anthony Horowitz, the, he did a, the, the,

01:01:02  Barry Ritholtz: They made it into a series or a movie.

01:01:05  Sheila Bair: Which one? The Foils War. Foils of War. Foils War.

01:01:07  Actually, that was, that was a TV series. It wasn’t a book. That was one of the few things. But it’s, it’s, it’s, it’s really good.

01:01:13  I like the, the Morse. You know, have you ever watched Morse Inspector Morse? No. That’s, that’s so famous.

01:01:19  Sounds me familiar. It

01:01:20  Barry Ritholtz: Used to be on PBS at one point.

01:01:21  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Yeah. It’s old. But there were three Morse and then Endeavor, which was about Morse when he was younger.

01:01:27  And then Lewis, who was Morse’s sidekick. So BBC did a really good job there. So yeah, these are old stuff. I recycle ’em.

01:01:33  But yeah, I, I love, I love BBC and I love British. I love British Redbox. Excuse me. I love

01:01:38  Barry Ritholtz: Our final two questions. What sort of advice would you give to a recent college grad interested in a career in banking or finance or government service?

01:01:50  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, I would say be open-minded, because I think the job market is, you know, we don’t know. AI is kind of having a negative impact on entry level white collar jobs. So they’re need to be thoughtful about that and how to navigate that.

01:02:05  So I think you need to be open-minded. But preferably, if you have options, you know, pick, pick a company that has a good culture. I, you know, ask them how they think about their customers. Right.

01:02:17  If they’re an investment firm and they talk about them like, Muppets, you probably don’t wanna work there. But if they talk, talk about them as

01:02:24  Barry Ritholtz: I remember Muppets

01:02:25  Sheila Bair: Mpe. Yeah. Just to mention an example. So I think, I think it’s important, any business actually, whether it’s finance or any real economy business, how they think about their customers and treat their customers.

01:02:36  ’cause I do think long, long-term success is based on having a mutually beneficial relationship with your customers. So I would, and, you know, just the work ethic and, but, and again, keep an open mind. Sometimes things you weren’t even thinking about come up and they turn out to be really, really good job choices.

01:02:52  Barry Ritholtz: And our final question, what is it that you know about the world of banking regulations, government service, financial industry today might have been useful to know way back when, when you were first getting started. Yeah,

01:03:07  Sheila Bair: I thought about that. Markets, right? Not personal finance, but market. Clearly credit card debt

01:03:14  Barry Ritholtz: Go whichever way you want.

01:03:15  Sheila Bair: Yeah. Well, compounding was something I did or did not understand in credit card rates. That

01:03:20  Barry Ritholtz: Comes up surprisingly

01:03:22  Sheila Bair: Frequently. Yeah. Yeah.

01:03:22  Barry Ritholtz: So because it’s not intuitive.

01:03:23  Sheila Bair: Yeah. No, it’s not. And the, the daily compounding is, you know, it, it, it backs up pretty quickly, I think for markets, financial markets and investing in particular. I, I’ve actually done pretty well over time.

01:03:35  I was, my grandmother gave me a thousand dollars when she was getting later in life near her death. And she didn’t have much, but she wanted to give my sister and I something. So she gave me a thousand dollars and told me to put it in IRA. That was back when IRAs had just gotten started.

01:03:50  And with my dad’s self, I put it in the contra fund. It’s worth a lot of money now. Right. So I, I’ve made some lucky I’ve, I’ve stuck mainly, I’ve picked a few stocks, but I’ve picked mainly diversified index funds of various sorts.

01:04:03  And I wish I’d understand better about being brave during the dips though. You know, I think I usually, I, I, I buy and hold, so I don’t, I don’t sell when the market’s going down, which is the worst thing you can do. But I think I would’ve been a little more courageous buying in the dips,

01:04:15  Barry Ritholtz: You know, buy, buying more into, into weakness. Yeah. Yeah. Well, well, Sheila, thank you for being so generous with your time.

01:04:21  As always, a delight. We have been speaking with Sheila Bear, former chair of the FDIC, author of the new book, how Not to Lose a Million Dollars. If you enjoy this conversation, well check out any of the 600 we’ve done over the past 12 years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, Bloomberg, wherever you find your favorite podcasts.

01:04:44  I would be remiss if I didn’t thank the crack staff that helps put these conversations together each week. Alexis Noriega is my video producer. Sean Russo is my researcher. Anna Luke is my podcast producer.

01:04:59  I’m Barry Bri Holtz. You’ve been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio Video.

 

~~~

 

 

 

The post Transcript: Shelia Bair, former FDIC Chair appeared first on The Big Picture.

"Taiwan Loses Its Strategic Importance In 18 Months," Says Chamath Palihapitiya

Zero Hedge -

"Taiwan Loses Its Strategic Importance In 18 Months," Says Chamath Palihapitiya

In an interview with Fox News' Bret Baier that aired Friday, President Trump said that he doesn't want "to travel 9,500 miles to fight a war" over Taiwan.

"I'm not looking to have somebody to go independent and, you know, we're supposed to travel 9,500 miles to fight a war," Trump told Baier. "I'm not looking for that. I want them to cool down. I want China to cool down."

Taiwan has been a major point of friction between Washington and Beijing. Last week, Secretary of State Marco Rubio told NBC News that the issue was not a key topic during Trump's summit with Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

The initial White House readout of the summit also did not mention Taiwan, home to the world's most advanced semiconductor production.

Taiwan is strategically important for three main reasons:

  • It is indispensable to global semiconductor production.

  • It sits at the center of the Western Pacific security architecture.

  • It remains a major flashpoint in U.S.-China relations.

In other words, Taiwan is critically important to the U.S. because it is not only a semiconductor production supernode, but also a geopolitical fortress against China and a potential flashpoint in U.S.-China relations.

However, Chamath Palihapitiya, CEO of Social Capital and part of the All-In podcast, pointed out that Taiwan could be on track to lose one of its most strategic advantages in the next 18 months.

Palihapitiya continued:

We're 18 months from Taiwan not being an important moment of conversation the way it is today.

Why 18 months? Because we are at a point where we're probably 1-2 nanometers away from being able to do what we need Taiwan to strategically do for us.

And so as we scale up our chip fabs, as we get more capacity, and interestingly, there are these orthogonal technologies being developed.

I don't know if you guys saw, but Neuralink was showcasing a machine that is literally operating at the almost nanometer scale to do the brain operations for the implantation, all automatically.

When you have the dexterity and the capability mechanically to make these things, the real reason then is a very different one than what it is today.

Today, it's economic. And if you take that off the table, I think we'll have a very different attitude to Taiwan.

Palihapitiya's take on the rise of U.S. chip fabs, many of which are based in Arizona and could soon turn the state into the new Taiwan, drew backlash on X, notably from geopolitical risk analyst Ian Bremmer, who said, "This is Trump's perspective: the only thing that matters about Taiwan is the chips. Very different from the view of U.S. allies in the region: Japan, South Korea, and Australia."

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 07:54

"Please Work Remote": NYC Braces For Commuter Chaos With Ongoing LIRR Strike

Zero Hedge -

"Please Work Remote": NYC Braces For Commuter Chaos With Ongoing LIRR Strike

Welcome to day three of the Long Island Rail Road strike, which is set to cause commuter chaos this morning in the New York City area, as more than 3,500 workers across five unions walked off the job Saturday after contract talks with the MTA collapsed.

Negotiations between the MTA and unions resumed Sunday and are set to continue Monday morning.

The MTA has urged riders to work remotely today and is deploying up to 275 free shuttle buses, though that capacity only covers a tiny fraction of the LIRR's nearly 300,000 weekday riders.

It seems that Socialist NYC Mayor Mandami finally got his promise of free buses, but at the cost of a strike and commuter chaos.

The disruption could also snarl travel to Long Island beach destinations over Memorial Day weekend, including the Hamptons.

Some employers, including JPMorgan and Citigroup, have advised affected workers to consider remote work this week.

The National Mediation Board, a federal agency that oversees labor disputes, summoned both sides late Sunday evening to continue negotiations, but no resolution was found. Talks are expected later today.

A spokesman for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters stated that their wage proposal was reasonable and that two federal review panels had sided with them.

"We remain ready to negotiate a fair agreement at any time and get back to work on behalf of Long Island commuters," the statement said.

The union wrote on X, "After more than three years with no raises, LIRR's union workers, including 500 Teamsters locomotive engineers, will not make any more sacrifices to cover for the MTA's mismanagement."

What an absolute mess for commuters this morning.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 07:45

Futures Slide After Bond Yields, Oil Prices Jump Around The Globe

Zero Hedge -

Futures Slide After Bond Yields, Oil Prices Jump Around The Globe

Futures are lower, but off their overnight lows as markets focus on soaring global yields after US/Iran talk progress remains stalled (but at least armed hostilities did not resume contrary to some speculation). Yields also spiked on rising oil prices, concerns of an extra budget in Japan and continued political chaos in the UK. As of 7:00am ET, S&P futures are -0.5%, while Nasdaq futures drop 0.3%; semis are bid, Mag7 are mostly lower ex-NVDA which reports earnings this week. Semis / AI are the bullish story pre-mkt with most names flat to down with the market expressing a slight preference for Defensives over Cyclicals. In other news, US-China will set up a trade/investment board, and China will increase Ag purchases from the US. Bond yields are flat to +1bp with the 10Y at 4.60% after last week's meltup;Japan’s 30-year yield surged as much as 20 basis points before paring most of the move on what may have been another round of BOJ intervention. Treasuries and European bonds were little changed, while the dollar was set to snap a five-day run of wins as it reverses overnight gains. In commodities, Energy is leading but crude prices have cut their gains: Brent trades around $11 after Trump warned that the “clock is ticking” for Iran to reach a deal that will end the war. Metals are weaker and Ags are bid. Today's macro data focus is on TIC, housing price index, and NY Fed activity indicator. 

In premarket trading, Nvidia is the only Mag 7 member rising: the $6 trillion semiconductor giant is slated to report first quarter results on Wednesday (Nvidia +0.8%, Alphabet -0.6%, Microsoft -0.6%, Apple -0.8%, Meta -0.9%, Amazon -1%, Tesla -1.1%)

  • Shares in UnitedHealth (UNH) fall 5.3% after Berkshire Hathaway exited its stake in the health insurer. The conglomerate also disclosed that it amassed a $2.6 billion stake in Delta Air Lines (DAL), boosting the carrier’s shares by 2.4%.
  • EchoStar (SATS), Rocket Lab (RKLB) and AST SpaceMobile (ASTS) rise as billionaire Elon Musk said he’s back in Texas working on plans for an initial public offering of SpaceX.
  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals (REGN) falls 10% after the drugmaker’s phase 3 data for fianlimab in metastatic melanoma fell short of expectations. Citi downgraded its rating on the stock following the “disappointing” trial update.

The standoff in the Middle East shows no signs of easing after more than two months, puncturing an AI-driven rally that has pushed global stocks to record highs. Over the weekend, Trump said the “clock is ticking” for Iran to reach a deal, while G7 finance chiefs’ two-day meeting in Paris starts today, focusing on mounting imbalances and rare earths. Meanwhile, bond yields have climbed to levels seen decades ago on fears that central banks will lift interest rates and governments will ramp up borrowing to cushion the blow from rising energy prices. Japan’s 30-year yield surged as much as 20 basis points before paring most of the move.

“Bonds were more nervous about the inflation picture and the equity market was comforted and encouraged by the very strong earnings and AI-led optimism,” said Willem Sels, global chief investment officer at HSBC Private Bank. “What you now have is a bit of a catch-up movement in the equity market, a bit of an exhaustion of the momentum.”

As a fragile ceasefire between the US and Iran extends past 40 days and a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz remains elusive, President Donald Trump expressed frustration with Tehran and told it the “clock is ticking.” Earlier, drones targeted a nuclear power plant in the United Arab Emirates.

Elsewhere, at a time when markets expect the Federal Reserve under Kevin Warsh to hike rates as soon as December, minutes from last month’s meeting due for release Wednesday will give investors clues about policymakers’ thinking. “The absence of a near-term bullish catalyst can continue to pressure bonds, with spillover effects to exuberant equities,” said Laura Cooper, global investment strategist and head of macro at Nuveen. “Signs of conflict de-escalation are likely needed to assuage jittery markets.” 

Ed Yardeni wrote that the Fed needed to catch up with bond markets or risk losing control of borrowing costs. If the Fed fails to remove its easing bias, “investors will conclude that the central bank is falling behind the inflation curve and will demand a higher inflation risk premium,” Yardeni wrote. “We expect the Fed to hold rates unchanged at the June meeting and shift to a tightening policy stance.”

Meanwhile, the higher yields rise, the more bullish Wall Street strategists turn. Six out of the 21 strategists polled by Bloomberg have raised their target for the S&P 500 over the past month. Morgan Stanley’s Mike Wilson retains high conviction of an earnings recovery and broadening thesis, while noting the 10-year yield at the critical 4.50% threshold could be more of a “noticeable headwind” for equity multiples.

Bloomberg News interviewed 32 investment managers across the US, Asia and Europe who were overwhelmingly bullish, with 80% expecting equities to outperform other asset classes over the next three to six months. The top investment choice for about half of these buy-side professionals is megacap tech and AI stocks. Most investors interviewed pointed to the yield on 30-year Treasuries holding sustainably above 5% as the biggest threat to stocks. Perhaps they have been reading Michael Hartnett who has repeatedly said 5% on the 30Y is the "door to doom."

And while the tech-fueled stock rally is looking bubble-like to some investors, timing the pop is tough. Some are turning to exotic options that better protect against an eventual slump. Single-stock volatility — especially in parts of the tech sector such as semiconductors — far outpace relatively mild increases in indexes. 

d

In Europe, consumer and auto shares drove a 0.4% decline in the Stoxx 600, although stocks have trimmed some early declines Monday as last week’s selloff in bonds eased and energy shares outperformed.  Here are the biggest movers Monday:

  • Technoprobe shares rise as much as 7.7% to a record high, extending last week’s results-driven gains after an upgrade for the chip-testing equipment maker from Bank of America, which lifted its target price to a Street-high of €38
  • Sonova shares rise as much as 4.4%, the biggest gainer in the Stoxx 600 Health Care Index, after the Swiss hearing-aid maker’s full-year adjusted Ebita beat the average analyst estimate
  • FLSmidth gains as much as 5.3%, the most since April 8, after Nordea and Danske Bank upgraded their views on the Danish industrial equipment maker to buy from hold, with Nordea quoting a positive risk/reward profile
  • Publicis shares climb as much as 5.8% on Monday after the advertising agency increased its earnings growth targets for the next two years, following a $2.2 billion deal to buy US-based data collaboration platform LiveRamp
  • Draegerwerk shares rise as much as 4.7%, rebounding from a four-month low, after the medical and safety equipment maker was upgraded
  • Deutsche Boerse shares outperformed Monday after a regulatory filing showed Chris Hohn’s activist hedge fund TCI Fund Management has increased its voting rights in the German market operator to 5.15%
  • Smart Eye rises as much as 12%, the most since November, after the Swedish eye-tracking technology company reported what DNB Carnegie called a “solid” set of results, with Ebitda showing a “clear improvement”
  • Ipsen shares drop as much as 5.6%, the most since July last year, following the French biopharma company’s trial data for its experimental frown-lines treatment corabotase
  • Future shares slide as much as 10% after Stifel downgrades the publisher to hold from buy, saying it will take time for the firm to find new ways to monetize its content, as new AI tools threaten the search market
  • Alleima falls as much as 7.5%, the most since January, after Swedish business daily Dagens Industri recommended in a column that readers sell shares in the specialty steels group, flagging a weakening order book and rising short interest
  • Advanced Medical Solutions shares drop as much as 24%, the most since September 2023, after TA Associates confirmed late on Friday that it won’t make an offer for the London-listed firm

Earlier in the session, Asian stocks fell for a second session, as stalled progress on ending the Iran war and higher oil prices intensified concerns about inflation and economic growth. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index dropped as much as 1.4%, before paring losses. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Toyota Motor Corp. and Mitsubishi Corp. were among the biggest contributors to the losses. Benchmarks in Indonesia, Hong Kong and Australia all fell over 1%. Bucking the trend, South Korean stocks reversed losses of as much as 4.7%, as optimism over progress in Samsung Electronics Co.’s labor talks helped offset pressure from rising bond yields. Behind the global debt selloff and stock market weakness was a third consecutive day of oil price gains, after President Donald Trump renewed pressure on Iran to resolve the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. Following the recent rally driven by optimism about artificial intelligence, equities investors are now shifting their attention back to the risk of worsening inflation. Separately, Chinese shares fell after data showed the country’s economic growth slowed across the board in April. 

In FX, The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index is down 0.1%, while the pound takes top spot among G-10 currencies, rising 0.4% against the greenback. The yen is lagging.

In rates, treasuries erased an earlier drop, leaving US 10-year yields flat at 4.60%. US yields are cheaper by 1bp to 2bp across the curve with spreads trading broadly within a basis point of Friday close. US 10-year yields trade around 4.6% with gilts outperforming by around 3bp in the sector. Bunds are steady, while gilts are outperforming, with UK 10-year yields down 3 bps to 5.14% as UK gilts steadied after last week’s sharp selloff.  During Asia session, Japan’s 30-year yield surged as much as 20 basis points before paring most of the move as inflation fears continue to ripple through global bond market. IG dollar issuance slate includes a couple of names. Estimates from dealers for this week point to about $40 billion in bond sales. Treasury auctions this week include $16 billion 20-year bonds (Wednesday) and $19 billion 10-year TIPS reopening (Thursday)/

In commodities, Brent crude futures pulled back from their overnight highs to trade around $110 a barrel, helping arrest a selloff in global government bonds.

Economic data slate includes May New York Fed services business activity (8:30am), May NAHB housing market index (10am) and March TIC flows (4pm). Fed speaker slate empty for the session

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 mini -0.4%
  • Nasdaq 100 mini -0.2%
  • Russell 2000 mini -0.3%
  • Stoxx Europe 600 -0.3%
  • DAX +0.2%
  • CAC 40 -0.7%
  • 10-year Treasury yield little changed at 4.6%
  • VIX +0.6 points at 19
  • Bloomberg Dollar Index -0.1% at 1201.01
  • euro +0.1% at $1.1639
  • WTI crude +1.1% at $106.54/barrel

Top Overnight News

  • President Trump told Axios in a phone call that "the clock is ticking" for Iran and warned that if the Iranian regime doesn't come with a better offer for a deal, "they are going to get hit much harder." Axios
  • Trump declined to give a specific deadline for negotiations with Iran and will hold a Situation Room meeting with his national security team on Tuesday to discuss possible options for military action, while he spoke with Israeli PM Netanyahu about the situation in Iran, according to Axios. Trump also stated that he still thinks Iran wants a deal and he is waiting for an updated Iranian proposal, which he hopes will be better than the prior offer. Furthermore, Axios’s Ravid reported that Trump threatened that attacks would resume with greater intensity if the Iranian regime does not come up with a better proposal, while Channel 12’s Kraus posted that President Trump said in a phone call that he thinks the Iranians should be afraid of what’s going on right now.
  • China’s industrial output and retail sales growth slowed sharply last month while investment dropped as policymakers warned that geopolitical conflicts were creating a “severe” global economic environment. Industrial production rose 4.1 per cent in April from a year earlier, official data showed on Monday. FT
  • Chinese artificial intelligence groups have moved ahead of US rivals in video generation, a key battleground in generative AI in which there is rapid uptake across advertising, ecommerce and entertainment. FT
  • China agreed to buy at least $17 billion of farm products annually through 2028 and establish trade and investment boards, the US announced. Earlier, Beijing said the two countries will also reduce tariffs on certain goods. BBG
  • Japan's government is likely to issue fresh debt as part of funding for a planned extra budget to cushion the economic blow from the Middle East war. Any additional debt issuance would further strain Japan's ‌already worsening finances and may accelerate rises in long-term interest rates. RTRS
  • Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni asked the European Commission to extend greater latitude within European Union budget rules to measures aimed at tackling rising energy costs. Italy’s government is seeking to include investments and extraordinary measures to address the energy crisis in the so-called national safeguard clause. BBG
  • NextEra is said to be in talks to buy Dominion in a mostly stock deal valuing the utility at about $66 billion. BBG
  • Anthropic agreed to brief members of the Financial Stability Board on its AI model Mythos. FT
  • Over 60 allies of US President Trump have urged him to test and approve the most powerful AI models before its released: Axios 
  • Central banks’ gold purchases are expected to pick up to average 60 tons a month over 2026. We maintain a bullish target for prices to climb to $5,400 an ounce by the end of the year. Goldman
  • Trump told Fortune he thinks US could sell Intel (INTC) shares slowly over time without tanking the stock market. He added that "Intel should be the biggest company in the world right now... If I had been president when all these companies started sending their chips in from China, I would have put a tariff on that would have protected Intel."

Iran Headlines

  • US President Trump warned on Truth Social that the clock is ticking for Iran and that they better get moving fast, or there won’t be anything left for them, and that time is of the essence.
  • US President Trump declined to give a specific deadline for negotiations with Iran and will hold a Situation Room meeting with his national security team on Tuesday to discuss possible options for military action, while he spoke with Israeli PM Netanyahu about the situation in Iran, according to Axios. Trump also stated that he still thinks Iran wants a deal and he is waiting for an updated Iranian proposal, which he hopes will be better than the prior offer. Furthermore, Axios’s Ravid reported that Trump threatened that attacks would resume with greater intensity if the Iranian regime does not come up with a better proposal, while Channel 12’s Kraus posted that President Trump said in a phone call that he thinks the Iranians should be afraid of what’s going on right now.
  • Pakistan shared revised Iranian proposal to end the war with the US on Sunday night, according to Pakistani sources. The course added that "we don't have much time", adding that both countries "keep changing their goalposts".
  • Western sources say the new Iranian proposal includes a commitment of unclear value not to produce nuclear weapons but no mention of uranium or Hormuz, according to Journalist Segal.
  • Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Baghaei said talks with the US continue through Pakistani mediation. The spokesperson added that they have made great efforts for safe movement and protection of the Strait of Hormuz and are in constant contact with Oman to develop a mechanism. On Uranium, Baghaei said Tehran does not need any party to recognize its right to uranium enrichment and will not discuss during negotiations with the US.
  • Iranian Defence Ministry spokesman Brigadier General Reza Talaei-Nik warned of a regretful response to enemies and said that Iranian armed forces are fully prepared to confront any potential attack by the US and Israeli regime, according to IRNA.
  • Iranian Major General Rezaei said Iran is serious about diplomacy and negotiations, but is more serious about dealing with the aggressor, while he added that the US must now prove its good intentions and that Iranian armed forces are on the trigger as diplomatic efforts continue.
  • Iran said transit through the Strait of Hormuz would flow again once its conflict with the US and Israel is over, although the sides remain far from resolving their differences, according to Bloomberg. In relevant news, three cargo-empty, US-sanctioned tankers reportedly slipped through the US naval blockade in recent days, according to TankerTrackers.com.
  • Israel said it carried out a Gaza strike targeting the de facto head of Hamas's armed wing, while Israel also conducted an airstrike on the towns of Froun, Kfar Hounah and Zawtar al-Sharqiya in southern Lebanon. Furthermore, an Israeli air strike targeted Baalbek, Lebanon and killed an Islamic Jihad commander and his daughter.
  • UAE officials said a drone attack set off a fire near the UAE’s nuclear power station, while it was still investigating the source of the attack.
  • Saudi Defence Ministry said it intercepted three drones launched from Iraq after entering the kingdom’s airspace.

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

APAC stocks were mostly in the red after last Friday's losses on Wall St, and with risk sentiment sapped as oil prices and yields extended higher after US President Trump warned the clock was ticking on Iran, heading into a meeting on Tuesday with his national security team to discuss possible options for military action, while participants in the region also digest disappointing Chinese activity data. ASX 200 was dragged lower amid losses across nearly all sectors aside from energy, and with sentiment not helped by disappointing data from Australia's largest trading partner. Nikkei 225 resumed its pullback from last week's record highs amid higher oil prices and the anticipation of the BoJ to resume rate normalisation next month. KOSPI was volatile as the index initially suffered heavy losses and the Korea Exchange triggered a sidecar after KOSPI 200 futures dropped 5.0% with jitters seen as Samsung Electronics faces an 18-day strike involving nearly 45,000 of Samsung’s unionised workers starting on May 21st. The index then staged a firm rebound alongside Samsung shares after the union said it would engage in government-mediated pay talks, and a court was said to partially accept an injunction request against the union's planned strike, although the union later announced that it would proceed with the strike as planned. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp were pressured following the disappointing activity data in which Industrial Production, Retail Sales and Fixed Assets Ex-Rural Investment all missed forecasts, with the latter showing a surprise contraction, while the stats bureau noted the external situation is complex and that China's economic foundation still needs to be consolidated.

Top Asian news

  • China State Council said it will leverage national venture capital guidance fund to increase support for entrepreneurship in tech innovation.
  • Chinese MIIT Minister Li Lecheng said China should upgrade “outdated” industries, and not scrap them, because manufacturing remains the backbone of the economy.
  • China’s State Administration for Market Regulation set 34 priorities for this year to support private sector growth, with a focus on fair competition, legal protections and efficient regulation.
  • China's stats bureau said the external situation is complex and China's economic foundation still needs to be consolidated, while it added that China is to continue to optimise supply and that the domestic supply-demand imbalance remains prominent. China's stats bureau said China will continue to expand the domestic demand and should implement more active fiscal policies and moderately loose monetary policies. Furthermore, it said the international situation remains grim and complicated as of April, and the world economic recovery is facing greater headwinds, as well as stated that the will and capacity of people to spend needs improving.
  • Japan is likely to issue fresh debt as part of funding for a planned extra budget to soften the blow from the Middle East conflict, according to sources cited by Reuters. A separate report confirmed that Japanese PM Takaichi was set to announce an extra Japan budget. However, conflicting comments by Japanese Finance Minister Katayama followed, stating that they are not yet at a stage to talk about the specifics of an extra budget.
  • Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Kihara said they are watching market moves with a high sense of urgency, including long-term rates. No comment on FX intervention.

European bourses (STOXX 600 -0.2%) opened entirely in the red this morning, given the lack of US-Iran progress, and further punchy rhetoric from President Trump. Over the weekend, he stated that the clock is ticking for Iran, though he declined to give a specific deadline. Since then, bourses have clambered off lows amidst positive geopolitical updates; notably, Iran’s Baghaei suggesting that talks with the US continue through Pakistani mediation. Moreover, Pakistani sources suggested that Pakistan shared a revised Iranian proposal to end the war with the US on Sunday night.  European sectors opened with a clear negative bias, but this picture is now a little more mixed. Energy takes pole position, benefiting from higher underlying crude prices; Media and Utilities complete the top three. At the bottom of the pile reside cyclical sectors, such as Autos and Travel & Leisure. The latter has been pressured by post-earning losses in Ryanair after reporting in-line metrics, but warned that flat fares may put pressure on profits.

Top European News

  • UK PM Starmer has decided not to announce a departure timetable unless and until Andy Burnham wins the Makerfield by-election, ITV's Peston reported.
  • UK Deputy PM Lammy said PM Starmer will not be announcing a timetable for departure, speaking to Sky News.
  • UK PM Starmer was reportedly mulling whether he would bring more government stability by announcing a timetable for his departure and a leadership election, according to ITV.
  • Former UK Health Secretary Streeting vowed to stand in any Labour Party leadership contest to oust UK PM Starmer. In relevant news, Streeting said he would battle Manchester Mayor Burnham for the Labour leadership and called for the UK to rejoin the EU, while Burnham played down rejoining the EU.
  • UK Chancellor Reeves is reportedly to lay out more details in the week ahead regarding proposals to ease bank regulations that were imposed to prevent a repeat of the 2008 GFC.
  • Fitch affirmed Germany's sovereign rating at AAA; Outlook Stable, while DBRS maintained Portugal at A (high), Outlook Raised to Positive.

FX

  • FX shows a risk-on bias with high-beta outperforming and DXY in the red.
  • DXY firmed at the Asia reopen and rose to a 99.40 peak as participants digested US President Trump’s remarks over the weekend, “the clock is ticking for Iran.” However, with Brent crude falling from its USD 112/bbl peak (curr. 110/bbl), the index now trades modestly in the red, a touch above 99.00 where its 50 DMA lies. Nothing notable scheduled today, though the rest of the week sees weekly ADP jobs on Tuesday, FOMC Minutes + NVIDIA earnings Wednesday, Jobless Claims and PMIs Thursday and UoM on Friday.
  • GBP is one of the best G10 performers, likely a factor of technical factors than political reprieve with newsflow light heading into the likely June 18th by-election. EUR/GBP reversed from 0.8730, and Cable bounced from 1.33. On domestic politics, PM potential candidates Streeting and Burnham were on the wires talking up the importance of rejoining the EU. On the Fiscal/Consumer front, the Times reported Chancellor Reeves has plans to retain the cut on fuel duty from September amid fuel price concerns, while separately drawing up plans for a targeted intervention on energy bills - both potentially factors helping the Pound today. The week ahead sees Jobs on Tuesday, CPI on Wednesday and PSNB on Friday, the former which ING says is expected to be mild because of base effects.
  • JPY is the only G10 currency that trades lower against the buck amid: a) a weak 5yr JGB auction, b) reports that the Japanese government is to start compiling a supplementary budget, c) lack of Iran progress, and d) surging energy prices. (See Fixed Income 09:35 BST for more). USD/JPY +0.1%, up a touch despite earlier gains which were capped by the 159 mark.

Central Banks

  • BoE's Greene said some of the global economic resilience to the Iran war is due to inventories while second round effects of the energy price shock will not show up for another year. Should not be looking through negative supply shocks.
  • BoE's Breeden said the central bank should not be ‘trigger happy’ on rates, while she warned of a hit to business from political uncertainty, according to FT.

Fixed Income

  • A bearish start to the week as US President Trump's escalatory language on Iran and the associated energy move, with Brent peaking at USD 112/bbl overnight.
  • Amidst this, fixed benchmarks spent the APAC session in the red. Note, JGBs derived pressure from this alongside a weak 5yr outing and reports around the compiling of a supplementary Japanese budget, see 09:35 BST for more details.
  • USTs hit a 108-30 trough, a fresh contract low, in the early hours. Since, and particularly after remarks from the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, energy benchmarks have eased off, which has allowed fixed to lift, taking USTs to a 109-08 high with gains of one tick on the session. Today's US docket is quiet, but the week is busy with Nvidia due before the FOMC Minutes and a 20yr auction. From the Minutes, the last with Powell as Chair, BofA expects the account to "reinforce the Fed's recent hawkish tone", showing that Warsh will inherit a Fed with "little appetite to cut".
  • Bunds in-fitting with the above, hit a 123.74 base, which is also a new contract low. Given the discussed energy moves, the benchmark has pared much of its 53 ticks of downside and is now lower by a more modest c. 15 ticks, just off a 124.20 peak. Newsflow has been relatively limited, we had remarks from but no move to ECB's Lagarde, who essentially noted that she is watching the yield space. On yields, the German 10yr hit a 3.19% peak overnight, a new high for the year and the highest since 2011's 3.49% best. Furthermore, the energy moves continue to be reflected in near-term policy expectations, with 21bps of ECB tightening implied for June and 75bps by end-2026.
  • Gilts opened near-enough flat, as the bearish leads from overnight had already begun to moderate, in addition to the lack of significant weekend development on the fate of PM Starmer. Furthermore, the complex is perhaps deriving some support from a revival of coverage that contenders Burnham and Streeting would like to rejoin the EU at some point; albeit, Burnham did somewhat distance himself from this over the weekend, concerning the upcoming by-election campaigning at least. As it stands, Gilts are holding at highs of 85.53 with gains of c. 25 ticks. A bounce from the 84.96 base this morning, another contract low.
  • Japan sells JPY 1.9tln 5yr JGBs; b/c 3.22x (prev. 3.58x), average yield 2.024% (prev. 1.826%), Lowest accepted price 99.85 (prev. 99.84), Weighted average price 99.89 (prev. 99.88), Tail in price 0.05 (prev. 0.04).

Commodities

  • Crude futures surged at the start of Asia-Pac trade, with WTI making a new contract high of USD 104.37/bbl while Brent peaked at USD 112.00/bbl. Punchy rhetoric over the weekend by US President Trump, warning Iran that the “clock is ticking” and that “they better get moving, fast, or there won’t be anything left of them" initially spurred the upside in energy prices. However, benchmarks have pulled back as European trade gets underway, with WTI and Brent now trading at the lower end of its USD 101.59-104.37/bbl and USD 109.56-112/bbl range, respectively. More recently, according to Pakistani sources, Pakistan shared a revised Iranian proposal to end the war with the US on Sunday night.
  • Spot gold briefly dipped below USD 4,500/oz amid higher energy prices as trade got underway but has since regained the handle and currently trading at the upper end of its USD 4481-4560/oz range. Jewellers in India have reported higher demand for the yellow metal, ahead of the wedding season, after Indian authorities hiked gold import tariffs and then later curbed the amount of gold that can be imported. Silver has also faced restrictions with tightening rules for imports, describing imports as now “restricted” rather than “free”. Spot silver is currently in a USD 73.71-76.76/oz range, consolidating following Friday’s selloff.
  • 3M LME Copper has started Monday’s trade on the backfoot, slipping back below USD 13.5k/t and falling closer towards last week’s trough of USD 13.4k/t. China’s growth slowed in April, with investment contracting while retail sales printed essentially flat Y/Y.

Trade/Tariffs

  • USTR Greer said President Trump will be presented with options for action on China if US investigations determine that industrial overcapacity is influencing Chinese exports.
  • White House released a Fact Sheet on Sunday following last week’s Trump-Xi summit, which stated that China will purchase at least USD 17bln in US agricultural products annually for 2026, 2027 and 2028.
  • EU is drawing up plans to force European companies to purchase critical components from at least three different suppliers, in an effort to lower the bloc’s reliance on China, according to FT.
  • France wants Stellantis (STLAM IM/STLAP FP) and Renault (RNO FP) to favour local parts suppliers to protect jobs and keep know-how in the region as Europe’s automakers deepen ties with manufacturers from China.
  • China flagged that Australian beef imports are approaching the safeguard threshold and are at the 80% of the annual quota, which caps imports at current tariff rates, while additional imports would be subject to 55% tariffs on top of existing tariffs three days after shipments reach 100% of the quota.

Geopolitics (ex Iran)

  • Ukraine upped the pressure on Russia with the biggest strike on Moscow in over a year involving dozens of drones on Sunday, according to WSJ.
  • Russian drones hit Odessa and damaged residential homes, according to Interfax.
  • Ukrainian manufacturers and officials warned the EU’s plan to slash steel imports would hurt Ukraine.
  • Intelligence claimed that Cuba has acquired more than 300 military drones and recently began discussing plans to use them to attack the US base at Guantanamo Bay, US military vessels and possibly Key West, Florida, according to Axios, which added that the intelligence could become a pretext for US military action and shows the degree to which the Trump administration sees Cuba as a threat.
  • Taiwan’s President Lai said on Sunday that Taiwan will never be sacrificed or traded, after US President Trump recently described a planned USD 14bln arms sale to Taipei as a bargaining chip with China.

US Event Calendar

  • 8;30am: May New York Fed services business activity
  • 10:00am: May NAHB housing market index
  • 4:00pm: March TIC flows 

DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

Today is my annual thank you message for voting for the UK in Eurovision. Despite all your support, we finished last for the third time since 2019, and it was the fourth successive year of "nul points" from the public vote. To be fair listening to the song, I was impressed it finished as high as last! The winning song from Bulgaria is perhaps 30-40 years too modern for me but was at least quite catchy!

Moving onto more serious matters, the Iran war is 80 days old as of today, with no obvious end in sight, whilst the Strait of Hormuz remains closed. Notably though, the truce and ceasefire period (41 days) has now lasted longer than the initial kinetic phase (39 days). While an end to the ceasefire clearly cannot be ruled out, the fact this stalemate has persisted for so long suggests the US would prefer to avoid that route, given the political and economic consequences—particularly the political ones in an election year. As a result, the tense stalemate continues.
Nevertheless, the fragile nature of the ceasefire was exposed over the weekend when a drone attack caused a fire at an electrical generator at a UAE nuclear facility. Moreover, Trump suggested on Truth Social yesterday: "For Iran, the clock is ticking, and they better get moving, FAST, or there won't be anything left of them. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE!" Trump and Israel’s PM Netanyahu spoke last night, which could prove to be a key conversation in determining the next stage of the conflict.

For markets, the ongoing closure of the Strait of Hormuz and the prospect of a fresh escalation has pushed oil prices higher this morning. Brent crude is up +1.77% to a two-week high of $111.19/bbl. And it’s clear that investors are pricing in a more protracted conflict, as the 6-month brent future is also up to $92.14/bbl this morning, which would be its highest closing level since the conflict began.
Those oil moves have exacerbated fears about a stagflationary shock, which has pushed global bond yields even higher this morning. For instance, the 10yr Treasury yield (+3.2bps) is now up to 4.63%, its highest level in the last year, whilst the 30yr yield (+3.4bps) is up to 5.15%, which would be another post-2007 high. It’s a similar story in Japan this morning, where the 10yr JGB yield (+4.8bps) is up to 2.75%, a level last seen in 1997, and the 30yr yield (+9.3bps) is up to 4.11%, the highest since that maturity was first issued in 1999. That also follows comments from PM Takaichi, who said she’d asked the finance minister “to consider ways of funding including compiling a supplementary budget”. Indeed, Reuters reported the government was likely to issue fresh debt to fund part of it.

Stagflation fears have continued to hit risk assets as well, with the major equity indices moving lower in Asia this morning. In addition, the latest activity data in China was weaker than expected. Retail sales were only up +0.2% year-on-year in April (vs. +2.0% expected), whilst industrial production was up +4.1% yoy (vs. +6.0% expected). That backdrop has seen equities fall overnight, including the Nikkei (-0.83%), the Hang Seng (-1.35%), the CSI 300 (-0.69%) and the Shanghai Comp (-0.22%). That’s been echoed in the US and Europe too, where futures on the S&P 500 (-0.60%) and the DAX (-0.94%) are both lower as well. The only clear exception is South Korea’s KOSPI (+0.45%).

Those overnight declines follow several landmark bond moves in a global rout last week. Admittedly, if you look over the entire conflict, bond yields have moved in lockstep with oil, and Friday doesn’t look too anomalous. However, if you zoom in a bit, then yields have shifted from being broadly in line with the current price of oil to looking a bit high relative to it. That suggests some evidence of a small decoupling on Friday. With these end-of-week moves, 30yr US yields hit their highest level since 2007, 30yr Japanese yields their highest since their introduction in 1999, 30yr gilts reached levels last seen in 1997, and 30yr German yields returned to 2011 levels. You can see more details of the move in the review of last week towards the end. One thing to be aware of for risk assets is the relatively subdued reaction so far in the MOVE (bond volatility) index. This is the bond variable that most closely correlates with risk assets. It is currently around 80 and spent most of the period between early 2022 and early 2024 in a range of 100 to 150, so it remains relatively low so far which limits the impact of the rate shock.

Regardless, the bond move will no doubt be a major topic at the two-day G7 finance ministers’ meeting starting today in Paris. The meeting was billed as an opportunity to discuss global imbalances, such as the US budget deficit, China’s huge trade surplus, and Europe’s lack of investment. That might get a little overtaken by events.

This meeting follows on from last week’s Xi–Trump meeting in Beijing, which can best be characterised after the event, as a “summit lite”. It produced few concrete economic or geopolitical outcomes, with both sides emphasising stability and continued dialogue rather than agreements. Despite market hopes, China offered no assistance in reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and the US position remained unchanged on Taiwan, semiconductor controls, rare earths and AI cooperation. For markets, the key takeaway was what did not happen: there was no escalation, but also no progress on the issues that matter most to investors.

Another hot topic right now is the UK, where there’s been a lot of political turmoil in the last week. That helped push the 30yr gilt up +21.3bps, which was a clear underperformance, whilst the pound sterling had its worst week against the US dollar since 2024. That came as a route opened for Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham to return to Parliament, because a Labour MP resigned and a by-election will now be held. That’s significant for markets, because Burnham is seen as a contender for the Labour leadership, and he said in September last year that the UK should not be “in hock to the bond markets”. Although he’s since walked back his interpretation of those comments, markets are likely to fear higher fiscal spending with Burnham as PM. So the focus is now on that by-election, which the BBC have reported will be on June 18. Burnham has been cleared by Labour’s ruling NEC to stand as well. However, there’s no guarantee he will win the by-election, as it’s a marginal seat for Labour and Nigel Farage’s Reform UK performed very strongly there at the local elections earlier this month. Much will depend on how aggressively the Green Party contests the seat and splits the left-wing vote.

Looking at the week ahead, Nvidia’s earnings on Wednesday, with a market capitalisation now of $5.46tn, could well be the main event. Elsewhere, we have the global flash PMIs on Thursday, along with inflation data from Canada tomorrow, the UK on Wednesday, and Japan on Friday. From central banks, the highlight will be the FOMC minutes on Wednesday. Those flash PMIs will be important, as they’re one of the first indicators on how the global economy has performed this month, so will be scrutinised for any signs of how the war in Iran is impacting activity and prices.

The US calendar is relatively light, with the NAHB housing market index today expected to remain unchanged at a cyclically low 34, followed by Tuesday’s pending home sales, where a modest +1.0% increase is anticipated (from +1.5% previously). Attention will then turn to Thursday’s April housing activity data, where housing starts are expected to ease to an annualised pace of 1.425mn (from 1.502mn), while permits are projected to tick higher to 1.375mn (from 1.363mn). All estimates are according to our economists.

Beyond housing, Thursday is the key day for macro releases. The weekly initial jobless claims are expected to edge slightly lower to 209k (from 211k). The same day will also bring the Philadelphia Fed manufacturing survey, where our economists expect a pullback to +21.0 (from +26.7), alongside the flash PMIs. In the US, manufacturing is expected to soften marginally to 53.7 (from 54.5), while services are seen ticking up to 51.5 (from 51.0).

In contrast to consumer sentiment—which will see an updated reading of the Michigan survey on Friday (expected at 48.2 versus 49.8 previously)—business surveys have generally remained more resilient despite the energy shock. That said, some indicators have shown rising input costs and lengthening delivery times, developments that could signal renewed inflationary pressure building beneath the surface.
Turning to central bank communications, the Fed speaker slate is relatively limited but still notable. Governor Waller is scheduled to participate in an ECB policy panel tomorrow, alongside comments from Philadelphia Fed President Harker (voter) on the outlook. On Wednesday, Vice Chair Barr will discuss consumer financial health metrics, while the Fed will also publish the minutes from the April FOMC meeting. Richmond Fed President Barkin (non-voter) will follow on Thursday with remarks on the economy, before Governor Waller rounds out the week with a further appearance on Friday.

In Europe, the highlights will include the UK labour market report tomorrow and inflation data on Wednesday. Our UK economist expects headline CPI to slow to 2.98% YoY and core CPI to fall to 2.61% YoY. More detail and forecasts are in the full inflation spotlight note here. The UK will also release the GfK May consumer confidence index and April retail sales on Friday. Other notable European releases include Eurozone consumer confidence on Thursday and Germany’s Ifo survey on Friday.

In Asia, Japan faces a busy week, with key data including Q1 GDP tomorrow and April nationwide CPI on Friday. Our Chief Japan economist expects positive real growth of an annualised 1.3% QoQ for the GDP report and sees core CPI inflation, excluding fresh food, holding at 1.8% YoY, alongside a retreat in core-core inflation, excluding fresh food and energy, to 2.2% (from 2.4% in March). The full week-ahead preview for Japan is available here.

Finally, beyond Nvidia’s earnings on Wednesday, results are also due from major US retailers, including Walmart, Home Depot, and TJX.
Recapping last week now, the main story was the global bond selloff, with yields hitting new highs in multiple countries. That came as the Strait of Hormuz remained blocked, and Trump said that the US-Iran ceasefire was on “massive life support”, which helped to drive further gains for oil prices. So Brent crude ended the week up +7.87% (+3.35% Friday) at $109.26/bbl. Moreover, those inflation fears were exacerbated by strong CPI and PPI reports from the US, which led to mounting anticipation about a Fed rate hike this year. Indeed, the probability of a hike by the December meeting surged from 6% the previous week to 62% by Friday’s close. And over in Europe, the probability of an ECB hike at the June meeting was up from 79% the previous week to 89% by Friday’s close.

That backdrop led to significant pressure on sovereign bonds. In fact, 10yr Treasury yields were up +23.9bps last week (+11.1bps Friday) to 4.59%, their highest level since May 2025. Meanwhile, the 2yr Treasury yield was up +18.6bps (+5.2bps Friday) to 4.07%, its highest level since February 2025. And the biggest milestone came for 30yr yields, which rose +18.2bps (+8.9bps) to a post-2007 high of 5.12%. Similarly, in Germany 10yr bunds rose +16.2bps (+12.4bps Friday) to 3.17%, their highest level since 2011.

Here in the UK, gilts struggled in particular as the political turmoil showed no sign of easing. Notably, there were multiple ministerial resignations from PM Keir Starmer’s government, and Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham announced he would seek to return to Parliament in a by-election. So 10yr gilt yields rose +26.0bps last week (+17.8bps Friday), closing at a post-2008 high of 5.17%. Meanwhile, the pound weakened -2.24% against the US Dollar, marking its worst weekly performance since 2024.

For equities, there was a relatively stronger performance, with the S&P 500 just about posting a 7th consecutive weekly gain, up +0.13%. That’s its longest run of weekly gains since 2023, even as Friday saw its worst day since March (-1.24%) amidst the rise in bond yields and oil. Non-US equities struggled more clearly, with Europe’s STOXX 600 down -0.85% (-1.48% Friday), whilst Japan’s Nikkei fell -2.08% (-1.99% Friday). Meanwhile, US credit saw a mixed performance, with US IG spreads (-4bps) tightening but HY spreads (+1bps) marginally wider, whilst Euro IG (-2bps) and HY spreads (-14bps) both moved lower.

Tyler Durden Mon, 05/18/2026 - 07:42

Pages