Individual Economists

US Housing Starts Highest In Over A Year As Mortgage Rates Tumbled In January

Zero Hedge -

US Housing Starts Highest In Over A Year As Mortgage Rates Tumbled In January

With mortgage rates tumbling (before the war started) and a top-down push for affordability, Housing Starts printed better than expected for January while the more forward-looking Building Permits disappointed, falling more than expected.

Starts rose 7.2k in preliminary January data (far greater than the 4.5% MoM decline expected while Permits plunged 5.4% MoM (worse than the 3.1% decline expected)...

Source: Bloomberg

This pushed the SAAR totals for Starts to their highest since Dec 2024, but Building Permits fell to their lowest since Aug 2025...

Source: Bloomberg

Under the hood, Multi-Family Permits plunged 13.5% MoM (biggest drop since June 2023) while Multi-Family Starts soared 29.1% MoM...

Source: Bloomberg

The lowest mortgage rate since Aug 2022 likely helped spark homebuilder appetite to start building...

A mixed bag overall, and tough to project given the impact of surging Treasury yields on the mortgage rates currently.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 08:48

Iran May Let Indian Tankers Through Hormuz Strait, Reports Of High-Level Talks

Zero Hedge -

Iran May Let Indian Tankers Through Hormuz Strait, Reports Of High-Level Talks

First it was China, now an India exception? 

Bloomberg reports another major potential exception Tehran could make for Strait of Hormuz oil transit. "India is in talks with Iran to secure the safe passage of more than 20 tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, according to people familiar with the matter," a Thursday morning report indicates.

"Negotiations are still ongoing and are being handled by the ministry of foreign affairs, said the people, who asked not to be named as the conversations are sensitive," Bloomberg continues. "The narrow waterway, through which around a fifth of the world’s crude typically flows, has been effectively closed since the start of the war in the Persian Gulf."

via India Today

However, Reuters has separately cited an Iranian source to say no such agreement has been made for safe passage of Indian vessels. 

India ranks as third among the world's top crude importers, with China at the top. New Delhi gets some 40% of all its global imports from the Mideast and based on transit through the vital Strait of Hormuz waterway.

Since the US-Israeli Operation Epic Fury began, maritime monitors have noticed that China-owned tankers, or at least ones signaling their China links, appeared to have been given free and safe passage - not coming under Iranian attack. Also, one report this week notes:

Iran has continued to send large amounts of crude oil via the Strait of Hormuz to China even as the war between U.S.-Israel and Iran has jeopardized broader supplies through the critical waterway.

Iran has sent at least 11.7 million barrels of crude oil through the Strait of Hormuz since the war began on Feb. 28, all of which were headed to China, Samir Madani, co-founder of TankerTrackers.com, told CNBC on Tuesday.

But now Indian tankers laden with crude oil, liquefied petroleum gas and liquefied natural gas - all stuck in regional waters amid the broader international backlog of ships too afraid to make the passage, especially now that the Iranians are reportedly laying explosive mines in the narrow water lanes - are hoping their own government could get a 'pass' akin to what some Chinese tankers appear to be enjoying.

Such was also the case in the Red Sea, with the past two years of the Houthi war on global shipping, which the US Navy ultimately could not thwart at the time - despite some significant engagements and bombing campaigns: Chinese and Russian vessels were declared by the Iran-linked Houthis to be safe. 

Meanwhile, of the jagged, mountainous coastline from which the Iranians can easily fire on the strait:

It remains too early to say whether a similar deal might be unfolding with the Islamic Republic in Hormuz, but one source notes that "The Economic Times, an Indian outlet, reported on Thursday that Iran had allowed two India-flagged tankers to transit the Strait of Hormuz after the Indian and Iranian foreign ministers held a telephone conversation to discuss keeping the route open for Indian vessels."

As a reminder the IEA said in a Thursday report, "The war in the Middle East is creating the largest supply disruption in the history of the global oil market."

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 08:40

Once Again, Initial Jobless Claims Refuse To Signal Labor Market Stress

Zero Hedge -

Once Again, Initial Jobless Claims Refuse To Signal Labor Market Stress

Initial jobless claims dipped last week to 213k - basically unchanged since Nov 2021 - continuing to suggest an economy that is not seeing the average joe get canned at anything other than a de minimus rate...

Continuing jobless claims also dipped last week, remaining well below the 1.9 million Americans Maginot Line...

With ADP's strong job additions report earlier in the week, all indications (except the aberrant payrolls print) are that the US labor market remains solid. The 'no hire, no fire' economy may be improving to a 'some hire, no fire' economy... for now.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 08:36

Futures Tumble As Oil Jumps Above $100 On Iran War Chaos

Zero Hedge -

Futures Tumble As Oil Jumps Above $100 On Iran War Chaos

US futures are sharply lower, as oil briefly surges back over $100 while markets start to accept the view that the Iran war will not end this week, and possibly any time soon. As of 8:15am ET, S&P and Nasdaq futures are down 0.7% and R2K futures slide more than 1%. Futures dropped more than 1% overnight as Iraq suspended oil terminal activity following an attack on two tankers; they recovered some losses after the resumption of normal operations at Oman’s Mina Al Fahal oil terminal. Global market moves overnight were relatively benign: KOSPI down 48bps the most muted day in weeks, China flattish, Europe mixed with Germany flat and France down 50bps. In premarket trading, Mag 7 names are all weaker, energy names are stronger, and defensives outperform cyclicals on the move lower. Iran offered an off-ramp (guarantee of no future attacks from US and Israel) but unclear if that will be accepted. Private credit fears continue to surface as Morgan Stanley and Cliffwater gated withdrawals from their private credit funds, pressuring both Equities and Credit. Bond yields are flat, the USD is bid, and commodities are seeing strength across all 3 complexes, led by Energy. Today’s macro data focus is on jobless claims and housing starts. The Fed remains in blackout into next week’s (Mar 18) meeting. The market wants to see if Powell echoed Trump’s view that prices increases from the conflict are transitory when other central banks are seeing expectations flip from cuts to hikes.

In premarket trading, Mag 7 stocks are all lower (Alphabet -0.7%, Meta -0.7%, Amazon -0.6%, Microsoft -0.4%, Nvidia -0.4%, Tesla and Apple little changed)

  • Fertilizer, energy and chemical stocks climb as the war in Iran and disruptions to the Strait of Hormuz tighten supply, raising prices, while airlines and cruise stocks are down as higher crude prices lift costs.
  • Blue Owl Capital Inc. (OWL) falls 3% after the asset manager defended its recent sale of $1.4 billion of loans from three of its funds, arguing the transaction contained no backstops or hidden incentives.
  • Bumble (BMBL) rises 24% after the online dating company forecast Ebitda for the first quarter that beat expectations. Analysts noted that focus now shifts to upcoming product overhaul planned for later in the year.
  • Hims & Hers Health (HIMS) rises 5% after rallying 10% on Wednesday. The stock is set to extend its advance for a fourth straight session.
  • Lightwave Logic (LWLG) climbs 16% after the company announced a development agreement with Tower Semiconductor.
  • Petco (WOOF) rises 10% as the pet health and wellness company’s adjusted Ebitda forecast for the first quarter beat the average analyst estimate. Jefferies upgrades its rating, noting that investors underappreciate the progress made thus far.
  • UiPath (PATH) falls 6% after the software company reported fourth-quarter results. Bloomberg Intelligence writes that growth concerns persist despite a strong quarter.

In corporate news, Atlassian is the latest software firm to announce AI-linked job cuts. Abivax shares are surging after French media reported that the biotech had granted AstraZeneca exclusive access to confidential information until March 23 with a view to formalizing an offer. And the widening war has upended global travel, sending fares soaring and leaving travelers facing record prices ahead of the Easter rush.

Iran escalated attacks on parts of Dubai and shipping assets, pushing oil briefly back above $100 a barrel and intensifying concern about the length of the Middle East war and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Multiple oil tankers were attacked in Iraqi waters and Oman evacuated ships from a key terminal. The Iran war has disrupted 7.5% of global crude supply, with flows through the Strait down by more than 90%, the IEA said. It's telling that after yet another Whitehouse jawbone and the IEA’s record reserve release announcement, oil still failed to drop. Overnight Reuters reported, “Iran has laid about a dozen mines in Strait of Hormuz, sources say”. 

Hostilities are fast-approaching a third week, with no sign of de-escalation. Iran escalated attacks on parts of Dubai and shipping assets, driving oil prices higher and increasing concern among traders about how much longer the conflict in the Middle East will go on for. The surge in oil prices reflects concern that the conflict could throw energy markets into turmoil for a prolonged period, with efforts to cushion the impact offering little relief. Crude is driving moves across asset classes as traders fear that higher fuel costs will rekindle inflation and hit economic growth.

“What you’re are seeing is the market pricing a long-lasting scenario of high oil prices,” said Karen Georges, an equity fund manager at Ecofi in Paris. “The security of shipping in the region is a big concern while the release of emergency oil reserves can only provide temporary relief.”

The International Energy Agency said in a monthly report that the Iran war is causing unprecedented turmoil in oil markets. Global oil supply will be slashed by 8 million barrels a day this month, or almost 250 million barrels in total, the IEA estimated. The report comes after the agency’s members agreed to release 400 million barrels from emergency reserves on Wednesday. 

“While Trump’s claim that we could soon see a resolution to the conflict does provide hesitancy for the bulls, the reality of the situation will undoubtedly call for higher prices as the days roll on,” said Joshua Mahony, chief market analyst at Scope Markets.

For Francois Rimeu, senior strategist at Credit Mutuel Asset Management in Paris, the reaction in equity markets has been rather sanguine given how broad and impactful a worst-case scenario for the conflict could be. “The draw-down could really turn much lower should the conflict last longer, and the longer it lasts, the longer a return to business as usual will be,” Rimeu said. “If you ask me when is the right time to buy back, I would tend to say when one actually sees ships crossing the Strait of Hormuz again.”

In the latest hit to private credit, Morgan Stanley and Cliffwater gated withdrawals from their multibillion-dollar private credit funds after investors sought to redeem vastly more than the vehicles allow. Partners Group warned that private credit default rates could double in the next few years. Tariffs are also back in the spotlight as the US begins a probe into trade investigations that set the stage for new levies.

Back on oil, China tightened fuel export curbs, while the average retail cost for one gallon of gasoline in the US has risen to the highest level since May 2024, piling pressure onto the administration to find an off-ramp for the conflict. Trump has said that the war could end soon, but the latest rhetoric from Iran dimmed prospects for a quick resolution.

Elsewhere, JPMorgan said hedge funds are experiencing the biggest drawdown since April’s tariff turmoil, as unwinds in crowded trades punish the fast-money cohort. In a brutal trading week, Citadel’s Global Fixed Income Fund and Taula Capital Management are among the hedge funds worst hit, while D.E. Shaw’s two main vehicles were a rare bright spot in the industry.

European stocks are lower across the board but off session troughs after the resumption of normal operations at Oman’s Mina Al Fahal oil terminal provided some reprieve. Banks are the biggest underperformer, while chemicals outperform most. Here are the biggest movers Thursday:

  • Accelleron Industries shares rise as much as 17%, a record jump that briefly sent the stock to an all-time high, after the maker of turbochargers posted full-year earnings that topped expectations, with a solid outlook and its first buybacks
  • Abivax shares rise as much as 17% after La Lettre reported the biotech company had granted AstraZeneca exclusive access to confidential information until March 23 with a view to formalizing an offer
  • K+S gains as much as 8.8%, the most since last April, after the German fertilizer group reported solid earnings, which analysts said boded well for 2026. They noted that higher sulfur prices due to tumult in the Middle East could prove a tailwind
  • Zalando gains as much as 9.2%, the most since November, after the German online seller of fashion announced a new share buyback program of up to €300 million, which RBC said should soothe concerns over capital allocation
  • Leonardo shares gain as much as 8.7% to a new record high after the defense technology firm outlined its targets through 2030, which Mediobanca described as “bullish.” Analysts highlight, in particular, order intake expectations
  • Bachem shares jump as much as 9.7%, the most since July, after the pharmaceutical ingredients producer reported slightly better results than expected
  • PolyPeptide advances as much as 11% after confirming its 2025 numbers and providing outlook commentary which Jefferies says demonstrates the biotechnology company’s strong execution
  • Trainline shares slide as much as 6.7% after its annual results, with JPMorgan warning the rail ticketing platform is lacking visibility and faces a “more challenging chapter ahead” in FY27
  • Bodycote drops as much as 5.5% after being downgraded at RBC Capital Markets, with analysts citing more limited upside. The cut comes a day after the provider of heat treatment and specialist thermal processing services beat expectation
  • Savills shares fall as much as 8.4% to the lowest in six months, as the property services group’s in-line results are overshadowed by the war in the Middle East
  • On the Beach shares drop as much as 15% to the lowest level since November 2024. The online seller of package holidays suspended its full-year guidance of £39m to £43m adjusted profit before tax due to a “significant slowdown”

Earlier in the session, Asian stocks fell on Thursday, snapping a two-day rising streak after a string of disruptions in the Iran war renewed fears of a longer-term energy supply strain in the Middle East and briefly pushed Brent crude back above $100 a barrel.  The MSCI Asia Pacific Index fell as much as 2%, led by chipmakers TSMC, Samsung and SK Hynix. The jump in oil prices came as Iran suspended oil terminal activity following an assault on two tankers, and Oman temporarily evacuated its main export hub. The regional benchmark had climbed for two previous sessions when oil prices softened, underscoring investors’ focus on volatile energy markets.  Bonds in the euro area trimmed early declines.

In FX, the Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index gains 0.3%, before paring the advance; the greenback is on course for a fresh 2026 high, options markets showUSD/JPY is little changed at 158.90; it rose earlier to a two-month high at 159.24 as options traders and strategists see a high threshold for intervention from Japan to defend the yen

In rates, US rates have clambered off session lows but remain weak with global bonds erasing 2026 gains. US yields are down around 1bps across the curve. US long-end yields are little changed with front-end tenors richer by 1bp-2bp, steepening 5s30s spread by around 1bp. 10-year near 4.21% is lower by about 1bp with UK counterpart up about 4bp. In IG issuance, Salesforce led eight issuers that sold a combined $41.7 billion Wednesday, taking weekly volume past $107b, the third largest on record achieved in only two sessions. Issuers paid an elevated 21bp in new issue concessions on deals that were 1.9 times covered. At least one issuer stood down Wednesday, while a couple are considering Thursday.

A Bloomberg index that tracks total returns from investment-grade government and corporate bonds is now flat for 2026. The gauge had been up as much as 2.1% this year through Feb. 27, just before the US and Israel attacked Iran.

In commodities, Brent crude futures rise 4.6% to $98 but off session highs; Iranian attacks on shipping assets and areas of Dubai alongside China tightening fuel export curbs briefly lifted prices above the $100 a barrel mark.Spot gold and silver are higher by 1.5% and 0.1% respectively. Bitcoin is down 0.4%. 

US economic data slate includes January trade balance and housing starts and weekly jobless claims (8:30am) and 4Q household change in net worth (12pm)

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 mini -0.6%
  • Nasdaq 100 mini -0.6%
  • Russell 2000 mini -1.3%
  • Stoxx Europe 600 -0.6%
  • DAX -0.5%
  • CAC 40 -0.7%
  • 10-year Treasury yield little changed at 4.23%
  • VIX +1.3 points at 25.53
  • Bloomberg Dollar Index +0.2% at 1204.95
  • euro -0.1% at $1.1551
  • WTI crude +6.2% at $92.66/barrel

Top Overnight News

  • Iran escalated attacks on parts of Dubai and shipping assets, pushing oil briefly back above $100 a barrel and intensifying concern about the length of the Middle East war and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz. Two oil tankers were attacked in Iraqi waters and Oman evacuated ships from a key terminal. The Iran war has disrupted 7.5% of global crude supply, with flows through the Strait down by more than 90%, the IEA said. BBG
  • President Trump—faced with rising oil prices and pushback from his MAGA base—is signaling that he wants to wind down the war he launched against Iran less than two weeks ago. Stopping the fighting carries risks. Leaving in place Iran’s theocratic regime—angry, defiant and in possession of its nuclear stockpile and what remains of its arsenal of missiles and drones—would essentially grant Tehran control over the world’s energy markets. WSJ
  • India plans to unveil a more than $10.8 billion fund aimed at bolstering domestic chipmaking, people familiar said. BBG
  • German bond yields rose to their highest since October 2023 as the Iran war stoked inflation concerns. BBG
  • Oracle has stepped up preparations to cut jobs over the coming months as it credits AI with driving efficiencies in its team and conserves cash to fund its costly push into data centers. FT
  • President Trump—faced with rising oil prices and pushback from his MAGA base—is signaling that he wants to wind down the war he launched against Iran less than two weeks ago. Stopping the fighting carries risks. Leaving in place Iran’s theocratic regime—angry, defiant and in possession of its nuclear stockpile and what remains of its arsenal of missiles and drones—would essentially grant Tehran control over the world’s energy markets. WSJ
  • U.S. officials say relentless American and Israeli aerial attacks have crippled Iran’s air defenses, navy and missile arsenal. But the regime in Tehran has so far held on to power, and it effectively shut down a crucial choke point for the world’s oil supplies. CNBC
  • The White House believes it has until the end of March before rising gas prices become an “unsustainable” political five-alarm fire, one of the officials said. CNBC
  • Morgan Stanley and private credit lender Cliffwater have restricted withdrawals from private credit funds, in the latest sign of investor unease about the sector. Separately, a US distressed debt investment fund told its investors that private credit lenders such as Blue Owl are obscuring weaknesses in their portfolios and a sharp correction in debt markets is approaching soon. FT
  • Investors demanded significant concessions in Salesforce’s $25bn bond deal on Wed, highlighting rising worries on Wall Street about how AI technology could disrupt software companies. FT
  • Trump is to signs orders on housing in the coming days, according to Punchbowl citing a White House spokesperson.
  • BofA Card Spending (w/e March 7th): +4.6% Y/Y, vs 3.2% in February. Y/Y spending appears to be robust in the early part of March.

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

APAC stocks declined as rising oil prices dampened sentiment and stoked inflationary concerns, while the announcement of a record joint emergency reserves release failed to drag energy prices lower, due to likely slow deliveries and with further disruptions in the Middle East from the ongoing hostilities. ASX 200 was dragged lower by losses in nearly all sectors aside from energy, and with further calls by large banks for the RBA to deliver a back-to-back rate hike next week. Nikkei 225 briefly slumped below the 54,000 level as the higher oil prices lifted yields and weighed on manufacturer and exporter sentiment. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp conformed to the broad downbeat mood in the region, with risk appetite also not helped by the announcement that the US is initiating a Section 301 investigation into 16 trading partners, including China, the EU, Mexico, Vietnam, India and Japan.

Top Asian News

  • Japanese PM Takaichi said won't rule out using FY25 reserve funds for fuel and the existing fund has JPY 280bln remaining, adds no additional budget for fuel subsidies now and will use existing fund for fuel price measures.

European bourses (STOXX 600 -0.4%) have started the cash session on the backfoot, with higher oil prices continuing to weigh on growth prospects. Weakness in banks continues to affect the IBEX 35 (-0.9%), given its exposure. The DAX 40 (U/C) is modestly lower, but losses are limited due to gains in Zalando (+12.2%), Rheinmetall (+2.9%) and Hannover Re (+3.2%). European sectors are broadly in the red, with Banks (-2.1%) continuing to underperform. Automobiles (-0.9%) also sit near the bottom of the pile after BMW (-1.1%) missed Q4 sales estimates and forecast higher tariffs acting as a headwind on EBIT margin. Basic Resources (+0.7%) are benefiting from the rise in metals prices, while Chemicals (+0.8%) gain after K+S (+8.0%) beat Adj. EBITDA estimates.

Top European News

  • Germany's IFW institute sees 2026 inflation at 2.5% (prev. 1.8%), GDP at 0.8% (prev. 1.0%), 2027 GDP at 1.4% (prev. 1.3%).

Trade/Tariffs

  • USTR Greer said US is initiating Section 301 investigation into 16 trading partners, including China, EU, Mexico, Vietnam, India and Japan, adds the investigation could lead to responsive actions, including tariffs. Said the EU has done approximately 0% of what was agreed in the bilateral trade deal.
  • South Korea parliament passes US investment bill, as expected.

FX

  • DXY is slightly firmer this morning and trades within a 99.31-99.52 range, and now heading back to the YTD high at 99.69 (March 9th). Upside on Wednesday was facilitated by higher yields as the energy prices continue to trudge higher as the geopolitical situation in Iran is showing little signs of abating any time soon, as an overnight attack on Omani export terminals led Brent back above USD 100/bbl. The recent IEA 400mln barrel reserve release has ultimately had little impact on prices, given the lengthy timeline for the barrels to enter the market and ING rightly points out, it still works out to be “far short of the supply losses we are seeing from the Persian Gulf”. Domestically, weekly jobless claims, trade data and Fed speak via Bowman - though she will not touch on monetary policy.
  • G10s are broadly flat to lower against the USD. The JPY and CAD hold afloat, though the former remains within the touted intervention zone beyond 158.00. As mentioned in previous FX pieces, intervention seems unlikely given, a) intervention would prove to be ineffective given the current geopolitical environment, b) low volume short positions on the JPY, c) the move is fundamentally driven by higher energy prices d) the recent lack of verbal intervention suggests potentially higher bar for USD/JPY to rise. Nonetheless, markets will be cognizant of any jawboning heading into the BoJ meeting and wage negations next week.
  • AUD underperforms vs USD this morning, scaling back some of this week’s gains. RBA hike bets continue to be taken by sell-side banks, with ANZ the latest see a 25bps increase at next week’s meeting; money markets now assign a circa 80% chance of such a move.

Central Banks

  • Bank of Japan Governor Ueda said foreign exchange is an important factor affecting the economy and prices, during parliamentary testimony. Need to be mindful that Forex has larger impacts on prices than in the past and could affect inflation expectations. Will conduct appropriate monetary policy while assessing how Forex affects the likelihood of our forecasts.
  • ANZ Bank and Goldman Sachs now see the RBA hiking the Cash Rate at next week's meeting.
  • NBP's Janczyk said the current base rate is at an appropriate level for the coming quarters.
  • BoK member Hwang said need to make rate decision with greater caution.

Fixed Income

  • Another bearish session for fixed as, despite the IEA stockpile announcement, energy benchmarks are on the front foot once again with Brent eclipsing USD 100/bbl in APAC trade and Dutch TTF as high as EUR 53.80/MWh. In brief, energy strength comes as the market digests the time it will take for the IEA flows to hit the market, the Middle East conflict showing no immediate signs of stopping, and the associated ongoing Strait of Hormuz block.
  • Given this, USTs are lower by a handful of ticks and holding just off a 111-21 base. If the move continues, we look to support at 111-19+, 111-10 and 111-08+ from earlier in the year. The US docket is headlined by Fed speak and then a 30yr auction to round off the week, after a poor 3yr and a 10yr that was an improvement from the last outing, but softer than the average tap.
  • Gilts lower by around 40 ticks at most, hitting a 89.36 trough, which, while notable is still some way clear of the 88.80 MTD low and the 88.52 contract base. Pressure a function of the referenced energy moves and a return towards some of the hawkish BoE pricing seen at the start of the week, with around a 20% chance of a hike by end-2026 currently implied.
  • Finally, Bunds followed suit at first and hit a 125.91 base, taking the German 10yr yield to another multi-year high. Amidst this, market pricing got to around an 80% chance of two 25bps hikes by the ECB in 2026; reminder, at most we have seen two hikes fully priced in recent sessions. However, this pared across the mid-morning with the benchmark briefly, but only marginally, moving into the green. No clear or overt fundamental behind the gradual turnaround, but the action is potentially a function of energy benchmarks easing from overnight peaks.

Commodities

  • WTI and Brent futures trade firmer but off best levels after Brent futures briefly rose above USD 100/bbl in APAC hours, with the former currently in a USD 88.61-95.97/bbl range and the latter in a USD 96.69-101.59/bbl parameter. The gains come amid a war that seems to be escalating rather than abating (full Newsquawk Analysis available on the headline feed).
  • European natgas prices are firmer but off their best levels after rising almost 8% in sympathy with crude prices. The EU’s Dombrovskis warned that inflation could exceed 3% this year if the Middle East war keeps Brent around USD 100/bbl and gas prices elevated for a prolonged period; under that scenario, 2026 growth would be up to 0.4ppts below the 1.4% pace forecast late last year.
  • Spot gold is mildly firmer this morning and largely moves in tandem with the USD, which in turn tracks oil prices. Gold retreated overnight following US CPI data, which reduced expectations for any near-term Fed rate cuts, and as the Middle East conflict lifted crude prices. XAU/USD resides in a USD 5,125.64-5,189.86/oz range within Tuesday’s USD 5,117.35-5,238.75/oz.
  • 3M LME copper ekes mild gains on either side of USD 13,000/t as the red metal largely tracks the USD and oil for any impact on the growth narrative, with further upside likely capped by the US initiating a Section 301 investigation into 16 trading partners, including China, the EU. 3M LME copper currently resides in a narrow USD 12,920.60-13,055.88/t range at the time of writing.
  • IEA OMR: cuts 2026 global oil supply growth forecast to 1.1mln BPD (prev. 2.4mln BPD), total 2026 supply forecast 107.2mln BPD (prev. 108.6mln BPD). Middle East conflict is the largest oil supply disruption ever. Demand Forecasts. 2026, total: 104.8mln BPD. 2026, growth: 640k BPD (prev. 850k BPD). OPEC+ production decreased by 210k BPD in February.
  • US is to release 172mln barrels of crude from strategic petroleum reserve, according to Energy Department. The release will begin next week, with delivery expected to take around 120 days based on planned discharge rates, while the US will replace reserves by 20% more than what will be withdrawn. SPR release is part of the broader coordinated crude oil release from IEA member countries in response to the Iran war.
  • US President Trump said IEA decision to release oil from reserves will substantially reduce oil prices.
  • Oman’s Mina Al Fahal crude export terminal has resumed normal operations after a temporary halt earlier Thursday, with loading activities now proceeding as usual, according to reported.
  • Iraqi official said oil ports have completely stopped operations, while commercial ports continue to operate following attack on two fuel tankers.
  • India is in discussions with Iran to secure passage for 20 tankers through the Strait of Hormuz, Bloomberg reported citing sources.
  • US Energy Secretary Wright said hope to see ships through the Strait of Hormuz in a few weeks.
  • China reportedly expands BHP's (BHP AT) iron ore ban to new products, asking domestic steel mills not to take delivery from BHP's Portside Newman fines from next week.

Geopolitics

  • A senior US administration official, on the Middle East conflict and President Trump's view, said "The Iranians fcking around with the Strait makes him more dug in". An advisor said that Trump is bullish on the success of the operation thus far and believes the American people will believe it was the right approach once it is over. Advisor adds that Trump, and others in the administration, genuinely believe that gas prices will substantially fall when the Middle East conflict concludes, and long enough before the midterms to not be a problem.
  • US President Trump was reportedly "ambiguous and noncommittal" during the G7 leaders call, Axios reported; with some participants thinking POTUS wants to end the war, while other attendees left with the opposite view.
  • US President Trump said we knocked out Iran's navy and mine layers, adds oil prices will come down, but we won't leave early. said the job on Iran must be finished and don't want to return every two years.
  • US President Trump said we know where Iranian sleeper cells are and have eyes on all of them, adds we are going to look very closely at the Straits.
  • Reports of a drone attack on a US military base in Kuwait, Tasnim reported.
  • According to Lebanese newspaper citing diplomatic sources, Iran clarified that they defend itself against American and Israeli aggression and that it will not agree to a ceasefire that is not accompanied by clear guarantees, via N12 News reporter Lipkin.
  • Officials from four nations are attempting to persuade Iran to begin talks with the US, Jerusalem Post reported citing sources; however, thus far, Iran has refused to engage and is maintaining a hardline position.
  • Reports suggests that Iran says it struck a US oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz.
  • Iran said it gives permission for Indian oil tankers to pass through the Strait of Hormuz. This was later denied by an Iranian source.
  • "The campaign against Hezbollah will not be short and will not adhere to a specific timetable", according to Sky News Arabia citing Israeli officials.
  • Iranian explosive-laden boats hit two fuel tankers in Iraqi waters.
  • Iran military-affiliated outlet Defa press cites informed sources that note Yemeni resistance and some other resistance groups are fully prepared to join the battle in the coming days. According to predictions, with the entry of these groups, there is a risk of closing the strategic Bab-al-Mandab Strait which would disrupt transit in the Suez Canal.
  • UKMTO received a report of an incident 35 nautical miles north of Jebel Ali in United Arab Emirates, in which a container ship was struck by an unknown projectile causing a small fire, while all crew are safe.
  • Saudi Ministry of Defence said they are intercepting a drone heading to the Shaybah oil field, Sky News Arabia reported; reported suggest the interception was successful.
  • Qatar residents reportedly receive mobile alert for missile threat.

US Event Calendar

  • 8:30 am: United States Jan Trade Balance, est. -66b, prior -70.3b
  • 8:30 am: United States Mar 7 Initial Jobless Claims, est. 215k, prior 213k
  • 8:30 am: United States Feb 28 Continuing Claims, est. 1849k, prior 1868k
  • 8:30 am: United States Jan Housing Starts, est. 1340.5k, prior 1404k
  • 8:30 am: United States Jan P Building Permits, est. 1410k, prior 1455k
  • 11:00 am: United States Fed’s Bowman Speaks on Basel III

DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

As we go to press this morning, the market volatility has shown no sign of easing, with Brent crude surging back +8.95% overnight to $100.21/bbl. The main catalyst for that has been further attacks on shipping, with two tankers and a container vessel struck in the Gulf this morning. Moreover, Bloomberg have also reported overnight that Oman has evacuated ships from the export terminal of Mina Al Fahal, which exports around 1mn barrels per day. So that’s driven a fresh surge in oil prices, and there’s been a clear risk-off move as a result. Indeed, futures on the S&P 500 (-0.86%) and the German DAX (-1.06%) have seen further declines this morning, and the major indices in Asia have all lost ground as well.

From a market perspective, the problem is that investors are increasingly pricing in a more protracted conflict that causes extensive economic damage. After all, with no concrete signs of de-escalation yet, that’s keeping oil prices elevated, and raising the risk of a broader stagflationary shock. Indeed, we know that investors are pricing in the longer scenarios, because the 6-month Brent future is also up +3.06% this morning to $82.97/bbl, and with each passing day it gets harder to argue that the disruption to shipping and energy infrastructure will only prove temporary.

With the latest move back above $100/bbl, we’re also getting closer to the territory that’s historically led to bigger risk-off moves. I explored this in a note on Monday (link here), looking at the scenarios where previous oil shocks have led to sizeable market selloffs. So far at least we’ve not been in that territory, because of the assumption that oil prices aren’t going to be elevated for a sustained period, which we can see in the futures curve. In other words, markets aren’t yet pricing in a 2022-style scenario, where oil prices spent around 5 months above $100/bbl. In addition, fears of a hawkish response aren’t as prominent today relative to 2022 because inflation was running well above target to start with back then, even before the oil price spike. But clearly the longer that oil remains at these levels, expectations of a sustained shock will only grow.

Those fears of a longer conflict have been reflected in the latest newsflow as well, with few signs that either side are moving towards a ceasefire. Indeed, Iran’s Fars News agency cited a military spokesman yesterday who said that they were moving from reciprocal to continuous strikes, while Bloomberg reported later in the day that Iran had told regional intermediaries that to achieve a ceasefire the US must guarantee that neither it nor Israel will strike Iran in the future. Meanwhile, President Trump separately said that the US could strike even more targets if they wanted. So comments like that added to the concern that both sides were preparing for an extended operation, with no obvious sign of either backing down.

For investors, a big focus is whether the Strait of Hormuz can reopen, but traffic there is still largely suspended in practice. For instance, the German foreign minister said yesterday that it was “definitely not navigable at the moment”. And even though there was more discussion about escorting ships through the Strait of Hormuz, President Macron said it would take a few weeks to coordinate. However, there was some brief relief from the International Energy Agency’s announcement, as they agreed to release 400mn barrels from emergency reserves, with the US confirming later on that this would include 172mn barrels from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve to be released over 120 days.

The latest oil spike overnight comes on the back of another tough session yesterday, with Brent crude (+4.76%) already posting a decent increase back up to $91.98/bbl, even before the latest attacks. And there was little respite elsewhere, as hawkish ECB commentary led to a major selloff for European sovereign bonds, with 10yr bund yields (+9.7bps) closing at their highest level since late-2023, at 2.93%. So it was a tough day across the board, and concern about the wider economic damage meant equities struggled, even before the latest falls overnight. Indeed, we know that the longer-term scenarios are being priced in, because the 12-month Brent future (+2.94%) was up to $74.17/bbl, posting its biggest daily gain yesterday since the strikes began.

As all that was happening, there were huge moves for European sovereigns yesterday as speculation grew about an ECB rate hike this year. That was driven by comments from Slovakia’s central bank governor Kazimir, who said “a reaction by the ECB is potentially closer than many people think”. Meanwhile, Bundesbank President Nagel said the ECB “will act decisively” if the energy shock translates into higher medium-term inflation. So those comments and yesterday’s oil price moves saw investors fully price in an ECB rate hike as soon as the July meeting. And in turn, yields on 10yr bunds (+9.7bps), OATs (+12.6bps) and BTPs (+14.3bps) all saw their biggest rise since March last year, back when the German debt brake reform was announced. So these were significant moves, even in the context of the volatility of recent days. Indeed, there were even larger yield moves at the front end of the curve, with 2yr German yields (+12.4bps) jumping up to 2.37%, their highest since September 2024.

That pattern was echoed in the US, where investors also moved to dial back the pace of cuts this year. So by the close, there was just a 35% probability of a cut by the June meeting, which spoke to growing doubt about how quickly a new Fed Chair could start easing policy. And looking further out, just 30bps of cuts were priced in by the December meeting, which is the fewest so far this year, and overnight that’s fallen back to 28bps. So Treasury yields rose across the curve, with the 2yr yield (+6.1bps) at a 5-month high of 3.65%, whilst the 10yr yield (+7.4bps) was up to 4.23%. And overnight, the 10yr yield (+1.0bps) is up again to 4.24%.

Amidst all that, we did get the latest US CPI print for February. However, markets were paying a lot less attention to that than usual, given we know there’s going to be a fresh price shock from the Middle East conflict. So to some extent, the print was already seen as backward-looking. Even so, there was little reaction anyway, as the numbers were broadly in line with expectations beforehand. So headline CPI was at a monthly +0.3% as expected, keeping the year-on-year rate at +2.4%. And core CPI was at a monthly +0.2%, leaving the year-on-year rate at +2.5%.

Given the mounting fears about an extended economic shock, with potentially hawkish implications, global equities have lost ground across the world. In Asia overnight, the major indices have fallen back across the region, with declines for the Nikkei (-1.34%), the Hang Seng (-1.32%), the CSI 300 (-0.98%), the KOSPI (-0.91%) and the Shanghai Comp (-0.65%). Then in Europe, the STOXX 600, the DAX (-1.37%) and the CAC 40 (-0.19%) all fell back. And in the US, the S&P 500 (-0.08%) was down for a second day running despite paring back its losses later in the session. That was another broad-based decline, with two-thirds of the S&P 500’s constituents down on the day, though a third consecutive gain for the Mag 7 (+0.37%) helped counteract the deeper losses elsewhere.

In other news, US Trade Representative Greer announced that they would begin Section 301 investigations into over a dozen major economies, including China, the EU, India and Japan, focusing on alleged excess manufacturing capacity. The investigations are required for the President to be able to set tariffs against countries deemed to rely on unfair trading practices, which the administration could use to replace the stopgap 150-day Section 122 duties that it imposed after the Supreme Court struck down the IEEPA tariffs last month.

Looking at the day ahead, data releases include the US weekly initial jobless claims, along with housing starts and building permits for January. Otherwise, central bank speakers include BoE Governor Bailey, the Fed’s Bowman, and the ECB’s Villeroy.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 08:33

DHS IG Launched Probe Into $220M Contract For Noem Ads

Zero Hedge -

DHS IG Launched Probe Into $220M Contract For Noem Ads

Authored by Susan Crabtree via RealClearInvestigations,

The Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General has for more than a month been investigating the process in which three businesses received $220 million for an ad campaign encouraging illegal immigrants to self-deport and featuring outgoing Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, according to sources familiar with the probe.

The existence of the IG probe and its inquiries have raised concerns among other investigators within the watchdog agency that Noem and her leadership team have retaliated against them by blocking access to critical information and data necessary to provide congressionally mandated oversight of key DHS functions, including the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown.

A source in the DHS community accused Noem of “retaliating” by not allowing the IG to “work real cases” because she and her top adviser, Corey Lewandowski, could be implicated in the watchdog probe of the ad contracts.

The $220 million ad contract sparked bipartisan Senate scrutiny during a Judiciary Committee hearing last week before Trump fired Noem, who will leave her role by March 31. Trump, who has since openly criticized the ad campaign’s price tag, tapped Oklahoma GOP Sen. Markwayne Mullin to replace Noem.

Republican Sens. John Kennedy and Thom Tillis joined Sen. Peter Welch, a Vermont Democrat, in questioning Noem about the ad campaign contract and whether any DHS employee had financially benefited from it. The senators repeatedly pressed Noem on why it was awarded to three companies, including a subcontractor run by Ben Yoho, the husband of former DHS press secretary Tricia McLaughlin.

Welch and Sen. Richard Blumenthal, who is the ranking member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, followed up late last week with letters to the three companies – Safe America Media, People Who Think, and Yoho’s Strategy Group. Safe America Media was incorporated in Delaware less than two weeks before receiving a $143 million contract. People Who Think was awarded a $77 million contract.

As the lead contractors, Safe America Media and People Who Think stood to reap millions in profit for the ad placements in media companies across the United States. Safe America Media is run by veteran GOP operative Michael McElwain, who through his DMM Media company is a well-known ad buyer for Senate Republican campaign committees.

Ad maker Pat McCarthy, also of DMM Media, is best known for producing Trump’s viral 2024 “They/Them” ad targeting then-Vice President Kamala Harris’ support for transgender surgeries for California prisoners. MAGA Inc., the super PAC that spent the most money supporting Trump’s 2024 campaign, hammered Harris in the ads, echoing a Trump campaign ad almost exactly, saying, “Crazy liberal Kamala’s for they/them. President Trump is for you.”

People Who Think is associated with Jay Connaughton, who worked with Lewandowski on Jeff Landry’s Louisiana gubernatorial campaign.

A DHS spokesperson denied any retaliation against the Inspector General’s office.

“It is completely false that there has been any kind of retaliation against the IG and his staff,” an unidentified DHS spokesperson told RealClearPolitics in an emailed statement.

A spokesman for the DHS IG’s office said it could not confirm nor deny the existence of any particular investigation. On its website, however, the IG lists as one of its ongoing projects “an audit of grants and contracts awarded by any means other than full and open competition during fiscal year 2025,” which could perceivably include information about the process in which DHS officials awarded the contracts for the $220 million Noem ad campaign.

That audit, which is congressionally mandated to take place on a yearly basis and apply oversight to all DHS grants and contracts, is currently paused because the ongoing DHS government shutdown has forced the watchdog agency to furlough employees assigned to it. One source, however, said the DHS IG investigation into the Noem ad campaign in question was separate from this audit.

Inspector General Joseph Cuffari in a letter to Congress sent last week accused DHS leadership of having “systematically obstructed” his work, including on a criminal investigation and another into the Secret Service’s failures before and after the 2024 assassination attempt on Trump’s life in Butler, Pennsylvania.

Cuffari claimed that DHS leadership had blocked his team’s access to a compartmentalized intelligence program related to the Secret Service’s mishandling of the threats against Trump, even though a separate intelligence agency had approved his access.

Preventing the access significantly “stymied” his investigation into the USSS’ failures, Cuffari wrote to the chairmen and ranking members of the Senate and House Homeland Security Committees.

This is particularly troubling given the other reported attempts on President Trump’s life coupled with the present worldwide conflict,” Cuffari stressed, asking the lawmakers for their help in resolving these problems.

In addition, Cuffari, whom Trump appointed during his first term, said leaders at Immigrations and Custom Enforcement late last year revoked his team’s prior years-long access to key enforcement databases, and that Customs and Border Patrol has refused to grant access to a data warehouse containing information about border crossings, among other limitations.

DHS general counsel James Percival II wrote a letter to Cuffari in late January arguing that the watchdog had refused to provide “answers to basic questions” that would allow him to address the access complaints. Percival also asked Cuffari to document the scope of his requests, arguing that specific scopes are “even more warranted” as it pertains to classified information systems.

Percival, acting on Noem’s behalf, requested a list of all ongoing DHS IG investigations, which he confirmed in a letter to Democratic Sen. Tammy Duckworth in early February after the lawmaker expressed concern that the department was considering halting the watchdog’s oversight role.

Duckworth at the time said the DHS Office of Inspector General has received “repeated tacit threats” in the form of a reminder about a provision of the law that allows the secretary to kill ongoing inspector general investigations.

Percival said that DHS was within its legal rights to request a full accounting of investigations the watchdog had undertaken but argued that neither he nor Noem was trying to quash any of the probes.

“Rather, I requested on her behalf a list of all investigations to ensure she can evaluate whether it might ever be appropriate to exercise that power,” the general counsel said in a letter to Duckworth.

Duckworth called Percival’s response an admission that Noem’s office was seeking to “sabotage” the watchdog agency’s independence. 

Cuffari had no choice but to provide the list of ongoing investigations and audits because he was forced to do so under the law, even though no other inspector general in the 48 years since an act of Congress created these watchdogs has been asked to do so.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 08:25

Carson Block Turns Bearish, Says AI Threatens 15% Of US Knowledge Jobs

Zero Hedge -

Carson Block Turns Bearish, Says AI Threatens 15% Of US Knowledge Jobs

Carson Block says artificial intelligence has completely changed how he views markets over the past several weeks, according to Bloomberg.

In a conversation with Barry Ritholtz at the Future Proof Wealth Management conference in Miami Beach, the founder and chief investment officer of Muddy Waters Capital said his outlook has flipped.

“Up until one month ago, I was completely sanguine on the S&P 500 and markets in general and the economy,” Block said. “And my view has 180-ed.”

Known for his short-selling campaigns, Block had been relatively constructive on equities as recently as late November, saying he preferred being long rather than short the U.S. market and even revealing several uncommon long positions. Since then, however, the S&P 500 has lost momentum after a stretch of successive record highs.

Block now believes AI could meaningfully reshape both the economy and the stock market. Investor anxiety has been building over whether the hundreds of billions being spent on AI infrastructure will generate sufficient returns — or instead disrupt large parts of the corporate landscape and eliminate many white-collar jobs.

At the center of his concern is how job losses could ripple through the labor market and eventually affect financial markets.

“I think it’s not unrealistic to say 15% of knowledge worker jobs in the US in three years are gone,” Block said.

If new roles don’t emerge quickly enough, higher unemployment could reduce flows into retirement accounts such as 401(k) plans, which have long supported equity markets. If displaced workers then begin withdrawing savings because they cannot find new jobs, it could add further pressure.

Bloomberg writes that once that process begins, “there’s nobody there to catch the falling knife,” he said.

Block expects the disruption to appear first in fields such as law, accounting, tax advisory and finance support functions, particularly among junior staff and administrative roles. In hedge funds, he said many operational and back-office functions, including IT work, could be replaced by automated systems that are cheaper and more efficient. Large, profitable firms may continue hiring junior analysts out of tradition, but businesses operating with thinner margins will likely automate quickly.

Even with those concerns, Block sees opportunities in parts of the market. His firm has positioned trades that effectively bet against extremely tight credit spreads and seek to exploit liquidity mismatches in certain exchange-traded funds.

“I do think credit spreads are stupidly tight right now and credit volatility is stupidly low,” he said. “To me, you want convexity, and there are lots of ways to play it where you’re capping your potential loss.”

He also argued that years of easy money and ultra-low interest rates have made investors more tolerant of risk and enabled questionable corporate behavior. While outright fraud remains relatively rare, he believes a broad “gray zone” of aggressive accounting and misleading narratives has become common.

“My business has gotten harder because unless it’s something really, really egregious, people don’t care,” he said.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 07:45

US Reportedly Has Just Two Months Of Rare Earths Left

Zero Hedge -

US Reportedly Has Just Two Months Of Rare Earths Left

The U.S. military’s reliance on Chinese rare-earth minerals is emerging as a strategic vulnerability as Washington’s conflict with Iran unfolds and President Donald Trump prepares for a closely watched visit to Beijing later this month.

Blocks with symbols and atomic numbers of Rare Earth Elements (REE) are placed on a Chinese flag in this illustration taken January 21, 2026. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

US officials and analysts say the war has intensified concerns about supply chains for the specialized minerals used in advanced weapons systems, SCMP reports. According to people familiar with the issue, the U.S. may have only about two months of rare-earth inventories remaining, raising questions about how long current military operations could be sustained if access to Chinese supplies were disrupted.

As we noted in 2023, former Raytheon CEO Greg Hayes admitted that Beijing effectively has the US military's supply chain by the balls thanks to its reliance on rare earths and other materials which come from, or are processed in, China.

According to Hayes, Raytheon has "several thousand suppliers in China," because of which "decoupling ... is impossible."

"We can de-risk but not decouple," he told the Financial Times, adding that he thinks this is the case "for everybody."

"Think about the $500bn of trade that goes from China to the US every year. More than 95 per cent of rare earth materials or metals come from, or are processed in, China. There is no alternative," Hayes continued, adding "If we had to pull out of China, it would take us many many years to re-establish that capability either domestically or in other friendly countries."

Hayes’ comments underline the difficulties facing western manufacturers amid growing friction between China and the US and its allies.

Beijing in February imposed new sanctions on both Raytheon and US defence peer Lockheed Martin for supplying weapons to Taiwan. Hayes has also been placed under sanctions. 

The sanctions have had little commercial impact as the groups are not allowed to sell military equipment to China. Raytheon, however, has a substantial commercial aerospace business in the country through its engine subsidiary, Pratt & Whitney, and aviation systems and cabin equipment specialist Collins Aerospace. It has about 2,000 direct employees in China. -FT

Hayes - at least two years ago, said that the company is looking "to take some of the most critical components and have second sources but we are not in a position to pull out of China the way we did out of Russia."

Now, concerns over the allegedly limited supply will loom over Trump's planned meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping scheduled to take place March 31 to April 2, according to a White House official, while people briefed on the discussions say rare-earth supplies could dominate the agenda when the two leaders meet.

Rabobank's Michael Every has drawn parallels to the 1956 Suez Crisis, when the United States used financial pressure to force Britain and France to halt military operations in Egypt. In that episode, Washington’s leverage reshaped the geopolitical balance among Western powers.:

This is obviously of critical importance. To extend an analogy used yesterday, is China of 2026 the US of 1956 and the US of 2026 the UK and France of the Suez Crisis?  (This is as Germany may emulate Japan in shoring up critical minerals supply via joint purchasing from its key firms aimed at reducing reliance on China.)

Today, the roles could be reversed. China’s control over critical mineral supplies raises the possibility that Beijing may wield similar influence over Washington at a moment when U.S. military operations and industrial supply chains depend heavily on those materials.

Rare-earth elements - particularly heavy varieties such as dysprosium and terbium - are essential to the manufacture of high-performance permanent magnets, radar systems, missile guidance components and propulsion systems used in modern weapons. China has long dominated global production and processing of these minerals, leaving the U.S. dependent on imports for critical components of its defense industry.

A report this month from the U.S. Geological Survey found that China accounted for 71% of U.S. rare-earth imports between 2021 and 2024 (so obviously less reliant than 2.5 years ago). During that period, China was the sole supplier of certain heavy rare earths, including terbium, with no immediate alternative sources available.

Marina Zhang, an associate professor at the University of Technology Sydney’s Australia-China Relations Institute, told SCMP that the imbalance gives Beijing "significant indirect leverage over the duration and cost of potential conflicts," creating what she described as an “asymmetric vulnerability for Washington,” potentially allowing China to influence geopolitical negotiations by tightening or loosening access to materials vital for weapons production.

Zhao Minghao, a professor at Fudan University’s Institute of International Studies, said Beijing is likely to press the U.S. to ease tariffs and export controls in exchange for assurances on stable rare-earth supplies.

The issue has gained urgency as the U.S. military burns through munitions in its campaign against Iran, which began Feb. 28. President Trump initially projected that the strikes could last four to five weeks but said Monday that American objectives had nearly been achieved and the crisis could end “very soon.”

The Washington Post, citing unnamed U.S. officials, reported that the Pentagon expended roughly $5.6 billion worth of munitions during the first two days of operations alone, highlighting the pace at which advanced weapons stockpiles are being drawn down.

While existing missile inventories could support several months of combat, replenishing them could prove difficult if access to Chinese minerals is constrained, according to Amanda van Dyke, founder of the industry think tank Critical Minerals Hub.

Missile stockpiles are more than sufficient to sustain the Iran war for at least three to six months,” she said. “But restocking those munitions afterward may take much longer without Chinese minerals.”

The Trump administration has attempted to mitigate the risk by launching “Project Vault,” a $12 billion public-private initiative aimed at building strategic stockpiles of critical minerals. Industry analysts say the program may help but could fall short of meeting the specific needs of modern weapons systems.

China has already demonstrated its willingness to use rare-earth exports as leverage. In April, Beijing imposed export controls on seven medium and heavy rare-earth elements - including dysprosium and terbium - requiring special licenses for shipments abroad. The move came in retaliation for U.S. tariffs introduced under Trump’s so-called “Liberation Day” trade measures.

Additional restrictions introduced in October were suspended the following month as part of a temporary trade truce, though the earlier licensing requirements remain in place.

For Washington, however, the stakes may extend beyond trade. As the conflict in Iran continues and munitions stockpiles shrink, the availability of rare earths could become an increasingly central factor in both military planning and diplomacy.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 06:55

10 Thursday AM Reads

The Big Picture -

My morning train WFH reads:

Iran tells world to get ready for oil at $200 a barrel as it fires on merchant ships: Tehran is targeting commercial shipping and warning of triple-digit oil. The Strait of Hormuz risk premium is no longer theoretical. (Yahoo News/Reuters)

• Private Credit’s Gate-Crashers Are Forcing Funds Into a Reckoning: Redemption requests are surging across private credit, and the funds that promised liquidity in an illiquid asset class are finding out what that actually means. Bloomberg on the stress test nobody wanted. (Bloomberg)

The Highly Exclusive Way That Everybody Shops NowThe Atlantic on the paradox of “drop” culture — artificial scarcity marketed as exclusivity, consumed by everyone, exclusive to no one. The economics of manufactured desire. (The Atlantic)

• Yield Curve Inversion History: Complete 2s10s Spread Data (1976–2026): Six of seven 2s10s inversions preceded recessions — with the 2022-2024 episode being the notable exception so far. (Eco3min)

How Trump and His Advisers Miscalculated Iran’s Response to War: In the lead-up to the U.S.-Israeli attack, President Trump downplayed the risks to the energy markets as a short-term concern that should not overshadow the mission to decapitate the Iranian regime. Reconstructing the decision-making that assumed Tehran would fold quickly. (They didn’t). The gap between expectation and reality is widening daily. (New York Times) see also This War’s Economic Crisis Could Get Much Worse — For the U.S. and the Whole World: Derek Thompson on the cascading economic risks of the Iran conflict — oil shocks, supply chain disruptions, sovereign debt stress, and the compounding effect of doing all this while tariffs are already squeezing trade. (Plain English)

•  Electric Air Taxis Are About to Take Flight in 26 States: TechCrunch on the eVTOL rollout that’s actually happening — regulatory approvals, infrastructure buildout, and whether this time the flying car people are for real. (TechCrunch)

The Uncomfortable Truth About Hybrid Vehicles: The Verge on the data showing hybrids are often driven in gas-only mode, emitting far more than their EPA ratings suggest. The gap between the sticker and the road. (The Verge)

• MacBook Neo Review: Fresh-Squeezed Laptop: Six Colors’ review of Apple’s newest MacBook. The verdict on whether the redesign justifies the hype. (Six Colors)

• TACOs With a Side of War Porn: The Bulwark on the troubling spectacle of Trump and Hegseth treating military strikes on Iran like entertainment programming. The acronym alone is worth the click. (The Bulwark)

The Bam Game: The 83-Point Night That Broke the NBA’s Order: Historic, absurd, and a little unsettling. What do we make of one of the strangest games in NBA history? Bam Adebayo dropped 83 points and The Ringer dissects what it means for the league’s hierarchy, the evolution of the center position, and the Kobe/Wilt conversation. (The Ringer)

Be sure to check out our Masters in Business interview this weekend with Matt Cherwin, co-founder and Chief Investment Officer of Marek Capital. The alternative asset management firm launched in 2024. Previously, he spent 16-years at JPMorgan Chase & Co where he held titles of Chief Investment Officer, Group Treasurer, Co-Head of Global Spread Markets, Global Head of Securitized Products, and Global Head of Asset-Backed Trading.

 

Markets now assign roughly a 47% chance of Democrats regaining Senate control, up from about 35% in early February and 41% before the Iran strikes 10 days ago

Source: Jim Reid, Deutsche Bank

 

Sign up for our reads-only mailing list here.

 

The post 10 Thursday AM Reads appeared first on The Big Picture.

They're Replacing Winston Churchill With A Hedgehog

Zero Hedge -

They're Replacing Winston Churchill With A Hedgehog

Authored by Steve Watson via Modernity.news,

In a stunning betrayal, the Bank of England has announced plans to scrub Winston Churchill and other iconic British figures from the nation’s banknotes, ludicrously swapping them out for images of wildlife like hedgehogs, badgers, and otters. 

This comes after a so-called public consultation where nature themes supposedly won out, but detractors see it as the latest chapter in a relentless campaign to dismantle British heritage under the guise of ‘progress’.

Conservatives and history defenders are fuming, labeling the decision a cowardly capitulation to woke sensitivities that deem giants like Churchill too “divisive.” As globalist forces push to rewrite the past, this shift reeks of an agenda to erase the very leaders who built and defended the free world—forwarding a relentless pattern.

The Bank of England revealed the overhaul following a consultation that drew over 44,000 responses, with 60 percent favoring nature over historical figures, architecture, or cultural milestones. Current notes feature Churchill on the £5, Jane Austen on the £10, JMW Turner on the £20, and Alan Turing on the £50. All will be phased out in favor of native species, plants, and landscapes, albeit with King Charles III remaining on the front.

A second consultation this summer will finalize specifics, drawing from a shortlist curated by wildlife experts. The bank claims this boosts security features and celebrates the UK’s environment, but the timing—amid ongoing attacks on British icons—raises eyebrows.

Former business minister Kevin Hollinrake didn’t hold back, calling the idea “bonkers” and insisting banknotes should honor “historical giants who shaped our nation.” Ex-business secretary Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg piled on, accusing the bank of lacking seriousness: “Animals on notes? What next, squirrels running the economy?”

The Express reported Conservative pledges to reverse the change if they regain power, slamming it as a sign of cultural self-loathing. “We should be proud of our history, not hide it,” one source told the paper.

The development prompted many to predict what else we could soon see appearing on our currency:

This isn’t an isolated incident. It’s part of a broader leftist crusade to purge Britain’s past. As we detailed in our coverage of a London museum draping a historical portrait in cloth to “reclaim Caribbean history,” institutions are bending over backward to obscure figures tied to empire, even flagging statues of Nelson and Churchill for potential removal.

Recall how Prime Minister Keir Starmer gutted 10 Downing Street of artworks depicting Shakespeare, Thatcher, and Churchill himself, replacing them with abstract pieces from “diverse” artists like Denzil Forrester and Lynette Yiadom-Boakye. Critics labeled the move a petty purge, swapping heritage for soulless scribbles that scream contempt for English roots.

Academic elites have long fueled this fire. Cambridge University has hosted panels in recent years branding Churchill a “white supremacist” whose empire was “worse than the Nazis,” downplaying his role in crushing fascism while amplifying outdated grievances.

Schools aren’t immune. A London primary renamed its “Churchill House” after footballer Marcus Rashford for “diversity,” ignoring the wartime PM’s legacy in favor of modern symbolism. Parents raged, but the headteacher pressed on, claiming it empowered student voices.

During 2020’s BLM unrest, a petition demanded uncovering Churchill’s Parliament Square statue after it was boxed up amid vandalism fears—yet Boris Johnson did zilch.

The Churchill statue has become a repeated target for obsessed misanthropic leftists.

Another push in Croydon sought to erase a Churchill mural, backed by a Labour councillor who peddled the “racist bigot” narrative.

These assaults add up to a calculated effort to strip Britain of its identity. By ditching Churchill for badgers, the Bank of England plays into hands that view national heroes as obstacles to a borderless, history-free utopia.

 

It’s clear: this caters to a vocal minority obsessed with decolonizing everything, from currency to classrooms.

The irony bites hard. Churchill, who rallied the free world against tyranny with lines like “We shall fight on the beaches,” now gets sidelined for squirrels. If this doesn’t wake up the masses to the cultural erosion, what will?

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 06:30

Humanoid Soldiers Tested In Ukraine; Founder Eyes Contract To Patrol US Border

Zero Hedge -

Humanoid Soldiers Tested In Ukraine; Founder Eyes Contract To Patrol US Border

Corporate media is finally catching up to our humanoid robot theme, with these bots moving beyond factory floors and possibly soon marching onto modern battlefields, as conflicts rage in Eastern Europe and the Middle East.

TIME reports that Foundation Robotics, a U.S.-based startup developing humanoid robots for industrial and military applications, has recently sent two Phantom MK1 robots to Ukraine for testing.

A Foundation spokesperson said the startup is preparing its Phantom robots for potential deployment in combat scenarios for the Pentagon, which "continues to explore the development of militarized humanoid prototypes designed to operate alongside warfighters in complex, high-risk environments."

Foundation co-founder Mike LeBlanc, a 14-year Marine Corps veteran with multiple tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, also told the outlet that the company is in "very close contact" with the Department of Homeland Security regarding possible patrol functions for Phantom along the U.S. southern border.

LeBlanc prepares to hand a shotgun to a PhantomMattia Balsamini for TIME. Source: TIME

Foundation is already a military-approved vendor and holds government research contracts worth $24 million with the U.S. Army, Navy, and Air Force. This suggests that these war bots are very close to being tested in war zones.

TIME reported that the MK1 robots will soon be training with the Marine Corps for the "methods of entry" operations. This advanced course teaches soldiers breaching techniques for buildings, structures, and ships, using several types of methods: explosive, ballistic, thermal, manual, and mechanical entry.

LeBlanc pointed out that the natural evolution of today's autonomous systems is a leap from drones to ground bots to humanoid robots. He said humanoid soldiers do not crack under intense mental pressure and can be deployed as highly expendable assets.

In February, we outlined that humanoid robots would soon enter the modern battlefield, and it appears TIME has now confirmed it.

The conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East have demonstrated that modern warfare is becoming increasingly automated, with low-cost ground bots, FPVs, weaponized AI kill chains, and many other technologies now being deployed by foreign adversaries.

Sankaet Pathak, Foundation co-founder and CEO, told the outlet that a humanoid-soldier arms race is "already happening," as Russia and China develop dual-use technology.

"Just like drones, machine guns, or any technology, you first have to get them into the hands of customers," Pathak said.

With the world seemingly at war on two fronts, the development and deployment of next-generation war tech, such as humanoid robots, is likely to be thrown into hyperdrive. This is bullish for "war unicorns," as the Department of War's DOGE resets procurement program directs more funding toward defense startups.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 05:45

Germany's Commuters Bear The Cost Of The Iran Crisis And Tax State

Zero Hedge -

Germany's Commuters Bear The Cost Of The Iran Crisis And Tax State

Submitted by Thomas Kolbe

The excessive fiscal burden on fuels has driven gasoline prices in Germany higher since the start of the Iran crisis. Yet it seems unlikely that German policymakers will ease the burden on commuters or businesses. Apart from a task force, nothing has been planned. Other regions are proving more resilient.

The Iran conflict has entered its second week, and with it, concerns are growing over the consequences of the slowly but steadily building energy crisis for the global economy.

In Germany, the rise in oil prices was quickly reflected at the pumps. Prices jumped from around €1.65 per liter to over €2 – a roughly 25 percent increase in a very short period (Apollo News reported).

At the same time, suspicions arise that oil companies are securing quick profits by selling already invoiced and refined petroleum as well as existing gasoline stocks at the now significantly higher retail price, realizing excess profits.

However, this is a temporary effect, likely to be balanced quickly by market dynamics. The internationally high increase in German gasoline prices is almost entirely due to the fact that the state, through its tax policies, accounts for roughly 65 percent of the retail price. A silent profiteer in the crisis, while commuters face growing problems.

Whether CO₂ levies, fuel taxes, or VAT – the government should now act with fiscal restraint and provide significant relief to both commuters and businesses. So far, this is not the case. German politics stares like a rabbit at the snake in the Iran conflict. Slowly, it becomes clear that decades of ideologically driven energy policy were nothing more than a trillion-euro, subsidized fantasy – now turning into a nightmare.

USA Operate Autarkically 

Across the Atlantic, the situation is very different. Gas prices in the United States rose by about five to ten percent. Eight months before the crucial midterm elections, this will be decisive for President Donald Trump to uphold his campaign promises and keep inflation under control.

A quick end to the Iran war is now imperative. Washington is weighing the geopolitical effects, control of global oil markets, and domestic inflation risks.

Since 2018, the United States has been the world’s largest oil producer with a daily output of 18 million barrels and is also an exporter of “black gold.” Its dominant position makes it relatively insulated from major oil price shocks while giving it significant market influence.

If the crisis persists, the global energy market risks fragmentation. Massive price hikes threaten import-dependent states, such as many European countries, while energy-autarkic nations retain pricing power and are largely shielded from extreme increases.

South Korea as a Special Case 

Looking to Asia, South Korea is highly energy-dependent like Europe but boasts substantial refining capacity. Companies such as SK Energy, GS Caltex, or S-Oil typically operate on long-term supply contracts and fixed prices, while holding significant crude inventories that can be drawn down during a supply disruption.

The South Korean economy is temporarily insulated from a Hormuz blockade. Gas prices rose about 13 percent since the outbreak of the war, from €1.11 to €1.25 per liter – markedly less than in Germany.

Taxes and levies account for only around 40 percent of the retail gasoline price in South Korea, providing an advantage compared with Germany’s steadily rising mobility and energy taxes.

It may take up to three weeks for an oil shock to reach Korean gas stations. During this time, firms hedge currency and price risks on futures markets, operating largely in isolation. Refineries and storage practices act as an additional strategic oil reserve directly integrated into the processing of the economy’s key resource.

Politically, the government remains on alert. Seoul has so far refrained from temporary fuel tax cuts, a measure historically used to support the economy. Most recently, this occurred during the lockdown phase. This suggests that Korean authorities do not expect a prolonged conflict – and certainly not a ground invasion by U.S. or Israeli troops. Such a scenario would inevitably escalate, including on global commodity markets.

Crystal Ball Outlook 

It is currently almost impossible to predict how the conflict will evolve. Regime change in Tehran appears to be neither a U.S. nor Israeli objective. Likewise, ground troop interventions remain highly unlikely, especially given the approaching midterms in the U.S.

This makes a short conflict duration likely. Strategic oil reserves in most EU countries cover roughly three months and have not yet been tapped. Despite rapid price increases, no acute supply shortages currently exist.

To relieve pressure at the pumps, fuel taxes would need to be cut. Yet it is unlikely that Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil will forgo the additional revenues generated by the temporary energy price spike.

Politically, the focus remains on optics: a gasoline price task force has been convened – a media maneuver during election season, a political chimera drawn reflexively from the government’s toolkit.

Structural solutions to Europe’s dangerous energy dependence would require a geopolitical reset, including a peace settlement with Russia, exploitation of domestic resources such as the continent’s immense gas reserves, and potentially a return to nuclear power in Germany.

* * * 

About the author: Thomas Kolbe, a German graduate economist, has worked for over 25 years as a journalist and media producer for clients from various industries and business associations. As a publicist, he focuses on economic processes and observes geopolitical events from the perspective of the capital markets. His publications follow a philosophy that focuses on the individual and their right to self-determination.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 05:00

Middle East Conflict Tightens LNG Supply, Redirects Cargoes To Asia

Zero Hedge -

Middle East Conflict Tightens LNG Supply, Redirects Cargoes To Asia

The shutdown of key gas export facilities in the Middle East is tightening global liquefied natural gas supplies, raising the risk of a deficit and pushing cargoes toward Asia as buyers compete for limited shipments, according to Bloomberg.

Ras Laffan in Qatar — the world’s largest LNG export complex — has halted production, while shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has also been disrupted. Bloomberg calculations based on 2025 output suggest that roughly three Qatari LNG cargoes are effectively removed from the market for every day the disruption continues. A smaller export facility in Abu Dhabi is also unable to ship, leaving about 20% of global LNG supply offline.

The tightening market is already reshaping trade flows. Ship-tracking data compiled by Bloomberg show that at least nine LNG cargoes originally bound for Europe have diverted to Asia since the fighting began, with the pace increasing in recent days as spare supply in the market rapidly dwindles.

“If this situation were to persist for multiple months, dragging well into the summer, there aren’t enough alternative LNG sources to sufficiently supply the global market,” said Mathieu Utting, an analyst at Rystad Energy. “The two other major LNG suppliers, the US and Australia, are already operating at full capacity with little room to increase utilization.”

The squeeze comes at a critical moment for both regions. Europe needs additional LNG to rebuild storage depleted during winter, while hotter-than-normal weather in parts of Asia is expected to boost air-conditioning demand in the coming months. Prices in both regions have surged over the past week, raising concerns about inflation and economic impacts.

“Asian buyers will need to supplement their term supply with spot cargoes,” said James O’Brien, head of LNG at D.Trading, a unit of Ukraine’s private energy company DTEK. “This will inevitably pull more Atlantic molecules east.”

Bloomberg writes that buyers in India, Bangladesh and Thailand have already turned to the spot market for additional supply, though some recent tenders for March delivery — including ones from India — failed to attract sellers because of limited availability and high prices.

New LNG supply from the US is unlikely to arrive quickly. While projects including Golden Pass in Texas and expansions at Corpus Christi and Plaquemines are progressing, additional capacity will come online only gradually.

Analysts say the disruption is also reducing the chances of a widely expected LNG glut this year. Morgan Stanley said any extension of the Qatar outage beyond a month “quickly brings a deficit,” after the bank had previously forecast 6 to 8 million tons of oversupply.

Rabobank strategist Florence Schmit estimates that each week of lost Qatari production cuts the expected surplus by about 1.5 million tons, leaving only a few weeks before the market tips into deficit.

“Markets are now facing a supply deficit even with higher US flows,” Schmit said. “The LNG glut has been delayed by a year.”

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 04:15

Italy Challenges EU Carbon Market: Hidden Tax Driving Industry Abroad

Zero Hedge -

Italy Challenges EU Carbon Market: Hidden Tax Driving Industry Abroad

Submitted by Thomas Kolbe

Italian weeks in Brussels: Just days after Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni announced a hardline migration policy, openly defying Brussels’ globalist open-border agenda, she delivered a second shock.

At the start of the week, Italy’s Industry Minister Adolfo Urso called for the suspension of EU-wide CO₂ trading—or at least a profound reform. Rome calls it a hidden tax and laments the growing displacement of Italian industrial companies to non-European locations. A conclusion that will sound all too familiar in Germany.

EU climate policy is artificially driving costs ever higher across the board. Companies able to operate flexibly are losing patience with this fanatical clientelist politics. Investments are redirected elsewhere, jobs relocated—while the taxes politicians desire are collected abroad. Yet even this argument seems to fall on deaf ears in European politics, as the European taxpayer remains a convenient source of revenue. Unlike mobile capital, citizens can’t easily move their wealth and property out of reach.

It is high time European leaders confront the European Commission and its grotesque degrowth fantasies. The so-called green transformation is under evident legitimacy pressure, now that it is clear that the “green Hesperia”—a realm where economic rules and logic are suspended—will never exist. Brussels’ attempt to build a power base with its own “green” industrial sector as an economic foundation increasingly looks like a project of power-obsessed dreamers, hung around the private sector’s neck like a millstone.

While Italy is drawing a clear line and trying to distance itself from Brussels’ industrial pillage, few in German politics seem seriously concerned that the CO₂ credit system channels real capital from productive sectors into an unproductive green patronage economy, while feeding the moral self-assurance of climate-policy snake-oil merchants.

What is sold as “transformation” is in truth a large-scale impoverishment program, eroding both the middle class and its civic values. Prosperity comes from commitment to achievement, individual sovereignty, and freedom. Only a civilization already damaged allows an unqualified political elite to centralize power.

The European carbon market is a centralized redistribution scheme, which next year will extend to transport and heating sectors. Brussels is pushing its reach ever deeper into European citizens’ daily lives. Costs will rise—this much is certain. And no Strait of Hormuz energy blockade is required; Europeans can achieve this on their own.

Even Friedrich Merz proved in February, on the Welt podcast with Robin Alexander and Dagmar Rosenfeld, that he belongs to the group of green statists. There, he defended the European CO₂ mechanism as an indispensable pillar of transformation policy, a great achievement of European convergence. Riding together into summer’s decline, together into insolvency—was that Merz’s real meaning? Is the Chancellor a romantic of decay?

Just days before, he sounded entirely different. At an employers’ meeting in Antwerp, Merz—almost toxically masculine, in line with Italy’s government—called for radical reform of the climate-policy carbon plunder. The contrast between the two appearances could hardly have been starker.

Yet after nearly a year observing the Chancellor’s public appearances, one knows: Merz’s shifts and volte-faces are no exception—they are part of his political camouflage. Performative acts, distraction techniques aimed squarely at stabilizing polling. In this respect, he is a classic politician, whose speech stream generates emotional connectivity—or: form trumps substance.

His green-moral compass, however, functions reliably. Regulatory reform will not come with this man in Germany—nor will a rollback of the green transformation mechanism. Loyal voters can be certain: the Chancellor will deliver this as surely as he performs his recurring obeisance to the Social Democratic junior partner.

More than two points underscore the political importance of carbon trading.

First, it provides Brussels’ central body with its own steadily growing revenue stream, disguised from open taxation. Brussels thus gains autonomy and additional leverage in struggles with centrifugal forces in the Union—such as Viktor Orbán’s Hungary or Giorgia Meloni’s Italy.

Second, it creates the green art-economy: a reliable voter base for the established party cartel. It funds the NGO complex and ensures the future growth of the bureaucratic apparatus.

It is therefore logical that the true initiators of the green transformation—found mainly in German politics—will cling to this tool until sufficient domestic pressure forces a reversal. Such pressure can ultimately come only from civil society and the economy itself.

The question is: when will Germany join an alliance for regulatory reform?

The answer may lie in the accounts, stock portfolios, real estate, and cash reserves of the German middle class. Here, politics has hidden the activatable sedative of its welfare state—a calming agent gradually fed into the redistribution mechanism to buy social peace on the road to the green ideal society.

* * * 

About the author: Thomas Kolbe, a German graduate economist, has worked for over 25 years as a journalist and media producer for clients from various industries and business associations. As a publicist, he focuses on economic processes and observes geopolitical events from the perspective of the capital markets. His publications follow a philosophy that focuses on the individual and their right to self-determination.

Tyler Durden Thu, 03/12/2026 - 03:30

Large Study Shows High Caffeine Intake Linked To Reduced Dementia Risk

Zero Hedge -

Large Study Shows High Caffeine Intake Linked To Reduced Dementia Risk

Authored by George Citroner via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

A daily cup of coffee or tea may do more than wake you up - it could also help keep your brain sharp as you age.

Coffee, like this?

suwijaknook6644689/Shutterstock

New research tracking hundreds of thousands of people over decades suggests that moderate caffeine consumption is linked to a lower risk of developing dementia.

“Caffeine increases the brain’s activity and can accelerate the speed of messages between the brain and the body,” Jolene Knight, psychiatric nurse practitioner at Stony Brook Medicine’s Center of Excellence for Alzheimer’s disease, and not involved in the study, told The Epoch Times. Caffeine Linked to 20 Percent Risk Reduction The study, recently published in JAMA, followed 131,821 people for up to 43 years and found that those who drank two to three cups of caffeinated coffee or one to two cups of tea daily had a lower risk of developing dementia than those who drank little or no caffeine.   “When searching for possible dementia prevention tools, we thought something as prevalent as coffee may be a promising dietary intervention,” senior author Dr. Daniel Wang, associate scientist with the Channing Division of Network Medicine at Mass General Brigham, said in a statement.

Wang and his team tracked participants from two long-term studies of medical professionals, the Nurses’ Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, with starting ages typically in their mid-40s to early 50s.

They found that people who drank between one and five eight-ounce cups of caffeinated coffee had an 18 percent reduced risk of dementia. However, those who drank caffeinated tea daily had a roughly 15 percent reduced risk.

Interestingly, the benefits plateaued beyond two and a half cups of coffee daily, possibly because the body cannot process higher amounts of the beneficial compounds in these beverages. Caffeine can mimic adenosine and bind to receptors in the brain, blocking the molecule that promotes sleepiness, and keeping us alert, Knight said. By doing so, it increases neuron activity, which may reduce inflammation.

“Inflammation is being studied as a cause of cognitive impairment,” she said. “Caffeine has the potential to reduce oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, which helps to decrease brain aging.”

Scientists propose that caffeine might protect the brain by reducing inflammation and improving blood vessel function. It may also enhance insulin sensitivity, which is important because diabetes is a risk factor for dementia, due to the increased risk of heart disease and stroke. Higher Caffeine, Better Outcomes During the study, 11,033 participants developed dementia, confirmed through medical records or death certificates. The findings held regardless of genetic risk factors for Alzheimer’s or other dementias.

The study also looked at subjective cognitive decline—people’s perceptions that their memory and thinking skills are slipping. Those who drank more caffeine were less likely to report such issues. Among women over 70, those who drank more caffeine scored better on cognitive tests, indicating slower cognitive decline by about seven months.

Cognitive decline was assessed using cohort-specific questionnaires with yes-or-no responses covering general memory, executive function, attention, and visuospatial skills.

The better cognition among tea and coffee drinkers may come from caffeine’s ability to increase dopamine and acetylcholine in the brain, which are important for memory and cognition, Knight said. “Dopamine is the reward center in the brain and leads to feeling alert, focused, and pleasure. Acetylcholine is the memory neurotransmitter.”

The study didn’t track whether participants added milk or sugar, which could influence health effects. Some experts note that drinking more than four cups a day offers no additional benefits and could even be harmful, potentially disrupting sleep or increasing anxiety.

Researchers caution that they cannot determine causation and that other factors may influence the results. For example, some participants might have been drinking decaffeinated coffee for health reasons, which could affect outcomes.

“While our results are encouraging, it’s important to remember that the effect size is small and there are lots of important ways to protect cognitive function as we age. Our study suggests that caffeinated coffee or tea consumption can be one piece of that puzzle,” Wang stated. Moderation Is Key There are risks associated with increasing caffeine intake, especially for older adults or those with certain health conditions, Knight noted.

Coffee acts as a diuretic, which can lead to dehydration—a concern given that most adults already fall short of the recommended eight glasses of water a day.

I always tell my patients for each cup of coffee you should drink a glass of water.” She added that dehydration can lead to altered mental status, confusion, and kidney damage.

Finally, Knight cautioned that older people should be careful about caffeine intake, because it can disrupt sleep, which itself is a risk factor for cognitive decline.

“Caffeine can lead to increased difficulty with sleep,” she said. “Poor sleep can impair cognition, causing increased confusion or brain fog, and increase dementia risk over time.”

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/11/2026 - 22:40

AG Bondi Moves To Secure Military Housing After Threats, Joining Other Trump Officials

Zero Hedge -

AG Bondi Moves To Secure Military Housing After Threats, Joining Other Trump Officials

Attorney General Pam Bondi has reportedly moved into heavily guarded housing at a military base in the Washington area after receiving multiple threats.

Several sources familiar with the situation say the threats came from drug cartels as well as political critics, prompting the relocation. Bondi joins a growing list of Donald Trump administration officials who now live at secure military facilities in and around the nation’s capital due to heightened security concerns. 

“Ms. Bondi moved from an apartment in the city within the past month in response to an array of threats flagged to her staff by federal law enforcement, these people said, including an uptick in criticism of Ms. Bondi, and threats relayed by investigators,” the New York Times reports.

“One catalyst was an increase in threats following the capture and prosecution of President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela in January, according to a senior official with direct knowledge of the situation who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss security matters.”

The threats against Trump administration officials are very real. For example, Trump advisor Stephen Miller and his family were subjected to repeated protests outside their Arlington, Virginia home, including activists posting fliers in their neighborhood with their home address, branding him a “Nazi” and accusing him of “crimes against humanity.” Protesters with Arlington Neighbors United for Humanity also chalked messages on the sidewalk accusing him of “destroying democracy,” “kidnapping,” and “White nationalism,” and the group warned the couple on Instagram that their efforts to “dismantle our democracy” would not be tolerated. His wife, Katie Miller, also recounted that a protester told her, “I’m watching you,” as she left their house. Other officials living on a military base include Sec. of State Marco Rubio, Sec. of Defense Pete Hegseth, and outgoing DHS Sec. Kristi Noem. 

Even though legitimate threats have forced these officials to move to military bases, the liberal media outlets have been criticizing the relocations for months. Fox News Digital reported last year that left-leaning outlets like The New Republic and The Daily Beast claimed the officials were merely trying to avoid public backlash.

The New Republic called Stephen Miller “one of a handful of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet members who are hiding out on military bases so they don’t have to be exposed to the public that hates them,” while The Daily Beast said he had secured “a taxpayer-subsidized military home, shielding him from the type of people he hates the most: left-wing agitators.”

The New York Times similarly questioned the legitimacy of the arrangements and the costs to taxpayers.

“It is not clear how much, if anything, officials are paying to stay at some of the most historic properties in the government’s possession,” the paper wrote, and noted that “this appears to be the first administration to take such widespread advantage of taxpayer-funded military housing to accommodate political appointees who do not have a direct connection to the military, according to former officials and historians.”

Last year, the Network Contagion Research Institute published research warning that what it calls "assassination culture" is taking root in American political life. Lead researcher Joel Finkelstein traced the inflection point to December 2024, when Luigi Mangione shot UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in broad daylight in Manhattan. Rather than near-universal condemnation, Mangione became a folk hero among the political left. 

"What was formerly taboo culturally has become acceptable," Finkelstein told Fox News Digital. "We are seeing a clear shift — glorification, increased attempts and changing norms — all converging into what we define as 'assassination culture.'"

Five months after the study was published, Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was assassinated in Utah.

The left may not like the fact that Trump administration officials are living on military bases, but they are the reason they have to.

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/11/2026 - 22:15

AI Won't Fix America's Looming Debt Crisis

Zero Hedge -

AI Won't Fix America's Looming Debt Crisis

Authored by David Youngberg via TheDailyEconomy.org,

Last month, Congress sparred with the president over a partial budget, but with few real cuts, America’s slow march toward an epic debt crisis went on undeterred. With over $38 trillion in debt and interest payments exceeding defense or Medicare spending, one would expect lawmakers to confront reality and do the difficult work needed to restore fiscal sanity. But why would they? Cutting entitlements and increasing middle-class taxes rarely make for winning campaign slogans.

It’s no surprise, then, that some prefer to pin their hopes on AI as America’s fiscal savior. Vanguard’s chief economist Joe Davis argued there’s as high as a 50 percent chance AI will prevent a debt-driven economic malaise. Elon Musk voiced a similar conclusion late last year, claiming AI and robotics are “the only thing that’s going to solve the US debt crisis.”

The argument goes like this: an AI boom drives explosive economic growth and tax revenue, while, at the same time, productivity gains impressively offset any upward pressure on interest rates. The deficit becomes a surplus and the overall debt shrinks, possibly disappearing entirely.

If that sounds less like a policy plan and more like a retirement strategy built around winning the lottery, you’re not wrong. The entire scenario hinges on a massive if: that AI generates extraordinary revenue and does it quickly enough to outrun rising interest costs.

But even if the government hits the tax revenue jackpot before Congress drives us off a fiscal cliff, it would be naïve to assume lawmakers would pay down the debt. 

The More the Government Gets, the More the Government Spends

For the sake of argument, suppose the tech optimists are right, and the federal government enjoys a massive AI-driven revenue windfall. Understanding what happens next requires understanding the incentives of politicians and their voters.

This is where public choice shines. Rather than assuming politicians and voters act in everyone’s best interest, this branch of economics recognizes that people don’t become angels once they interface with the government. Incentives matter, especially for politicians.

Incentives are why we have a deficit in the first place. The public isn’t particularly interested in financial restraint because high spending and low taxes benefit them now, and the resulting debt is some future generation’s problem. Politicians surely see the crisis brewing, but solving it is a sure way to get voted out of office. And so the incentive is to run constant deficits and grow the debt year after year, decade after decade.

Without changing incentives, it will be hard to avoid spending new revenue. Ballooning coffers mean voters will demand that the government dole out more goodies (especially if AI displaces workers along the way). Washington already excels at entertaining expensive ideas: healthcare subsidies for well-off families, a universal basic income, generous tax cuts, a fifty-percent increase in military spending, all despite the pushback the current deficit’s able to muster. Imagine the wish list after it drops even a little.

Expecting Congress to use a jolt of revenue to pay down debt is like expecting a compulsive gambler to save his winnings for retirement. There’s a reason nearly a third of lottery winners file for bankruptcy within five years of getting their windfall. Winners tend to be the ones who bought a lot of tickets, and people who buy a lot of tickets tend to be reckless with their money.

Not all lottery winners are reckless, and not all lawmakers are more interested in buying votes than paying off debts. The question is whether Congress is more likely to emulate the prudent winner or the reckless one.

This Has All Happened Before…

Public choice theory suggests we already know the answer, but maybe there’s some crucial detail we’re missing. Or maybe American politics is just different in some way. The good (or, depending on your position, bad) news is that we have a ready example from the last time a tech revolution balanced the government budget: the internet boom of the late 1990s.

Right before investors realized you couldn’t slap a ‘dot-com’ onto any English word and make a billion dollars selling pet food over what we laughingly called the information superhighway, a surge of investment handed the Treasury Department the biggest budget surplus since World War II demilitarization. It also arrived in time for a presidential election.

The 2000 election pitted Vice President Al Gore against Texas Governor George W. Bush, and the question of what to do with the surplus was a major campaign issue. Gore proposed using some of it to pay down the debt. Bush preferred spending it on tax cuts, Social Security, and “important projects.” Yes, the Democrat was more of a fiscal conservative than the Republican. Those were wild times.

Bush would go on to win that election.

It was incredibly close, and Gore could’ve easily won. And if not for something called a butterfly ballot, he would’ve won.

But he didn’t win, and all we knew at the time was that it was very, very close. It was so close that if Gore had promised some “important projects” in Florida instead of paying down a bill that wouldn’t have come due until some distant decade, the White House would’ve been his.

Losing by a hair’s breadth is every campaign’s nightmare. Mere oversights become colossal blunders, and every ill-fated gamble becomes a decisive mistake. The 2000 election made something crystal clear to anyone who hadn’t already gotten the memo: prudence is for losers.

The surplus proved to be transient anyway, vaporized in the aftermath of 9/11 and the bursting of the dot-com bubble. The US returned to familiar deficit territory two years later, and we never looked back.

…And It Will Happen Again.

The optimists might say that this time will be different. The looming deficit crisis is so bad that politicians will use any AI windfall to pay down the debt rather than spend it. This time they’ll do the responsible thing.

Be serious.

It’s of course possible that the political stars align and lawmakers will pay down the deficit instead of playing another round of “someone else’s problem.” It’s possible that the prudent thing will be done without a financial crisis to jar the public out of their “the future is never” fantasy.

But let’s get real. Though public concern about the debt is high, there’s so much disagreement about how to address the problem that politicians can safely ignore it. When President Trump threw his own eye-watering increase onto the debt last year, his approval rating didn’t budge. Voters say they care about the debt but they clearly care more about the things that have created it. The political incentives are the same as they ever were: if the government wins the AI lottery, lawmakers will behave as they always have. This time won’t be different.

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/11/2026 - 21:50

Moody's Cuts New York City's Rating Outlook Despite Mamdani Protests

Zero Hedge -

Moody's Cuts New York City's Rating Outlook Despite Mamdani Protests

The only surprise is that the move came so late. 

With New York City facing a historic fiscal crisis courtesy of its new mayor, late on Wednesday Moody’s lowered its outlook on New York City to negative, citing the “sizable and persistent” budget shortfalls it’s facing.

The move, which usually precedes a ratings cut in the subsequent several months, came as the ratings company also affirmed its Aa2 rating on the city’s debt, the third-highest level of investment-grade.

Moody’s said the change came after the city’s spending projections showed larger budget shortfalls than previously forecast.

“The negative outlook reflects the emergence of sizable and persistent projected budget gaps that signal underlying structural imbalance and reduced financial flexibility, despite New York City’s still favorable economic conditions,” Moody’s analysts said in a statement Wednesday, perhaps confused how to rate the former mecca of capitalism which was rapidly transforming into a socialist paradise.

Dora Pekec, a spokesperson for Mayor Zohran Mamdani, said the move was premature, citing the $5 billion in additional state funding the city stands to receive under proposed budgets being considered by the legislature.

“These proposals reflect a real commitment by Albany to investing in the services New Yorkers rely on, and the fiscal health of our city,” the statement said. Moody's ignored the protest. 

New York City Comptroller Mark Levine said on Wednesday that the change was “a sobering wake-up call about the fiscal challenges ahead for us.”

The Comptroller warned that New York City must close a deficit of at least $5.4 billion this year and next year even as Wall Street bonuses are at record highs, and every major source of revenue, apart from corporate taxes, is rising. “Unfortunately, our expenses are growing even faster,” he said in testimony to city council members on Wednesday. As we said: "socialist paradise"

Levine said that the city’s operating expenses are projected to be $4.53 billion higher than its revenue in fiscal 2026, and warned that a proposed property tax increase floated by Mamdani would put the levy near its limit.

The mayor’s $127 billion budget relies on drawing from the city’s rainy-day fund, which would limit the city’s ability to weather the next economic downturn.

Spending on the city’s schools total $36.9 billion, a 31.5% increase since 2020, even as enrollment has fallen by 100,000 students, according to the comptroller. Moreover, the city’s housing voucher program has been growing at 4% per month and is estimated to total $2.6 billion next year.

But the real gut punch would be if New York proceeds with the planned tax hike on the city's wealthy, a move which will decimate the city's revenue as the ultra wealthy will move to Florida (as their California peers have already done), as well as leading to an exodus of office tenants, something which the collapsing stock price of commercial real estate giant Vornado has already sniffed out.

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/11/2026 - 21:26

Hudson River NJ-NY Rail Tunnel Faces New Halt Without Federal Funds

Zero Hedge -

Hudson River NJ-NY Rail Tunnel Faces New Halt Without Federal Funds

Construction on the planned $16 billion rail tunnel under the Hudson River could halt again within two to three months unless federal funding resumes, the project’s developer warned last week, according to Bloomberg.

The project, led by the Gateway Development Commission, would build a new rail tunnel linking New Jersey and Manhattan for Amtrak and New Jersey Transit trains. It would also allow rehabilitation of the existing tunnel, which opened in 1910 and is in urgent need of repairs. Gateway says the broader project would expand rail capacity between the two states and generate about $19.6 billion in economic activity.

Funding for the project has been in dispute for months. The US Department of Transportation has withheld funds since October, prompting Gateway to sue last month to force the release of the money. New York and New Jersey filed a similar lawsuit.

Bloomberg writes that some payments resumed after a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to release reimbursement funds the agency had requested. Since the ruling last month, Gateway has received about $254 million. The federal government had suspended payments while reviewing whether the project complied with a new administration policy banning contracting requirements tied to race or gender.

Still, Gateway officials say the funding interruptions threaten construction progress. A previous stoppage between Feb. 6 and Feb. 22 temporarily laid off about 1,000 construction workers and added “million of dollars in additional costs,” Gateway chief financial officer Pat McCoy said in a court filing.

“We will have no choice but to stop work again if the federal government does not continue to disburse the funds that are committed to the project,” Gateway Chief Executive Officer Tom Prendergast said in a statement Tuesday. “This project is too important to delay. That’s why we’re doing everything possible to regain consistent and predictable access to all our federal funding so we can keep our workers on the job and deliver the reliable, modern rail transit Americans deserve.”

Congress has already approved funding for the project, including $11 billion in federal support and $4 billion in loans to be repaid by New York, New Jersey and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. Amtrak is expected to contribute another $1 billion.

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/11/2026 - 21:25

No, New York Times, Climate Change Isn't Driving Inflation

Zero Hedge -

No, New York Times, Climate Change Isn't Driving Inflation

Authored by Anthony Watts via ClimateRealism.com,

In The New York Times (NYT) article “Is Climate Change Making Inflation Worse?,” writer Lydia DePillis suggests that extreme weather linked to global warming is quietly raising the price of everyday goods like food, electricity, and insurance.

The framing is, at best, misleading and, at worst, flat-out false. Inflation is a monetary phenomenon driven by fiscal policy, central banking decisions, supply-chain disruptions, and energy policy choices — there is no evidence climate change has altered in a way that impacts any of those factors. The NYT erroneously substitutes weather anecdotes and speculative projections for demonstrated economic causation. However, since instances of extreme weather haven’t become more frequent or severe in recent decades, climate change can’t be causing “inflationary” impacts.

The NYT opens by asserting that there is “mounting evidence that extreme weather is making some everyday stuff more expensive.” That claim is presented as a settled fact. It’s not. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) assigns low confidence to global increases in most types of extreme weather and emphasizes regional variability. The IPCC AR6 does not claim that extreme weather trends are uniformly intensifying in a way that would systematically impact global inflation.

The NYT then turns to food prices, citing drought in Eastern Europe and China, coffee impacts in Brazil, and ranchers culling cattle. Agricultural output, however, fluctuates every year due to natural variability. Long-term production data in the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization’s FAOSTAT database, shown in the figure below, illustrate that global grain production has generally trended upward, amid modest warming and the recent claims of the “three hottest years ever” from 2022 to 2025.

Commodity markets automatically adjust; when one region underperforms, trade reallocates supply. The NYT acknowledges that tariffs and export controls can amplify price spikes. That is policy-driven inflation, not climate-driven inflation.

When discussing energy, the article points to grid repairs and increased electricity demand during heat waves. U.S. electricity prices have risen sharply in recent years, but that’s not due to a changing climate but rather is primarily due to fuel mix changes, regulatory mandates, and grid reliability challenges tied to rapid renewables integration driven by climate policies. It’s not climate change, but climate policies that have driven higher energy prices. Historical pricing data available through the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) electricity database show that price increases correlate more closely with political decisions that cause fuel supply volatility and shifts to expensive, intermittent, wind, solar, and battery storage power rather than with long-term temperature trends.

The NYT also cites a study projecting that weather-related disruptions could raise electricity infrastructure costs by as much as 25 percent toward the end of the century. That is a modeling projection, not an observed cost trend. The United States has already experienced roughly 1°C of warming since the late nineteenth century, yet official inflation tracking in the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer Price Index database attributes recent inflation primarily to pandemic-era stimulus, supply chain disruptions, and energy price shocks, not temperature changes.

The article presents insurance costs as the clearest climate-related inflation driver. But insurance markets respond more to litigation environments, construction costs, regulatory frameworks, and development patterns in high-risk areas. Long-term normalized hurricane damage trends discussed at Climate at a Glance Hurricanes  show no upward trajectory after population growth and coastal development are accounted for. The same is true for rising wildfire costs. They are due to shifting policies on public lands and increased development in areas historically prone to wildfires, not significant changes in the climate in those regions. Indeed, acreage lost to wildfires has declined significantly over the past two decades. Rising premiums reflect higher rebuilding costs and denser development in vulnerable zones, not necessarily stronger storms.

The article pegs global warming’s impact at “between $400 and $900 per person annually,” but concedes the wide range stems from difficulty separating weather variability from climate change. That uncertainty is not incidental, it is central. Without a clear attribution chain linking long-term warming trends to persistent price acceleration in specific sectors, the NYT claim remains purely speculative; it’s not just that there is no causal link, there isn’t even a correlation between experienced weather trends and inflation related price increases.

The NYT further notes that U.S. commodity crops like corn, soybeans, wheat, and rice “have been less affected by shifting weather patterns.” Those crops form the backbone of global calorie supply. If staple production remains broadly stable, sweeping claims about climate-driven food inflation collapse.

Finally, the article cites mitigation policies, such as emissions trading systems and regulatory mandates, as contributors to rising prices. That is not climate inflation. That is climate policy inflation. When governments impose carbon pricing, trade barriers, or compliance costs, consumers pay more by design. Conflating the cost of political decisions supposedly designed to fight climate change with the cost of climate change itself obscures the true driver.

Inflation over the past five years has been historically elevated across advanced economies, driven primarily by unprecedented fiscal stimulus, monetary expansion, pandemic supply disruptions, and geopolitical energy shocks. None of those are climate variables. Economic research consistently identifies monetary policy as the dominant long-term determinant of inflation.

Weather variability can affect specific commodity prices in specific years. That has always been true. Droughts affected grain markets in the 1930s. Hurricanes disrupted supply chains in the twentieth century, yet sustained inflation requires sustained monetary imbalance.

The New York Times frames climate change as an emerging inflationary force poised to accelerate, but observational economic record refutes any such economy-wide climate-driven inflation trend. Weather anecdotes, modeling projections, and policy cost provide no proof of climate-driven inflation. Inflation is fundamentally a monetary and policy phenomenon. Blaming it on the weather may make compelling click-bait copy, but it does not withstand economic scrutiny.

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/11/2026 - 21:00

Watch: The Moment LA Street Mob Storms Luxury Apartments

Zero Hedge -

Watch: The Moment LA Street Mob Storms Luxury Apartments

A group linked to a late-night street takeover forced its way into a luxury downtown Los Angeles apartment tower early Sunday, fighting with staff and leaving shattered glass and overturned furniture behind, according to police and video of the incident, according to the NY Post.

The disturbance happened around 3 a.m. at the Circa LA Apartments on South Figueroa Street, the Los Angeles Police Department said.

Authorities told KTLA that a crowd involved in a nearby street takeover moved toward the upscale high-rise and began vandalizing the property.

        View this post on Instagram                      

A post shared by OC PRESS (@ocpress)

Video shows a large group gathering outside the building before targeting the lobby. One person is seen throwing an object at a suited employee who appeared to be working near the front desk. The worker initially stood outside but retreated inside as other staff gathered in the lobby.

The crowd soon forced its way into the building. Outside, several people smashed glass doors and windows, while one individual used a metal barricade to ram the entrance.

The Post writes that once inside, members of the group knocked over furniture and ran through the lobby as the scene descended into chaos. At one point, a person appeared to grab a box from the front desk while others rummaged through it before the group dispersed as sirens approached.

Police said the building sustained exterior damage, including broken doors and windows. No injuries were reported, and no victims filed a report with authorities, though video shows at least one punch being thrown. It was not immediately clear whether any arrests had been made. 

Tyler Durden Wed, 03/11/2026 - 20:35

Pages