Individual Economists

Asking Rents Fall 0.7% To Lowest Level Since March 2022

Zero Hedge -

Asking Rents Fall 0.7% To Lowest Level Since March 2022

By Mark Worley of Redfin

The median U.S. asking rent fell 0.7% year over year in November to $1,595, the lowest level since March 2022. Rents were down 1.1% on a month-over-month basis.

The median rent is now 6.2% lower than when it hit an all-time high of $1,700 in August 2022.

Highlighting improved rental affordability, November marked the 19th consecutive month where the median asking rent price per square foot (PPSF) fell year over year, down 2.2% to $1.79. That’s the first time the median PPSF has been below $1.80 since November 2021. 

While the rental market has remained essentially flat over the past two years, rents have started to tick down slightly in recent months, thanks in part to the record number of new apartments that have been completed this year. 

Nationally, apartment completions rose 22.6% year over year to the highest level in over 12 years in the second quarter. As a result, the vacancy rate for buildings with five or more units rose to 8% in the third quarter, the highest level since early 2021.

“Renters in areas where construction has boomed are in a sweet spot right now. Affordability is improving as rents fall and wages rise, and there is increased choice with more and more new apartment buildings opening,” said Redfin Senior Economist Sheharyar Bokhari. “As construction starts to slow, rents will eventually tick back up, but 2025 is shaping up as a renter’s market with potential for the affordability gap between buying and renting to widen.”

Rents for 0-1 bedroom apartments fall to three-year low

With a major boost in supply, November marked the fifth consecutive month that asking rents fell across all bedroom counts.

Median asking rents for 0-1 bedroom apartments fell 1.7% year over year to $1,450 a month, the lowest level since November 2021. Rents for 2 bedroom apartments fell 1.1% (to $1,671) and 3+ bedroom apartments fell 2.3% (to $1,955).

On a price per square foot basis, the decline was more apparent, with 0-1 bedroom apartments falling the most (-2.5%), followed by 3+ bedroom apartments (-2.4%) and 2 bedroom apartments (-1.2%).

Austin rents drop 12%, leading a number of Sun Belt metros seeing significant declines

As has been the case for most of 2024, of the 44 major metros Redfin analyzes, Sun Belt metros saw the most significant declines in median rents, led by Austin, TX (-12.4%), Tampa, FL (-11.3%), Raleigh, NC (-8.4%), Jacksonville, FL (-7.5%) and Nashville, TN (-7%). 

Major Metros With Highest Rent Decreases

Rents rose the most in Midwest and on the East Coast metros, where there has been less new construction compared to the Sun Belt. 

Cleveland posted the biggest increase (10.6%), followed by Louisville, KY (10.2%), Baltimore (9.4%), Washington D.C. (9.4%), and Providence, RI (9.3%).

Major Metros With Highest Rent Increases

 

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 12:25

Turley To Debate Karpf On ZeroHedge: Free Speech, Musk, And X

Zero Hedge -

Turley To Debate Karpf On ZeroHedge: Free Speech, Musk, And X

Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter in late 2022 caused a media shit storm with calls for imminent bankruptcy, the infamous ADL shakedown, and disinformation alarm bells in the beltway think tank community.

Duking it out two years after the acquisition will be George Washington Professors Jonathan Turley and David Karpf. Each will join moderator Gene Epstein, director of The SoHo Forum, for a 90-minute debate broadcast live to the ZeroHedge homepage.

On the docket will be free speech, censorship, disinformation, and the government’s proper role in all this. The resolution: Elon Musk’s purchase of Twitter was a net positive for society. 

Turley for the affirmative will be making the free speech absolutist’s case in favor of Musk’s management style. The professor has lauded Musk as “the most consequential figure in free speech of our generation”:

A long-time 1A bull, Turley recently authored The Indispensable Right: Free Speech in an Age of Rage.

The Anti-Elon case:

Karpf — no longer on X — posted to “Substack Notes” that Musk had broken election law and committed “glaring violations” of Federal Trade Commission (FTC) consent law. Karpf referred to him as a “ketamine-addled chump” and predicted in March of 2023 that X/Twitter would be bankrupt within 6 months.

“Musk offered to buy Twitter on a (drug-addled) lark… Zombie Twitter will stumble along at a financial loss until Elon can find a villain to hang its failure on. “

FTC head Lina Khan was accused by Rep. Jim Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee of “blatant political harassment of Musk and Twitter” when Khan’s agency appeared to fast-track a probe into the billionaire and his new company immediately following his acquisition.

In this evening’s debate, Karpf will be arguing that Musk’s purchase and management style of Twitter has been a net negative for society.

Tune in live on the top of the ZeroHedge homepage and our X, YouTube, and Rumble accounts tonight at 7pm ET.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 12:05

"We're Almost There": Congress Scrambles To Pass Stopgap Funding Bill Before Friday

Zero Hedge -

"We're Almost There": Congress Scrambles To Pass Stopgap Funding Bill Before Friday

With less than four days to avoid a government shutdown, House Speaker Mike Johnson, (R-LA), and congressional leaders are working to finalize a bipartisan short-term funding bill, though delays and mounting frustrations within the House Republican caucus are complicating the effort.

Johnson, who initially expected to release the text of the bill over the weekend, then on Monday, said Tuesday that it would be unveiled by the end of the day.

"We’re almost there," Johnson told reporters Tuesday following a press conference. “We do expect text today.

The proposed legislation would keep the government funded through March 14 while addressing specific priorities, including disaster relief and $10 billion in assistance to farmers. Johnson emphasized that he intends to honor the House’s 72-hour rule, which requires time for lawmakers to review the bill before a vote. However, this would push the process close to the Friday midnight deadline for avoiding a shutdown.

Johnson said he remains focused on securing broad Republican support for the measure - which we're sure will contain more pork than a barbecue pit.

Senate Leaders Echo Urgency

In the Senate, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, (D-NY), struck a cautiously optimistic tone but stressed the need to finalize the agreement quickly.

"There continues to be good progress, but appropriators are still working on finalizing an agreement," Schumer said Tuesday on the Senate floor. "Obviously, we’re getting closer to the December 20 deadline, so time is of the essence for Republicans to reach an agreement with us that we can act on quickly."

Both chambers of Congress are facing pressure to wrap up funding negotiations before they adjourn for the Christmas, Hanukkah, and New Year holidays.

Frustration Grows Among House Conservatives

While negotiations continue, conservative House Republicans are growing increasingly critical of Johnson’s handling of the bill and its timeline.

"This is not the way to do things," Rep. Chip Roy, (R-TX), said in a post on X.

Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., delivered a scathing critique, calling the emerging legislation “a total dumpster fire” and expressing deep disappointment in Johnson’s leadership.

"I think it’s garbage," Burlison told reporters. "This is why I ran for Congress, to try to stop this. And sadly, this is happening again... I’m disappointed. I think that he can do better. He can communicate better. The fact that we haven’t seen the language today and we’re supposed to vote on it this week is unacceptable.”

When asked if the situation makes him hesitant to support Johnson in the upcoming January 3rd vote for House speaker, Burlison deflected, saying, "That I won’t say."

Johnson, however, brushed aside concerns about his leadership.

"I’m not worried about the speaker vote," Johnson told reporters. "We’re governing. Everybody knows we have difficult circumstances. We’re doing the very best we can under those circumstances."

Leadership Focused on Farmers, Disaster Relief

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, (R-LA), offered support for Johnson’s efforts, underscoring the bill’s priorities while projecting optimism about the path forward.

"We plan to pass a bill to get the government funded," Scalise said, "and ensure that we take care of disasters and our farmers here in America."

Looking ahead, Scalise emphasized the urgency of finishing the week’s work while expressing hopes for a smoother 2024.

"We have a lot to do the rest of this week, but we all look forward to getting back home to our families and enjoying a great Christmas as we get ready for what will be a very busy and productive New Year," Scalise said, standing alongside Johnson.

Stay tuned for updates...

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 11:45

Trump's Return To The World Stage Is Already Claiming Numerous Victims

Zero Hedge -

Trump's Return To The World Stage Is Already Claiming Numerous Victims

By Elwin de Groot, head of macro strategy at Rabobank

Trump’s return to the world stage – even though his official inauguration is on January 20 – is already claiming numerous victims. Arguably, even the fall of both the French and German government in recent months have been given some impetus by the political events in the US. But one of the clearest victims appears to be Canadian Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, who resigned yesterday, citing differences with PM Trudeau’s Cabinet over how to prepare for a looming trade war with its big neighbour. Observers say her comments in her resignation letter on “eschewing political gimmicks” likely refer to the temporary tax cuts and pay-checks planned by the government to support consumption. She sees handing out money as fiscally imprudent. Given that she announced her decision just hours before she was due to speak in Parliament on the fiscal and economic outlook, markets reacted with a fall in the Canadian dollar (depreciating some 0.4% vis-à-vis the US dollar) and rising bond yields (some 7bp on the 10y note).

Meanwhile, data this morning showed that UK regular wages increased by 5.2% annually in the three months to October, up from 4.9% previously and surpassing the consensus forecast of 5%. Regular pay growth in the private sector, which is more sensitive to the business cycle and therefore tracked more closely by the Bank of England, even rose to 5.4% during that same period. This significant wage inflation underscores the Bank of England's dilemma, as economic growth is slowing, as indicated by Friday's production figures and yesterday’s PMI. Job growth remains weak as well. Vacancies have declined to pre-pandemic levels, while payroll employment stagnant. We remain cautious about the official employment and unemployment data, as even the ONS acknowledges that its current estimates are essentially random. Our base scenario is that the central bank will continue easing in quarterly steps. We expect rates to remain unchanged at Thursday's meeting and to decrease by 100 basis points over the course of 2025.

Turning back to Europe then, where - to no one’s surprise - German Chancellor Scholz lost yesterday’s confidence vote, putting the country on track for snap elections on February 23. The debate in the run-up to the vote was heated and was first and foremost about the dire state of the economy and the threats from the East (and arguably from the ‘West’ as well). Of course the debate was largely a show for parties to set out their key campaign themes. Scholz said “It’s high time to invest forcefully into our country. […] we must turn the switch and this means now.” Yet one may wonder whether Scholz’ call for more public spending and investment resonated with lawmakers and voters, given that his Cabinet largely failed to do exactly just that under his reign. Indeed, CDU’s Merz responded: “Were you on another planet?” Yet, here too (as well as in France) the core of the issue is whether fiscal policy can and should play a role to support sustainable growth and, if so, how?

As long as this debate is not settled, Europe is likely to remain a playball of the markets, as it has been of late; negative sentiment has driven an wedge between US and European equity prices and has driven Eurodollar near its lowest level since late 2022, when the currency union was still reeling from the energy shock. Indeed, European industry is in a difficult position. Energy-intensive and/or low-added value industries are either closing or moving location to other parts of the world. A renewed decline in the German manufacturing PMI to 42.5 and an eyewatering 41.6 (a fresh cyclical low) in France for December once again drove home that message. The overall Eurozone index stayed put at 45.2, a level normally associated with (mild) recession. 

The manufacturing sector again produced less than a month earlier, and the decline in activity was even the largest so far this year. Production is clearly being scaled back due to declining demand, which is reflected in the subpar inflow of new orders. Especially new export orders continued to decline, and this does not seem to be entirely a Trump effect. Although the fear of import tariffs may make American companies more cautious about placing international orders, the contraction in new orders was less severe than in previous months. The empty order books thus seem more a reflection of the poor competitive position of European industry in the global market. The lower demand and emptying order books are now also forcing more companies to shrink their workforce. According to the purchasing managers' survey, the number of layoffs has not been this high in the past four years as this month, particularly in Germany and France. However, that sounds worse than it is: the number of job losses is still quite limited. As far as companies were still “hoarding” staff after the earlier experience with staff shortages around the Covid pandemic, some of these layoffs will be a 'rationalization' of the number of employees. After all, keeping more employees than necessary is not cheap.

Moreover, structural and cyclical issues are often mixed up and it seems fair to say that US industry isn’t in a great state either. For example, the US manufacturing PMI for December also fell decisively below the boom-bust mark of 50. At 48.4 it is more or less the same level as the November-reading for the much longer-running ISM manufacturing index. In statistical terms the European and US manufacturing indices are actually not very different right now, the normalized difference  is currently less than 0.5 standard-deviations (to the disadvantage of the Eurozone). 

Meanwhile, the Eurozone Services PMI data seemed to confirm what we have been saying for some time, namely that these indices tend to paint too-negative picture of economic activity in the autumn, only to paint too-positive a picture during the spring. This is a ‘seasonal pattern’ where the services sector PMI peaks around mid-year and then weakens between July and November/December appears to have slipped in since 2021 (when the world was slowly recovering from the pandemic). In any case, the December readings were better than the consensus estimate, and this compensated for the weakness in industry, even though the overall picture remains one of (very) moderate growth of activity.

Despite the sluggish activity, respondents of the PMI survey report higher costs and selling prices once again. Prices are no longer rising as sharply as in 2022, but companies have increased their selling prices for the third consecutive month. This price pressure remains particularly problematic in the services sector, suggesting that costs are largely related to salaries.

This underscores the challenge for the European Central Bank once again. Just last week, President Lagarde stated that domestically-driven inflation remains high. This measure of inflation, which tries to exclude the effects of imports, was still 4.2% in October. This inflation is closely related to services inflation and labor costs, which are also decreasing very slowly. The ECB still assumes that the high wage increases and high services inflation are the result of the high inflation in recent years, leading to higher collective labor agreements now. The ECB expects this to decrease next year. The PMI survey did not provide reassurance in this regard yesterday.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 11:25

After Pardoning Hunter's Weapons Charges, Biden Renews Demands For More Gun Control After Wisconsin Shooting

Zero Hedge -

After Pardoning Hunter's Weapons Charges, Biden Renews Demands For More Gun Control After Wisconsin Shooting

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

The shooting at the Abundant Life Christian School in Madison, Wisconsin, immediately prompted renewed calls for gun control from President Joe Biden and others.

As I have previously written, these calls often appear entirely disconnected from the actual crime or the constitutional protections afforded gun owners, including President Biden demanding a ban on assault weapons after a shooting with a handgun.

President Biden’s call for greater background checks and enforcement was a bit incongruous after he pardoned his own son on gun charges. More importantly, the Wisconsin case only highlighted why these standard demands for gun control would not have impacted that case.

This was a juvenile who is believed to have used a 9mm handgun in the attack. Natalie Rupnow, 15, was not supposed to have a gun and would not have gone through background checks. While both Biden and Kamala Harris have raised limiting or banning the popular 9mm, Harris admits that she is one of millions with the weapon and it would not be subject to any of these proposals.

The president once again denounced the availability of what he collectively calls “assault weapons,” a common reference to such popular models as the AR-15. Efforts to ban this model have already failed in the courts on constitutional grounds, though litigation is continuing on that issue.

In 2008, the Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller, recognizing the Second Amendment as encompassing an individual right to bear arms. The Supreme Court further strengthened the right in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen.

The AR-15 is the most popular gun in America and the number is continuing to rise rapidly, with one AR-15 purchased in every five new firearms sales. These AR-15s clearly are not being purchased for armored deer. Many are purchased for personal and home protection; it also is popular for target shooting and hunting. Many gun owners like the AR-15 because it is modular; depending on the model, you can swap out barrels, bolts and high-capacity magazines, or add a variety of accessories. While it does more damage than a typical handgun, it is not the most powerful gun sold in terms of caliber; many guns have equal or greater calibre.

That is why laws to ban or curtail sales of the AR-15 run into constitutional barriers. Even the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit struck down a California ban on adults under 21 purchasing semi-automatic weapons like the AR-15.

After past tragedies, some of us have cautioned that there is a limited range of options for gun bans, given constitutional protections. There also are practical barriers, with an estimated 393 million guns in the United States and an estimated 72 million gun owners; three out of ten Americans say they have guns. Indeed, gun ownership rose during the pandemic. When former Texas congressman and U.S. Senate candidate Beto O’Rourke declared, “Hell yes, we are going to take your AR-15,” he was widely celebrated on the left. However, even seizing that one type of gun would require confiscation of as many as 15 million weapons.

These calls for greater gun controls remain either factually ambiguous or legally dubious.

For example, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe declared after the Wisconsin shooting that it is time to “change the context of gun ownership.”

While admitting that he did not know all of the facts, McCabe said:

We’re [going] nowhere because it keeps happening. We know it’s going to happen again. It’s happening today. It’s going to happen again in the near future. I can guarantee you that and every time it happens, we do just about nothing. That doesn’t mean there aren’t things we can’t do. We could do things. We could — we could support and enact legislation that changes the — the — the context of gun ownership in this country and emphasizes gun safety and responsibility with the firearms that you own and keeping them out of the hands of children and doing — and really vigorous, consistent background checks across the country. We could stop selling people — stop — you — eliminate the ability to purchase guns without a background check.

It is unclear what “changing the context” means, particularly when the context is first and foremost constitutional.

Likewise, Rep. Mark Pocan (D-WI) called for his House colleagues to “stand up to gun manufacturers” but stopped short of explaining what that would actually mean:

Pocan has previously called for “common sense” laws without tackling the more difficult question of how to produce the sweeping changes given the narrow scope of constitutional limits for an individual right.

Wisconsin has robust gun control laws that did not prevent this shooting because Rupnow was not subject to the background checks and other regulations. She was not supposed to have the weapon and 9mm is not one of the guns that Democrats are calling to ban.

None of this means that people of good faith should not work on new initiatives and measures to combat gun violence. However, politicians like President Biden have misled the public for years about the narrow range of constitutional options for gun control legislation. The suggestion is that “this did not have to happen” despite the fact that none of these proposals would have stopped this from happening.

In a tragedy of this magnitude, our leaders have a duty, first and foremost, of honesty in speaking with the public.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 10:45

Boeing's Failed Plea Deal: What Happens Next

Zero Hedge -

Boeing's Failed Plea Deal: What Happens Next

Authored by Jacob Burg via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Months after the Department of Justice (DOJ) offered Boeing a plea deal to avoid criminal fraud charges, a U.S. judge threw a curveball in the case, rejecting the deal after taking issue with a “diversity and inclusion” provision in selecting a monitor to supervise the company’s safety practices, along with how the court would participate in that process.

The Boeing logo is displayed at the company's factory in Renton, Wash., on Sept. 24, 2024. Lindsey Wasson/AP Photo

The United States charged Boeing with fraud on Jan. 7, 2021, following the 2018 and 2019 737 MAX 8 crashes, which killed all 346 people onboard both flights. The DOJ accused the aerospace company of deliberately hiding its Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System software, which caused both planes to stall midair and fall to the ground, from Federal Aviation Administration regulators.

To avoid criminal charges, the DOJ offered Boeing a deferred prosecution agreement: a criminal settlement that required the plane manufacturer to pay a total of $2.5 billion in damages, including a $243.6 million penalty and a $500 million fund to compensate families of the 737 Max crash victims.

Boeing had to remain in compliance for three years after the agreement was signed—which ended on Jan. 7. But, two days prior, a door panel ripped off an Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 MAX 9 flight midair, changing the company’s fortunes overnight and thrusting its safety practices back into public scrutiny.

After the DOJ wrote in a May 14 court filing that Boeing had violated the criminal settlement, which the company denied, Boeing then pleaded guilty to defrauding the United States over the 737 MAX 8 crashes. The plea deal would have required Boeing to pay an additional $243.6 million fine, invest $455 million into safety and compliance programs, and submit to three years of independent monitoring over its safety and quality control.

Now that U.S. District Judge Reed O’Connor has rejected the deal, the aerospace giant faces several possible outcomes, aside from appealing the ruling, aviation and legal experts told The Epoch Times.

[The DOJ] can sit down with Boeing and rework the plea deal so that the monitor selection process is more acceptable to the court. Or they can take Boeing to trial on the conspiracy charge,” Erin Applebaum, a partner at Kreindler & Kreindler LLP, which represents 34 families who lost loved ones on Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, told The Epoch Times.

“I have no doubt that the first option is what will happen. I fully expect that DOJ and Boeing will rewrite the plea so that its terms are more favorable to the court.”

Judge Objects to ‘Diversity’ Provision

O’Connor wrote in a Dec. 5 order that he had concerns about a diversity and inclusion provision in Boeing’s plea deal with the DOJ. He targeted a single sentence in the plea agreement that referenced the DOJ’s diversity policy in selecting an independent monitor to monitor Boeing’s safety compliance practices.

In a case of this magnitude, it is in the utmost interest of justice that the public is confident this monitor selection is done based solely on competency,” O'Connor wrote. “The parties’ DEI efforts only serve to undermine this confidence in the Government and Boeing’s ethics and anti-fraud efforts.”

Shawn Pruchnicki, aviation safety expert and assistant professor at Ohio State University’s Center for Aviation Studies, said the monitor had an “amazingly important task” of supervising the company’s safety compliance practices.

I stand fully behind [diversity], but I think many of us in aerospace and certainly in aviation, just like we do on the flight deck ... we want someone who is qualified, that can meet the same requirements that we get,” Pruchnicki told The Epoch Times.

Applebaum said she and the victims’ families are very appreciative of the court’s mandating that the DOJ and Boeing improve the monitor selection process.

“Though there is still much work to be done, the imposition of a highly qualified monitor who will hold Boeing’s feet to the fire is a good first step towards strengthening aviation safety and ensuring that there are no more Boeing crashes,” she said.

Other Plea Deal Objections

In rejecting the deal, O’Connor also criticized how the DOJ positioned the court in the monitor selection process.

“At this point, the public interest requires the Court to step in,” he wrote in his order.

Marginalizing the Court in the selection and monitoring of the independent monitor as the plea agreement does undermines public confidence in Boeing’s probation, fails to promote respect for the law, and is therefore not in the public interest.

He also noted that the families of the 737 MAX 8 crash victims took issue with the government’s role in the plea deal.

“They argue, in essence, that the Government has monitored Boeing since the case was filed and yet failed to ensure Boeing’s compliance,” O'Connor wrote. “Because of this failure, they contend the monitor should be selected by and report to the Court to guarantee compliance.”

Michael Stumo, who lost his daughter in the Ethiopian Airlines crash, told The Epoch Times earlier this year that he strongly objected to the deal the DOJ had offered Boeing.

It’s a weak slap on the wrist for one of the biggest corporate death cases in U.S. history,” Stumo said.

In a Dec. 5 post on social media platform X, he said he was “very glad” the judge had rejected the deal.

“DOJ’s ‘coddling corporate criminals’ policy just got ... nailed,” he wrote.

Boeing and the DOJ now have 30 days to respond to the court on how they plan to proceed with the case, O’Connor said.

What Happens Next

Vikramaditya Khanna, a corporate law professor at the University of Michigan, told The Epoch Times that Boeing and the DOJ may go back to the negotiating table but that an appeal could be difficult given the trial court’s discretion in approving a settlement.

I’m not sure if this affects Boeing’s government contracts—I presume they will be likely to renegotiate the plea, and that will likely include things on government contracts,” he said.

“If there is no plea, then there are several questions about government contracts if Boeing were to be found liable for fraud at some point.”

Applebaum said that Boeing’s sentence could change if the DOJ decides to take the company to trial on the conspiracy charge and convict it. Otherwise, the manufacturer would face the same charges after losing the plea deal.

“In a perfect world, the families would see Boeing executives put on trial and held accountable for the deaths of their loved ones. But we have accepted the reality that this outcome is unrealistic,” she said.

“The families want Boeing to significantly improve its safety and compliance culture. A weak plea deal will do nothing to effectuate major change within the company, which is why the families pushed so hard for DOJ to include stringent and punitive terms as part of the plea agreement.”

Pruchnicki, who testified before the U.S. Senate in April about the issues with Boeing’s safety culture, said individuals at the company should still be held accountable and there should not be a plea deal.

“This is what it comes down to at the end of the day; the DPA, the deferred prosecution agreement, they clearly, without a doubt, [violated it],” he told The Epoch Times.

“They need to be held accountable for that. It was an absolute joke with what they came up with, completely insulting to the American public and completely insulting to the courts.”

Sam Dorman contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 09:35

US Industrial Production Tumbled For The 3rd Straight Month As Capacity Utilization Craters

Zero Hedge -

US Industrial Production Tumbled For The 3rd Straight Month As Capacity Utilization Craters

US Industrial Production tumbled for the third straight month in November (and 4th of the last 5). The 0.1% MoM decline (vs +0.3% exp) - following a downwardly revised 0.4% drop the month prior - dragged production down 0.9% YoY (the worst drop since January)...

Source: Bloomberg

Factory Orders rose 0.2% MoM - after a downwardly revised 0.7% slide a month earlier - (considerably weaker than the +0.5% MoM expected)...

Source: Bloomberg

Ex-Transportation, the picture was a little more rosy with core factory orders up a modest 0.13% MoM rise lifting YoY production by 1.13%...

Source: Bloomberg

Output at utilities fell by the most in four months, while mining posted the largest decline since May.

Finally, capacity utilization fell to 76.8% (the lowest since April 2021) and well below expectations...

Source: Bloomberg

...but, but, but it's not a recession!

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 09:27

Surging Car Sales Spark Upside Surprise For Retail Spending In November

Zero Hedge -

Surging Car Sales Spark Upside Surprise For Retail Spending In November

BofA's omniscient forecasters were - for a change - more or less in line with consensus for retail sales in November...

The actual print was mixed with the headline retail sales rising 0.7% MoM (hotter than expected), while core retail sales disappointed. The headline beat pushed sales up 3.8% YoY - the highest since Dec 2023...

Source: Bloomberg

Motor Vehicle & Parts were the biggest driver of the upside surprise...

Sales were also helped by online retailers...

Motor Vehicle & Parts Dealers sales surged for the second month to a new record high...

The key 'Control Group' saw sales rise 0.4% MoM (as expected) providing support for GDP...

Source: Bloomberg

BofA notes that the robust spending that we saw around Thanksgiving continued through Cyber Monday week.

We can’t learn much from year-over-year growth rates, since they were heavily impacted by the calendar shift. Therefore, we compare spending to the analogous period in 2023.

We find that spending on holiday items in the two weeks ending Dec 7 in 2024 was 6.1% higher than in the two weeks ending the Saturday after Cyber Monday in 2023.

Finally, as a reminder, retail sales data is 'nominal' so a quick sleight of hand using CPI data as a rough indication of inflation and we see that in fact, real retail sales have basically oscillated around the flatline for the last 30-months-plus...

Source: Bloomberg

So another data point for The Fed that clearly signals no need for rate-cuts! Does this look like an economy dealing with 'restrictive' rates?

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 08:39

Futures Drop As Global Selloff Reaches The US

Zero Hedge -

Futures Drop As Global Selloff Reaches The US

There is only so much the US can "exceptionally" decouple from the rest of the world, and on Tuesday US futures finally succumbed to the persistent selling in markets around the world, as traders awaited the Federal Reserve’s final interest-rate decision for 2024 and its monetary policy forecasts. As of 8:00am, S&P futures dropped 0.3%, while Nasdaq 100 futs eased back 0.2% after the relentless rally in tech stocks pushed the gauge to a fresh all-time high on Monday as AAPL/GOOGL/AMZN/TSLA/AVGO all reached new ATHs. TSLA (+3% pre-mkt) on an u/g away while NVDA (-1.5% pre mkt) continues to be under pressure. Europe’s Stoxx 600 fell 0.4% as weaker crude prices weighed on oil-related stocks (FTSE -70bps/DAX +15bps/CAC +30bps). A key Asian gauge dropped 0.5% after erasing gains as concerns over China’s economy persist (Shanghai -73bps/Hang Seng -48bps/Nikkei -24bps). US rates rose with 10Y TSY yields rising +4bps @ 4.43%. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index adds 0.1%. The Aussie dollar is the weakest of the G-10 currencies, losing 0.5%. The yen outperforms with a 0.2% gain. Crude oil extended its drop as WTI dropped 0.8% to $70.15. Meanwhile, Bitcoin adds another +90bps to $107,040 as global equities chop around ahead of a slew of central bank rate decisions the next few days (FOMC tomorrow). There is a busy macro calendar today with retail sales, industrial/mfg production, business inventories and the NAHB housing index all on deck.

In premarket trading, Pfizer rose 2% after the company forecast 2025 sales and earnings in line with analysts’ projections, a step toward fending off an activist investor’s claims that the drugmaker is being mismanaged. Here are some other notable premarket movers:

  • Mitek (MITK) rallies 15% after the identity verification software company reported fourth quarter revenue and earnings that beat the average analyst estimate.
  • Pacs Group (PACS) slips 3% as JPMorgan issued a downgrade after nursing home operator said it received investigative demands over its reimbursement and referral practices.
  • Rockwell Medical (RMTI) climbs 14% after the manufacturer of hemodialysis products entered into a supply pact with a provider of dialysis products and services.
  • Shoals Technologies (SHLS) climbs 8% as Morgan Stanley upgraded the renewable energy equipment company to overweight citing increased confidence in the earnings outlook heading into 2025.
  • Tesla shares rise as much as 3.4% in premarket trading on Tuesday as Mizuho Securities upgrades to outperform from neutral citing an improved outlook under the new administration.
  • Shares in electric-vehicle and charging station companies may be active on Tuesday after Reuters reported that Donald Trump’s transition team plans changes that would redirect funding from EV and charging stations markers to national-defense priorities.

As equity markets head into the final weeks of 2024, US stocks have significantly outperformed their peers for the year as optimism about artificial intelligence and falling rates fuel investor confidence. Traders are now focusing on Wednesday’s Fed announcement, with Chair Jerome Powell widely expected to deliver a quarter-point of easing.

What happens in the following months remains less clear. While the US economy is resilient, the prospect of inflationary import tariffs threatened by the incoming administration of Donald Trump may give Fed officials pause about the pace of further moves. Money markets are seeing an 80% chance of three cuts next year, compared to the small probability of a fourth reduction seen at the start of the month. “There is also the Fed, which stirs some uncertainty,” said Alexandre Baradez, chief market analyst at IG in Paris. “My scenario is for a hawkish cut with a much more cautious narrative.”

Bank of America strategists cautioned that fund managers have been reducing cash holdings to a record low and pouring money into US stocks, triggering a metric that could be a signal to sell global equities. Cash as a percentage of total assets under management fell below 4%, a move that in the past has been followed by stock market losses.

In Europe, the Stoxx 600 fell for a fourth consecutive session, as political upheaval in the region weighs on sentiment, with traders also bracing for Eurozone inflation data and a US rate decision due tomorrow. Technology and automakers are among gainers while energy and telecom sectors lead declines. Here are some of the biggest movers on Tuesday:

  • Airbus shares rise as much as 1.9% after Deutsche Bank upgraded the planemaker to buy from hold, saying it is better positioned for 2025 and is trading at a relatively affordable valuation.
  • Jungheinrich gains as much as 4.9% after Citi upgrades the intralogistics solutions provider to buy from neutral, saying the stock is too cheap to ignore after prolonged underperformance.
  • Goodwin shares rise as much as 18% after the UK mechanical and refractory engineering company reports what Shore Capital describes as “excellent” interim results.
  • Thyssenkrupp Nucera shares gain as much as 9.3% after full-year earnings from the German green hydrogen technology firm revealed encouraging developments in the pipeline and funding potential, according to Citi.
  • Hollywood Bowl shares drop as much as 11%, their worst day in over four years, after the bowling center operator reported a slide in pretax profit as well as flagging an impact of £1.2 million when UK National Insurance changes are implemented next year.
  • Bunzl drops as much as 5.7% after the year-end trading update reports revenue that fell below consensus as Jefferies analyst says the update flags “continued top-line weakness.”
  • Capita drops as much as 11% after the outsourcing specialist issued a trading update that showed an 8% adjusted-revenue decline and flagged a further slide in revenue growth next year.
  • Chemring shares fall as much as 11% as the British defense firm decided not to renew its share buyback program and said its margin has fallen due to operational challenges.
  • JDE Peet’s falls as much as 5% to hit a record low, after Goldman Sachs re-initiated coverage of the Dutch coffee and tea company with a sell rating, noting that a sharp uptick in coffee prices could hit sales, potentially putting at risk its presence in equity indexes.
  • UCB shares slip as much as 3.6% after a proof-of-concept study for its experimental drug minzasolmin developed in partnership with Novartis for Parkinson’s disease didn’t meet primary and secondary clinical endpoints.

Earlier in the session, HK/China closed lower despite a midday spike following a Reuters headline that placed China’s 2025 GDP growth and fiscal deficit targets at the upper bound of investor expectations. Small caps caught the most weakness today, suggesting that retail investors are taking a breather after being better buyers over the past few sessions. Meanwhile, Samsung Electronics 00597230 KS caught selling after GIR cut its price targets, while ASIC names in Taiwan were well bid after Broadcom AVGO US rallied again overnight.

  • Australia: S&P/ASX 200 +0.78%, snapping a five-day losing streak. The index took cues from Wall Street, where Tech shares delivered strong performance, bolstering sentiment. Investors are bracing for an expected interest rate cut from the US Fed Reserve later this week, with much of the focus shifting to the Fed's outlook for 2025. Notable performers were Commonwealth Bank CBA AU +1.6%, NA Bank NAB +1.5%.
  • Taiwan: TAIEX -0.09%. Market opened higher but gradually lost steam over the day. TSMC 2330 TT retreated 0.9% and is just 3 ticks short of another A-T-H. United Microelectronics Corp UMC + 2.7% after the biggest morning headlines were focused on their reported securing advanced packaging orders from Qualcomm. The ASIC theme was also very strong again, as Broadcom gained another 11% overnight with the local ASIC names benefiting again, including Alchip limit up, GUC 3443 TT +8.8%, and Faraday 3035 TT +5.2%.
  • Korea: KOSPI -1.29%. It opened weak and dipped lower further into the afternoon on accelerated foreign outflows with the bulk of the selling coming from program trades which indicated passive, systematic driven selling while locals (institutios, retail) were on the receiving end of the supply. Tech was an underperformer today whereas within semis - Samsung and Hynix saw divergence again while the EV names were notably weaker following potential tariff headwinds.
  • Japan: Nikkei 225 -0.23%. Market opened with risk on mode led by momentum trades. Investors preferred popular themes like defense names, AI related names. Investors shifted their positions from cyclicals to defensives, from high vol names to low vol names, value names to growth names. Shares of Advantest 6857 JP tumbled 9.1% as the unveiling of its latest testing solutions for advanced applications. Meanwhile, SoftBank Group 9984 JP +4.3% after CEO Masayoshi Son announced plans to invest $100 bn in the US.
  • China: SHSZ300 +0.26% but A-shares in other indices took another leg lower weighed weighed by small and micro cap names. Headlines from Reuters that China GDP growth target set at 5% for next year, and budgeted fiscal deficit 4% hit the tape at noon. Growth target is in line (and deemed aggressive by many; GSe: 4.5%), and fiscal target to the upper bound of expectation. The news spurred a quick spike in the PM session, but tapered soon.
  • Hong Kong: HSI -0.22%. Markets saw a sharp spike in PM inline with onshore, but soon faded marking the 3rd straight session of losses as most sectors retreated - particularly property, consumers, and tech. Sluggish activity data for Nov in China continued to weigh on sentiment, with retail sales growth unexpectedly slowing while industrial output rose at a relatively similar pace to October. Notable decliners include Techtronic Inds. 669 HK -2.4%, JD Logistics 2618 HK -1.58%, Wuxi Biologics 2269 HK -2.66%.

In FX, Bloomberg’s dollar gauge was little changed. An index of Asian currencies fell to the lowest in more than two years amid pessimism over China’s economic outlook and expectations that Trump policies will drive gains in the greenback. The yen snapped a six-day losing streak after weakening beyond the 154 level versus the dollar overnight. The yen’s rapid decline in the past week had strategists warning that further weakness may trigger verbal intervention from authorities and add pressure on the Bank of Japan to hike rates. Traders are pricing in a less than 20% chance of a rate hike in December, according to swaps market pricing. The pound erased a small loss while gilt yields rose as traders scaled back bets on Bank of England rate cuts after UK wage growth accelerated for the first time in more than year. The implied chance of three quarter-point cuts in 2025 fell to around 55%, down from 90% before the report. The yuan was little changed in both onshore and overseas trading, as markets shrugged off news that Chinese leaders were planning to set an annual growth goal of about 5% for next year and raise the budget deficit.

In rates, yields on US Treasuries advanced across the curve, with the US 10-year yield rising 3bps to 4.432%, cheapest since Nov. 21. UK government bonds fall as traders pare bets on interest-rate cuts by the Bank of England after UK wage growth accelerated for the first time in more than a year. UK 10-year yields rise 6 bps to 4.50% although the pound has given back its earlier advance versus the dollar. OIS swaps price in about 60bps of easing through December 2025 vs around 75bp at Monday’s close. The US Treasury sells $13 billion of 20-year bonds in a reopening at 1pm New York time; WI yield near 4.72% is ~4bp cheaper than November’s new-issue sale, which tailed by 1.5bp.

The 10Y yield may climb to 6% as US fiscal woes worsen and Trump’s policies help keep inflation elevated, according to T. Rowe Price. “Is a 6% 10‑year Treasury yield possible? Why not? But we can consider that when we move through 5%,” Arif Husain, chief investment officer of fixed-income, wrote in a report. “The transition period in US politics is an opportunity to position for increasing longer‑term Treasury yields and a steeper yield curve.”

In commodities, oil prices dropped with WTI falling 1% to $70 a barrel. Spot gold drops $11 to around $2,641/oz.

The US economic data calendar includes November retail sales and December New York Fed services business activity (8:30am), November industrial production (9:15am), and October business inventories and December NAHB housing market index (10am)

Market Snapshot

  • S&P 500 futures down 0.3% to 6,062.00
  • STOXX Europe 600 down 0.4% to 513.83
  • MXAP down 0.5% to 183.86
  • MXAPJ down 0.6% to 579.67
  • Nikkei down 0.2% to 39,364.68
  • Topix down 0.4% to 2,728.20
  • Hang Seng Index down 0.5% to 19,700.48
  • Shanghai Composite down 0.7% to 3,361.49
  • Sensex down 1.2% to 80,747.70
  • Australia S&P/ASX 200 up 0.8% to 8,314.00
  • Kospi down 1.3% to 2,456.81
  • German 10Y yield down 2 bps at 2.23%
  • Euro down 0.3% to $1.0482
  • Brent Futures down 0.6% to $73.47/bbl
  • Brent Futures down 0.6% to $73.47/bbl
  • Gold spot down 0.4% to $2,641.97
  • US Dollar Index up 0.18% to 107.05

Top Overnight News

  • China suffered the biggest outflow on record from its financial markets last month as the prospect of higher US tariffs posed more risks for the world’s second-largest economy. Domestic banks wired a net $45.7 billion of funds overseas on behalf of their clients for securities investment. BBG
  • China will keep its growth target of about 5% next year and agreed to increase its fiscal deficit target to 4% of GDP in 2025, up 1% from 2024’s 3% goal and consistent with the recent pledge to adopt a more proactive fiscal policy. RTRS
  • BABA (Alibaba) to book a $1B loss on the sale of its department-store chain Intime. WSJ
  • Ukraine said it killed a senior Russian general in a Moscow bombing after a device planted in a scooter exploded early Tuesday, a rare targeted assassination of a high-profile military official in the capital. Ukraine accuses the general of committing chemical weapons crimes. WSJ
  • The White House reiterated its position that it’s up to Volodymyr Zelenskiy to choose the timing and terms of talks with Russia, after Trump said Kyiv must make a deal to end the war. BBG
  • Senior U.S. officials say Turkey and its militia allies are building up forces along the border with Syria, raising alarm that Ankara is preparing for a large-scale incursion into territory held by American-backed Syrian Kurds
  • US retail sales are expected to rise 0.6% in November, compared with 0.4% the prior month, as companies lured bargain-hunters with discounts and tariff-wary shoppers pulled forward big-ticket purchases. BBG
  • Fund managers have been reducing cash holdings to a record low and pouring money into US stocks. Cash as a percentage of total AUM fell below 4%, a move that in the past has been followed by losses. BBG
  • Ten-year Treasury yields may climb to 6% for the first time since 2000 on Donald Trump’s inflationary policies. The benchmark may reach 5% in the first quarter. BBG

A more detailed look at global markets courtesy of Newsquawk

APAC stocks eventually traded mixed after the region initially showed a positive bias, taking cues from Wall Street, and in the absence of macro newsflow with looming risk events. ASX 200 firmed with banks underpinning the index, with Westpac among the gainers while its CFO announced plans to retire. Nikkei 225 trimmed earlier upside as traders were cautious ahead of the BoJ, with the decision contingent on the FOMC's announcement hours beforehand. Hang Seng and Shanghai Comp traded within narrow parameters in uneventful trade amid quiet newsflow, with participants remaining non-committal ahead of major risk events.

Top Asian News

  • China is to maintain a growth target of "around 5%" for 2025, according to Reuters sources. China is to target a budget deficit of 4% in 2025 (vs 3% initially). More stimulus will be funded through issuing off-budget special bonds, sources added.
  • New Zealand sees 2024/25 operating balance before gains, losses at NZD -17.32 bln (budget NZD -13.37 bln), according to Reuters.
  • New Zealand Debt Management Office says 2024/25 gross bond issuance increases to NZD 40 bln from NZD 38 bln in May, according to Reuters.
  • Alibaba Group (9988 HK/ BABA) sells Intime; Expected gross proceeds to Alibaba from Intime sale is approximately RMB 7.4bln; Alibaba expects to record losses of approximately RMB 9.3bln as a result of the sale of Intime.
  • PBoC injected CNY 355.4 bln via 7-day reverse repos with the rate maintained at 1.50%, according to Reuters.
  • South Korean acting President Han says South Korea is to implement the budget on Jan 1st; South Korea to allocate budget promptly for economic revitalisation, according to Reuters.
  • Magnitude 7.4 quake has struck Port-Vila in the Vanuatu region, according to USGS.

European bourses began the session entirely in the red and have mostly resided in negative territory throughout the European morning, but have attempted to edge a little higher in recent trade, with some indices managing to climb incrementally into the green. German Ifo data confirmed the dire situation in the region, whilst ZEW surprised to the upside; metrics which sparked little price action. European sectors are almost entirely in the red, given the slip in risk sentiment in today’s session thus far. Tech is marginally in positive territory, alongside Consumer Products and Services. Energy is the clear underperformer joined by Basic Resources, attributed to the losses seen in underlying commodity prices today. US equity futures are modestly in negative territory, in-fitting with the losses seen in Europe and the general risk tone; a slight turn in fortunes in comparison to the gains seen in the prior session.

Top European News

  • French Central Bank Forecasts: 2024 Growth seen at 1.1% (unchanged), 2025 seen at 0.9% (prev. 1.2% in Sept.); 2026 at 1.3% (prev. 1.5%), 2027% at 1.3%. HICP inflation 1.6% in 2025, 1.7% in 2026 and 1.9% in 2027.
  • ECB's Rehn says data to decide speed and scale of rate cuts; scale and speed of rate cuts will be determined in each meeting on the basis of incoming data and comprehensive analysis; Euro area inflation starting to stabilise at ECB's 2% target. Monetary policy will cease to be restrictive in the later winter, early spring period (i.e. between January and June 2025)
  • ECB's Kazimir says inflation risks are well balanced, via Bloomberg. Will discuss the neutral rate when they approach 2.5%.
  • ECB keeps capital requirements broadly steady for 2025, reflecting strong bank performance amid heightened geopolitical risks

FX

  • DXY is on a firmer footing and topped 107.00 in early European trade, to currently trade at the top-end of a 107.05-106.69 range. Should the upside continue, the Dollar index could see a potential test of the prior day’s best at 107.16, and then 107.18 from Friday 13th December. The North American day sees the release of US retail sales, which are expected to rise +0.5% M/M in November.
  • EUR is on the backfoot vs the Dollar, after posting modest gains in the prior session. German Ifo figures were mixed, with the Business Climate and Expectations components printed below expectations whilst the Current conditions improved a touch. Overall the figures only further confirmed the dire situation in the region. German ZEW was a little more optimistic, which helped to lift the Single-Currency a touch, but ultimately proved fleeting. Currently trading near session troughs at 1.0480.
  • GBP is on a firmer footing and one of the better G10 performers today, as traders trim their bets for more cuts in the coming year following today’s hot jobs reports, with particular focus in the wages components which surpassed the top end analyst expectations. Cable briefly topped 1.27 before then paring the upside to a current 1.2687.
  • The JPY is the best G10 performer thus far, in contrast to the losses seen in the prior day. USD/JPY currently trades in a 153.76-154.34 range, and just within the confines made on Monday.
  • Antipodeans are on the backfoot and in-fact the worst G10 performers, given the subdued risk sentiment and losses in commodity prices.
  • PBoC sets USD/CNY mid-point at 7.1891 vs exp. 7.2842 (prev. 7.1882)
  • RBI likely sold USD via state-run banks at 84.92-84.93, according to Reuters citing traders.
  • Barclays Month- & Quarter-end Rebalancing: USD neutral.

Fixed Income

  • USTs are in the red but only modestly so, moving in tandem with the morning’s data release out of the UK and Germany but in relatively thin 109-21 to 109-29+ parameters. US Retail Sales precedes a 20yr auction later today.
  • Bunds came under pressure on the morning’s UK wage data (see Gilts for details) with leads bearish in-fitting with contained/softer UST action overnight. However, this proved relatively short-lived as Bunds were sent back into positive territory to a 134.94 session high on Germany’s 13% Y/Y lower 2025 issuance intentions, and the mixed but ultimately softer German Ifo release. On the data front, Ifo figures were poor whilst the ZEW was a little more optimistic on the economy and helped to spark some short-lived upside.
  • Gilts are underperforming after the day's jobs data, with the wages components have taken centre stage with the hot metrics essentially removing any chance of easing on Thursday with just 1bps implied (c. 4bps pre-release. Though, we await CPI on Wednesday. A release which caused Gilts to gap lower by 47 ticks at the open and then slip further to an initial 93.27 trough. The 2029 outing saw a softer cover than the prior, which led Gilts down to a new 93.23 trough.
  • German Finance Agency intends to issue around EUR 380bln via Federal debt sales in 2025, -13% Y/Y. Plus two syndications.
  • Italy PM calls for discussions on common EU bonds to fund defence spending.
  • UK sells GBP 3.75bln 4.125% 2029 Gilt: 2.9x (prev. 3.05x), avg yield 4.348% (prev. 4.148%) & tail 0.8bps (prev. 0.8bps)

Commodities

  • WTI and Brent came under pressure early-doors despite a lack of fresh fundamental drivers at the time. Pressure which took the benchmarks to fresh lows for the week and back towards the troughs from Friday; though, well within last week’s circa. USD 5/bbl parameters. Brent'Feb 25 currently sits near session lows at USD 73.35/bbl.
  • Gold is softer, pressured by continued USD advances which has taken the DXY above the 107.00 mark. Yellow metal has been waning gradually in European hours, as the region's risk tone meanders higher. Thus far, down to a USD 2641/oz base.
  • Base metals spent APAC trade in very thin ranges but have since slipped to the lower-end of those and modestly into the red. Pressure which comes despite the modest inch higher in the European risk tone.

Geopolitics: Middle East

  • "The IDF has approved plans for major strikes in Yemen, and is prepared to act pending government approval", via Open Source Intel citing N12 News
  • US military said it conducted an airstrike against Houthis in Yemen, according to Reuters.
  • Syria's rebel leader said factions would be 'disbanded' and fighters would join the army, according to AFP.

Geopolitics: Other

  • Russia may increase the frequency of missile testing as external threats grow, according to Russian state news agencies citing the commander of Russian strategic missile forces. Russia may also increase the number of nuclear warheads on deployed carriers in response to similar actions by the US. Mobile-based missile systems, the commander noted, will be decisive means of inflicting devastating enemy damage in a potential retaliatory nuclear attack. Russia’s strategic missile forces plan maximum-range launches as part of state testing of prospective new systems. Additionally, Russia and the US give each other at least a day's warning about planned launches of intercontinental ballistic missiles.
  • Russian lieutenant general Kirillov and his associate killed in explosion in Moscow, according to RT sources; Kirillov is listed as Chief of Radiological, Chemical and Biological Defence of Russian Armed Forces.
  • Senior US officials say Turkey and its militia allies are building up forces along the border with Syria, raising alarm that Ankara is preparing for a large-scale incursion into territory held by American-backed Syrian Kurds, according to WSJ.

US Event Calendar

  • 08:30: Nov. Retail Sales Advance MoM, est. 0.6%, prior 0.4%
    • Nov. Retail Sales Ex Auto MoM, est. 0.4%, prior 0.1%
    • Nov. Retail Sales Control Group, est. 0.4%, prior -0.1%
  • 08:30: Dec. New York Fed Services Business, prior -0.5
  • 09:15: Nov. Industrial Production MoM, est. 0.3%, prior -0.3%
    • Nov. Manufacturing (SIC) Production, est. 0.5%, prior -0.5%
    • Nov. Capacity Utilization, est. 77.3%, prior 77.1%
  • 10:00: Oct. Business Inventories, est. 0.1%, prior 0.1%
  • 10:00: Dec. NAHB Housing Market Index, est. 47, prior 46

DB's Jim Reid concludes the overnight wrap

In what should be a quiet week given the time of year there is still a lot going on in markets as we build up to the FOMC that concludes tomorrow. The S&P 500 (+0.38%) ended the session just beneath its all-time high from earlier in the month but with the number of decliners (321) in the index exceeding advancers (182) for a remarkable 11th session in a row. On my calculations this is the longest such run for 40 years. Elsewhere French assets under-performed a touch after the Moody’s downgrade on Friday night, whilst the Canadian Dollar hit its weakest intraday level in four-and-a-half years after the country’s finance minister resigned heaping pressure on Trudeau as the political instability in several G7 countries seen over the last few months continues.

Talking of which, the other main story of the day centred around Germany as the government lost a no-confidence vote as expected that paves the way for an early election to happen. By way of background, Chancellor Scholz had led a three-party coalition of his own SPD, the Greens and the FDP. But the coalition collapsed after Scholz fired the FDP leader and finance minister Christian Lindner because of a budget dispute. Under the German system, the Chancellor can’t simply call an early election at the time of their own choosing. However, they can ask the President for an early election if they lose a vote of no confidence, so this one was tabled deliberately by the government in order to bring forward the election date. The election is expected to take place in February, and the conservative CDU/CSU bloc currently have a clear lead in opinion polls. Today they will release their manifesto with the leaks suggesting no plans to reform the debt brake. However part of this is likely to help ensure they have a stronger negotiating position in coalition talks. See Robin Winkler's latest piece yesterday looking at DB's latest thoughts.

In the meantime, there were also big developments in Canadian politics yesterday, as Finance Minister and Deputy PM Chrystia Freeland resigned from the cabinet. In her resignation letter, she said that the threat of US tariffs meant Canada should be “keeping our fiscal powder dry today, so we have the reserves we may need for a coming tariff war.” The move came just hours before Freeland was set to deliver an economic update, and Canadian assets struggled following the resignation, with equities around half a percent lower and the Canadian Dollar weakening. Canada’s next election is due by October 2025, but the governing Liberal Party under Justin Trudeau are lagging well behind the opposition Conservatives, and CBC News’ poll tracker points to a high chance of a Conservative majority based on current polls. The question after this is whether Trudeau can ride this out until next October or will have to go to the polls earlier.

Moving on to France, there was an underperformance in the country’s markets following the credit rating downgrade from Moody’s on Friday. For instance, the CAC 40 (-0.71%) was the worst performer among the big European indices, well beneath the Europe-wide STOXX 600 (-0.12%). In addition, the Franco-German 10yr spread widened by +1.4bps to 79.9bps, which is its 5th consecutive move wider. Remember the downgrade only bring Moody's into line with S&P and Fitch so it aligns the main agencies rather than creates an incremental move away from the pack. Otherwise, there wasn’t much in the way of concrete political news, but the new PM François Bayrou met with Marine Le Pen, who said after the meeting that “It’s perhaps a little early to say if we were heard, but we were listened to.”

Elsewhere in Europe, there was a bit more optimism yesterday as the December flash PMIs were slightly better than expected. Now admittedly, the Euro Area composite PMI was still in contractionary territory at 49.5, so it was hardly a stellar performance. But that was stronger than the 48.2 print expected, and the services PMI was back in expansionary territory at 51.4 (vs. 49.5 expected). From a market perspective however, there wasn’t much to shift the dial for the ECB, who are still widely expected to keep cutting rates in 2025. And sovereign bonds were broadly steady yesterday, with 10yr bund yields (-1.0bps) coming down slightly to 2.24%.

The modest rally in European bonds also came as ECB President Lagarde followed through on some of the more dovish signals seen at last week’s press conference, saying that the ECB is looking to deliver an “appropriate” policy stance and that “If the incoming data continue to confirm our baseline, the direction of travel is clear and we expect to lower interest rates further”. Meanwhile, Schnabel, one of more hawkish ECB voices, noted that “lowering policy rates gradually towards a neutral level is the most appropriate course of action”, so some implicit pushback against the possibility of the ECB having to move rates below neutral.

Over in the US, the theme of American exceptionalism continued as the flash PMIs were notably stronger than expected. Indeed, the composite PMI was up to 56.6, which is its highest since March 2022 when the Fed started to hike rates again. In turn, that contributed to a selloff among US Treasuries, which pared back their initial gains to leave the 10yr yield little changed (+0.1bps) at 4.40%. At the same time, there was a notable outperformance from US equities, with the S&P 500 (+0.38%) ending the session just -0.27% beneath its all-time high. As mentioned at the top the breadth was again a negative as more stocks fell than rose for an eleventh day with the equal weight index down -0.36%. So the advance was driven by the Magnificent 7 (+2.07%), which hit another all-time high. Health care stocks (-1.24%) were among the underperformers as Trump commented that he plans to “knock out the middleman” in the sector during a wide-ranging press Q&A.

In Asia the main headline just coming through is Reuters reporting that China is set to announce a 5% growth target for 2025 along with a 4% budget deficit. There has been talk of such an expanded deficit number in the last couple of weeks but if that is the growth target the market will likely conclude that the authorities will have to be serious about stimulus. After the story's release Chinese equities have rallied several tenths of a percent with the Shanghai Comp now "only" -0.16% lower on the day. The Hang Seng is +0.2% higher having spent most of the session notably lower. The Nikkei (+0.20%) and the ASX (+0.78%) are higher but the KOSPI (-1.0%) is the biggest underperformer as the country continues to digest the weekend impeachment news. US futures are flat.

Bitcoin (+0.41%) is advancing for the third straight session, hitting a record high of $106,511 as the incoming Trump administration is seen as being far more friendly towards cryptocurrencies.

To the day ahead now, and data releases in the US include retail sales and industrial production for November, in Canada there’s the November CPI print, in Germany there’s the Ifo’s business climate indicator and the ZEW survey for December, and in the UK we’ll get unemployment for October. Central bank speakers include the ECB’s Kazimir and Rehn.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 08:26

Transcript: Tony Kim, Blackrock Active Technology

The Big Picture -

 

 

The transcript from this week’s, MiB: Tony Kim, Blackrock Active Technology, is below.

You can stream and download our full conversation, including any podcast extras, on Apple Podcasts, SpotifyYouTube, and Bloomberg. All of our earlier podcasts on your favorite pod hosts can be found here.

~~~

This is Masters in business with Barry Ritholtz on Bloomberg Radio.

Barry Ritholtz: This week on the podcast, another extra special guest, Tony Kim, is managing director at BlackRock, where he heads the fundamental equity technology group helping to oversee all of the active technology investments BlackRock makes. In addition to being a portfolio manager and running a number of mutual funds and ETFs, he is just a world-class technology investor who understands the sector like few other people do. Not only has he put up a a very impressive track record, his entire approach to the ecosystem of technology covering everything from robotics to ai, to software to semiconductors is, is really quite fascinating. If you’re at all interested in technology, in ai, in the process of thinking about tech investing, then you’re gonna find this conversation to be absolutely fascinating. With no further ado my discussion with BlackRocks Tony Kim.

Tony Kim: Thank you, Barry. It’s a pleasure to be here.

Barry Ritholtz: Pleasure to have you. So let’s start out with your background. Bachelor’s in industrial engineering from University of Illinois, and then an MBA from Columbia. What were the career plans?

Tony Kim: Career plans? Yeah. First of all, thanks for having me, you, your, your show title, masters in Business. I, I am no Master in business. Well,

Barry Ritholtz:  You have an MBA, so you automatically qualify. That’s a master’s, right? Yeah,

Tony Kim: Yeah, that’s true. That’s true. Yeah. The origins of the career. You know, I, I grew up in the Midwest. It’s the first phase of my life. And growing up in the eighties in, in Illinois, I, I, you know, as a, I’m from Korea actually, but, so the natural, I was a STEM kid and, and that, that kind of propelled me into the engineering side, but I always had other interests outside of that. But the reason I went to Champaign, we were all from state of Illinois, and my siblings and I all went to school in the state of Illinois, and, and I gravitated initially to engineering, and that’s kind of the, that, that got into that. And then eventually I ended up in New York and then transitioned into finance. We we’re

00:02:37 [Speaker Changed] Gonna talk about that transition in a minute. Yeah. But before we get there, you, you really begin your career as an engineer at Rockwell Automation. Yeah. What did you do there?

00:02:46 [Speaker Changed] This is first job, right? First job, first real job out outta school. It really, it was the first entree into a company, not only a company a, this was a automation company that’s often known for, works with many industries, but helping automate, we were help, I was working on projects to automate manufacturing. They had these things called PLCs, which are basically industrial computers with sensors, with drives, drive systems, motor control, robotics, and all of these things. And then you package them together, and you work with many different kinds of manufacturing companies in the early days of automating manufacturing processes across many industries. So that was my first entree in seeing the diversity of, of the manufacturing base in this country. I was particularly, I was in, I was working in, on the East coast and, you know, any, everything from like pharmaceutical to automotive to, to what a, what a distribution network looked like. What, what tier one, tier two kind of systems integrators were with the technology of automating manufacturing. And so we working on different projects and see the, across a lot of industries, but I realized I, I didn’t want to, you know, I had other, I had other ambitions, and this is what led me to going to graduate school.

00:04:16 [Speaker Changed] So, so let, let’s talk about some of those other ambitions. You end up doing investment banking in New York in the mid nineties. Yes. What was the transition from being an engineer slash operator to an investor? What was that like?

00:04:32 [Speaker Changed] Well, when I was at, when I went to Columbia, you know, I did the engineer, I worked in an engineering company, and I thought I wanted something, a higher level, more strategic in nature. And I actually thought I wanted to, I wanted to try to get into consulting. That’s the classical, right? Classical role for A MBA. None of the consultants would wanted to hire me, but the, somehow the investment banking side found me, or I found them. And it was an engineering, here’s a guy from engineering with engineering background. And, you know, at the time, those was the early days of pre pre.com, and it was, it was a new emerging industry. And so I think they saw that linkage between some technical expertise with finance, maybe working that with that industry. So that was, but the, but the, the finance is what, what pulled me in on the investment banking more so than the consulting because of that angle, I think.

00:05:37 [Speaker Changed] And your timing was perfect, the 1990s, timing was great. Time to be doing iBanking in technology. Tell us about some of the transactions you saw late nineties, early two thousands. What sort of deals were you working on?

00:05:51 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, I just, that, that transition, I, you know, I was originally hired by SG, or which is a British investment bank, and it got acquired. And then after the

00:06:00 [Speaker Changed] War, that became Warburg Pincus, is that right?

00:06:02 [Speaker Changed] That became SBC Warburg, and then UBS bought SBC and then UBS Warburg, and then the Warburg name went away. But I was there right at the time when Warburg was acquired. And, and then that transition, I joined Merrill Lynch, and then Merrill Lynch said, go west young man.

00:06:23 [Speaker Changed] Right?

00:06:23 [Speaker Changed] Okay. So I,

00:06:25 [Speaker Changed] I remember Merrill Lynch during the 1990s was absolutely a powerhouse, or at least became a powerhouse towards the, the back half of that decade.

00:06:34 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, it, yeah, yeah, yeah. So it was very much a new thing for them in, in the West Coast. And so I, I went, and I still recall to this day, there were several of us that were, were the origins of the MM and a group on the West Coast for Merrill Lynch. In fact, three of those people, 20 some years later, were back at or joined at BlackRock. And I can tell you the story of that.

00:07:03 [Speaker Changed] Sure. Let’s hear

00:07:03 [Speaker Changed] That. Oh, okay. Yeah, there were, there were, there were three of us that were VPs and directors at the m and a group. It was, feel,

00:07:11 [Speaker Changed] Feel free to drop names.

00:07:13 [Speaker Changed] A guy named Drag Vic, who is now Vice Chairman of JP Morgan, runs the tech m and a. This guy Michael Lightner, and then myself, and then we work for this guy named Rob Stewart. And then Mark Schafer above led the group, but Mike Michael at 10 Bone BlackRock later acquired them. And he was one of the partners at 10 Bone. And then recently BlackRock bought GIP, and then Rob is one of the partners at GIP. So three of the four of us, Rob, myself, Michael, all ended up at BlackRock in some famous,

00:07:49 [Speaker Changed] Let’s get the band back together, get the band,

00:07:51 [Speaker Changed] See if we can Mad Drago did not. Drago still is at JP Morgan right now. So, so, but those were the original days. And then, you know, the transactions, you know, this was pre.com and you know, the internet was just getting going.

00:08:05 [Speaker Changed] Are you talking early nineties or

00:08:08 [Speaker Changed] Mid? Mid nineties? Mid nineties. Mid late, mid to late nineties.

00:08:11 [Speaker Changed] Like, I remember being on a trading desk in 96 when the Netscape and I was not allowed to trade it when the Netscape IPO happened. Yeah. That was really what kicked off a giant explosion. Were you there around that time?

00:08:27 [Speaker Changed] Yes, in that time. And, and this, these were the deals when, when Cisco was going crazy, and there were, you know, there’s so many transactions and networking. There was the optical communications boom, some of the original software internet assets. And so I did transactions in this, especially a lot in the networking telecom. I remember working on one or two software deals. And I did that for a while. And then, then I real, I decided to leave investment banking, which I, or I learned a tremendous amount, especially the, you know, putting, you know, the strategic nature of looking at industries and companies, and of course all of the, the financial acumen, the rigor of, of doing very intensive financial analysis. But you’re always at working at the behest of a client, right? Right. You, you’re working on it, it was transactional related. And, and this is when I decided to go and, and take a, take a career path changed to the investment side.

00:09:30 [Speaker Changed] So tell us what that transition was like. What is it like going from transactional m and a on the west coast to No, I just wanna find companies public and private and invest capital in them.

00:09:44 [Speaker Changed] Yeah. I, I think that’s, that was a transition. The, the, the, the financial financial analysis is the same, effectively, maybe it’s even more intensive on the, on the, on the m and a side. ’cause you’re doing much more detailed work. The way you look at industries and companies are relatively similar. It’s that on the transactional side, you work on projects for a short duration of time, and then you move on and move on and move on. And hopefully over time, you, you persist. You have persistence and you learn more about, about that industry and the domain. When you go to investment side, I, I started as an analyst, right? I wasn’t, you know, and here you are looking at wider array of companies. You’re doing financial analysis, but not as detailed as you were working on one deal, one transaction for months at a time.

00:10:43 And, and then you, but you, yet you have persistence because you’re able to look at sectors and industries and companies for a longer period of time consistently. And, and so you build deeper domain knowledge. And, and, and so that was one. The second is that you’re no longer working for a client. You’re, you’re, you are working to find the best inve, you know, investments and, and put your own capital at risk, right? And so that was a change of the mindset of how to assess, because you’re, you’re not working really. You’re not just servicing a client here. You’re putting your own capital at risk. And, and, you know, that was the, that was the first big change of just assessing how that works and then, and then going from, and then, and then learning many, many, many domains. And, and then that was the, working with many different kinds of investors, different kinds of investment philosophies. I must have worked for 30, 40 portfolio managers across four, four or five investment firms. And that’s, that was like, I guess my second fair era here was to learn the skills of investing.

00:12:00 [Speaker Changed] Huh? We we’re gonna spend more time on what you’ve learned in a little bit. Yeah. You said something I have to explore a little bit. Sure. It, it was more in depth, more intensive on the m and a side than the investing side. I’m curious as to why the two ideas that immediately pop into mind, you’re covering a whole lot more companies on the investment side, but, but one can help but imagine on the m and a side, Hey, it’s all in, you’re taking the whole thing as an investor. If you buy something and you have second thoughts, well, you sell a few million shares and you’re done, you could walk away with maybe a little worse for the wear and tear. But when you buy an entire company, hey, it’s really hard to unwind that, isn’t it?

00:12:50 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, that’s, that’s right. You know, and, and you’re buying the whole thing, or you’re representing, or you’re selling the whole thing, or you’re selling pieces of it, and you’re working on one company and another company, maybe two companies at a time. And you want to get every, every number right? Every, every comma, every nuts and bolts to, to the, as many, as much detail as you can. So the precision and the accuracy and the, and the information fidelity is much higher because that’s what you’re just working on. That one company, that one transaction versus, like you said, you’re looking at hundreds of companies and, and you can make a decision with the push of a button and sell or sell or buy. And so the, the time spent on that analysis will invariably be less than the time spent on this one definitive transaction.

00:13:52 [Speaker Changed] Huh. Really, really interesting. So you’ve been in BlackRock since 2013. Obviously passive has been a huge success for BlackRock. You’re on the active side. Is there any crossover? Do you get pulled into any discussions from, you know, any of the big BlackRock ETFs sector funds, passive indexes?

00:14:17 [Speaker Changed] So the passive industry, passive part of BlackRock is separate to the active part. I guess what would be one trend is that we are also launching many active ETFs, which is the container in which most of the passive funds are traded at. And then there’s like passive decisions, you know, are, you know, a lot of the passive index thing is now an active decision, I guess you could say. That’s what, that’s

00:14:45 [Speaker Changed] Hey, it always has

00:14:45 [Speaker Changed] Been. It always has been. Right?

00:14:47 [Speaker Changed] We,

00:14:48 [Speaker Changed] Yes, that’s right.

00:14:48 [Speaker Changed] It, it, it’s, it’s, Hey, we’re gonna make it market cap index. That’s an active decision. Yeah. We’re gonna, we are gonna cap apple, nvidia, Microsoft at X percent. That’s an active decision, right? There’s lots of active decisions. People don’t realize there’s quite a bit of active in their passive.

00:15:03 [Speaker Changed] Yeah. So now we’re, we’re joining that, that, that party as well. We have now active s we launched two recently, one on the AI side. So where we fail that dynamism, like especially an industry that is in rapid change, like an ai, I think you need a lot of adaptation flexibility because things are changing so rapidly.

00:15:27 [Speaker Changed] So, so I wanna stay with that. We’re gonna talk about the, the multiple ETFs you, you actively manage. But generally speaking, after passive captured more than half of, of the mutual funds and ETF assets, there has since been an explosion of active ETFs as well as mutual funds. Some are thematic, some are sector based, but they all have in common that it’s not relying on a passive index. What are your thoughts on the future of active management in the ETF space?

00:16:01 [Speaker Changed] Well, I think the, the future of active management, you know, as, as you correctly pointed out, I think there are generic sections of the market where it is the broad market exposure, S and P, those I think, continue to be under pressure as it moves to, to those passive indices. But I, but you, you, you said something very interesting there. You know, the industry is, is specialized, you know, sectors, thematics in the container of an active ETF. I think that is more representative maybe where the future of active industry’s going, where, where one can express a, a differentiated view. And invariably that is a function of specialization, I think. And, and I, of course, I’m, I’m biased in that ’cause I am focused on a specialized area, which is the technology area. And, and then within the technology area, there are many further sub-specializations. And I, I think those that have broader depth of domain knowledge, hopefully that is the advantage.

00:17:14 And, and that, that gets expressed in an active fund and ETF or a mutual fund or whatever. And, you know, I, as I, as I’ve been in this technology industry for a long time, you know, 20 years ago, tech was 20% of the s and p, it’s over 40 and it’s probably going higher as, as, as now we’re entering the AI era. And so generalists, I think are at a information asymmetry disadvantage to those that have domain specificity. And if you have better information, better knowledge, hopefully that leads to better decision making, which is, you know, which will hopefully sustain the active management

00:17:54 [Speaker Changed] Industry. You know, I’m so glad you said that you think the technology sector of the s and p 500 is going higher. When, whenever people say to me, aren’t you concerned that tech is 29% of the s and p 500 or whatever the number happens to be? My answer is always the, the magnificent seven are responsible for something like two and a half trillion dollars in revenue and $500 billion in profits. I’m shocked it’s only 29%. Why isn’t it half of the s and p 500? This is what’s driving the economy in the market. Doesn’t it deserve a, a richer valuation? I’m curious as to your thoughts on that.

00:18:34 [Speaker Changed] 100% agree. Okay. I 100% agree. The, you know, the multiple in aggregate has not changed dramatically, but it has driven by free cash flow. And, and the 40% I quoting is a combination of comm services, which they carved out, which is really tech companies, right? With classic tech that’s over 40%. And when you look at the contribution of free cash flow, right, which is the ultimate profit metrics, it’s followed, it is 40% of the free cash flow. Right? You know, the other thing about tech, I don’t think people realize it. It has represented the highest growth. It actually has the highest margin. It is the highest free profitable margin. If people think it’s unprofitable, it’s like, but 90 some percent of teve profitable,

00:19:26 [Speaker Changed] This is not,

00:19:26 [Speaker Changed] And the highest profit margin and the highest free cash flow growth. And that’s what’s driven the market cap appreciation. That is the, that is not, not well understood,

00:19:38 [Speaker Changed] Fair to say. This is not the late nineties.com No, no. You know, whimsical ideas with hardly any revenue and no profits, these companies are printing money and are wildly profitable. Yeah.

00:19:53 [Speaker Changed] And in fact, I would even make another distinct, you know, the, the max seven, the most profitable sector in all the s and p of any is the semiconductor industry. Hmm. They even have higher margins now than the software industry. And the software industry is amongst the highest, right? So tech in general, if you say software and semis are two thirds of all of tech, right? They have the highest margins in the world. Huh? So they have the most profitable companies with the most growth, which generates the most free cash flow, which generates the returns, which generates the 40% of the market cap, which is, and most of those are max seven.

00:20:31 [Speaker Changed] Doesn’t, doesn’t sound like a bad place, doesn’t not sound

00:20:34 [Speaker Changed] Bad place

00:20:34 [Speaker Changed] To, to

00:20:35 [Speaker Changed] Keep your, and now we have AI and it probably goes higher. It’s gonna go higher, huh.

00:20:40 [Speaker Changed] Fascinating. So we were talking a little bit about what makes technology so interesting. Share a little bit of your perspective. How do you go about identifying technologies that are going to drive future growth and as we’ve seen, reshape the entire economy?

00:20:59 [Speaker Changed] You know, I, I guess I would say first I’m a deconstructionist. I like to deconstruct problems, deconstruct any kind of situation, deconstruct sectors and industries. So I like to break things down and then be even before breaking ’em down, this kind of goes to my childhood. I, I always had a fascination love of maps. So maps. Maps, huh,

00:21:21 [Speaker Changed] That’s

00:21:21 [Speaker Changed] Interesting. Cartography, ancient maps. And so I would, I’d like to map everything out. Okay. And, and so like the ancient mariners would say all the oceans that you, you’d want a map of where you’re navigating to. And, and so I start with that. I, I, I like to break things down. I break technology down into five or six major sub-sectors, and then we just continually deconstruct and break those down. And so once you start breaking these things down, you then create a, a map of the whole landscape, the semiconductor and landscape internet landscape, the software landscape, et cetera, and continually break things down. And so then they are digestible pieces. And then within those pieces, then you interrogate all of the technologies that are going. And so now you have this, this giant, giant map of all of technology, all reconfigured and mapped out. And then you go into detail.

00:22:21 And then this way you start, it’s kinda like a battlefield commander looking at a giant war map. And you see hotspots, this is hot, this is cold, this is hot, this is cold. And, and then you have systematized a way of looking at all of those different categories and technologies and sub-sectors, and you know, all the companies that are there, you know, the competitors there. And then you’re observing what’s hot and what’s not. And so then, so that’s the current, that’s the initial framework. And so then you, you start to see trends that are, that are happening and you think you see other trends that are, that are declining.

00:22:58 [Speaker Changed] So what’s so intriguing about that is we tend to think of fundamental research, CFP type research as very balance sheet driven. What you’re describing is something that’s much more holistic and comprehensive. You’re, you’re really looking at the whole echo system of technology to, to see what is, is moving and use the magic word systematize. How, how do you systematize that? Is it, is it just identifying what is on a mathematical basis, popping its head up? Yeah,

00:23:33 [Speaker Changed] I, I think, I think if we use AI as a great framework, as a test, as a case study. So if I were to frame technology industry as we have this hardware industry, and inside the hardware industry, there are many categories like smartphones and robotics and servers and things. And then there’s a semiconductor industry. There’s different kinds of chips, accelerator chips, memory chips, foundry, logic, analog. And then let’s say the software industry, there’s security and applications, infrastructure, et cetera. And once you have mapped all of these things out, and you know, where all the companies, where all the bodies are buried and you know, who’s, who’s competing with whom and what, who’s working on what along comes ai, AI starts with chat, GPT and GPT-3 0.5 in the end of 2022, early 2023. And it, it shows up as an application, a chat application. Well, the first thing you, when I saw that, I said, wow, this is going to change the world. And that

00:24:42 [Speaker Changed] Was your initial response to the first demonstration you saw of chat, GBT,

00:24:48 [Speaker Changed] That and having a meeting with Jensen, Huang in January, 2023, those two things kinda triggered it. Then once you see that, then you say, okay, how is this gonna cascade through? You know, it’s kind of like in biology, there’s a, there’s a thing called what I call a trophic cascade, an ecological ecosystem. And, and then you say AI is, is the trigger, the first thing that you see it, it’s the first representation’s, well, you gotta build these models and to build the models, you need these chips. And so then you go, well, then you interrogate, well you need these kinds of grab GPUs and memory and things. Then you say, well, then you need to, well, those are connected to the packaging systems. And those packaging systems are connected then to foundries. And then these foundries are connected to the wafer output, which you need the equipment.

00:25:40 And then you start to build a chain of this is what’s needed to build this part. And then those chips get thrown in servers, and servers need this whole eco supply chain. And then those servers get then deployed in clouds, right? And these clouds then need, oh, by the way, these things generate a lot of electricity. And that spawned the whole power energy movement. And then you, but then, you know what the power transmission and grid and technical thermal equipment that needs to power and cool these cloud data centers. And so you have built that supply chain down. And then, and then after the AI is built, you bring the AI into, into the, into business at Bloomberg and BlackRock, and you bring those into a software, and then you embed that in applications. And then, oh, by the way, that same AI that’s being will, will throw that into the self-driving car and robots. And so once you see that whole chain and how that gets diffused, and then you have interrogate, you’ve already built these maps effectively of every single one of these little ecosystems and supply chains. And then you see how diffusion works and, and then, then you say, well, is it worth investing in these companies or not? And that’s when then you get into the financial analysis. So,

00:27:00 [Speaker Changed] Huh, really interesting. So I’m hearing infrastructure, which is everything from power to cloud to database to intelligence, which is the modeling. Yeah, that’s right. And then software, tools, application solutions. So this isn’t, you know, I think people tend to think of, oh, ai, that’s Nvidia. But what you are really saying is this is dozens, if not hundreds of companies working across a whole ecosystem.

00:27:28 [Speaker Changed] That’s exactly right. Now, in the public stock market, the man, the, the first two years, the manifestation of what I just described, or what you just eloquently described, gets expressed in the mag seven. You know, if I were to re, let’s recompile that as a, as a nine layer cake, okay? At the bottom of this, of this, of this cake is the power and the energy. And then that feeds the servers and chips. And then those servers and chips get live in a, in a, in a data center cloud. That whole bottom layer, those three layers is what I call infrastructure. Okay. So that’s why you’re seeing most of the mag seven are here.

00:28:18 [Speaker Changed] So that’s Google and Amazon. Yeah. And Microsoft, to say the very least.

00:28:23 [Speaker Changed] And now Tesla’s building a AI I and

00:28:25 [Speaker Changed] Cloud centers, right?

00:28:26 [Speaker Changed] And, and then above that layer, let’s call it, that’s the models and the data. So this is where you also have more back seven, Microsoft, Google, OpenAI, these, some of the private companies and now xai and, and you know, there are six or six of these companies building these foundation models. And then the data, you’re feeding the data, and then you have all these data companies that have, let’s say, legal data, healthcare data, insurance, data. And then some of ’em are proprietary data, which are helping train these models, right? So

00:29:01 [Speaker Changed] We’ve seen a couple of stories about the Wall Street Journal and Reuters That’s right. Leasing their entire corpus of all their content to various AI models to, to work on.

00:29:13 [Speaker Changed] Correct. And you know, companies like Reddit have done a deal like that Wall Street Journal, there’s some lawsuits, even New York Times,

00:29:21 [Speaker Changed] Well, they have in, in some instances seem to have borrowed stuff that was Yes, yes. You know, you, your $99 a year subscription to the Washington Post doesn’t entitle you arguably to scrape all that data, but hey, they’re cutting checks and cutting deals and I think everybody just wants their piece of the pie.

00:29:39 [Speaker Changed] That’s right. And then there are some companies, you mentioned Thomson Reuters, which was, you know, they have, they run one of the, one of, they have one of their biggest legal DA data sets, you know, and they control that legal data. And so then they’re putting AI on top of that. So that’s that, that’s that intelligence and the data layer. And then above that layer, you have the applications, the tools and data infrastructure, and then the services, the human IT labor to implement and, and to the ai.

00:30:12 [Speaker Changed] Give us some, give us some names. I have a couple of things on my phone. What, what do you like?

00:30:17 [Speaker Changed] Oh, on the app side? Yeah.

00:30:18 [Speaker Changed] Yeah. I mean, I’m using perplexity.

00:30:20 [Speaker Changed] I use perplex. Perplexity use it.

00:30:21 [Speaker Changed] It, it’s so clean and so simple.

00:30:23 [Speaker Changed] I love perplexity. I love Chachi pt.

00:30:27 [Speaker Changed] They’re, they’re slightly different. Slightly different, yeah. Right. Just the output. Yeah. But they’re still, and I’m finding far fewer hallucinations than, than I used to. Yes. Like I had Bill Dudley from the New York Fed in, who was born in, you know, the late 1950s and chat, GBT mentioned he happened to be a linebacker for the Detroit Lions in, in 1952. It took it a and there was a guy named Bill Dudley who was a, it took it a while for it to figure out, like after a certain period that eventually got cleaned up. Wait, if you’re born in 57, you’re probably not a pro football player in 55. It, but it took, it definitely took months, right? Yes. For it to kind of somehow recognize that. Yeah.

00:31:12 [Speaker Changed] And, and that’s on the consumer side. And there’ll be a lot more consumer apps coming, you know, you know, companies like Apple have this Apple intelligence, right. If any in, they’re absolutely locked in on your private seed, but they’re gonna know you the best. And so there’ll be AI assistance coming.

00:31:29 [Speaker Changed] I hope it’ll be better than Siri, which was a huge disappointment for sure, for sure. But, but I would trust an Apple agent. You would Exactly. Absolutely. To be able to say, Hey, make dinner reservations for Friday at this restaurant, here’s my calendar, and invite Bob Smith and Mary, and hopefully it can manage that.

00:31:44 [Speaker Changed] Absolutely. And, and even more things even more difficult than let’s say that like, oh, I need to help with my, I need to do my taxes. I want my taxes help, or I need,

00:31:56 [Speaker Changed] So I’m skeptical on really complex things. And at the same time, I, I just read yesterday the latest comparison of AI diagnostics versus doctors AI just moved ahead. They moved ahead on things like x-rays and MRIs a while ago. Correct. But now on here’s 20 data points, diagnosis, illness, it just moved ahead of the accuracy rate of, of human doctors. Yeah.

00:32:22 [Speaker Changed] You, you said exactly. The complexity of the tasks will only go higher in terms of what they’ll be capable to do. And so, and, and these ais are following, you know, these what we call these scaling laws of scaling intelligence, but the things that they will be capable of, it’s not just booking a restaurant. It’ll be doing very complex tasks. And so we are just at the very, very, very beginning of that.

00:32:50 [Speaker Changed] Huh. That, that, that’s really fascinating. So given the mapping you do of the whole ecosystem and then the dive into the financial background, what strategies do you, do you then use in saying, okay, I understand the whole ecosystem, I understand the various balance sheets of these companies. How do you then pick which stock you wanna own? Ah,

00:33:15 [Speaker Changed] So I, I, I have cer certain small, you know, rules, I guess if you could call it that, that I’ve, I’ve, or observations that I’ve made over many years, especially in tech, right? ’cause this is a very dynamic industry. One of those is like, there’s a power law. What I, I believe in power laws, and I, it seems like every industry I’ve ever looked at, there’s number one, a number two, and then maybe a number three.

00:33:46 [Speaker Changed] So very fat head, and then a long, yeah. Minor,

00:33:49 [Speaker Changed] Let’s just say 50% number, market share, number 1, 25, number two, and then cats and dogs, right?

00:33:55 [Speaker Changed] Winner takes all,

00:33:57 [Speaker Changed] Yeah. Winter takes true everywhere. And it doesn’t matter if you’re selling frozen pizza to search advertising, okay? It there, these power laws and, and, and then, because, but the thing is that you could have power laws that apply to hundreds of categories, right? It doesn’t have to be all encompassing in one. And so when I look at tech and those, all those different categories, I firmly believe in these power law concept that you want to be betting on, number one, or number two, especially number one, not even number two, you want number one, ideally. And, and so are you. And so in many cases there’re already existing players. Okay? And so if they are already existing players and then their, their hegemony is not being challenged, that’s kind of an easy answer. You, you keep riding the wave. And that’s why people are always complaining about mag seven.

00:34:51 [Speaker Changed] You you anticipated where I was gonna go next. Oh yeah. What you’re essentially saying is, mag seven is, they’re focusing on the number seven while ignoring the magnificent side. You wanna be in the number one stock everywhere, which is gonna naturally force the crowd investors to the top 5, 10, 15 companies.

00:35:12 [Speaker Changed] That’s exactly what’s been happening, huh? The, the strong gets stronger Unless, unless there are signs of weakness, right? I if there is it,

00:35:22 [Speaker Changed] Is it competition? Is it missteps by management? Is it some new disruptive technology that thrusts the winners aside? Yeah. What, what do you look for to say, Hey, X, Y, Z has been killing it for five, 10 years, but their run is over.

00:35:39 [Speaker Changed] That’s exactly right. Usually, usually it, these companies do not get disruptive, but on occasion they do. I think the most obvious one recently was the ascendancy of Nvidia versus Intel, right? For 30 years Intel what ran, ran Legion. And, and then there was a transition, there are several, several reasons, but there was a, a transition to, to accelerated computing from CPUs. And, and then they’ve lost leadership on Foundry to TS MC

00:36:14 [Speaker Changed] And then MA Mobile, they lost

00:36:16 [Speaker Changed] Leadership on that. And they didn’t, they didn’t engage in mobile. And so, so there are times, there are times where companies, you know, different, different transitions. Like if Microsoft did not pivot to the cloud from Windows, right? And the government, you know, went after them on, on, on Windows, but they were, they were litigating yesterday’s war, right? Right. But Microsoft found Azure and then, and then history was rewritten. And what

00:36:43 [Speaker Changed] Do, what do you think of the job Saudi Nadal been that, you know, people forget,

00:36:47 [Speaker Changed] That’s gotta be one of the great right? The great great CEO and, and and, and what he has mastered in the history of business.

00:36:55 [Speaker Changed] Mi, Microsoft was dead money for a decade. For a decade. I know that sounds ridiculous to say. Yeah, I know people

00:37:00 [Speaker Changed] Don’t remember that.

00:37:01 [Speaker Changed] Not that Balmer was a terrible CEO, but he was a founder and maybe just wasn’t nimble enough to see the next generation. He he was, you know, like many founders, they’re stuck in, you know, Microsoft 1.0 yes. And Nadella is, I dunno, maybe he’s 3.0 or 4.0, but

00:37:20 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, definitely he’s gotta, this has gotta be one of the greatest unbelievable business turnarounds Yeah. In history. That doesn’t get that much enough recognition in my

00:37:28 [Speaker Changed] Opinion. I, I, I, I totally, totally agree.

00:37:32 [Speaker Changed] And, and so they had this power law concept, going back to your idea. The other one is you need a second act. You, well, you need multiple acts. If you even look at these great companies, right? You know, Microsoft for example, you had the windows and then you had a second act, which is Azure, right? Right. And Azure has been driving the company, right? Even Apple found the iPhone after Mac, right? And so you need companies that have, and then Amazon, I don’t even know how many acts they’ve had. They have so many different acts, right? And, and so the great established companies can, can continually add multiple new businesses. Not only what you’re currently doing, you gotta anticipate the next, so these power laws can do you have, you know, multiple acts, because then that helps you have duration that you can endure and, and then are you differentiated enough? And, but then there is a whole new class of companies, right? So there you have the Max seven, these power law companies, but there’s always history is for tech has always given you the opportunity for the new companies, the new companies to come. And so it’s really the combination of let’s continue to ride the power laws of the established companies, and then let’s find those new companies that can rise and, and, and become the new challenger. So it, it’s that those two, those are the two components of, of a technology

00:38:58 [Speaker Changed] Fund ab absolutely fascinating. Before we get into the funds, I I, I really wanna just touch base on two really interesting things you, you said earlier. One is just generally on the valuation question with technology and similarly, the market concentration of the magnificent seven. Share your thoughts on that.

00:39:23 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, I think valuation to, right, if I were to broadly say is, is at a fair level now there’s dis dispersion in that you mentioned the max seven and the crowding and these, these giant winners, they have valuations that are higher than the rest of tech. The rest of tech has not, for the most part, recovered from, from the depression that we had, the recession we had in 2022, they went, they were well way exaggerated in 21, it crashed in 22 and there’s been not that much of a recovery. So a large part of tech is still in at depressed levels. I I I would say we’re back to pre, you know, 20 18, 17 levels except the Max seven and a few companies like that, that have, that are at higher levels, but their performance have been better, you know, so. Right.

00:40:24 [Speaker Changed] And you know, it’s funny, we, we still have o over a month ago this year, this could be the first year the s and p 500 beats the NASDAQ 100 in, in a long time. That’s, I’m trying to remember the last time we saw that.

00:40:39 [Speaker Changed] Yeah. Because a large part of the, of, of, of the Nasdaq, especially non mag seven, they’ve not done well. You know, large parts of software, large parts of semiconductors. Even if you’re not in the AI class, you know, you’ve been left behind.

00:40:59 [Speaker Changed] Huh. Really interesting. So I wanna talk about something that you do with your team every year. You conduct a tour of, of Silicon Valley. You meet with leaders of both public and private technology companies, often 25, 30 different companies and their senior management. Tell us a little bit about what that experience is like, what do you learn? Does it actually help you with your investing process?

00:41:26 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, I think you’re referring to our annual, every summer we do a, a bus tour. Effectively we bring 30 BlackRock investors. Now that said, we do, you know, 2000 meetings a year with companies on my team. Wow. I personally do almost a thousand meetings with companies. Now, this is a special event ’cause it, it pulls together are 7, 8, 9, 10 different teams at BlackRock, 30 plus execs and investors. And then we, we get on a bus and we go visit the top managements and CEOs, both public and private companies every year. This has been, I’ve been running this now 11 years. Wow. And, and what that does is that, you know, you, you’re on site, you know, it’s a little, it’s a little less formal. You, you, the companies feel more comfortable ’cause they’re, they’re hosting you and it’s, and, and it’s really more of a strategic discussions than re-litigating the quarter. Right. So it is a and and, and much

00:42:32 [Speaker Changed] Longer term than

00:42:33 [Speaker Changed] The usual discussion. Yeah. Yeah. And then, you know, it’s always a great barometer of like, what, what, what were the topics of the tour in 2014 versus 2024? And you could really see an evolutionary of what was topical every year. And it, and so it’s a great way, it’s also great for the people because many times, even, you know, within a firm like BlackRock, any of the teams don’t get that much time to be with each other. So, so, so it’s both for representing a unified front to the company and then also within, within the interpersonal relationships that, that are strengthened. And, and then it’s a really a great barometer of what are the, the key topics. And then if you looked at the last two years of, of the bus tour, there’s only one topic ai.

00:43:26 [Speaker Changed] Yeah. Yeah. So, so let’s go before the previous two years. Yeah. Give us some examples of ideas that were surfaced via this bus tour.

00:43:35 [Speaker Changed] So I’ll give you some specific examples. Sure. I remember distinctly, there was one about a MD when a MD had just announced its new chip based, you know, Jim Keller was still working there. And it was one of the fame chip designers, and they had redesigned the processor and the CPU and that zen architecture was the basis in which 10 years later they’ve gained all that market share from Intel. But that was that day. And, and, and I remember because a MD was on its back,

00:44:14 [Speaker Changed] It was on its perennially always a laggard, always short of capital, always like, Hey, these guys gonna be here in five years.

00:44:21 [Speaker Changed] But they made that seminal bet to really change that chip architecture and that. And then another one I remember distinctly when there was lots of questions around Tesla, right. Can they get the model three? There, there were, there were, they had warehouse, you know, not even a warehouse, a tent Right. To, to make remember that? Yep. Everyone was saying you’re

00:44:43 [Speaker Changed] Losing 24 hours a day. Yeah. It was, it

00:44:45 [Speaker Changed] Was, they had a tent to make the model three. And I think that kind of unlocked, that’s like, well, we’re about to, we’re about to turn, we’re about to make it, we’re this production is about to scale. And that was another seminal moment. So you have these, these events like that, that come through.

00:45:00 [Speaker Changed] Let me ask you relative to Tesla, an ecosystem question. So for the longest time, Tesla had the market all to itself. Recently I saw a chart that showed for the first time Tesla’s market share dropped below 50%. Not because their sales have fallen, but because there are so many other players in, in the EV space. I can’t help but give either credit or blame to Jeff Bezos who so totally destroyed sector after sector after sector that when Musk came along, the automobile industry said, Hey, we saw what Amazon did, we better, you know, get our act together pretty quickly. Any truth to that urban legend?

00:45:47 [Speaker Changed] I would say in ev, just pure ev cars, Tesla’s share and its ascendancy the entire market is, especially in the us especially in the west, not China is definitely slowed if not stalled. Okay. Right.

00:46:05 [Speaker Changed] Arguably I had the CEO of Lucid in here Yeah. Who made a very aggressive claim that whether it was battery technology, motors, range software, Tesla was a leader and lucid is as leapfrog them. You, you could, you can, we could debate that.

00:46:22 [Speaker Changed] Yeah. I would, I would keep that. But

00:46:23 [Speaker Changed] At least, but it’s a credible, whether it’s true or not, it’s a credible claim, which would not have been remotely credible five years ago, even three years ago.

00:46:32 [Speaker Changed] I would say to that, and, and I don’t want to comment on that specific company, but you know, companies like that, they’re selling a hundred thousand dollars car, right? Tesla’s selling a $40,000 car, the $50,000 and up market

00:46:49 [Speaker Changed] Is very different,

00:46:50 [Speaker Changed] Which is, which is most EVs. Right. You know, if you remember, you go in the past, the greatest, the best selling single car was like the Toyota Corolla, you know, like couple million a year. And, and you look at Tesla’s model three and y and they’re also in that range coming up on that. Anyway, so basically if you’re in that kind of category, you, you get to a certain market level, a saturation level. And, and I think that in, in the west, and then, you know, with the more reticence to adopt ev and still in the United States, you kind of have a certain ceiling you need. And this is why there’s so much discussion about Tesla either having a lower cost robot taxi or lower cost car to get at the market sub 50,000 where you have, you know, that unlocks a market three times bigger. It’s like a $30,000 car or a 25,000 car. But I think Tesla’s main pivot really, and, and, and even Elon would, would tell you it’s not about the car. The car is a mere means to deliver autonomy. Right. Huh. And it’s a robotics company. Right. It’s, and and, and autonomy is the meet big unlock not, not selling the car itself.

00:48:09 [Speaker Changed] Huh. That’ll be interesting. We’ve been waiting autonomy for a while. Yes. One can’t help but wonder how much easier it would be if, if built into the roads and other vehicles where some form of RF device that allows other cars to know where here’s where the exit is, here’s where the lanes are, here’s where other cars are. Like there could be an infrastructure build out that makes that Have you,

00:48:38 [Speaker Changed] When’s the last time you were in LA Or this year? Yeah, this year. Okay. Did you see Waymo’s running around

00:48:44 [Speaker Changed] In I did not. Oh, okay. I did not.

00:48:46 [Speaker Changed] So Waymo’s now operating in Los Angeles and they’re everywhere in San Francisco, Phoenix. And

00:48:54 [Speaker Changed] The future’s here, it’s just not even distributed.

00:48:56 [Speaker Changed] It is, it is. It’s within grasp. Finally. It’s, it’s always been three years in the future, but like it really is now, I

00:49:02 [Speaker Changed] Think. Yeah. So, so now let, let’s bring this conversation. Yeah. Full circle back to the funds you run. Yes. Let, let’s talk about bi BAI, which is the iShares AI innovation and technology active ETF. Tell us a little bit about that. That that’s a fairly concentrated portfolio, isn’t it?

00:49:21 [Speaker Changed] That’s right. This, this is, we just launched this, this is our first foray, our first, we have two ETFs. Now we’re jumping on that, that ETF bandwagon if

00:49:33 [Speaker Changed] You will. Right? Yeah. I, I think that that might work out for BlackRock.

00:49:35 [Speaker Changed] Yeah, that’s what I hear. I hear. But this, this one is, you know, I think, you know, hopefully we look back, this is the second year of AI as we would, as I would say, and I think this is gonna be a decade long if not longer trend. And we are trying to express in a concentrated way, 30 plus companies and an ETF that represents this whole stack of AI

00:50:05 [Speaker Changed] From Nvidia down to the all

00:50:07 [Speaker Changed] Stacks, all the way up to the apps from the compute to the, to the apps and everything in between. And, and I do know one thing. So we want a concentrated exposure to the builders of AI companies building the key elements of ai. And I do know one thing, it will be, it’s gonna change dramatically what we think is the companies of today might not be. And so we need, I, I feel like especially when there’s high rate of change in the early days of an industry like this, we need dynamic adaptation. We need to be flexibly and adaptive. And so to lock yourself into a fixed passive structure versus a dynamically changing structure, that’s really the goal of this ETF.

00:50:55 [Speaker Changed] Let’s talk about iShares technology opportunities. Active ETF or TEK, broader portfolio, 50 to 70 global tech companies. Tell us what that focus is.

00:51:06 [Speaker Changed] That is basically the ETF version of our mutual fund. And so that includes tech companies, not only ETF, not only AI companies, but broad tech globally, larger companies. But you know, there’s lots of tech companies that don’t really, that don’t really have that much to do with AI building ai. And so you’re gonna get the whole totality of tech in that, in that.

00:51:33 [Speaker Changed] So you said something before that has stayed with me about looking at the entire map of the ecosystem and, and watching what becomes hot and, and what fades techno technological change today is just so rapid. Yes. It changes at, at light speed. How do you keep up, how do you stay aligned with the industry dynamics as they evolve in real time? It seems like it’s not even quarter to quarter anymore. It’s minute to minute.

00:52:04 [Speaker Changed] Maybe not minute to minute, but you, you’re, you’re absolutely right in ai. So there are different timescales according to different industries. So let’s say in ai, you’re right, it might literally be minute to minute, day to day, okay. On the smartphone, you know, things are more sta they’re, they’re slower paced. And, and so you have a, a, a a spectrum of, of rates of, of change. That’s number one. So number two, how do we keep, keep up? I mean, you know, I’ve, I I read a lot and not only read, you have to stay attuned to all this new multimedia, like there’s so many experts and podcasts like yours and, and scientists and, and then we do, like, I do personally a thousand company meetings a year.

00:52:56 [Speaker Changed] That’s amazing.

00:52:57 [Speaker Changed] So

00:52:58 [Speaker Changed] That’s four a day if you’re working 50 weeks a year.

00:53:02 [Speaker Changed] Yes. I mean, yes, I do many, many, many, many meetings a week. Huh. So, and so then you assimilate all this information and then you are all, I’m always doing the calculus. Who’s winning, who’s losing, who’s winning, who’s losing, what’s changing, what’s not.

00:53:23 [Speaker Changed] So how do you balance having a long term perspective for a technology like AI with, you run a fund, you run a couple of funds Yeah. You get judged every quarter. Absolutely. That’s a very short term. And, and Wall Street is notorious for being too short term focused. How do you manage the trade off between, hey, this is gonna be a dominant technology over the next five years to oh, it, it’s September 30th and we know what happens starting in October. How, how do you manage that trade off?

00:53:57 [Speaker Changed] That is the essential question because we are being challenged all the time. You know, I, I feel you, you get some latitude if you have already a historical track record. So for example, 2022 was just brutal hell on earth for tech.

00:54:17 [Speaker Changed] It was, you know, not only was it hell on earth for tech, it was the first year in over 40 years where both stocks and bonds were down double digits. Yeah. Like once every half century. And then the, the only saving grace was 2021 was so spectacular that it felt like we’re giving back some profits, but it’s not, you know, it didn’t feel like it was oh 7, 0 8 0 9, which was

00:54:43 [Speaker Changed] 2022 was worse than, was worse than 2008 nine

00:54:49 [Speaker Changed] For technology for

00:54:50 [Speaker Changed] Tech. Oh yeah, for sure.

00:54:51 [Speaker Changed] Really? Oh yeah. That’s a big statement

00:54:52 [Speaker Changed] Because in, in 2009 it was a universal collapse.

00:54:57 [Speaker Changed] That’s correct. It

00:54:58 [Speaker Changed] Centered mostly in, in, you know, bank

00:55:01 [Speaker Changed] Of finance, finance real estate. Yeah. Tech

00:55:02 [Speaker Changed] Went down of course, but it didn’t go down more in, in 2022. It was predominantly a tech collapse.

00:55:12 [Speaker Changed] But it wasn’t like the dotcom implosion where the NASDAQ 100 fell 80 plus percent. That’s

00:55:18 [Speaker Changed] Right. It wasn’t, it wasn’t.

00:55:19 [Speaker Changed] And, but it was still no fun. You were down. Yeah. Heck was down 30 plus percent. Yeah. Yeah. Lost a third of its value. That’s a

00:55:25 [Speaker Changed] Big hit. But I, in my, in my, in my career, 2022 was the worst year. Huh. And, and, and so do you have the latitude and, and the confidence and support by, by investors and management to allow you to continue, you know, and, and you know, and then obviously the last couple years has been good, right? And so, but do you, does everybody get that avail, that opportunity to, and, and that goes to the short term long term, but I try not to focus on the short term and, and you know, we’re, we’re trying to make systematic bets to the best of our ability with, you know, especially an active manager. You know, it is, you need to show, ’cause we’re, we hold generally fewer companies and you need, you need a couple of years to show that those longer duration bets start to manifest. And, and so if I was always chasing the quarter, you, you would, you know, you’re, you’re now, you’re trying to be,

00:56:40 [Speaker Changed] You’re not a momentum trader.

00:56:42 [Speaker Changed] You would you Yeah. Or Yeah, exactly. We, we, and that’s really kind of at, at the end, we’re, we’re, we’re saying our decisions that are born out of all of this domain and expertise and all of this, an analytical rigor. And then we express that for a multi-year basis. And then that ultimately comes through. And if we were to continually shift by the wind every quarter, you kind of lose your, your soul effectively of what you stand for. And, and so we try not to do that obviously in 2022. We had to make a lot of adjustments. But other than that, I, we kind of stick to the same framework.

00:57:17 [Speaker Changed] Huh. Really, really fascinating. Alright, so I only have you for another few minutes, let’s jump to our favorite questions. Okay. Alright. That we ask all of our guests starting with what’s keeping you entertained these days? What are you listening to, watching streaming, et cetera.

00:57:34 [Speaker Changed] Okay. I don’t get a chance to watch that much TV and, and streaming, but streaming shows, the ones I’ve recently seen, I, I’ve seen, I really like Show Gun. Oh really? The new one. The new one. The remake from the, from the eighties or three body problem. I, I, I enjoyed, I love that.

00:57:56 [Speaker Changed] I couldn’t get through the book, but the show was great. Yeah.

00:57:59 [Speaker Changed] And then, but I, I’d watch a lot more. I’m a history guy, so I, I love Epic history on, on YouTube. It is absolutely fantastic.

00:58:10 [Speaker Changed] Epic history.

00:58:11 [Speaker Changed] Epic history tv. Yeah. It’s fantastic. I I watch a lot of science stuff like World Science Festival, Columbia professor here, Brian Green. Oh, sure.

00:58:22 [Speaker Changed] Also, he’s a prior guest. I

00:58:24 [Speaker Changed] Also, he’s great. Yeah. I also like chess. I watch like chess.

00:58:28 [Speaker Changed] You watch chess.

00:58:29 [Speaker Changed] Yes. I love watching chess. Huh. So, like, chess dog is, it’s a great show. Especially the old, old matches of the, of the great, the great players like Bobby Fisher and Paul Morphy and things and the podcast. I think the best podcast for me is the ancients.

00:58:46 [Speaker Changed] The ancients. I’m gonna check that

00:58:48 [Speaker Changed] Out. This is on ancient civilizations in ancient history. So those are what Yeah, that’s what kind of occupies me. I I, I don’t do as much business shows and business pods. I’ve listened to yours a few times and a few others, but I’m more about, you know, I’m, I’m in finance all day long. I, I don’t really need more finance. So I, I go for my, my love of of history is probably the, I

00:59:17 [Speaker Changed] I have the same issue. It’s like, I don’t want to hear a guest I’m going to interview on another show. Yeah. I wanna, I don’t wanna repeat questions or steal questions. I wanna bring a fresh approach. And when you’re immersed in it all day, I, you just don’t wanna go that way. Next question. Yeah. Who are your early mentors who helped to shape your career?

00:59:39 [Speaker Changed] The, you know, mentor would imbue a personal one-on-one like tutor tutoring and things. I didn’t have too many of those. I would say my earliest mentors, I, I go to high school. Those were my formative years in, in, in Illinois. My English teacher, who was also my debate coach, the, my history teacher and my chemistry teacher. I, I look back and they really helped form who I am today. And then in the professional world, I would say I, I go to, and this is like BlackRock, when I, and I joined, it was Tom Callen who hired me and Tom said, not so much as a mentor, but he said, here are the keys and you express your creativity and build the business. And he gave me that latitude. And so I, I, I give credit to Tom Callan, but I didn’t have too many people mentoring me of doing this. It was more, most of my mentors are dead. I have people that I have influenced me. Like, like, like Napoleon and Frank Lloyd Wright and, and, and, and Beethoven and others. And

01:00:54 [Speaker Changed] So you grew up in Illinois? Yeah. Did you do any of the Frank Lloyd Wright tours?

01:00:59 [Speaker Changed] Oh yeah. I

01:01:00 [Speaker Changed] Did all that. Right. I did that. So we spent every Thanksgiving in Wilmette. And so I’ve done that whole run. Yeah. And I have to assume you’ve been to falling Waters, right? I’ve not

01:01:08 [Speaker Changed] Been falling water.

01:01:09 [Speaker Changed] So I, I call

01:01:11 [Speaker Changed] Esen. I’ve been

01:01:12 [Speaker Changed] 20. Oh really? I, that’s on my list. In 2017, I bought a car in Indianapolis, flew out, test, drove it, signed the papers, drove home, and halfway home was falling waters. Mm. And we were there the first day it was open in, I wanna say it was early March, and it was like a light coat of

01:01:31 [Speaker Changed] Snow. And you went inside as well?

01:01:32 [Speaker Changed] Oh yeah, we did the whole tour. That’s, it’s absolutely astonishing. Astonishing. Yeah. Not just because how delightful the building is, but never before and probably never since Will a house be so ideally suited to its surroundings? Yes. It’s just Absolutely.

01:01:50 [Speaker Changed] Yes. It,

01:01:51 [Speaker Changed] It, it’s, it’s always interesting when you see, oh you, you could see the thought that went into Yeah. Every curve, every line, every detail. It’s really, it’s really amazing

01:02:01 [Speaker Changed] The, the genesis of that. My, my interest in architecture. Yeah. I read the Fountain head. You read that book? Anne Rand, I,

01:02:11 [Speaker Changed] I slog through it in college and basically gave up on her because of that book.

01:02:17 [Speaker Changed] Oh, you gave up. But like that really,

01:02:19 [Speaker Changed] It’s such a painful book

01:02:20 [Speaker Changed] To read. It’s, yeah. But it spawned this, there’s

01:02:24 [Speaker Changed] Some ideas in it that are interesting.

01:02:25 [Speaker Changed] The idea, especially the architecture that really triggered all architecture. Right. But

01:02:31 [Speaker Changed] So since you mentioned the Fountain head, let’s talk about books. Oh. But what are some of your favorites? What are you reading right now?

01:02:37 [Speaker Changed] Okay. There are certain books that are influential to me. I, I, I, I was grew up in just people on, on the show. They don’t, I grew up before the internet,

01:02:49 [Speaker Changed] As did I, as you did. I don’t think we’re that far apart in age.

01:02:52 [Speaker Changed] Yeah. And, and I was a nerd. I was a total nerd. Same. And so the Lord of the Rings and told me,

01:02:59 [Speaker Changed] I knew you were gonna go there. Oh, how did you know that? So, ’cause that was the, I reread The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings every summer throughout my teen years.

01:03:06 [Speaker Changed] Oh my God.

01:03:07 [Speaker Changed] Yeah. And someone just told me that the character actor who played Smigel

01:03:13 [Speaker Changed] Smigel Yes.

01:03:14 [Speaker Changed] In the movie Yes. Actually narrates the book on the audible version. Ah. And people have told me it’s not like listening to a book on tape. It’s like a, a full radio play that he does Voice, voice any circus. Yeah, that’s right. He, it’s supposed to be fantastic. Yeah.

01:03:31 [Speaker Changed] I, I even, yeah, I loved it. And then I went even, I went really deep. I I the silmarillion and the 20,000 year prehistory to the Lord, the Rings. Like I went that,

01:03:41 [Speaker Changed] How far afield did you go in sci-fi? Did Hyland, Philip k Dick

01:03:46 [Speaker Changed] Hyland, Philip kj,

01:03:47 [Speaker Changed] CJ Shera.

01:03:47 [Speaker Changed] Only CJ Shera. But

01:03:49 [Speaker Changed] He pride of Shano Strong recommends pride of Shara, pride of Nu Shanore. So, okay. Just fascinating book. Give us one or two more books and then we’ll get to our

01:03:59 [Speaker Changed] Last two. And currently I’m reading, I read a lot of history books, so I’m reading three books. I read, I, I browse, I read a lot Parallel, and I tend to, not to finish it all, but I’m reading right now, campaigns of Napoleon by David Chandler. I’m reading The Fall of Carthage by Adrian Goldsworthy and SPQR, Mary Beard. And I just bought the, my 16 Memorable Games by Bobby Fisher. I just wanted to go read

01:04:22 [Speaker Changed] All the, did you read, I forgot who the author was, but there’s a great Youngest Khan biography.

01:04:29 [Speaker Changed] Ah, yes.

01:04:29 [Speaker Changed] That’s really interesting. I could see the book.

01:04:32 [Speaker Changed] Oh, I, I want Yes. That, I

01:04:33 [Speaker Changed] Would like to write that. But I have one other, I have a book recommendation to you

01:04:36 [Speaker Changed] That you would love. You tell me. You tell me. Yeah.

01:04:37 [Speaker Changed] And it’s called How to Invent Everything, A Survival Guide to the Stranded Time Traveler. And it, it’s just a history of technology, but they use the, the whatchamacallit, the cheat is they’re using the guide for time travel as, Hey, if you ever get stuck in ancient history, here are the tools you can build and here’s how you should do it. And it’s just a, just a history of technology 10,000 years ago to today. Absolutely fascinating.

01:05:05 [Speaker Changed] 10,000 years ago.

01:05:06 [Speaker Changed] Right. Going back to the invention of glass, the invention.

01:05:09 [Speaker Changed] I, I have, I I like to collect some of those ancient artifacts. Oh,

01:05:12 [Speaker Changed] That would be, that sounds like fun. Yeah. Alright, so I only have you for two minutes. Okay. Let get to my last two questions. Yes.

01:05:17 [Speaker Changed] Last

01:05:17 [Speaker Changed] Two questions. Like, that’s the problem with sci-fi geeks. You

01:05:19 [Speaker Changed] Can, yes. Okay. I did know you’re sci-fi geek.

01:05:21 [Speaker Changed] Oh, oh, absolutely. Yeah. What sort of advice would you give to a recent college grad interested in a career in technology investing?

01:05:30 [Speaker Changed] Not so much technology, let’s say investing in general. Sure. I, I think you gotta be a great thinker. It’s not so much the finance. Finance can be taught easy. It’s about thinking. And it is about a flexibility to have a, to be reason and plan and think at a, you know, in, in a kind of a holistic and a, in a flexible manner. Because AI’s gonna do so many of the tasks. And, and, and they will often know more than you about any specific domain. So do you need to be above that in a way, almost like an architect would, would,

01:06:20 [Speaker Changed] Makes, makes a lot of sense. Yeah. And our final question. Yes. What do you know about the world of technology today? You wish you knew back in the mid nineties when you were really starting out.

01:06:30 [Speaker Changed] You know, if I knew what, how this would unfold, I, I, in the Silicon Valley, has I, I would’ve just gone straight to Silicon Valley, the company maybe, maybe instead of being on the investment side. Huh? I don’t know. It it, it is, it is a, it it’s a double-edged question. ’cause I, I like the, I like the dynamic exposure to many companies, but like,

01:06:56 [Speaker Changed] Plus the path you’ve taken is so fascinating. Yeah.

01:06:59 [Speaker Changed] I would say another point of, for the young people, always bet on the future, not on the current past bet on the future. What

01:07:07 [Speaker Changed] A, what a great way to wrap this up. Tony, thank you for being so generous with your time. We have been speaking with Tony Kim, managing director at BlackRock, where he heads the fundamental equity technology group. BlackRock manages about $11 trillion in assets. If you enjoy this conversation, well be sure to check out any of the 500 previous discussions we’ve had over the past 10 years. You can find those at iTunes, Spotify, YouTube, Bloomberg, wherever you find your favorite podcast. And be sure to check out my new podcast at the Money short conversations with experts about topics affecting your money, earning it, spending it, and most of all, investing it at the money wherever you find your favorite podcast. And in the Masters in Business Feed, I would be remiss if I did not thank the crack team that helps with these conversations together each week. My audio engineer is Meredith Frank. My producer is Anna Luke. Sean Russo is my researcher. Sage Bauman is the head of podcasts at Bloomberg. I’m Barry Riol. You’ve been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

~~~

 

 

 

 

The post Transcript: Tony Kim, Blackrock Active Technology appeared first on The Big Picture.

For 2nd Trump Term, America Must Unite Around Progress Mindset

Zero Hedge -

For 2nd Trump Term, America Must Unite Around Progress Mindset

Authored by Clay Routledge via RealClearPolitics,

In the middle of a Trump transition, the “Resistance 2.0,” and the inevitable partisan mud-slinging, it is easy to lose faith in humanity’s future. Polls show growing pessimism about everything from democracy to economic mobility to climate change.

Yet the major challenges we face demand something different from us: a progress mindset. 

Our team at Archbridge Institute’s Human Flourishing Lab recently launched Progress Pulse, a new research initiative to study the attitudes, knowledge, motives, and goals that individuals hold regarding progress. In our first Progress Pulse survey, the results from over 2,000 U.S. adults reveal a stark divide: 52% believe we will make significant progress and create a better world for future generations, while 48% expect failure and decline.

Particularly concerning is our finding that young Americans are the most cynical about the future. Among adults aged 18 to 34, only 47% believe life will be better for future generations, while 53% expect decline. This drops to 42% when looking specifically at Gen Z (adults under 28). In other words, nearly 60% of Gen Z believes we will fail to improve the world and that life will be worse in the future. This stands in stark contrast to older Americans: Among those 65 and older, 60% believe in a better future, with only 40% expecting decline. 

This generational divide should worry us all, given that young adults will be at the forefront of solving tomorrow’s challenges. We cannot afford for them to have a negative outlook.

Some might argue that negativity is actually needed to drive progress. I frequently come across the view that positive feelings – from happiness to hope – are signs of people putting their heads in the sand or living blissfully unaware. The slogan, “If you’re not outraged, you’re not paying attention,” captures the sentiment that negative feelings are necessary for driving change.

But this view fundamentally misunderstands human psychology. Negative feelings such as anxiety often make us more psychologically defensive. While this can be useful when we need to protect ourselves from immediate physical, social, or financial threats, it also orients us away from the creative, innovative thinking and action that progress requires. For instance, research finds that the more anxious people are, the less likely they are to engage in entrepreneurial activities. Whether we are building businesses, families, friendships, or the broader institutions that advance civilization, negative thoughts and feelings are barriers to success.

Positive mental states, not negative ones, tend to push us outward toward solving problems and improving the world. This is because positive emotions promote a more expansive mindset, leading to greater willingness to take risks and explore new possibilities, which is crucial for addressing complex societal challenges. 

Take hope, for example. Hope is a positive and action-oriented mental state. Behavioral sciences research shows that when people are hopeful, they have a firm confidence in themselves and an unwavering belief that they will attain positive change in their lives. This allows them to persist through adversity. Hopeful people are flexible in finding effective paths toward their goals and can quickly adjust their approach when they encounter obstacles. Hopeful individuals are also more motivated to want to improve the world and they show greater creativity and tolerance for different perspectives – essential qualities for addressing the major challenges of our time.

The good news? Hope is contagious. Hopeful individuals inspire others to adopt more positive and action-oriented mindsets. They create ripple effects of positive change in their communities and organizations.

Right now, we need hope to spread. Our public discourse is saturated with negativity. Research finds that a growing proportion of news headlines convey anger, fear, disgust, and sadness. And we are part of the problem: Research also shows that when individuals engage with news online, they give more clicks to negative headlines. All of this is taking a toll on our nation’s psyche. 

As we confront the challenges of our time, we face a choice: Succumb to negativity or embrace a progress mindset. The evidence is clear – if we want to solve big problems and create a better future, we need to adopt a positive outlook.

The future remains unwritten. The challenges we face are real, but so is our capacity to overcome them. The first step is believing we can.

Clay Routledge is vice president of Research and director of the Human Flourishing Lab at the Archbridge Institute.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 07:20

China Is Now 39% Of Global Auto Production; Dominating Europe, Japan, U.S.

Zero Hedge -

China Is Now 39% Of Global Auto Production; Dominating Europe, Japan, U.S.

China has transformed itself from a minor player in the auto industry two decades ago to the world leader in car production and exports, particularly in electric vehicles (EVs), the New York Times reported late last month.

But the trend of China's impact on the global auto market has been best characterized by this chart, published over the weekend, showing how Chinese car production has gone from 1% to 39% of global production in 20 years.

The rapid ascent was fueled by significant government investment, advancements in automation, and the growth of its domestic market, which is now the largest globally.

The NYT piece said that as domestic sales have slowed due to economic headwinds, China has increasingly turned to international markets to sell its cars, especially EVs.

Chinese brands like BYD have gained global recognition for offering advanced electric cars at highly competitive prices, exporting more EVs than any other country. Major markets include Europe, where compact models are popular, and Southeast Asia, where affordability drives demand.

We wrote back in November that China was even dethroning many of its long-rivaled Japanese competitors. Between 2019 and 2024, Japanese automakers experienced the steepest market share declines in China, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia, according to Bloomberg's analysis of sales and registration data.

Japanese automakers aren't just losing ground across Asian countries, with all six tracked by Bloomberg experiencing declines in China - but also globally as shown in the above chart.

Even Toyota, the global leader in car volume, has seen its sales stagnate. In Southeast Asia, a traditional stronghold for Japanese brands, market share has dropped sharply.

In Thailand and Singapore, Japanese carmakers now control just 35% of the market, down from over 50% in 2019, while streets once dominated by Nissan and Mazda are increasingly filled with Chinese brands.

China’s leadership in EVs is the result of over a decade of focused government support, including subsidies, tax breaks, low-interest loans, and heavy investment in battery technology.

Since 2009, over $230 billion has been funneled into the EV and battery sectors, the New York Times reported.

Chinese automakers also maintain a significant cost advantage over their global competitors. Cars made by Chinese companies cost roughly 30% less to assemble, largely due to control over the battery supply chain, lower labor costs, and more efficient production processes.

However, China’s dominance has raised concerns globally. Countries like the U.S. and the European Union have imposed tariffs on Chinese EVs, citing unfair subsidies and the potential threat to local industries. Despite these trade barriers, Chinese vehicles remain competitive because of their lower prices and comparable quality.

China’s heavy investment and technological edge position it to continue dominating the global auto market. Even with intensifying international pushback, its production capacity, cost advantages, and leadership in EV technology suggest that its influence will persist for years to come.

Recall just days ago we wrote that GM was taking a more than $5 billion charge and closing plants to address its declining business in China.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 06:55

Biden Lied About Everything: Philly Fed Finds All Jobs "Created" In Q2 Were Fake

Zero Hedge -

Biden Lied About Everything: Philly Fed Finds All Jobs "Created" In Q2 Were Fake

Back in August, many were surprised by the accuracy of our forecast, when we predicted that in its annual revision, the Biden Bureau of Labor Statistics would revise jobs for the April 2023-March 2024 period by "up to 1 million", something which we said would mean that all job report "beats" recorded in the past year will have been misses and the US labor market is in far worse shape than the admin would admit.

The final results, as everyone knows by now, was a shocking 818K revision lower, just as the Philadelphia Fed had predicted 6 months prior, in March, when it calculated correctly that the Biden Department of Goalseeking Propaganda had overstated payrolls by "at least 800,000."

The answer ended up 818,000 for the 12 month period ended March 31 (or about 68,000 per month) and the implied sharp deterioration to the job market was the main scapegoat used by the Fed to launch its easing cycle with a jumbo 50bps rate cut (now that "suddenly" the economic golden age pushed by the Biden propaganda regime, and trillions in debt, had just collapsed).

We mention all of this up because on Friday, the Philly Fed served up its latest shocker: not only did the Biden admin lie again, but the collapse in the labor market that had been covered up for much of the past year and was only exposed with the annual benchmark revision, extended into the second quarter.

"Estimates by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia indicate that the employment changes from March through June 2024 were significantly different" - read lower - "in 27 states compared with preliminary state estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS) Current Employment Statistics (CES)", the Philly Fed said on December 12.

"According to the early benchmark (EB) estimates conducted by the Phily Fed, employment was lower in 25 states, higher in two states, and lesser changes in the remaining 23 states and the District of Columbia."

Translation: 23 states unchanged, 1 revised higher...  and 25 lower. The breakdown is shown below.

Maybe someone can calculate what the odds of that distribution occurring naturally are, but here is our guess: virtually nil. Which is why would make such a loud stink every month after the Biden BLS revised jobs data lower month after month after month. The whole point was to make the labor market appear stronger than it was, then to gradually revised it all away. And now the Philadelphia Fed confirms - again - that we were right all along.

And so, after it first revised the 12 months ending March 31 by 818K, the downgrads extended into the second quarter of 2024, when the Philadelphia Fed early benchmark estimates showed that instead of the 1.1% gain shown initially by the BLS, payroll jobs in the 50 states and the District of Columbia were actually down 0.1%!

By state, the regional Fed bank estimates that largest revision of employment for the nine-month period ended in June will come from California, where it sees a downward revision of 172,700 jobs. Payrolls in Texas may be revised down by 112,100. An extended forecast by the BLS to the third quarter show further declines as well.

And while we don't yet know the specifics of the revisions - those will be revealed on Feb 7, 2025 when the final numbers are published - at the national level, we do know that all the jobs reportedly "created" in the second quarter, were actually fake, there were no net jobs created at all, and in fact, the US lost jobs in Q2!

Translation: in his latest attempt to create an impression of economic growth, Biden lied about everything, again.

Source: Philly Fed

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 06:44

Waste Of The Day: $267 Million Spent On Fighting "Misinformation"

Zero Hedge -

Waste Of The Day: $267 Million Spent On Fighting "Misinformation"

Authored by Jeremy Portnoy via RealClearInvestigations,

Topline: The federal government has recently spent $267 million on grants meant to suppress supposed “misinformation,” according to a new report from OpenTheBooks.com

Of course, federal bureaucrats themselves get to decide what is and isn’t misinformation.

Key facts: Misinformation spending soared in 2021 as the government worked with social media companies to restrict the views of those questioning federal Covid-19 policies online. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has since admitted it was “wrong” to censor varying opinions on vaccines, mask-wearing and social distancing. 

The U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government later accused the National Science Foundation of creating “AI-powered censorship and propaganda tools” at a cost of $13 million.

Another $200,000 was awarded to George Washington University to study how populist leaders spread misinformation. Researchers used government funds to analyze politicians who allegedly divided society during the pandemic, focusing on Donald Trump and three other world leaders.

In total, $127 million of the misinformation grants were related to Covid-19.

Other spending included $300,000 from the Department of Health and Human Services to create Innov8AI, which can “capture medical misinformation in social media for targeted interdiction using an advanced AI solution set.”

Trump’s administration spent $7 million on combating misinformation during his first term.

Background: Suppressing speech of any kind brings up potential First Amendment issues, and it runs the risk of erasing narratives that are actually true.

In October, reports emerged that Federal Emergency Management Agency workers were intentionally withholding financial aid from hurricane victims in Florida that had “Trump for President” signs on their lawns. Many news networks gave the story a “misinformation” label — until it turned out to be true and a Congressional investigation was launched.

Even the prediction that President Joe Biden would drop out of the presidential race was deemed a “conspiracy theory” from the “GOP fantasy crowd” by Politico in February. Months later, Biden stepped down from the ticket.

Summary: Americans can make up their own minds, they don’t need the government to do that for them. The best solution for bad speech isn’t censorship, it’s more speech.

The #WasteOfTheDay is brought to you by the forensic auditors at OpenTheBooks.com

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 06:30

Bullish Cattle Bets Soar As US Herd Crisis Sparks Breakout To Record High Price

Zero Hedge -

Bullish Cattle Bets Soar As US Herd Crisis Sparks Breakout To Record High Price

Institutional investors are increasing bullish bets on live cattle futures, pushing them to their highest levels in five years, as America's herd size dwindles to its lowest point in more than six decades.

The latest CFTC data via Bloomberg shows money managers boosted bullish live cattle bets by 3,908 net-long positions to 126,308 last week, the most bullish in over five years

Additional CFTC data (courtesy of Bloomberg): 

  • Long-only positions rose 5,781 lots to 140,036 in the week ending Dec. 10

  • The long-only total was the highest in more than five years

  • Short-only positions rose 1,873 lots to 13,728

  • The short-only total was the highest in three weeks

Chicago Mercantile Exchange live cattle futures are reaching new highs, driven by technical trading, anticipation of strong consumer demand heading into holidays, and the alarming decline in overall herd size.

The shrinking beef supply has pushed the nation's herd size to its smallest level since 1961. With severe droughts, high interest rates, costly feed prices, sliding farm income, surging farm debt, and a shifting consumer preference toward cheaper chicken, struggling ranchers have been culling heifers, preventing any meaningful recovery in the number of calves necessary to expand the nation's herds.

On top of all this, the nation's cattle crisis is set to worsen with new pressures: first, President-elect Trump's anticipated tariff war 2.0, which is expected to tighten domestic beef supplies, and second, immigration reform.

"All of the things he is talking about have potentially negative consequences more so than anything positive," Derrell Peel, a professor of agricultural economics at Oklahoma State University, told Bloomberg, adding, "Our fate's pretty well determined in the cattle industry in the US for the next two to four years – and it's not looking good."

In February, the United States Department of Agriculture projected that the cattle herd could begin rebuilding by 2025. However, that timeline has since shifted to 2027. The reason is primarily because of high interest rates and poor pasture conditions in the Midwest. 

"Even as the beef industry has experienced periods of growth over the past decades, the animal count has dropped almost 40% since a peak in 1975. During the current downcycle, which started in 2020, the herd has been shrinking at the fastest pace since the big farm crisis of the 1980s," Bloomberg noted.

If Trump introduces new tariffs, it could disrupt the flow of imported beef, further tightening domestic supplies, which will mean supermarket prices of ground beef are set to rise even higher in 2025. 

All things point to higher beef prices in 2025.

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 04:15

UK Govt Approves Sale Of Royal Mail To Czech Billionaire

Zero Hedge -

UK Govt Approves Sale Of Royal Mail To Czech Billionaire

Authored by Thomas Brooke via Remix News,

The British government has approved the £3.6 billion (€4.34 billion) sale of International Distribution Services (IDS), the parent company of Royal Mail, to EP Group, owned by Czech billionaire Daniel Křetínský.

The decision, announced on Monday by IDS on the London Stock Exchange, makes Křetínský the new owner of the historic Royal Mail after 500 years of British ownership.

The government will retain a “golden share” in the company, ensuring its control over key decisions, such as changes to ownership, tax residency, or the headquarters location.

Royal Mail, which employs over 150,000 people, will continue operating under strict conditions agreed upon by EP Group.

These include maintaining its Universal Service Obligation (USO), which guarantees letter delivery six days a week and parcel delivery Monday to Friday across the U.K. at a standard price.

Additionally, the agreement ensures that Royal Mail’s brand, headquarters, and tax residency will remain in the U.K. for at least five years. Workers will also benefit, with a commitment to allocate 10 percent of dividends paid to Křetínský to employees, alongside the establishment of a worker’s council to provide staff with a stronger voice in the company’s operations.

Daniel Křetínský, who has held a 27.5 percent stake in IDS since 2022, emphasized EP Group’s long-term commitment to preserving Royal Mail’s legacy while modernizing its operations.

“EP Group is a long-term and committed investor with a mission to make Royal Mail a successful modern postal operator with high-quality service and products for its customers,” Křetínský said.

He also acknowledged the historical significance of Royal Mail, stating he holds “maximum respect” for its tradition.

The acquisition was reviewed under national security laws due to Royal Mail’s status as critical national infrastructure due to Křetínský’s involvement in a gas transmission service that continues to transport reduced volumes of Russian gas to Europe under EU-approved terms.

The acquisition adds to Křetínský’s growing portfolio in the U.K., which includes a 27 percent stake in West Ham United Football Club and a 10 percent share in Sainsbury’s.

Read more here...

Tyler Durden Tue, 12/17/2024 - 03:30

Give Me Liberty, Not Pronouns

Zero Hedge -

Give Me Liberty, Not Pronouns

Authored by Kenin Spivak via RealClearPolitics,

It’s time to defrock the word police.

The election, polls, and anecdotal evidence confirm that Americans want to end the obnoxious recitation of pronouns – “Latinx,” “birthing persons,” and other entries in the radical left lexicon – except in eulogies for progressive virtue signaling.

In a March Gallup poll of more than 12 million adults, 4.4% identified as bisexual, 0.9% as transgender, and 0.1% as pansexual. In exit polls this year of more than 110,000 voters conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago, just 1% identified as “nonbinary,” a subset of the Gallup categories. Some of these individuals, most often nonbinaries, dominate use of non-standard pronouns such as “they,” “zir” and “hir.”

If 100% of bisexuals, transgenders, and pansexuals used non-standard pronouns (they do not) and all are offended if the remaining 94.6% of us do not publicly proclaim our pronouns in our signature cards and profiles (also untrue), then the pronoun kerfuffle risks offending 5.4% of Americans. From 10 to 20 times more Americans are offended by this babble. According to a Pew study published in June, nearly 56% of registered voters are uncomfortable with someone using the pronouns “they” or “them,” rather than “he” or “she.” Most of the 53% of Americans who consider religion to be “very important” in their lives likely agree.

Even in Canada, where polls show greater support for gender fluidity, a survey of 3,016 adults from the Angus-Reid Institute found that 66% opposed (36% strongly) and just 22% supported (6% strongly) that “everyone should put their pronouns in their social media profiles/emails.” Media savvy squad member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez deleted her pronouns from her X profile.

The core question is not whether those who choose non-standard pronouns, other than “they,” should be dissuaded from doing so, but whether we must all subjugate ourselves to pronoun activists by beclowning our signature cards and profiles to confirm that we are adhering to at least 2,000 years of gender identification, and whether we must adopt idiosyncratic pronouns when describing others.

At the least, no one should use the pronoun “they.” The use of “they” to describe an individual is grammatically incorrect in nearly all circumstances. It is narcissistic and pompous. When discussing multiple people and also using “they” as a pronoun for one or more of them, the result is indecipherable. (Try to understand the sentence I just wrote if the word “them” could mean both more than one individual, and one or more specific individuals.)

More than a few times I have had the following conversation with a professional whose firm uses pronouns in its signature cards. Me: Does anyone in the firm use pronouns other than him or her? Partner: “No” (or, rarely, “a few”). Me: Why then do you do this, since it must be off-putting to many more people than the number who like it? Partner: Some variation of, “We only care about the feelings of the few.”

This goes even further when people are penalized for refusing to participate in this farce. Being LGBTQ may be protected by law or common decency, but the Constitution unambiguously protects free speech and the exercise of religion. It does not protect an individual’s right to force others to refer to him or her as a “they.” At least 10 states have passed legislation to ensure that teachers, staff, and students aren’t required to use students’ pronouns or names if they don’t align with the student’s sex at birth.

Nothing, of course, is more absurd that the misogynistic “birthing person,” or that a nominee for the Supreme Court can’t define “woman.”

U.S. passport applicants now may select any gender, or an “X” gender, as may residents of 16 states on birth certificates, and at least 25 states and the District of Columbia on drivers’ licenses and other identification, defeating the purpose of identification.

French, Italian, Portuguese, and Spanish assign gender to most nouns. Hence, Americans from South America refer to themselves as “Latino,” “Latina,” or just “Hispanic.” The same misogynistic pathology that causes progressives to insist there are more than two immutable sexes, erase women, and put biological males in girls’ sports, drives them to the despised slur “Latinx.”

A 2021 poll of 800 registered voters of Latin American descent for Bendixen and Amandi International, a Democratic firm, found that only 2% described themselves as Latinx, and 40% found the term offensive. A Pew survey in September found that only 4% of Hispanics use it, 51% have never heard of it, and 75% of those who have, oppose it. In October, a study conducted by professors from Georgetown and Harvard found that the use of Latinx by Democrats was increasing Hispanic support for Donald Trump and other Republicans.

The progressive lexicon is based on tenuous connections (“grandfathered” is racist), wordy (“people experiencing homelessness” for “homeless”), kooky (“assigned female at birth” for “girl”) and offends vast number of Americans, including women and members of minority groups whom the progressives claim to be supporting.

According to Future Forward, Kamala Harris’ lead PAC, variants of Trump’s campaign advertisement about her support for taxpayer-funded sex reassignment surgery for transgenders with the tagline “Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you.” shifted the race 2.7% in Trump’s favor.

Trump’s success among most demographic groups, and exit and post-election polling (see here, here, here, and here) tell us that Americans don’t want to be told by the radical left what to think or how to speak about social issues. It is time to put pronouns, Latinx, and other progressive terminology in the waste basket.

Kenin M. Spivak is founder and chairman of SMI Group LLC, an international consulting firm and investment bank. He is the author of fiction and non-fiction books and a frequent speaker and contributor to media, including The American Mind, National Review, the National Association of Scholars, television, radio, and podcasts.

Tyler Durden Mon, 12/16/2024 - 23:25

Russia, Germany, Turkey Condemn Israeli Land Grab In Syria

Zero Hedge -

Russia, Germany, Turkey Condemn Israeli Land Grab In Syria

"Strengthening the Golan is strengthening the State of Israel, and it is especially important at this time. We will continue to hold onto it, cause it to blossom and settle in it," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday, confirming reports that Israel will expand its settler population there.

Netanyahu has now declare the Golan to belong to Israel 'forever' in the wake of the fall of the Assad, and Israel is expected to double the amount of settlers living there. "Multiple Middle Eastern nations and Israel’s ally Germany on Monday denounced Israel’s decision to double the Israeli settler population in the illegally occupied Syrian territory," Al Jazeera writes.

Via AFP

At this point Israeli tanks are positioned a mere couple dozen miles from the capital of Damascus, and Israel has established a forward base on the Syrian side of Mt. Hermon.

Russia has been among those countries strongly warning Israel not to expand its hold on Syrian territory. The Golan was first taken by Israel in 1967 and it was annexed in 1981.

Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov on Monday issued the following strong words telling Israel to stop exploiting the situation:

"I would like to warn certain ‘hotheads’ in West Jerusalem against being intoxicated by opportunities,” Ryabkov said, stressing that “the annexation of the Golan Heights, which many are talking about now, is absolutely unacceptable.” 

Turkey too has said something similar. "This decision is a new stage in Israel’s goal of expanding its borders through occupation. This step by Israel is a source of grave concern, taken together with Israel’s entry into the area of separation, in violation of the 1974 disengagement agreement, its advance into adjacent areas and airstrikes in Syria," its foreign ministry said.

Al Jazeera further notes the following countries' statements:

  • Qatar rebuked the scheme as a “new episode in a series of Israeli aggressions on Syrian territories”.
  • Jordan called it a “blatant violation of international law”.
  • Turkiye denounced the move as a bid by Israel to “expand its borders”.
  • Saudi Arabia slammed “continued sabotage of Syria’s chances of restoring its security and stability”.
  • Egypt condemned the plans as “a flagrant violation of Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity”.

Despite many acknowledging that Turkish intelligence was behind the rapid Hayat Tahrir al-Sham takeover of the country, Israel has by and large been a big 'winner' on a geostrategic level from Assad's ousting. 

But it's ironic and hypocritical that Turkey would do any condemning of annexing Syrian land here... given Turkey has long occupied northern Syria, and its troops have now moved into the environs of Aleppo while supporting its proxies there.

Tyler Durden Mon, 12/16/2024 - 23:00

Astaxanthin – The Ultimate Anti-Inflammatory And Anti-Aging Nutrient

Zero Hedge -

Astaxanthin – The Ultimate Anti-Inflammatory And Anti-Aging Nutrient

Authored by Derek Henry, Holistic Health Coach for Healing the Body,

At the root of every disease process is inflammation, a first defence process used by the body in order to try and heal itself. The problem is that when your body is in that state chronically it creates an overactive immune system, which brings crippling pain with it. This compromises your ability to do anything, which includes living a normal and productive life. So what do you do if you want to heal inflammation naturally? You consider astaxanthin.

robynmac/iStock Astaxanthin 101

Astaxanthin (asta-zan-thin) is a deep red coloured phytonutrient synthesized by microalgae called Haematococcus, and is also known as the “King of Carotenoids”. It’s grown in fresh water using sophisticated techniques that encourage the algae to grow its own powerful medicines protecting it from oxidation, UV radiation and other environmental stressors.

Astaxanthin is actually what gives salmon their reddish colour and allows them to perform heroic feats like swimming upstream against the current and leaping up waterfalls.

When it is harvested from the algae and concentrated into a tiny liquid capsule it becomes the most powerful antioxidant known in the natural world, with research showing that it is 550 times the antioxidant power of vitamin E! These antioxidants slow down the ageing process and protect us from free radicals that can cause DNA damage, nerve cell damage, and accelerated ageing of our internal organs.

Astaxanthin for Inflammation

Inflammation is a first response defence and healing mechanism that becomes active before our immune system does. It is an extremely complex system and in general causes redness, swelling, heat, and pain. These effects occur due to a wide spectrum of inflammation mediators that are released after a detected injury or attack. Some of the mediators are known as prostaglandins, tumor necrosis factors, interleukins, and nitric oxide.

Some of the strongest pharmaceutical anti-inflammatories limit the production of prostaglandins and therefore ease swelling and pain. However, these drugs can cause side effects as it is very unnatural and unbalanced for the body to deal with extreme suppression of one single mediator, without affecting the balance of the others.

Alternatively, naturally occurring anti-inflammatory foods will ease inflammation by gently inhibiting several mediators, including prostaglandins, to calm the system as a whole.

Even though astaxanthin is not as powerful as leading pharmaceutical anti-inflamamtories, it is found to be one of the strongest ones in nature. Several double blind, placebo controlled animal and clinical trials shows that astaxanthin naturally inhibits many of the known inflammation mediators, which eases inflammation and pain without the side effects.

Authors Note: I personally used astaxanthin in a period where I dealt with debilitating inflammation, and had no desire to use pharmaceutical drugs. I can accurately state that it extinguished 80-90% of my systemic inflammation.

Other Benefits of Astaxanthin

The best part of astaxanthin is that the healing benefits don’t stop at pain management due to inflammation. However, since it is such a strong anti-inflammatory it also deals effectively with a number of other health issues, including:

  • Reduces joint pain
  • Reduces the risk of cancer and proliferation of breast cancer tumour cells
  • Protects brain from dementia and other brain related disorders
  • Reduces damage to your DNA by up to 40%
  • Reduces blood sugar levels in diabetics
  • Improves fertility
  • Promotes cardiovascular health
  • Reduces or eliminates carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Boosts immune system
  • Protects against infections
  • Prevents asthma by normalizing histamine levels
  • Protects body from highly oxidative foods
  • Increases endurance, muscle recovery, and workout performance
  • Protects kidneys from damage due to high blood sugar
  • Protects eyes and reduces cataracts
  • Prevents UV damage to eyes and skin (works as an internal sunscreen)

Since astaxanthin is fat soluble (unlike most antioxidants) it gets carried by fat molecules directly to your muscles, tissues, and organs where it is needed most, like your brain, breast tissue, prostate tissue, skeletal muscles, and retina. This way it prevents oxidation right at the site of stress or potential oxidation.

Read the rest here...

Check out Derek Henry here.

And snag some Astaxanthin here.

Tyler Durden Mon, 12/16/2024 - 22:45

2 Men Arrested After Drone Operates 'Dangerously Close' To Boston's Airport, Police Say

Zero Hedge -

2 Men Arrested After Drone Operates 'Dangerously Close' To Boston's Airport, Police Say

Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),

Two people were arrested on Saturday evening near Boston’s Logan Airport for what was described as a “hazardous drone operation,” police said, coming amid widespread reports of drones flying over the New Jersey region.

A Spirit airlines flight takes off from Boston's Logan Airport on Jan. 9, 2023. Brian Snyder/Reuters

At around 10 p.m. Saturday, Boston police officers arrested 42-year-old Robert Duffy and 32-year-old Jeremy Folcik, both of Massachusetts, according to a news release issued Sunday.

“The arrests were made on Long Island, part of the Boston Harbor Islands, following a hazardous drone operation near Logan Airport’s airspace,” police said. “Both suspects face charges of trespassing, with additional fines or charges potentially forthcoming.”

It’s not clear if the Logan Airport incident was related to drone sightings in recent weeks near New Jersey and New York City.

A Boston officer detected a drone “operating dangerously close to Logan International Airport” before finding the location of the unmanned aerial vehicle, police said. Police officials then coordinated with state police, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, and other federal agencies.

Members of the local Boston Police unit found three people in the Long Island Health Campus, which has been decommissioned.

“Upon attempting to make contact, the suspects fled on foot. Two of the three individuals were apprehended and identified as Duffy and Folcik. During the investigation, a drone was discovered inside a backpack carried by Duffy,” the news release said.

The other individual was not located or named in the news release. Officials said he is suspected to have fled in a “small vessel,” according to the news release.

Dozens of mysterious nighttime flights started last month over New Jersey, raising concerns among residents and officials. Part of the worry stems from the flying objects initially being spotted near the Picatinny Arsenal, a U.S. military research and manufacturing facility, and over Trump’s golf course in Bedminster, located in the state.

Drones are legal in New Jersey for recreational and commercial use and are subject to local and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations and flight restrictions. Operators must be certified by the FAA.

On Sunday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said he is urging the federal government to deploy better drone-tracking technology to identify them.

“I’m pushing for answers amid these drone sightings. I’m calling for [Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas] to deploy special drone-detection tech across NY and NJ,” Schumer wrote on social platform X. “And I’m working to pass a bill in the Senate to give local law enforcement more tools for drone detection.”

The New York Democrat is calling on the Department of Homeland Security to immediately deploy special technology that identifies and tracks drones back to their landing spots, according to his office.

“There’s a lot of us who are pretty frustrated right now,” Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told Fox News Sunday. “The answer ‘We don’t know’ is not a good enough answer.”

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul on Sunday said federal officials were sending a drone detection system to the state.

This system will support state and federal law enforcement in their investigations,” Hochul said in a statement. The governor did not immediately provide additional details, including where the system will be deployed.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Tyler Durden Mon, 12/16/2024 - 22:35

Pages